The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Ostojic, WAMSDO, 19 May 2008 LHC Insertion Region Upgrade Phase I 1.Upgrade goals and milestones 2.Review of IR systems: main findings 3.The emerging.
Advertisements

The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
David Nisbet – LIUWG 17 th July 2008 LIUWG – Options for Powering Phase I David Nisbet Summary of points from LIUWG 7 Existing topology Future topology.
E. Todesco HL-LHC: OUTLOOK ON PROTECTION FOR IR MAGNETS (WP3) E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 23 rd April 2015 MPE meeting.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
S. Claudet - 31st May 2007Power refrigeration for LHC Power refrigeration at 4.5K & 1.8K for the LHC S. Claudet, CERN AT-ACR.
AT-MEI-PE, RD, LIUWG 31-JUL R. Denz AT-MEI-PE LHC Luminosity Upgrade Protection of the Inner Triplet, D1, Correctors and Superconducting Links/Leads.
Status of ITER collaboration for Machine Protection I. Romera On behalf of the colleagues who contribute to the project Thanks to: Sigrid, Markus, Rüdiger,
LHC Enhanced Quench Protection System Review 24 – 26 February 2009.
Circuit Protection: Progress and Challenges at HL-LHC B. Auchmann (WP 7) on behalf of many people in WPs 3, 6, 7, 11 and Mr. Circuit.
5 th Joint Hi-Lumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting 2015 SC Link Protection A.Ballarino 28/10/2015.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
D1/D2 Circuit Baseline Update Rationales for Baseline Discussion B. Auchmann, F. Rodriguez Mateos, A. Verweij, D. Wollmann CERN, TE-MPE.
SM18 cryogenics infrastructure upgrade L. Serio TE-CRG.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
MPP Meeting 07/03/2007 MPP Main Ring Magnet Performance Panel Meeting Wednesday 7th March 2007 Agenda: 1)Matters arising 2)Recommendations for the case.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The prototype test String 2 May 13, 20082Roberto Saban – Academic Training Lecture 1 – Why LHC Hardware Commissioning?
Mini-Review on CLIQ Units CERN, April Felix Rodriguez-Mateos, TE-MPE.
Electrical Quality Assurance and Voltage Withstand Levels F. Rodriguez-Mateos on behalf of the High Voltage Withstand Levels Working Group.
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
TEST FACILITY STATUS FOR TESTING CERN Marta Bajko WP10. EUCARD 2 Task 4 - HTS Magnet Tests, June 2015.
Inner Triplet Protection Strategy LHC & HL-LHC Daniel Wollmann with Inputs from B. Auchmann, G. Ambrosio, R. Denz, P. Fessia, E. Ravaioli, F. Rodrigues.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
Click here to add footer 1 Ludovic Grand-Clément & Hervé Prin 08/12/2014.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
09/05/ Modelling and testing of circuit protection of new superconducting magnets for the HL-LHC project 2 nd Workshop of the Spanish Traineeship.
CERN, 11th November 2011 Hi-lumi meeting
Modelling and testing of circuit protection of new superconducting magnets for the HL-LHC project
Considerations from machine protection and the ELQA teams
Cold mass design, assembly plans and QA/QC at CERN
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
D1 and D2 powering and protection
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Powering LHC magnets version 30/3/2007.
LHC Enhanced Quench Protection System Review
Testing of SC Magnets Status - November 2010
Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer
State of discussions in preparation for the HL-LHC Circuits Review
Power converters and circuits
Circuits description and requirements
Document Plan & Milestones WP7
Potential failure scenarios that can lead to very fast orbit changes and machine protection requirements for HL-LHC operation Daniel Wollmann with input.
M.Jonker CTC MPO-WG status
Powering the LHC Magnets
FMEA of a CLIQ-based protection of D1
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
Felix Rodriguez Mateos for the MCF
Lucio Rossi Project Leader
International Review of the Conceptual Design of the Cold Powering system for the HL-LHC Superconducting Magnets J.Ph. Tock
Update on circuit protection simulations of the HL-LHC Inner Triplet circuit Matthias Mentink, Circuit specifics + STEAM simulations: Samer Yammine, LEDET.
Quench Protection Measurements & Analysis
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
nuSTORM and the Physics Beyond Colliders workshop
Introduction to the technical content The Q4 magnet (MQYY) for HL-LHC
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
Quench detection electronics for the HL-LHC magnet circuits of the LHC
TEST PLANS for HL LHC IT STRING
WP3 Meeting – December the 10th 2015 H. Prin
HL LHC WP3 (magnets) TASK 2 ADVANCEMENT
Commissioning of the LHC superconducting magnets systems: Why an LHC Hardware Commissioning? Specificity and complexity of this machine Roberto Saban.
Simulations of failure cases 1st STEAM Workshop June 2019
ECR on pole order of the HL-LHC IT circuit and resulting implications
Review Bloc 4 and SM18 facilities and upgrade
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions F. Rodriguez-Mateos with inputs from many colleagues at CERN and Hi-Lumi Collaborating Institutes, in particular B. Auchmann and D. Wollmann

Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Outline Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Rationale for Baseline of Circuits Questions to answer Global View on Circuits Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Outline Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Rationale for Baseline of Circuits Questions to answer Global View on Circuits Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Initial considerations Many of the HL-LHC magnets are of a new design, with different technology than the present one in LHC, based on Nb3Sn superconductors. In many cases, the current is much larger than for the LHC correspondent elements. Various options could be adopted and the optimization of the performance and of costs depends on a variety of parameters: Magnet design and performance Magnet and circuit protection Optics and operations constraints and optimization Cold and warm powering options and optimization Other parameters may also be influential for the optimization process A global optimization having in mind performance, operation and cost (both construction and operation cost over the 10-15 years of HL-LHC) is not trivial and has to consider the level of operating currents, the number of circuits and the different powering and protection configurations that are possible within the LHC and HL-LHC constraints. Felix Rodriguez Mateos

A common effort across WPs Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Objectives of the review The goal of this review is to examine the baseline choices and open variants with respect to the following aspects: Circuit Layout Circuit Integration Magnet and Circuit Protection Operation Electrical Qualification Plan and Schedule The review should focus on technical aspects and optimization; not on cost and financial issues Felix Rodriguez Mateos

The instrumentation and protection means foreseen in the magnets Within the scope The powering schemes to fulfill the requirements with respect to beam operation at a conceptual level (this is a CDR) The instrumentation and protection means foreseen in the magnets The protection means foreseen at circuit level The integration aspects of the foreseen hardware in compatibility with the infrastructure The appropriateness of the proposed utilities and infrastructure (cabling, cooling & ventilation) The strategy for the electrical quality assurance of circuit components Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Not within scope The design of the components and systems only powering & protection aspects at conceptual level are to be considered at this stage: Magnets S.C. Link and Leads Bus bars Electrical Distribution Boxes Power converters Electronics Felix Rodriguez Mateos

How is the review structured Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Today Introductions to Review, HL-LHC Magnets and Circuits Integration Concepts for s.c. link, leads and bus bars Magnets and Circuits Powering and Protection Today Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Tomorrow Operational requirements Systems: Power converters Quench detection CLIQ and heater discharge supplies Cabling, cooling and ventilation HV qualification Recommendations in the light of LHC experience IT String Test validation Circuit Documentation Plan Roadmap and future milestones Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Outline Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Rationale for Baseline of Circuits Questions to answer Global View on Circuits Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Goals in terms of peak temperature and voltages includes probability analysis: protection goals for very rare failures; contingency goals for expected failures. Mean-time to failure (MTTF) Mean-time to repair (MTTR) B. Auchmann, D. Wollmann Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Outline Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Rationale for Baseline of Circuits Questions to answer Global View on Circuits Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Some of the questions to answer (1/2) Number of circuits, number of power supplies, number of auxiliary trims, fulfilling the beam dynamics requirements Ramp-down speed Power converter technology issues Losses in passive elements Protection elements Number of heater strips in active use, how many as spares HDS parameters, redundancy (capacity, triggering) Number and connection of CLIQ units CLIQ parameters, redundancy (capacity, triggering) Parallel elements Lead design (CLIQ, bypass and heaters) Heater & CLIQ polarity assignment

Some of the questions to answer (2/2) Detection and related instrumentation Taps (incl. symmetric detection) Logic (voting, redundancy) Variable thresholds Monitoring Online monitoring, interlocking Post-mortem data Test and reception criteria Documentation

Some of the questions to answer …later on Electro-dynamic aspects in s.c. link and bus bars are to be considered at the time of design. Designs of link and bus bars will have an impact on the protection hardware at circuit level, cross-coupling between circuits which may affect layouts strategy for power aborts Compatibility of CLIQ protection with respect to the design of the s.c. link remain to be studied in detail as return currents will pass through the link Feedback from s.c. magnet/link/leads tests will be of paramount importance as to confirm protection choices Feedback from s.c. magnet/link/leads manufacturing and electrical tests will be important as to define the right electrical QA levels Anything forgotten ???

Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Outline Why this Review?. What is within scope?. What is not within scope? Rationale for Baseline of Circuits Questions to answer Global View on Circuits Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Circuits Table as in TDR v0 (Ref. Baseline) D. Wollmann Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Circuits Table as in proposal at this Review D. Wollmann Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Summary of principal proposed changes It is proposed to reduce the number of main inner triplet circuits from 2 to 1 per IP side. This has implications that will be discussed later in several talks (E. Ravaioli, J.P. Burnet) This circuit will have no energy extraction system 2-quadrant converter is required Three trim circuits are required It is proposed to remove energy extraction systems from the closed-orbit dipole correctors of the inner triplet It is proposed that the super-ferric magnets get low voltage extraction within the crowbars of the converter (compatible with the PC limits) Only exception is the quadrupole corrector for which a standard 0.7Ohm/600A extraction system can be envisaged D2-Q4 orbit correctors would not require quench heaters Q5 orbit correctors would not require quench heaters Felix Rodriguez Mateos

Many thanks for your attention!