TMP development without coagulation pre-treatment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Process Of Reverse Osmosis Plant
Advertisements

Water Treatment Processes Disinfection and removal of solids.
Agenda Introduction Effects – How Does Habitat Loss Affect Mother Nature? Causes – Contributing Factors To Habitat Loss Definition : Process & Example.
A PRESENTATION FOR Americas Authority in Membrane Technology First Year of Operational Experience at Tennessee's Largest Membrane Filtration Plant KYTN.
Microfiltration / Reverse Osmosis The 1-2 Punch for Water Treatment
Ultrafiltration fouling control
Benjamin C. Whitehead, PE Benjamin J. Klayman, PhD, PE Case Study: Commissioning New Rapid Sand Filters at Donald K. Shine Water Treatment Plant.
The AFC Process What Is AFC? Key Operations are  Balancing of incoming waste streams  Thermophilic activated sludge (AFC) to oxidise the organic.
ERIN PARTLAN, DAVID LADNER Clemson University Dissolved CO 2 – An Alternative for Cleaning Inorganic Scale from RO Membranes Acknowledgements Clemson University.
Olotu Ogonah Benjamin Blaha Tarit Mukhopadhyay
Antunes Water Filtration Technologies Introduces to You:
The Deloro Mine Site Demonstration Project K.Volchek, D.Velicogna, W.P.Wong, C.E.Brown SAIC Canada, Environment Canada NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting “Prevention.
ETL Multi Media Grey Water Filters and Pre Reverse Osmosis Filtration.
1 Challenge the future Cake layer characteristics in long time ceramic MF filtration for surface water treatment Mingyang Li Master defence presentation.
Deborah Helstrom, P.E. Utilities Technical Review Water Supply Division Membrane Bioreactors Treatment Systems.
ARSENIC REMOVAL Case History Milos Markovic. Arsenic removal m3/day Plant in Subotica-SERBIA.
SWANA Chapter Conference 2008 West Edmonton Landfill Leachate Treatment Plant By Steve Johnson M.Eng, P.Eng.
Michael Eumann EUWA Water Treatment Plants 32 nd Convention Melbourne, Australia th – 30 th March Institute of Brewing & Distilling Asia Pacific.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems  Filtration avoidance criteria  Alternatives to Filtration.
1 CAN S-PAC CONTROL/REDUCE FOULING IN CERAMIC MF MEMBRANE?: PRE-COAT Approach J. Z. Hamad, M.D. Kennedy, S.G.J Heijman, B.S. Hofs, G.L. Amy and J.C. Schippers.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration.
Willamette Water Treatment Plant
NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration? ä Where should the plant(s) be located?
Ultrafiltration fouling control Demineralized water backwashing Louis Lagardère April-July 2009.
Evaluating Coagulants for Water Treatment Kari Duncan – City of Lake Oswego & Doug Wise – Eugene Water & Electric Board PNWS-AWWA Section Conference May.
Combined Ozonation-Nanofiltration for Drinking Water Treatment B. S
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Effective Use Of Peracetic Acid to Reduce Effluent Disinfection Byproduct in Water Resource Recovery Facilities Isaiah Shapiro, EIT Dimitri Katehis PhD,
Phosphorus Removal in a Membrane Reactor System— A Demonstration Study Wayne Lorenz, P.E. and Matthew J. Gavin Wright Water Engineers, Inc. and Newell.
1 Full-Scale Testing of Innovative High Rate Filter Media for Plant Expansion Bob Raczko, P.E. United Water.
Filtration. Filtration Single Media Rapid Sand Dual Media Rapid Sand.
The Drinking Water Treatment Process
SETA Water treatment plant maintenance
Everyone in the world needs clean water. Water can carry substances such as soil, dirt and chemicals. We have to treat water so that it is safe for.
Hg Fate and Transport Within the San Jose/Santa Clara WPCP: Study Design and Interim Progress Report Item #4.
1 Lake water (raw) Flocculation Flash mix Gentle mix Quiescent condition Sedimentation Precipitation Coagulant.
Name of presentation by Mr X Powerpoint Templates.
NC AWWA-WEA 2015 Annual Conference Monday, November 16, 2015 The Use of Chlorine Dioxide to Reduce TOC at Davidson Water, Inc. Water Treatment Plant.
Considerations and operational challenges in choosing Membrane Filtration for a Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Ed Cross Division Manager, Water Supply and.
Paris, 2/10/2003 TOWEF0 - Evaluation of the effect of the IPPC application on the sustainable waste management in textile industries Activities WP6 Davide.
What’s new in Water Treatment? Coagulants and Filter Aids Sticky Particles vs. Sticky Media Coagulants and Filter Aids Sticky Particles vs. Sticky Media.
Effective Removal of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Using MIEX Ion Exchange Treatment J. Michael Barnes, PE.
정수공학및 설계 Membrane Processes.
By: Jim Kibby Fouling and ROI Tools (Return On Investment)
December 10, 2009 TOWN OF PALM BEACH WATER COMMITTEE Discussion of Water Plant Options.
4 th International Congress of the European Confederation of Soil Science Societies (ECSSS). 2-6 July 2012, Bari – Italy. Removal of Cr (VI) from industrial.
Enhanced Biological Nitrogen Removal In PVA-Gel Based MBBR - A Novel Option To Save Dal Lake. J. Singh*, K.M.Gani*, N.K.Singh*, V. Rose**, A.A. Kazmi*
 Asia’s largest environment solutions provider, with a strong international presence  Total water & environment management solutions for all sectors.
Presentation Title Presented by Joe Blow Heat Transfer 101 & ROI.
Water Filtration Plant Improvements Project Summary
Evaluating Coagulants for Water Treatment
Elizabeth Keily, Daniel Boehling, Arif M. Sikder, S
AquaSel Brine Concentration Pilot Project Update
Groundwater Pilot Treatment System Update May 2017
Amherst , MA, Drinking Water System Atkins Water Treatment Plant
Engineered Water Treatment Solutions
Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering
テンプレート:A0 ページ設定※ 幅 84.1cm 高さ 118.9cm
Dissolved Gasses In Sea Water.
Pilot testing services and a case study to reduce organics Devendra Borikar, Laura Zettler, Jeff Avedesian, Lindsay Ariss, Luc Léonard, Denis Dolbec,
Natural Ceramic Membrane Filter for Water Purification
Enhancing Rapid Sand Filtration by Backwashing with Alum
Treatment of Simulated Petrochemical Wastewater by Continuous Electrocoagulation/Ultrafiltration Process Presenter: Mahmood Siddiqui.
Human Adenovirus Removal by Hollow Fiber Membranes in a Bench-Scale MBR: The effect of silica particles and humic acid as model foulants Ziqiang Yin, Volodymyr.
Energy Conservation Through the Removal of Bio-film
Treatment – Cartridge Filters
Sea water Reverse Osmosis
Arsenic Lisa Miller Water Quality Engineer Golden State Water Company
Skid Mounted Water Treatment Plant
Trihalomethanes Removal Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Pilot Evaluation of Ceramic Membranes for Manitowoc Public Utilities Water Treatment Plant TMP development without coagulation pre-treatment TMP development with coagulation pre-treatment PWN Technologies: J. Zheng, G. Galjaard and H. Shorney-Darby Manitowoc Public Utilities: R. Michaelson and P. Aumann From November 2014 to March 2016, PWN Technologies (PWNT) conducted pilot operations of ceramic membrane filtration at Manitowoc Public Utilities (MPU) water treatment plant (WTP). The aim was to evaluate the performance of the ceramic membrane when treating surface water from Lake Michigan, and to provide some design parameters for a 12 mgd plant. The pilot work was divided into two phases: phase 1 was critical flux determination, with only pre-treatment of 500 micron strainer; phase 2 was operation with coagulation pre-treatment. In the phase 2, the backwash (BW) and enhanced backwash (EBW) frequencies were optimized, as well as the coagulation conditions. RESULTS CIP efficiency (runs 1 to 15, chlorine CIP alone; runs 16 and 17, chlorine CIP followed by acid CIP) fouling rates (runs 1 to 17, runs 12 and 17 with sub-settings) INTRODUCTION A sustainable flux of 103 gfd can be maintained with a CIP interval of 12 months (possibly longer) with coagulation pre- treatment Cleaning with a 500 mg/L chlorine solution for at least two hours has adequately restored the specific flux when working without coagulation; but during the coagulation test runs, a pH 1.5 acid CIP after the chlorine CIP was needed, and this combination restored the specific flux to very high extent. An indicative full-scale system, designed to the parameters of flux 103 gfd, BW interval 40 minutes, EBW with 100 mg/L chlorine followed by EBW with pH < 3 using sulfuric acid after every 12 BWs. - A skid-mounted ceramic membrane pilot plant 269 sqft ceramic membrane (Metawater, Japan) nominal pore size 0.1 micron standard Metawater coagulation unit - Pre-screened raw water (500 micron) Sumalchlor 50 PACl coagulant (aluminum content 12.4%) Coagulant dosage 10 to 20 ppm as product - Coagulation pH 6.4, 7.0 or ambient - Chlorine (100 ppm) and acid (pH <3) EBW, back-to-back mode - Chlorine (500 ppm) and acid (pH 1.5) for clean-in-place - 17 runs tested (various flux, loadings until BW and EBW) This research has been carried out within the Interreg 2 Seas project DOC2C’s. The DOC2C’s project is a joint European collaboration with project partners from the water industry and universities in the 2 Seas Area to research and to exchange the results on Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) removal. METHODS CONCLUSIONS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS contact: jzheng@pwnt.com www.pwnt.com

Hint and tips PWNT Poster Do not PDF this page. For page 1 print: scale from 44 cm to 44 inches !!! Final size for print is 44 x 90 inch. (document size is now 44 x 90 cm because of PowerPoint paper size limitations Type: Open Sans / Open Sans Semibold