VISCOUS HEATING in the Earth‘s Mantle Induced by Glacial Loading

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Variable Types in Elasticity
Advertisements

VISCOUS HEATING in the Earths Mantle Induced by Glacial Loading L. Hanyk 1, C. Matyska 1, D. A. Yuen 2 and B. J. Kadlec 2 1 Department of Geophysics, Faculty.
Finite element method Among the up-to-date methods of stress state analysis, the finite element method (abbreviated as FEM below, or often as FEA for analyses.
Common Variable Types in Elasticity
Compatible Spatial Discretizations for Partial Differential Equations May 14, 2004 Compatible Reconstruction of Vectors Blair Perot Dept. of Mechanical.
Earthquake Seismology: The stress tensor Equation of motion
Continuity Equation. Continuity Equation Continuity Equation Net outflow in x direction.
Limiting fiber extensibility as parameter for damage in venous wall Lukas Horny, Rudolf Zitny, Hynek Chlup, Tomas Adamek and Michal Sara Faculty of Mechanical.
Some Ideas Behind Finite Element Analysis
Session: Computational Wave Propagation: Basic Theory Igel H., Fichtner A., Käser M., Virieux J., Seriani G., Capdeville Y., Moczo P.  The finite-difference.
APPLIED MECHANICS Lecture 10 Slovak University of Technology
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Flow over an Obstruction MECH 523 Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics Presented by Srinivasan C Rasipuram.
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
16/12/ Texture alignment in simple shear Hans Mühlhaus,Frederic Dufour and Louis Moresi.
MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Chapter 4: FLUID KINETMATICS
Expectations after today’s lecture
Fluid mechanics 3.1 – key points
Stress, Strain, and Viscosity San Andreas Fault Palmdale.
A finite volume solution method for thermal convection in a spherical shell with strong temperature- und pressure-dependent viscosity CIG Workshop 2005.
In the analysis of a tilting pad thrust bearing, the following dimensions were measured: h1 = 10 mm, h2 = 5mm, L = 10 cm, B = 24 cm The shaft rotates.
Remark: foils with „black background“ could be skipped, they are aimed to the more advanced courses Rudolf Žitný, Ústav procesní a zpracovatelské techniky.
Rheology I. Rheology Part of mechanics that deals with the flow of rocks, or matter in general Deals with the relationship of the following: (in terms.
Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis of Materials (Polymers)
Advanced Higher Mechanics Linear and Parabolic Motion Mathematical Techniques for Mechanics Force, Energy and Periodic Motion AH.
1 MAE 5130: VISCOUS FLOWS Momentum Equation: The Navier-Stokes Equations, Part 2 September 9, 2010 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida.
Dr. Wang Xingbo Fall , 2005 Mathematical & Mechanical Method in Mechanical Engineering.
Visual Computing of Global Postglacial Rebound in a Spherical Domain Ladislav Hanyk 1, Ctirad Matyska 1 and David A. Yuen 2
Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras
Convective Heat Transfer in Porous Media filled with Compressible Fluid subjected to Magnetic Field Watit Pakdee* and Bawonsak Yuwaganit Center R & D on.
The ordinary differential equations system of the sixth order, describing the strain state of the elastic, compressible, gravitating shell with geopotential,
SUMMARY We have studied the possibility of energy transfer from glacial forcing to the Earth's interior via viscous dissipation of the transient flow.
CIS/ME 794Y A Case Study in Computational Science & Engineering 2-D Conservation of Mass uu dx dy vv (x,y)
Vectors n v What is the projection of the vector (1, 3, 2) onto the plane described by ? Louisiana Tech University Ruston, LA
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS THE EXPLORATION TASK PLAN EXPLORATION APPROACH FOR A MATURE TREND GATHER DATA FOR A MATURE TREND DEVELOP PLAY PROSPECT FRAMEWORK.
MECH4450 Introduction to Finite Element Methods
CIS/ME 794Y A Case Study in Computational Science & Engineering 2-D conservation of momentum (contd.) Or, in cartesian tensor notation, Where repeated.
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
Strain energy density To eliminate the effects of size, evaluate the strain- energy per unit volume, The total strain energy density resulting from the.
14 - finite element method
Topic 3: Constitutive Properties of Tissues
Visualization of Viscous Heating in the Earth’s Mantle Induced by Glacial Loading Visualization of Viscous Heating in the Earth’s Mantle Induced by Glacial.
Solid object break-up Ivan Dramaliev CS260, Winter’03.
DEEP EARTHQUAKES SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION: NUMERICAL MODELING OF STRESSES WITHIN THE SUBDUCTING LITHOSPHERE Prasanna Gunawardana Advisor - Dr. Gabriele Morra.
Lecture 6: Maxwell’s Equations
ME 7980 Cardiovascular Biofluid Mechanics
Mantle convective heat flux into continental lithosphere
Chapter 4 Fluid Mechanics Frank White
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
MAE 5350: Gas Turbines Integral Forms of Mass and Momentum Equations
Part IV: Detailed Flow Structure Chap. 7: Microscopic Balances
Advanced Higher Mechanics
55th ASMR National Scientific Conference
Maxwell’s Equations.
Today’s Lecture Objectives:
Mechanics of Solids I Energy Method.
Continuum Mechanics (MTH487)
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Linearized Block Implicit (LBI) Method applied to Quasi-1D Flow
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Continuum Mechanics for Hillslopes: Part IV
Continuum Mechanics for Hillslopes: Part V
Continuum Mechanics for Hillslopes: Part III
VISCOUS HEATING in the Earth‘s Mantle Induced by Glacial Loading
Today’s Lecture Objectives:
Griffiths Chapter 2 Electrostatics
Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis of Materials (Polymers)
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Mechanics of Materials Engr Lecture 1
Finite Element Modelling in Geosciences FEM in 2D for viscous materials Introduction to Finite Element Modelling in Geosciences Summer 2018.
Presentation transcript:

VISCOUS HEATING in the Earth‘s Mantle Induced by Glacial Loading L. Hanyk1, C. Matyska1, D. A. Yuen2 and B. J. Kadlec2 1Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA

IDEA How efficient can be the shear heating in the Earth’s mantle due to glacial forcing, i.e., internal energy source with exogenic origin? (“energy pumping into the Earth’s mantle”) APPROACH • to evaluate viscous heating in the mantle during a glacial cycle by Maxwell viscoelastic modeling • to compare this heating with background radiogenic heating • to make a guess on the magnitude of surface heat flow below the areas of glaciation

PHYSICAL MODEL • a prestressed selfgravitating spherically symmetric Earth • Maxwell viscoelastic rheology • arbitrarily stratified density, elastic parameters and viscosity • both compressible and incompressible models • cyclic loading and unloading

MATHEMATICAL MODEL • momentum equation & Poisson equation • Maxwell constitutive relation • boundary and interface conditions • formulation in the time domain (not in the Laplace domain) • spherical harmonic decomposition • a set of partial differential equations in time and radial direction • discretization in the radial direction • a set of ordinary differential equations in time • initial value problem

NUMERICAL IMPLEMENTATION • method of lines (discretization of PDEs in spatial directions) • high-order pseudospectral discretization • staggered Chebyshev grids • multidomain discretization • ‘almost block diagonal’ (ABD) matrices (solvers in NAG) • numerically stiff initial value problem (Rosenbrock-Runge-Kutta scheme in Numerical Recipes)

DISSIPATIVE HEATING φ (r ) In calculating viscous dissipation, we are not interested in the volumetric deformations as they are purely elastic in our models and no heat is thus dissipated during volumetric changes. Therefore we have focussed only on the shear deformations. The Maxwellian constitutive relation (Peltier, 1974) rearranged for the shear deformations takes the form ∂ τS / ∂ t = 2 μ ∂ eS / ∂ t – μ / η τS , τS = τ – K div u I , eS = e – ⅓ div u I , where τ, e and I are the stress, deformation and identity tensors, respectively, and u is the displacement vector. This equation can be rewritten as the sum of elastic and viscous contributions to the total deformation, ∂ eS / ∂ t = 1 / (2 μ) ∂ τS / ∂ t + τS / (2 η) = ∂ eSel / ∂ t + ∂ eSvis / ∂ t . The rate of mechanical energy dissipation φ (cf. Joseph, 1990, p. 50) is then φ = τS : ∂ eSvis / ∂ t = (τS : τS) / (2 η) .

EARTH MODELS M1 . . . . . . . . PREM isoviscous mantle elastic lithosphere M2 . . . . . . . . PREM LM viscosity hill elastic lithosphere M3 . . . . . . . . PREM LM viscosity hill low-viscosity zone elastic lithosphere

SHAPE OF THE LOAD parabolic cross-sections radius 15 max. height 3500 m

LOADING HISTORIES L1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . glacial cycle 100 kyr linear unloading 100 yr L2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . glacial cycle 100 kyr linear unloading 1 kyr L3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . glacial cycle 100 kyr linear unloading 10 kyr

DISSIPATIVE HEATING φ (r ) Earth model M1 (isoviscous) Loading History L1 (100 yr) L2 (1 kyr) L3 (10 kyr)

DISSIPATIVE HEATING φ (r ) Earth Model M1 Loading History L1

DISSIPATIVE HEATING φ (r ) Earth model M2 (LM viscosity hill) Loading History L1 (100 yr) L2 (1 kyr) L3 (10 kyr)

DISSIPATIVE HEATING φ (r ) Earth Model M2 Loading History L1

DISSIPATIVE HEATING φ (r ) Earth model M3 (LM viscosity hill & LVZ) Loading History L1 (100 yr) L2 (1 kyr) L3 (10 kyr)

DISSIPATIVE HEATING φ (r ) Earth Model M3 Loading History L1

TIME EVOLUTION OF MAX LOCAL HEATING maxr φ(t) normalized by the chondritic radiogenic heating of 3x10-9 W/m3 M1 ► Earth Model M2 ► Loading histories L1 ... solid lines L2 ... dashed lines L3 ... dotted lines M3 ►

EQUIVALENT MANTLE HEAT FLOW qm(θ) M1 ► Earth Model M2 ► M3 ► peak values time averages [mW/m2] [mW/m2] M1 ► Earth Model M2 ► Loading histories L1 ... solid lines L2 ... dashed lines L3 ... dotted lines M3 ►

CONCLUSIONS • explored (for the first time ever) the magnitude of viscous dissipation in the mantle induced by glacial forcing • peak values 10-100 higher than chondritic radiogenic heating (below the center and/or edges of the glacier of 15 radius) • focusing of energy into the low-viscosity zone, if present • magnitude of the equivalent mantle heat flow at the surface up to mW/m2 after averaging over the glacial cycle • extreme sensitivity to the choice of the time-forcing function (equivalent mantle heat flow more than 10 times higher)