KFNEDS:SP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University ®
Advertisements

AMHO Conference May 26 The State of Peer Support Work in Ontario: Summary of Findings and Next Steps Toward a Community of Practice.
The Business of Empowering Women November 18, 2009 Presentation at the World Bank’s GAP Event Working Women: Better Outcomes for Growth CONFIDENTIAL AND.
Hiring Manager Role in Onboarding & Assimilation Understanding how your role can impact and improve the new employee experience.
Maureen B. Higgins Assistant Director, Agency Support & Technical Assistance Office of Personnel Management December 8, 2010.
Long Term Leave Management Program County of Los Angeles Department of Human Resources October 28, 2010.
Compliance /Monitoring and Data Collection Department of Labor and Industry Office of Equal Opportunity.
Yield Ratios Comparison of applicants across stages of the recruiting process: # applicants # Initial contacts # interviews # final interviews # offers.
EEO Best Practices: Addressing and Preventing Discrimination February 12, 2013 MHRMA.
Good Day This is your 30-Second DPN Training ENJOY Click here to begin DPN.
Findings from the 2008 ODEP Employer Survey Andrew J. Houtenville, Ph.D. New Editions Consulting, Inc. August 2009.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Equal Opportunity & The Legal Framework. Equal Employment Opportunity  Ensuring that the process of employment and the employee employer relationships.
District Office of Transition Services LAUSD March 31,2011.
The Business Case for Executive Assessment : Why Assessment in Challenging Times Can Enhance Productivity and Be a Talent “Game Changer” Linda Sharkey,
Long Term Leave Management Program Eliza Carrillo County of Los Angeles Department of Human Resources March 24, 2011.
Human Resource Planning (Theme Three) Jayendra Rimal.
Cybersecurity Workforce Initiatives Maureen B. Higgins Assistant Director Agency Support and Technical Assistance February 25, 2010.
1 Introduction to Human Resource Management Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Job Analysis and Competency Models.
EMPLOYER vs. EMPLOYEES (Survey Results).
The Performance and Staff Development Program
PRINCIPLES CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE PHARMACY MANAGEMENT
Learning Objectives For State Agency Affirmative Action Programs:
“A Rolodex is a rotating file device used to store business contact information”
Disability Employment Module
SHRM Poll: Performance Management and Other Workplace Practices
RECRUITMENT & SELECTION
DUAL CAREER This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF Cooperative Agreement No. HRD
Q1 issues: Lack of staff agreement in the decisions as to if and how to utilize volunteers within the agency Absence of job descriptions or support and.
DJ Hendricks, Ed.D. Job Accommodation Network
SHRM Survey Findings: Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Accessibility and Accommodation In collaboration with and commissioned.
DRS Business Terminology
CDRH 2010 Strategic Priorities
Equal Opportunity under WIOA: Using WIOA Section 188 as your blueprint for Equal Opportunity Compliance.
Ulrich’s model of HR.
Claudia Petrescu, Marton Balogh, Natalia Monica Balogh, Paula Beudean
HSA 530 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
HSA 530 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
HSA 530 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Non-Discriminatory Interviews at UCF Office of Institutional Equity
Retaining an Employee with an Intellectual Disability After a Supervisor Change August 6, 2018.
HSA 530 Inspiring Innovation-- snaptutorial.com
Chapter 3 Part 2 • MGT 3513 • Dr. Marler
Chapter 3 Part 2 • MGT 3513 • Dr. Barnett
Return to Work for an Employee with a Back Injury
Looking for Key Talent in the Midst of Procurement Retirements
Write-On Clinic March 7th-8th, 2016
This presentation will include:
Retaining Employees with Chronic Health Conditions
Apprenticeship Business Engagement Tools Webinar
Identify & Document Client Requirements.
Thoughts on the CPS-DS Andrew J. Houtenville, Ph.D.
Training interviewers
Successful Project Management in an Educational Environment
Overview of Updated Proposal and Reporting Guidelines
Workforce Solutions Division
Workforce Solutions Division
Powerful Partnerships With Today’s Volunteers
Advancing Racial Diversity in Your Organization for Better Services
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
Professional Review Panel
Obtaining Employment & Developing a Career
ENGENDERING POPULATION CENSUS
Recruitment & Selection Process For Talent Acquisition
The Future of Flexibility
Workforce Solutions Division
Jonathan Hill and Cathy Griffin | Home Care & Assisted Living Program
Apprenticeship and the DSP: Growing Opportunity for Frontline Workers
Multimedia Training Kit
Presentation transcript:

KFNEDS:SP

Main Objectives Identify the processes and practices used by employers to increase the employment of people with disabilities and their effectiveness. Collect qualitative information on specific practices and challenges. Further examine the upper management commitment, which is identified as quite important in prior studies. Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 2

Description 3,085 supervisors from across the country Drawn from Qualtrics Business-to-Business panel Subject areas: Recruiting & hiring, Onboarding & training, Retention & accommodation Within each subject area: Processes and practices and their effectiveness Supervisor’s and upper management commitment Open-ended question to obtain examples Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 3

Demographics of Respondents # % Male 1,265 41 Female 1,820 59 White 2,375 77 Non-white 1,018 33 18 – 34 833 27 35 – 54 1,481 48 55 + 740 24 < College College + 2,345 76 Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 4

Own/Family Experience with Disability % Any experience 45 - Own 18 - Someone close 39 - Hearing 14 - Vision 6 - Ambulatory - Cognitive 21 No experience 55 Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 5

Company Size (Number of Employees) # % 25 – 99 692 22.4 100 – 499 910 29.5 500 – 999 401 13.0 1,000 + 1,082 35.1 Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 6

Supervisory Experience of Respondents How long at employer Years % 1 to 5 32 6 to 10 29 11 to 20 24 21 or more 15 How long supervising Years % 1 or fewer 13 2 to 5 40 6 to 10 21 11 or more 26 How many supervised Number % 1 to 5 36 6 to 10 23 11 to 20 19 21 or more 22 Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 7

Experience Hiring People with Disabilities # Hired % % Hired any People w/ Disabilities Avg. # People w/ Disabilities None 10 - 1 to 5 28 29 0.5 6 to 10 16 55 1.4 11 to 20 14 70 3.1 21 to 50 13 76 5.4 > 50 19 80 12.8 Total 100 58 4.3 Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 8

Experience Supervising People with Disabilities % Experience 51 Hearing 20 - Vision 9 - Mobility 26 - Cognitive 27 Not experience 49 Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 9

Commitment of Upper Management and Importance to Supervisor Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 10

Hiring People with Disabilities Very Somewhat Not very Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” Not at all Upper management commitment Importance to supervisor 11

Supporting PwD Learning the Job Very Somewhat Not very Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” Not at all Upper management commitment Importance to supervisor 12

Providing Requested Accommodations Very Somewhat Not very Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” Not at all Upper management commitment Importance to supervisor 13

Organizational Processes - Has process? - Effective? - As effective for people with disabilities? Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 14

Recruiting Process Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 15

Organizational Hiring Goals Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 16

“Moderate” to “A Lot” of Effort Spent on Recruiting Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 17

Process: Supporting New Employees Learn Job Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 18

Process: Request Accommodations Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 19

Centralized Accommodation Fund Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 20

Specific Practices Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 21

Recruiting: Partner with Disability Organizations 35% 85% Feasible? Don’t Know 38% Uses Practice? Feasible? 66% No 27% Effective? 95% Yes Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 22

Train Supervisors in Accessible Application & Interview Techniques 23% Feasible? 83% Don’t Know 37% Feasible? 67% No Uses Practice? 40% 87% Effective? Yes Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 23

Hiring Practices: Review or Audit Hiring Procedures to Ensure Accessibility 37% 85% Feasible? Don’t Know 20% Feasible? No Uses Practice? 64% 43% 86% Effective? Yes Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 24

Training Practices: Short-term Outside Assistance 56% 70% Feasible? No Uses Practice? 25% Effective? 82% 86% Sometimes As effective PWD? 19% Effective? Yes 89% 86% Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 25

Training Practices: Job Shadowing Feasible? No 12% 70% 27% Effective? 93% As effective PWD? 75% Sometimes 61% 98% Uses Practice? 80% Effective? As effective PWD? Yes Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 26

Training Practices: Onsite Training by Supervisor or Coworker Feasible? No 5% 77% 22% Effective? 94% As effective PWD? 79% Sometimes 73% 97% 81% Uses Practice? Effective? As effective PWD? Yes Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 27

Accommodation Practices: Job Sharing 57% 48% Feasible? No Uses Practice? 37% 86% 84% Effective? Sometimes As effective PWD? Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” Effective? Yes 13% 95% 92% 28

Accommodation Practices: Flexible Work Schedule 23% Feasible? 48% No 52% 90% 79% Effective? As effective PWD? Uses Practice? Sometimes 25% Effective? 95% As effective PWD? 86% Yes Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 29

Accommodation Practices: Work from Home (At Least Some of the Time) 45% Feasible? No 21% Uses Practice? 38% Effective? 74% 69% Sometimes As effective PWD? Effective? 18% Yes 85% 87% Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 30

Retention Practices: Cultural Competence Training for Employees 30% Feasible? 80% No 27% 85% In the past Uses Practice? Effective for retaining PWD? 43% 94% Regularly Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 31

Areas of Future Analyses Investigate difference by company size, years of experience, and other factors. Analyze responses in relation to disability type. Examine open-ended responses for unique practices and experiences. Re-contact respondents with follow-up questions. Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 32

Findings to Improve Corporate Culture and Practices Underutilized Effective Practices Seen as Feasible Common Practices are Effective for Many - Universal Design Upper Management’s Commitment is Key to Success of Employees with Disabilities and their Supervisors  Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 33

Elaine E. Katz, MS, CCC-SLP MEET OUR EXPERTS: Kessler Foundation Rodger DeRose President & Chief Executive Officer Kessler Foundation Elaine E. Katz, MS, CCC-SLP Senior VP for Grants and Communication Kessler Foundation John O’Neill, PhD, CRC Director of Employment Research Kessler Foundation Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 34

Andrew Houtenville, PhD MEET OUR EXPERTS: University of New Hampshire Andrew Houtenville, PhD Director of Research University of New Hampshire-Institute on Disability Kimberly Philips, PhD Project Director University of New Hampshire-Institute on Disability Respondents were screened out if they currently have no direct supervisees We asked both demo & employment characteristics (e.g., gender, age, years with org, years as supervisor, state in which employed) Within each topic covered we asked Whether the organization has a formal or established process, How committed upper management is – and how important it is to the supervisors - to include people with disabilities in practices related to each topic area, We presented 1 to 3 specific practices and asked whether the organization engages in these practices. If so, we asked them how effective they thought each practice was; if not, we asked them if it would be feasible to adopt the practices in order to facilitate employment for people with disabilities; Finally, we asked several open-ended questions along the way to solicit more information. The survey culminates in two open-ended questions: “Please briefly share a [negative / positive] experience you had or a [difficulty you faced / success] related to supervising people with disabilities” 35