Calibrating the METEOSAT SEVIRI solar channels using lunar observations Sébastien Wagner (1) Bartolomeo Viticchie (1), Tom Stone (2), Tim Hewison(1), Gary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of the Moon as an On-orbit Calibration Source Thomas C. Stone US Geological Survey, Flagstaff AZ Hugh Kieffer Celestial Reasonings, Carson City NV.
Advertisements

Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
1EUM/RSP/VWG/16/ Tim Hewison Tom Stone Manik Bali Selecting and Migrating GSICS Inter-Calibration Reference Instruments.
1EUM/RSP/VWG/16/ Tim Hewison Tom Stone Manik Bali Selecting and Migrating GSICS Inter-Calibration Reference Instruments.
Recommendations to GSICS from international working groups GSICS meeting, March 2015, New Delhi, India Rob Roebeling.
NOAA GPRC Report 2013 GSICS Annual Meeting Williamsburg, VA 03/04/ /08/2013.
Beyond the workshop: Developing inter-calibration products based on Lunar Observations Tim Hewison (EUMETSAT) [GSICS Research Working Group Chair] Special.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
A.K. Mitra, Shailesh Parihar, S.K. Peshin Ministry of Earth Sciences
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
Future eumetsat missions: MTG/FCI, MTG/UVNS and EPS-SG/METimage
Lunar Radiance Calibration ABI/AHI Solar Reflective Bands
Description of the giro ON THE DETAILS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable
Tim Hewison (1) Sébastien Wagner (1), Tom Stone (2), Gary Fowler (1)
EUMETSAT’s Lunar Calibration Capabilities
JMA lunar calibration report [MTSAT-2 and GMS-5]
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration with D. Doelling (NASA)
SEVIRI Solar Channel Calibration system
Technical Expectations from Organizers & Participants B. Fougnie, S
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
The ROLO Lunar Calibration System Description and Current Status
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
Sébastien Wagner (1) Tom Stone (2), Gary Fowler (1), Tim Hewison (1)
GOES Lunar Calibration
Data Preparation for Using the ROLO / GIRO Model
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Lunar data preparation for FY-2
Update on Advancing Development of the ROLO Lunar Calibration System
Future Developments of the Lunar Calibration System
Extraction of Moon “imagettes” from MSG data
Update on the GIRO Benchmark
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
Estimating MTF post-launch using lunar imagery – the case of SEVIRI
Use of NWP+RTM as inter-calibration tool
Effort toward Characterization of Selected Lunar Sites for the Radiometric Calibration of Solar Reflective Bands Fangfang Yu1, Xi Shao1, Xiangqian Wu2.
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
GEO-GEO products – diurnal variations
EUMETSAT implementation of the DCC algorithm Sébastien Wagner
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Strategy for calibration references
Definition of a benchmark for the GIRO
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
Strategy for calibration references
Status of the EUMETSAT GSICS DCC product
Lunar Observation Activities with a Small Satellite and a Planetary Exploration Satellite. Hodoyoshi-1 Hayabusa-2 Toru Kouyama, AIST
Current Status of ROLO and Future Development
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
GOES DCC Deseasonalization & AHI DCC Calibration
Traceability of the GIRO to the ROLO: Definition of a benchmark
Lunar calibration of COMS visible channel using GIRO
Preliminary SCIAMACHY Lunar observations as intercalibration source
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
Progress toward DCC Demo product
Inter-band calibration using the Moon
goes-16/17 abi lunar calibration
T. Hewison, S. Wagner, A. Burini, O. Perez Navarro, M. Burla, F
S3B OLCI Lunar Observations
Lunar irradiance measurement and modelling
T. Hewison, S. Wagner, A. Burini, O. Perez Navarro, M. Burla, F
Revising the ROLO Lunar Model — A Status Update
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Toward a synergy between on-orbit lunar observations
Aid to Users Selection of GSICS Products Thoughts on need for RAC/ARC products Tim Hewison EUMETSAT.
Towards a GSICS DCC product...
Presentation transcript:

Calibrating the METEOSAT SEVIRI solar channels using lunar observations Sébastien Wagner (1) Bartolomeo Viticchie (1), Tom Stone (2), Tim Hewison(1), Gary Fowler (1) (1) EUMETSAT (2) USGS

The Moon as a radiometric calibration source INTRINSIC PROPERTIES: Exceptionally stable Non-uniform appearance, varying hemisphere seen (lunar librations) Non-Lambertian reflectance Smooth reflectance spectrum Continuous and periodic changes in apparent brightness (e.g. phase)  Can be characterized and modeled UTILITY AS A CALIBRATION REFERENCE Requires an analytic model with a continuous predictive capability Stability of the Moon  Model valid for any time  Calibration reference = model Source : PixHeaven.net / Wikipedia To date, USGS has the only established lunar reference model, based on the ROLO observation program

The USGS lunar irradiance model  More than 8 years of observations done at the Robotic Lunar Observatory (ROLO) (350-2450nm range covered by a total of 32 bands)  ROLO lunar images spatially integrated to irradiance and converted to disk reflectance: Empirical reflectance model — a function of geometric variables only: By fitting the observations, the model parameters are estimated Estimated uncertainty: 5-10% in absolute irradiance scale (due to measurement of Vega by the ROLO telescopes) 1% relative accuracy ref: Astronomical Journal 129, 2887-2901 (2005)

Sensor spectral responses Sensor spectral responses...ROLO versus MSG1/SEVIRI and MTG/FCI (indicative)

What about lunar observations with SEVIRI? Fields of regard for Low Resolution Channels: Level 1.0: raw measurement data + auxiliary data Visible Moon (up to 5 observations in a row) Field Of Regard covers a rectangle of 22 N/S and 18 E/W Level 1.5: data rectified to an uniform grid No visible Moon anymore FOR = Earth disk But: info on the Moon kept available in header + trailer: Flag to indicate if the Moon is in the FOR Statistics on the Moon counts (min/max/mean/std dev) Lunar observations available in the 4 image corners (more than 100 potential observations / year) SEVIRI Level 1.5 image SEVIRI Level 1.0 image (forward and backward scan)

What about the HRVIS band? SEVIRI Level 1.0 image (forward and backward scan)

What about the Rapid Scan Service? SEVIRI Level 1.0 image (forward and backward scan)

Extraction of the Moon imagette Knowing the relative position of the channels on the focal plane one can use the information obtained in the IR8.7 to spot the Moon in the Solar Channels (VIS06, VIS08, NIR1.6 and HRVIS)

Extraction of the Moon imagette Knowing the relative position of the channels on the focal plane one can use the information obtained in the IR8.7 to spot the Moon in the Solar Channels (VIS06, VIS08, NIR1.6 and HRVIS)

Extraction of the Moon imagette Why the IR8.7 channel? Earth and Moon = nearly saturated “patches” for all illumination conditions  Procedure based on patch detection (fast and simple)

How to extract the lunar observations from the SEVIRI L1.0 images? Location of the Moon within the SEVIRI Level 1.0 image Realignment of the Earth image Patch detection to trace the Moon in the IR8.7 band  detection in the other bands from focal plane geometry. Estimate of the Earth sub-satellite point in the IR8.7 + relative position of the Moon centre w.r.t. the SSP. Realignment of the Moon image (to correct for the apparent motion of the Moon) Extraction of the Moon imagettes From centre of the Moon  estimated radius of the Moon extraction circle (Moon radius + margin) Scaling of the Level 1.0 counts to equivalent Level 1.5 radiances Calculation of the equivalent Level 1.5 counts (correction for small potential instrument non-linearities) Conversion from the equivalent Level 1.5 counts to radiance, using calibration coefficients from the Level 1.5 headers

Extraction of the Moon imagette Correction for lunar motion VIS0.6 VIS0.8 NIR1.6 Correction for lunar motion HRVIS

Current available datasets Consolidation of the existing lunar observations database for MSG1, MSG2 and MSG3: MSG1: end 2003 – 2009 (Full Disk + RSS) complete (part of the commissioning + all the operational data). Validation data still missing (1 year of data between May 2007 and May 2008). MSG2: 2006- June 2012 complete. MSG3: after 01/01/2013 complete. Automatic saving of lunar observations after 01/01/2013 by the Image Processing Facility. For comparison: initially about 30 potential lunar observations for MSG1. Now more than 170 observations available. Full range of phase angles covered. Collaboration with USGS  inter-band calibration using the ROLO model as a reference (~1% relative error)

First comparison with the ROLO model (MSG1 + MSG2 FD low-res) SEVIRI – Meteosat 8 SEVIRI – Meteosat 9 Note: End at the end of 2006 after the start of Rapid Scan Service Courtesy T. Stone, USGS

Comparison with the ROLO model (MSG1 FD low-res channels) Stability below 1% over more than 3 years LATEST RESULTS Results to be used only for inter-band calibration and drift monitoring Lunar calibration method and instrument are stable. SD <1% - consistent with expected performance of ROLO  BUT is it affected by seasonality? Relative difference between channels = consistent with current findings in terms of absolute calibration.

Comparison with the ROLO model (MSG1 low-res channels) Irr = total irradiance from the Moon disk of SEVIRI observations ΔIrr = difference between ROLO-Irr and Irr in percentage ΔIrr vs. Irr : systematic deviation between ROLO and SEVIRI Phase Angle vs. ΔIrr : systematic deviation between ROLO and SEVIRI Selection according to the phase angle [-45 deg, 45 deg]

Files stored in the process DATA DOWNLOAD & STORAGE (Level 1.5 Headers & Trailers + Level 1.0 native) EXTRACTION OF MOON OBSERVATIONS (images + IDL save files) PRODUCTION OF THE BINARY FILES FOR ROLO to ROLO File Size .dat files with H&T about 807 KB each .nat files with the row data up to 323 MB each (standard mode) .txt files containing the time-stamps used for the download - File Size .sav files about 3.1 MB (HRVIS) about 868 KB (low-res) .gif files about 546 KB File Size binary files about 2 MB (HRVIS) about 171 KB (low-res) .txt file containing a report on the files rejected - .ps file with figure about 5.3 MB .sav file about one year about 140 KB Possibility to save intermediate data in order to build-up a validation database for lunar calibration available to other GSICS partners for validation purposes Reprocessing purposes 323000 + 807 + [3100 + (868 x 3) + 546] + [2000 + (171 x 3) + 5300 + 140] = 338010 KB 150 Moon observations per year (average), i.e. up to 338010 KB x 150 = 51 GB per year

Summary Development of a procedure to extract lunar observations from Level 1.0 MSG/SEVIRI data in all scanning configurations (FD, HRVIS and RSS) Consolidated database of lunar observations is being built-up for all MSG missions (MSG1, 2 and 3) between 2003 and 2012. Comparison against ROLO for MSG1 and MSG2 SEVIRI low-res channels: stability below 1% over three years for the consolidated dataset. Future activities: Comparison of the complete archive with the ROLO model  all MSGs + all scanning configurations: LRES and HRVIS in nominal scan mode or Rapid Scan Understanding of the differences for low illumination (high phase angles) between ROLO and MSG/SEVIRI Mechanism to monitor regularly MSGs/SEVIRI solar reflective bands Feasibility of performing lunar calibration with MFG/MVIRI observations. Feasibility of analysing detector performance (e.g. for MTG/FCI).

Thank you for your attention

Back-up slides

Extraction of the Moon imagette Moon observations from MSG1: successful extraction from both standard data and RSS data (2008 and 2009 in the plot)

Extraction of the Moon imagette MSG2 2008 43 Observations (8 HRVIS cases)

Extraction of the Moon imagette MSG2 2008 43 Observations (8 HRVIS cases) 1h 30min

Extraction of the Moon imagette Statistics on the Moon observations from MSG1 Statistics on the Moon observations from MSG2