Person Perception Lecture 8
Person Perception Midterm 1 Social Information Attribution Self-serving Biases Prediction
Midterm 1 Date: Friday, October 15th Time: 3 - 4:04 pm
Midterm 1 Locations Locations: AA112, AC223, HW215, HW216, SY110 Room assignments by last name: AA112: Last names from A - Di AC223: Last names from Do - M HW215: Last names from N - Pl HW216: Last names from Po - Su SY110: Last names from Sy - Z
Midterm 1 Format: 30 Multiple choice questions 3% each 5 Matching
Material covered by Midterm 1 Lectures 1 - 8 All textbook and supplemental readings that are assigned with Lectures 1 - 8 Films from Lecture 6 will be on Midterm 2, NOT Midterm 1
Preparing for Exam Review sheet and practise questions: Blackboard -> Intro to Social Psych -> Exams
Preparing for exam How to use review sheet: Questions will be asked on a subset of topics For each topic: Write a few sentences in your own words of what the topic means Come up with an example from your life of when that happened
Preparing for exam Practise questions: 5 multiple choice Example matching Give you a flavour for how I ask questions
Preparing for exam External factors: Get 8 hours sleep before exam Eat both breakfast and lunch on 10/15 Eat a snack around 2:30 MAKE SURE THEY ALL INCLUDE PROTEIN
Social Information What Goes Into Person Perception? Behaviour Context Schemas!
Behavioural Input Verbal Behaviour Nonverbal Behaviour Emblems Power of Behavioural Input: “Thin Slices”
Emblems Gestures that have well-understood meaning within a culture Effectively: nonverbal language
“Thin Slices” Approach within social psychology focused on the attributional power of brief exposure to others
SES in Social Interactions How quickly can you detect someone’s socio- economic status (SES)?
SES in Social Interactions Kraus & Keltner (2009) Method:
SES in Social Interactions
SES in Social Interactions Kraus & Keltner (2009) Results: Naive observers accurately detected parents’ income, mothers’ education, and subjective SES Relative to high SES participants, low SES participants spent less time: Grooming, doodling, manipulating objects
Context
Context
Context Context matters Provides additional input Can completely change attribution
Schemas What you expect is what you get
Attribution Explanation for an observed behaviour of another social object
Attribution How Automatic is Attribution? Attribution Theory Internal/External Attributions Fundamental (?) Attribution Error Covariation Theory
Ease of Attribution Heider & Simmel (1944)
Automaticity of Attributions How Automatic is an Attribution? Very Attributions = Pattern Matching
Attribution Theory Primary Question: Do we attribute behaviour to something about the person (“internal”) or something about the situation (“external”)?
Internal Attribution Attributing a person’s behaviour to something intrinsic to that person Personality, disposition, attitude, or character
External Attribution Attributing a person’s behaviour to something about the situation in which the behaviour occurred Specifically not changing beliefs regarding person’s character or personality
Fundamental Attribution Error AKA, “FAE” When perceiving others: Tendency to overestimate the influence of internal causes for behaviour and underestimate external causes When perceiving self: Much more likely to attribute own behaviour to external causes
Fundamental Attribution Error Jones & Harris (1967) Method:
Fundamental Attribution Error Jones & Harris (1967) Results: Choice No Choice
Perceptual Salience Tendency to overestimate the causal role of information that grabs our attention
Two-Step Process of Attribution Same process as Anchoring & Adjustment Heuristic Make an internal attribution Attempt to adjust away from internal attribution by considering situational constraints
How Fundamental is the FAE? Gang Lu (卢刚) Recent Physics Ph.D. from University of Iowa On 1991/11/01, he killed 4 faculty, 1 Ph.D. Student, and paralysed a student researcher
How Fundamental is the FAE? Morris & Peng (1994) Method: Analysed Chinese- and English-language newspaper articles written about Gang Lu Results:
Correspondence Bias Tendency to infer that a person’s behaviour corresponds to their disposition, personality, or attitude
Covariation Theory Assumption: People are lay statisticians 3 Factors of Attribution: Consensus Distinctiveness Consistency
Consensus Do other people behave in this way? Behaviour unique to person
Distinctiveness Does this person behave like this with other stimuli? Behaviour unique to situation
Consistency Does the person behave like this over time? Behaviour unique to this moment in time
Covariation Theory ↓ ↑ ↑ or ↓ 3 Patterns Lead to 3 Attributions: Consensus Distinctiveness Consistency Attribution ↓ ↑ Internal External ↑ or ↓ Situational
Self-Serving Biases Self-Serving Attributions Defensive Attributions: Unrealistic Optimism Just World Hypothesis False Consensus Effect Ultimate Attribution Error
Self-Serving Attributions You do really well on a test. Is this because: You are smart The test was easy You do really poorly on a test. Is this because: You are dumb The test was hard
Self-Serving Attributions Positive outcome for Self: Explain it in terms of internal factors Negative outcome for Self: Explain it in terms of external factors
Unrealistic Optimism Tendency to expect: Bad things are less likely to happen to you than to other people Good things are more likely to happen to you than other people
Just World Hypothesis Belief that good things happen to good people and bad things to bad people Leads to rejection of victims
False Consensus Error Assumption that more people share your beliefs, attitudes, and preferences than actually do
Ultimate Attribution Error Tendency to make internal attributions about an entire social group’s disposition based on the behaviour of one group member Only applies to social outgroups
Prediction How Good Are We At Predicting? Implicit Personality Theories
How Good Are We at Prediction? Demo! Need 6 volunteers!
Implicit Personality Theories Type of schema used to group certain personality traits together E.g., Jane is warm. Will Jane lend Jeric $10 for lunch?
“We see people and things not as they are, but as we are.” Next lecture: Conformity and Dissent Relevant Websites: How good at you at perceiving other people’s personality? http://www.youjustgetme.com What your stuff says about you: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90829875
Alexa’s Survey