Asekhame Yadua Introduction Main Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Predicting Future Gas Lift Performance in a Mature Water Flooded Field
Advertisements

E-petroleumservices.com 1 Business Benefits Delivered through True Valve Performance Yvonne Roberts Edinburgh Petroleum Services.
PRESSURE PULSE ANALYSIS OF GAS LIFT WELLS
Importance of Effective Sand Management - DTI View Colin Cranfield Reservoir Engineer Licensing & Consents Unit, Aberdeen.
University of Minho School of Engineering Institute for Polymer and Composites Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de Engenharia - 24 a.
by Wim der Kinderen Consultant Production Technologist
Chapter 3 COMPLETION.
Presentation to Repsol by MYS on 9/13/06 Well Completion Design for Tight-Gas Formations M. Y. Soliman, PhD September 20, 2006 Mendoza, Argentina.
ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS ® © 2002 Weatherford. All rights reserved. Unloading Water from Oil Wells Using Air.
25-26 August 1999Well Control Conference of the Americas Greater Kick Tolerance and Fewer Casing Strings Make Dual Gradient Drilling a Winner Schubert,
ABRASIVE JET MACHINE.
DOC ID © Chevron 2007 Chemical EOR Implementation for the Captain Field, UK 30 th IEA EOR Symposium and Workshop September 2009 Anette Poulsen, Chevron.
Gas Lift Design Philosophy for Chevron’s Subsea Developments
PAL PLUNGERS® BY PAL PLUNGERS, LLC.
Introduction Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of A Non Planar C Wing using Experimental and Numerical Tools Mano Prakash R., Manoj Kumar B., Lakshmi Narayanan.
PIPELINE ENGINEERING Multi-Diameter Pigging – Factors affecting the design and selection of pigging tools for multi-diameter.
EGEE 520: Spring 2008 Instructor: Dr. Derek Elsworth By: Sylvain-Didier Kouame A Study of Fluid displacement in Porous Medium using Nitrogen/CO2 injection.
Analysis of Gas Lift Transient Effects Henry Nickens Adam Ballard BP - Houston.
Base Case Simulation Model
Petroleum Experts Ltd. Janvier Lissanon
LAFAYETTE, LA NEW ORLEANS, LA HOUSTON, TX.
Gas Well De-Liquification Workshop Denver, Colorado February 27 - March 1, 2006 Problem Identification, Candidate Selection, & Selection of Artificial.
Copyright © MSC.Software Corporation, All rights reserved. Chaos and Uncertainty: Fighting the Stagnation in CAE J. Marczyk Ph.D. MSC Software Managing.
NUMERICAL MODEL FOR THE PREDICTION OF FLUID PRODUCTION AND GAS CONSUPTION OF GAS CHAMBER PUMPS PDVSA INTEVEP Fall 2001 ASME/API Gas Lift Workshop Aberdeen.
ARTIFICIAL LIFT METHODS
By Jayant Sadare Gas-Lift Optimization and Diagnosis by using
Lecture 10 Production Engineering
Gas Lift Design Philosophy for Subsea Developments 2001 European Gas Lift Workshop.
Mr. Brooks Foundations of Technology.  Examine and analyze open and closed fluid systems in terms of common components and basic design.
Oil and Gas Technology Program Oil and Gas Technology Program PTRT 2432 Artificial Lift Green Book Chapter 1 Planning an Artificial Lift Program.
The Experimental study of supercritical CO 2 flow in the porous media for the heat transfer of EGS Reporter :Ming-Che Chung Date : 2014/07/01.
Subsea Injection Flow Metering
Reporter :Ming-Che Chung
Hector Ngozi Akangbou*, Martin Burby, Ghasem Nasr
INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi
Hasan Nourdeen Martin Blunt 10 Jan 2017
Seating Nipple By-Pass System
Hydraulic lift with the aid of energy storage (accumulators)
Analysis of Heading in Artificially Lifted Wells
Probabilistic Estimates of Deepwater Offshore Field Abandonment Cost
Gas Lift in Subsea Wells
Melanie Reid, Emma Perfect and Fiona Mackay, LUX Assure Ltd.
Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using direct non-linear inversion method: an application to time-lapse seismic data Haiyan Zhang,
on Petroleum and Refinery
SUBSEA GAS BOOSTING Jon Steinar Gudmundsson October 8, 2008
Heat and Flow Technology I.
QC checks on composition
TUHWALP Introduction Cem Sarica.
Next adventure: The Flow of Water in the Vadose Zone
Houston, 4th & 5th February 2003
Completion Object Overview
Active Control of Gas Lift Wells Simulation and Experimental Series
Gas-Lift Design Outline
Shell Exploration & Production
Shell UK Exploration and Production
Gas Condensate engineering  Dry Gas engineering except:
CHAIR - JIM BENNETT EXXONMOBIL
Introduction to Effective Permeability and Relative Permeability
SUBPRO SUBSEA PRODUCTION AND PROCESSING
THERMO- AN D FLUID MECHANICS LECTURE
Gas Condensate Blockage
Gas Condensate Blockage
A. Dollari*, Ch. Chatzichristos and A. G. Yiotis
Fracking in Culver City
PANDA Collaboration Meeting
QC checks on composition
Project-3 Development of Guidelines and Recommended Practices for Unloading Horizontal Gas Wells Cem Sarica.
How does the CO2 quality impact on geological storage of CO2?
QC checks on composition
Presentation transcript:

Production Tubing Size and Gas lift Optimisation for Deepwater Subsea Development Asekhame Yadua Introduction Main Results Due to the huge costs involved in deepwater subsea development, operating companies seek to maximise production throughout the life span of such fields, in order to get quick return of investment. And the optimisation of the tubing size and gas lift operation is key to achieving this goal. Fig. 1 shows the sensitivity analysis of tubing size for Colsay 1 wells when WCT = 48% and Pwh = 0.446 Mpaa. It shows the main results of all the tubing size simulations carried out. The tubing and gas lift process are components of a system consisting of a reservoir, reservoir fluids, wellbore and tubing. Therefore, they must be compatible (carefully designed) with the other components in order to fulfil the production strategy of the operating company, as all the components affect each other’s performance (See Equations 1 and 2). Figure 3: Effect of gas lift on oil production rate. Figure 1: Sensitivity analysis of tubing size. Methodology In this study, PROSPER was used to determine the optimum tubing size and gas lift design (gas lift rate, number and spacing of valves) for two sets of wells in Chevron’s Colsay 1 and 3 reservoirs. The optimum tubing size was determined by sensitizing on water cut (0-96%), wellhead pressure (0.446-17.34 Mpaa) and tubing ID (101.6-190.5 mm), and then the optimum tubing size was used to carry out the gas lift design. Figure 2: Deviation survey showing the optimum injection depth. Conclusions The performance of a well is extremely sensitive to tubing ID. Tubing ID has the greatest impact on well performance. Lower wellhead pressures increase the risk of rapid erosion and larger tubings are more susceptible. Larger tubings are also more susceptible to unstable production. As both sets of wells have the same well geometry and optimum tubing size (139.7 mm), well geometry may be the most dominant factor influencing the optimum tubing size for a well, considering the fact that the two reservoir fluids have different properties. The deepest point in the vertical section of a horizontal well is the optimum injection depth for a gas lift operation. For the Rosebank field, the effect of gas lift will become more pronounced in the high water cut period, but it will diminish just before the wells die (WCT ~ 96%). This may be the case for other oil fields. In general, the optimum gas injection rate increases with increasing WCT. Asekhame Yadua a.yadua.10@aberdeen.ac.uk +44 (0) 7423702127 www.abdn.ac.uk MSc Oil and Gas Engineering, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX