2009 Youth Survey: Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hunt (Tacoma School District) Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey Fall 2008.
Advertisements

Tacoma School of the Arts (Tacoma School District) Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey Fall 2008.
Oakland Alternative High School (Tacoma School District) Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey Fall 2008.
The Commonwealth Fund Survey of the Health of Adolescent Girls, 1997 Louis Harris and Associates, Inc. More Than One in Eight Boys Report Abuse Percent.
McCreary Centre Society Adolescent Health Survey III: 2003 results in preparation for 2008 AHS IV A Brief Summary of Results for the Richmond Region.
1 California Healthy Kids Survey Ventura County Results Longitudinal Results 2005/06, 2007/08, 2009/10 Data Analysis by: Heidi Christensen, PhD Ventura.
The 2005 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Vermont Department of Health Agency of Human Services September 27, 2005.
Welcome to Swan Valley Middle School Data Presentation.
1 Healthy Youth Survey Forum Growing Up In Snoqualmie Valley Healthy Youth Survey Forum Growing Up In Snoqualmie Valley 1.
Data and Policy Consultant – DPI – Healthy Schools Hope E. White, Ph.D Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) Results: North Carolina.
Fostering School Connectedness Overview National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Adolescent and School Health.
Mercer Island High School (Mercer Island School District) Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey Fall 2008.
Pacific County (County No. 25) Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey Fall 2010.
Northwest ESD 189 Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2015) 1.
Bryant Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2013) 2012.
Virginia Youth Survey 2011 Results Summary Office of Family Health Services Virginia Department of Health June 2012.
Overview of the 2007 Ohio Youth Risk Behavior Survey Health Educators Institute October 13, 2010 Angie Norton, MA Ohio Department of Health School and.
Evergreen Middle School (Everett School District) Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2015) 1.
Heatherwood Middle School (Everett School District) Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2015) 1.
Cascade High School (Everett School District) Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2015) 1.
2007 CT School Health Survey Results Diane Aye, MPH, PhD Connecticut Department of Public Health (860)
Tacoma School District Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey Fall 2010.
Tacoma School of the Arts Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2013) 2012.
Evergreen Middle School Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2013) 2012.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey October Number of K-12 health office visits for social-emotional reasons September 2013-November 2014: 287 Mental Health.
2003 Boulder County Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data for Boulder Valley School District.
Lincoln Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2013) 2012.
Mercer Island High School Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2013) 2012.
Henry M. Jackson High School (Everett School District) Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2015) 1.
Iowa Youth Survey 2010 Southeast Polk Results. Who took this survey? Grade # in grade # surveyed % surveyed % % %
Everett School District Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2015) 1.
R isky Behaviors Among Pitt County Youth Data collection  Youth Risk Behavior Survey administered to middle school students taking health/physical.
California Healthy Kids Survey King City Joint Union High School District 2007/08 Results grades 9 & 11.
Lexington High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2015 Results.
Compared to Injury and Violence Imperial County - CA Healthy Kids Survey 2005 Results Compared to National Youth Risk Behavior System 2005 Results Injury.
Angelo Giaudrone Middle School Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2013) 2012.
Oakland High School Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2013) 2012.
Jason Lee Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2013) 2012.
Science and Math Institute Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2013) 2012.
Protective Factors of Alaskan High School Students 2011 & 2013 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Alaska.
Human Sexuality. Rules for Questions  The right to pass  The right to individuality  The right to confidentiality  The right to be heard  No personal.
Delaware County.
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Seat Belt,* by Sex, Grade, and Race/Ethnicity, 2016 Data for this slide are from the 2016.
2015 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results
Alcohol – Teen Facts By: Braden Griner.
Barry County MiPHY Results
Mercer Island School District
Mercer Island School District
Urban Indian Health Institute Seattle Indian Health Board
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Seat Belt,* by Sex,† Grade, and Race/Ethnicity, 2017 Data for this slide are from the 2017.
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Bicycle Helmet,* by Sex,† Grade, and Race/Ethnicity,† 2015 Data for this slide are from the.
Kansas School Health Profiles 2006 Results
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Bicycle Helmet,* by Sex, Grade, and Race/Ethnicity, 2015 Data for this slide are from the.
The Intersection Between Mental Health & School Based Health Centers
Adolescent Health Survey III: 2003 results in preparation for AHS IV
Teen Health Perspective Results
Sexual Risk Behaviors.
North Carolina High School Survey
West Virginia High School Survey
West Virginia Middle School Survey
Teen Health Perspective Results
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning (LGBQ) Youth in Delaware:
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
Youth Risk Behavior Survey
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Bicycle Helmet,* by Sex,† Grade, and Race/Ethnicity,† 2015 Data for this slide are from the.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey
LTHS Illinois Youth Survey Data
Skagit County Highlights from the 2017 Healthy Youth Survey
Hamilton County Power Up YOUth Survey
Presentation transcript:

2009 Youth Survey: Overview Based on Youth Risk Behavior Survey 12 BF-funded projects participated 335 youth responded Voluntary at every level Administered May-June 2009 Analysis: Center for Urban Initiatives & Research and Wilberg Community Planning LLC

Methodology Convenience sample Paper and pencil survey Conducted at program setting Administered by BF staff/evaluator Surveys scanned and tallied Frequency distributions & cross-tabs generated Each agency received its own results

More Survey Info Survey Sites Survey Components Demographics Parenting Network LGBT Community Center Pearls for Teen Girls Boys and Girls Clubs St. Joan Antida and LaVarnway Pathfinders COA Riverwest and Goldin Walker’s Point Youth & Family Center Silver Spring Neighborhood Center Latino Community Center Milwaukee Christian Center Demographics Safety and Violence Tobacco, Alcohol and Marijuana Use Sexual Behavior Healthy Behaviors Values Comparisons What Youth Want Us to Know

Demographics 335 respondents Average age 15.4 years/ average grade 9.2 66% girls/34% boys 97% African American, Hispanic/Latino or mixed ethnic origin 94% using one or more communication/social networking tools

41% ridden in a car (past 30 days) with a driver who had been drinking 12% did so 6 or more times 18% carried a weapon (past 30 days) 7% carried 6 or more days 52% in one or more physical fights (past 12 months) 11% had 6 or more fights 15% experienced dating violence (past 12 months) 72% felt safe at home 22% at school 14% in neighborhood 12% in entire city 88% felt sad or hopeless sometimes 39% talked to a friend 11% talked to parents 12% talked to a trusted adult 8% exercised/8% used alcohol or drugs Safety and Violence Questions: Who are the drivers who have been drinking? Are they friends? Relatives? Parents? Do we think that the percentage of habitual weapon-carriers and fighters is a little or a lot? Parents and other adults don’t seem to be much of a resource for kids when they’re depressed. Why is that?

Tobacco, Alcohol and Marijuana More youth had tried alcohol during their lifetimes (65%) than marijuana (51%) or cigarettes (41%). The average age of onset (age at first use) was 13-14, reaffirming this age as a critical juncture for teens. Having ever used a substance does not translate into currently using it. While 41% said they had smoked at some point, only 14% were current smokers. 51% had ever smoked marijuana; 35% had in the past month. 65% had tried alcohol; 41% current users. Heavy users (past 30 days): 5% smoke a ½ -1 pack of cigarettes a day 16% drank alcohol 3 or more times 15% smoked marijuana 6 or more times Questions: Why are kids more likely to use alcohol than marijuana or cigarettes? How do we explain the difference between ‘ever tried’ and current use? What are we most worried about?

Sexual Behavior 64% had experienced sexual intercourse Average age of onset: 13.0 years for boys 14.0 years for girls 21% age of onset – 12 or younger 3.2 average sexual partners (lifetime) 4.1 for boys 2.6 for girls 14% identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual 56% of sexually experienced youth had 3 or more partners 64% used condoms last experience/ 20% no method or ‘not sure’ 20% been pregnant or gotten someone pregnant 85% received AIDS/HIV education Questions: What is the differential between ever having had sexual intercourse and currently sexually active? What does it mean that 1 in 5 youth had an age of onset of 12 or younger? Do we understand the current social context and mores around teen sexual behavior?

Comparison of Boys and Girls Girls more likely than boys to feel safe at home (78% vs. 61%). Girls more likely to admit to feeling sad or hopeless (91% vs. 81%) and to cope with those feelings by talking with friends (48% vs. 23%). Girls less likely to have tried alcohol (40% vs. 26% never tried) but boys and girls who drink do so at the same rate (40% in past month). Peer groups more important to girls than boys relative to attitudes toward cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. 75% of girls and 55% of boys said their friends would try to stop them from smoking; for marijuana 61% of girls and 48% of boys; for alcohol 66% for girls and 47% for boys. Girls start having sex at an older age than boys and tend to have fewer sexual partners. 55% of girls sexually experienced compared to 79% of boys. Girls average 2.6 partners; boys 4.1 partners. Importance of peer group reappears relative to youth’s ability to resist peer pressure (girls 80% and boys 91%). Girls were more likely to rate helping others as important (girls 76% and boys 66%).

Comparison of Violent and Non-Violent Youth Definition : Carried a weapon 1+ days in the past 30 days and had 2+ physical fights during past 12 months. Violent youth more likely to have ridden in a car driven by someone who had been drinking (violent 66% and non-violent 38%). Dating violent more common for violent youth (V 31% and NV 13%). Violent youth less likely to feel safe at home (V 54% and NV 75%). Using drugs to deal with feelings of sadness/hopelessness more common among violent youth (V 23% and NV 6%). Alcohol and marijuana more prominent in lives of violent youth: age of onset (V 12.9 years and NV 13.4 years) and 30-day use of alcohol (V 60% and NV 40%) and marijuana (V 60% and NV 32%). Violent youth more likely to be sexually experienced (V 74% and NV 59%) and have 3+ sexual partners (V 50% and NV 33%).

Comparison of High Risk Sexual Behavior (HRSB) Youth and Non-HRSB Youth Definition: HRSB defined as reporting 2 or more of the following: Age at first sexual intercourse of 12 or younger, 4+ sexual partners in lifetime, pregnant or having gotten someone pregnant, no condom use of ‘not sure’ at last sexual intercourse, no contraceptive method or ‘not sure’. HRSB youth 4 times more likely to have had sexual intercourse at age 12 or younger (HRSB 48% Non-HRSB 11%). Boys more likely than girls to report HRSB (boys 39% girls 23%). HRSB associated with other dangerous/violent factors including riding in a car with a drinking driver (HRSB 55% and Non-HRSB 36%), carrying a weapon (HRSB 29% and Non-HRSB 12%), and dating violence (HRSB 24% and Non-HRSB 12%). Age at first use significantly lower for HRSB youth – with a third first using tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana at age 10-12 Substance use significantly higher for all three substances.

What do we do next? Good information, but where do we go with it? My views: Need to make maximum use of the data Conduct a critical review of the survey instrument involving project staff and youth Make the survey more current and relevant Your views?