MTSS Problem Solving Committee for Secondary Schools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rigorous Science Content and Instructional Practice Ms. Katrina Slone, Knott County Public Schools Dr. Kent Price, Morehead State University GEAR UP Alliance.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Through Instructional Rounds
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Expeditionary Learning Elementary School Meeting June 10,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
OAC Principals Collaborative Professional Learning Opportunities What can one teacher do? What can one administrator do? What can one school do? Fall Webinar.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
WCPSS Coaching Framework Strengthening Consistency, Cohesion, and Clarity for Coaches in WCPSS.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) – A Teacher Tool for Implementing the CCSS AGENDA October 4 th and 5 th 2012 Outcomes: Self- reflections on how the.
Lesson Study Lesson study is a particular form of job-embedded professional development that involves collaborative discourse among teachers over an extended.
Information for the Presenter Suggested Schedule: 8:00-8:30 Frame and Overview 8:30-9:00 Smarter Balanced Assessments 9:00-10:00 A Closer Look at Items.
Information for the Presenter Suggested Schedule: 8:00-8:30 Frame and Overview 8:30-9:00 Smarter Balanced Assessments 9:00-10:00 A Closer Look at Items.
Stages of ImplementationFocusStageDescription Exploration/Ado ption Develop commitment at ISD and LEA level InstallationEstablish ISD leadership team,
Curriculum Connectors
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Janice Creneti Project Coordinator Florida SPDG SIM
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Magothy River Middle School
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Self-Advocacy in the Observation Cycle
Why? Why do we provide for Talent Development opportunities in Cobb County? Meet the needs of high-achieving/highly- able students who have not qualified.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Why? Why do we provide for Talent Development opportunities in Cobb County? Meet the needs of high-achieving/highly- able students who have not qualified.
LEAP 360: Accessing K-2 Formative Tasks
Developing 21st Century Classrooms: Connecting the Dots IV
Illuminating the Black Box: Assessing and Monitoring Impact
SIR Observation Preparation and Report Examples
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Implementing Race to the Top
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Curriculum Learning Communities
New Prospect Elementary School
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

MTSS Problem Solving Committee for Secondary Schools December 12th, 2017

If we imagine instruction is like an app: PSAT/SAT How do we ensure instruction is aligned to the demands of the PSAT and SAT If we imagine instruction is like an app: Teachers Lesson’s Principal’s Support Student Engagement Cognitive Demand/Rigor PSAT/SAT Appropriate Assessments

While we don’t have an app, we do have a new potential tool, but we need your feedback and support.

Student Engagement, Content Rigor, & Assessment Tool: ELA Since our last MTSS problem solving session, where we discussed potential factors contributing to student-performance issues on the PSAT and SATs, a small group of educators from around the county has been working a tool to support our efforts towards deeper learning.

Student Engagement, Content Rigor, & Assessment Tool: ELA John Hattie Hattie has broken down the levels of student engagement and the student behaviors you would expect to see during the lesson or activity. As a teacher, you can monitor the student involvement within the lesson and make adjustments as needed. As an administrator, you have a clear picture how engaged students are at any given point in the lesson, and most importantly, the extent they are ready to learn.

Student Engagement, Content Rigor, & Assessment Tool: ELA Our partners in Wisconsin have identified the activities that typically take place at each levels of cognitive demands. Teachers can use information like this, as well as their personal SEC report, to consider what lessons and activities they may implement to reach the desired level of cognitive demand. Principals, can use these categories to identify the expected level of student cognitive demand in a lesson, even if they are not really familiar with the subject area. University of Wisconsin: Surveys of Enacted Curriculum

Finally, in understanding the levels of depth of knowledge that are possible to be measured by different formats or methods, informs both teachers and principals what student knowledge is actually being assessed. This information also indicated the frequency and types of assessments student are exposed to as we consider preparing students for rigorous state assessments. ASCD: Tomlinson, Moon, and Imbeau

When we look at the combination of these observable behaviors and activities, we can develop a connection or correlation to the extend of the impact that instruction is having in student learning. ASCD: Tomlinson, Moon, and Imbeau

As we move up the continuums with the participation, activities, and assessments categories, teachers and principals can begin to identify potential issues where the expectations of the lessons or activities don’t align vertically, thus possible to identify what changes may be necessary to improve impact. ASCD: Tomlinson, Moon, and Imbeau

Having the ability to identify miss-alignment is critical in making changes during the lesson and planning for next step to revisit or re-emphasize learning goals. Frequently we find that teachers don’t consistently adapt or adjust instructional practices based on student learning, but then are disappointed with the results. ASCD: Tomlinson, Moon, and Imbeau

As we push into even higher levels of cognitive demand, this alignment becomes exponentially more important. ASCD: Tomlinson, Moon, and Imbeau

ASCD: Tomlinson, Moon, and Imbeau

ASCD: Tomlinson, Moon, and Imbeau

Student Engagement, Content Rigor, & Assessment Tool: ELA As we move forward, we first need your feedback on the tool and recommendation for how we implement our efforts systematically to ensure secondary teachers and principals can have maximum impact.

Kevin Feldman February 14th: Day 1 Secondary (General Session) Morning Admin-Teacher Training Overview (The Why: with Kevin and HR) Why use common strategies and what strategies have the highest impact Kevin Feldman will demonstrate best practice for group to react to Debrief/React to Lesson Afternoon Learn how to teach strategies, provide feedback, implement with fidelity Develop District/School Implementation Plan Spring: Site Visits We will schedule classroom visits with teacher volunteers whom attended the training to observe the implementation of what they learned. After school, have a 1 hour session where principals share how they implemented the initiative and what strategies they used to build the capacity to support the work.   February 15th: __________________ ?