Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Siebel Service Order Extract MIMO Impact May 03, 2004.
Advertisements

Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.
Retail Market Guide Updates.  ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their.
Inadvertent Gain Overview February Introduction Why we are here –Original Inadvertent Gain (IAG) Task Force (2004) Creation of Retail Market.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.
Retail Sub-Committee Update Robert Connell June 14, 2002.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
MarkeTrak Enhancements Conceptual Design Review Presented By ERCOT.
1. ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT June 10, Supporting Reports Section.
1 Update from ERCOT Retail Market Services to RMS May 15, 2003.
Market Impact Assessment TF Final Report to RMS June 11, 2008.
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
TX SET January 21, 2009 Retail Release Items for February 21, 2009 Kathryn Thurman ERCOT.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT activities.
RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.
TX SET v2.1 Implementation Plan. Table of Contents A.Shut Down Procedure B.Shut Down Timeline Details C.Conference Calls D.Additional Contingencies.
1 ESI ID SERVICE HISTORY AND USAGE DATA EXTRACT SYSTEM CHANGE REQUEST (SCR 727) February 24, 2003.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT May 14, Supporting Reports Section.
1 MVI/MVO Workshop June 3 – 12, 2002 Workshop Results.
1. ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT.
1.  Welcome & Introductions  Antitrust Admonition  Inadvertent Gain/Loss (IGL) Overview ◦ Causes of IAS & Impacts to customer experience ◦ Prevention.
October 14, 2015 LRIS v2 / Self-scheduled Third party DR Provider Data Submission Proposal Carl L Raish.
Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
MARS 867_03F ROR vs. Settlement vs. 810 Scenarios ERCOT September 2008.
MARS Advanced Metering – ERCOT Market Facing Changes Jackie Ashbaugh Manager Data Integrity and Administration 3/9/2009.
1. ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT.
1.  Antitrust Admonition  Welcome & Introductions  Inadvertent Gain/Loss (IGL) Overview ◦ Causes of IAS & Impacts to customer experience ◦ Prevention.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
1 Critical Retail Issues RMS Update RMS Meeting Results 2/01 RMS Formed 3/01 RMS Identified “pent-up” issues Tx Set transaction development Service Order.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
1 RMS Update By Don Bender January 9, RMS Approved Resolution Upon TAC approval, suspend further True-up settlements for True-up resettlement.
© 2012 IBM Corporation 3 rd Party Registration & Account Management 1 1 SMT Post R 4.3 Potential Enhancements.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Follow up from April RMS presentation Expedited Switch/Customer Rescission (Retail Customer Choice Team)
Update to RMS December 18, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
Update to RMS June 3, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B High Level Timeline  Planning Phase - complete  Execution/Development - complete  Testing.
Update to RMS January 10, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
RMS Update to TAC October 2, RMS Update to TAC TAC Confirmation Vote Request Kyle Patrick of Reliant Energy and Independent Power Marketer segment.
COMET Working Group Progress Report. Contents of Report Provide COMET Recommendations, with May 6 revisions (Vote) –Competitive Meter Approval Process.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
Update to RMS October 6 th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline – REMINDER Timely execution of a customer rescission.
1. ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT.
1 Texas Data Transport & MarkeTrak Systems (TDTMS) Update to RMS March 1, 2016 Jim Lee (AEP) – Chair Monica Jones (NRG) – Vice Chair.
Mass Transition Lessons Learned. Should the FASD (First Available Switch Date) be revised for Mass Transition Projects? We need a better definition of.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
Summary of the November 11, 2002 Market Synchronization “How-to-Fix” Decisions For presentation to RMS November 14, 2002.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
MarkeTrak Issue Resolution Tool Retail Market Participant Workshop.
1.  What is the purpose of DEVs? Data Extract Variances (DEVs) are used to synchronize the data among all Market Participants (MP)  What is a DEV? It's.
1. ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
Special Language Characters in EDI Transactions Options and Considerations July 20, 2016.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott January 14,
Inadvertent Switch & Customer Rescission Market Training
MARS Taskforce RMS Update December 9, 2009.
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Usage Billing Issues.
Stacking Implementation Plan
Move-in/Move-out Transaction Analysis
Demand Response – ERCOT discussion items
Non-Geographic Porting Process : SWEDEN
Porting Process : Denmark
Presentation transcript:

Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team

Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures 867s Received on Cancelled Service Orders

867s received on Cancelled Service Orders Situation ERCOT periodically receives 867_03 Finals and 867_04s for service orders that are Cancelled in ERCOT systems. The Service Order Sub-Statuses that are considered Cancelled are: CR Requested, Customer Objection, ERCOT Operating Rule, Manual, Permit Not Received, with Exception, Unexecutable and Rejected by TDSP. This can indicate an out-of-sync condition between the TDSP and ERCOT. Mechanism for Handling 867 RCSO: Step 1: ERCOT produces 867RCSO data each Friday and submits a report file to each TDSP via the ERCOT Portal Step 2: The TDSPs review the report line items and take one of the following actions: a) If the TDSP has cancelled the service order, no further action is required b) If the TDSP has completed the service order, they will initiate a day-to-day MarkeTrak issue and work with ERCOT to get ERCOT systems changed to complete. Completion of cancelled service orders will require the approval of the CR initiating the transaction. (Note: For Cancel by Customer Objection, the TDSP will honor the cancel in their systems)

867s received on Cancelled Service Orders - 2010

Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures Missing 867 Report Summary

Missing 867 Report Missing 867 Report The Missing 867 Report will provide TDSPs information about Service Orders in a scheduled state for which ERCOT has not received an 867 completing transaction at least seven days after the scheduled meter read Weekly report provided to the TDSP via the ERCOT Portal Stats Summary:

Missing 867 Report

MarkeTrak Issue Statistics

Day to Day Issues - Summary

Day To Day Issues: Subtype Descriptions Issue Sub-Type: Submitted when… Inadvertent Gaining …CR has inadvertently gained (or is pending the gain) of an LSE Relationship to another CR in error. Inadvertent Losing …CR has inadvertently lost (or is pending the loss) of an LSE Relationship to another CR in error. Cancel w/Approval …CR/TDSP requesting cancellation of an initiating transaction in instances submitting an 814_08 would result in a rejection. Cancel w/o Approval …TDSP requesting cancellation of an initiating transaction for market defined reasons that do not require approval from the CR. Missing Transaction …CR/TDSP is missing any expected 814, 867_04 or 867_03 Final. Usage/Billing Issues …CR/TDSP has questions pertaining to point-to-point transactions excluding the 867 Contingency Plan. Reject Transactions …CR/TDSP has questions pertaining to rejected transactions or reject reasons. REP of Record …CR/TDSP has questions pertaining to ERCOT LSE or TDSP LSE relationship histories. Projects …CR/TDSP has issues pertaining to internal/market projects, system trouble, or related problems as defined by the submitter. Siebel/Chg Info …CR/TDSP questioning a discrepancy pertaining to Siebel service order status changes and Start/Stop time issues when transactions are present in ERCOT systems. 997 Issues …CR/TDSP verification of a 997 sent/received. Other …CR/TDSP has Day to Day issues that do not fit one of the Sub Types indicated above such as: Siebel/997 reports, CSA’s. Service Order – 650 …CR/TDSP has questions pertaining to missing EDI transactions or 650 transactions which are missing, not completed, or rejected. Move Out With Meter Removal …TDSP notifying the CR of 650_04 previously sent and the need for the MVO coded B44 to terminate the meter on the account. Premise Type …CR requesting that a TDSP send an 814_20 transaction to update systems with a new premise type for a particular ESIID when an out of sync condition exists. Service Address …CR requesting that a TDSP send an 814_20 transaction to update systems with a new service address for a particular ESIID. Safety Net …TDSP has questions pertaining to missing EDI transactions and who the TDSP shows as the Rep of Record in TDSP system.

Inadvertent Gains - Detail by State

Inadvertent Gain: State Description State Details… Pending Issue …Issue has not yet been submitted for consideration by the initiating party. New (ERCOT) …Pending initial acknowledgement by an individual at ERCOT. In Progress (ERCOT) …ERCOT to provide necessary information to move the issue towards resolution including IAS data and assistance with market guidelines. New (Gaining CR) …Pending either initial acknowledgement by the Gaining CR or returned to the Gaining CR for additional consideration. In Progress (Gaining CR) …Gaining CR to view and either agree with the IAG and move the issue toward resolution, or disagree with the IAG and provide reason for non-agreement. New (Losing CR) …Pending either initial acknowledgement by the Losing CR or returned to the Losing CR for additional consideration. In Progress (Losing CR) …Losing CR to view and either agree with the IAG and move the issue toward resolution, or disagree with the IAG and provide reason for non-agreement. New (TDSP) …Pending either initial acknowledgement by the TDSP or returned to the TDSP for additional consideration. In Progress (TDSP) …TDSP to view and either agree with the IAG and move the issue toward resolution, or disagree with the IAG and return to the Submitting CR with reason for non-agreement or return to the Losing CR for additional service order information. New (Losing CR Submit) …Pending initial acknowledgement by the Losing CR after the TDSP has indicated they are ready to receive the regaining transaction. In Progress (Submit Regaining) …Losing CR to send the regaining transaction and provide details of that transaction including submit date, BGN 02, and transaction date, or to send the issue back to the TDSP for additional information.

Inadvertent Gain: State Description Cont. State Details… Regaining Transaction Submitted (PC) …Losing CR has indicated the Regaining Transaction has been sent. The issue will auto close once the order status for the Regaining Transaction has updated to Complete in ERCOT system and the MarkeTrak issue reflects the Complete status. Withdrawn …Initiating MP has the option to remove the issue from consideration prior to acknowledgement by another MP. Invalid IAG …ERCOT has performed initial validations and determined that the issue is invalid for one or more of the reject reasons as defined in the RMG Section 7.2.2.4. Unexecutable (PC) …The Gaining CR or the Losing CR have indicated they are not in agreement with the IAG or that it cannot be resolved as submitted per Market guidelines. Barring updates, the issue will auto close in 2 weeks. Complete …Closed state: Issue resolution accepted by submitting party from a state of Regaining Transaction Submitted (PC). Auto Complete …Closed state: Regaining Transaction Status on issue has updated to Complete from the state of Regaining Transaction Status (PC), or the issue auto completes after 2 weeks with no update from a state of Unexecutable (PC). Closed by ERCOT …Closed state: ERCOT Intervention required to remove visibility due primarily to proprietary information updated to issue. Closed by Submitter …Closed state: Submitting party has the option to close the issue at any time that Withdraw is not available and the issue in not in a Complete state.

Cancel With Approval - Detail by State

Cancel with Approval: State Description State Details… Pending Issue …Issue has not yet been submitted for consideration by the initiating party. New …Pending either initial acknowledgement by an individual at the TDSP or returned to TDSP for additional consideration. Withdrawn …Initiating MP has the option to remove the issue from consideration prior to acknowledgement by another MP. In Progress …TDSP to provide ERCOT with agreement with cancel request or CR indication that request is already complete / unable to be completed. New (ERCOT) …Pending acknowledgement by ERCOT In Progress (ERCOT) …ERCOT to perform agreed upon cancels in the Registration System, request additional information or indicate that cancel cannot be performed . Cancelled (PC) …All parties have indicated the requested service order has or will be cancelled. Barring updates the Issue will auto close in 2 weeks. Unable to Cancel (PC) …Any party has indicated the issue is not a valid Cancel w Approval issue or cannot be cancelled. Barring updates the Issue will auto close in 2 weeks. Complete …Closed state: Issue resolution Accepted by submitting party from a state of Agreement Reached (PC) or No Agreement Reached (PC). Auto Complete …Closed state: No updates to issue for 2 weeks from a state of Agreement Reached (PC) or No Agreement Reached (PC). Closed by ERCOT …Closed state: ERCOT Intervention required to remove visibility due primarily to proprietary information updated to issue. Closed by Submitter …Closed state: Submitting party has the option to close the issue at any time that Withdraw is not available and the issue in not in a Complete state.

DEV LSE Issues - Summary

DEV LSE Issues: Subtype Descriptions Issue Sub-Type: Submitted when… LSE in MP System not ERCOT: Active …MP systems show an Active LSE relationship not present in ERCOT’s Registration System (Siebel) as indicated by MP SCR727 Extracts. LSE in MP System not ERCOT: Inactive …MP systems show an Inactive LSE relationship not present in ERCOT’s Registration System (Siebel) as indicated by MP SCR727 Extracts. LSE in ERCOT System not MP …MP systems do not show an LSE relationship which is present in ERCOT’s Registration System (Siebel) as indicated by MP SCR727 Extracts. LSE date change: Start Time …MP systems show an LSE relationship present in ERCOT’s Registration System (Siebel) as indicated by MP SCR727 Extracts with a different initiation/enrollment date. LSE date change: Stop Time …MP systems show an LSE relationship present in ERCOT’s Registration System (Siebel) as indicated by MP SCR727 Extracts with a different end date. LSE date change: Start and Stop Time …MP systems show an LSE relationship present in ERCOT’s Registration System (Siebel) as indicated by MP SCR727 Extracts with a initiation/enrollment and end date.