DRM SIAC Paper Destruction Working Group 13 September 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United Nations Statistics Division
Advertisements

ISIC and CPC Maintenance and Revision Policies Expert Group Meeting May 18-20, 2011.
[Hayes, Dassen, Schilder and Wallage, Principles of Auditing An Introduction to ISAs, edition 2.1] © Pearson Education Limited 2007 Slide 5.1 Client Acceptance.
1 Next Generation ISO Susan LK Briggs Presented to EFCOG/DOE EMS Implementation, Lessons Learned & Best Practices Training Workshop, 3/05.
COMPULSORY BRIEFING SESSION Maturity Assessment and implementation recommendation for ITIL V3, COBIT 5 and KING III Chapter 5 RAF /2015/00016 Date: 04.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Authentication, Access Control, and Authorization (1 of 2) 0 NPRM Request (for 2017) ONC is requesting comment on two-factor authentication in reference.
5 October 2015 AllSeen Alliance 1 Testing C&C WG 30 July 2014.
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Back Translation Summary Back translation and reconciliation services give you additional quality and accuracy assurance for your most sensitive translation.
GROUP 3. Establishing a Uniform System of Accounts (USoA) for the NESI The USoA establishes the regulatory accounting reporting framework for all licensees.
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
Tripartite meeting Japan, Tokyo, 20 – 21 September 2007 Agenda item 3.2 Status and Early Experience of CSR Kirsi Tikka Vice President, ABS Global Technology.
EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009.
©2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Update: AUL Guidance Revisions Summary of Comments June 23, 2011 Peggy Shaw Workgroup Chair.
1 IFAD consideration of a Code of Conduct for Executive Board Representatives Historical Background Presentation to an Informal Seminar of the Executive.
Advances In Software Inspection
Project Operating Guide. Purpose of Projects To advance the mission of the organization To provide value to ICIS Members.
Revised Quality Assurance Arrangements for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February 2006 September 2006.
1 DIA SIAC TMF Reference Model Lisa Mulcahy Karen Roy.
Paper Destruction Team Full Team Meeting 9 April 2013.
1 Brett Claffee 11-Mar-2011 Paper Destruction - Legal Topic Team Agenda
1 Package on food improvement agents Food additives Food enzymes Flavourings Common procedure Developments since earlier consultation.
COMPULSORY BRIEFING SESSION Maturity Assessment and implementation recommendation for ITIL V3, COBIT 5 and KING III Chapter 5 RAF /2015/00016 Date:
OASIS Next Generation Project Summary
Paper Destruction - Legal Topic Team
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Russell Stringer (Australia)
Update on the Latest Developments in Government Auditing Standards
Adastra v3 Reporting & National Quality Requirements
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
Computerized Systems in Clinical Research
Request History Capability – Requirements & Solution
Safeguards- Feedback on Safeguards ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
DIA SIAC TMF Reference Model
Structure of the Code – Phases 1 and 2
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
Directions for Expert Review Panel
Standards and Certification Training
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
Audit Documentation and Administration
WHO Model Formulary (WMF)
Standards Development: An Overview
Project Charter START IT! By Catherine B. Calio, PMP
Chapter 12: Project Procurement Management
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Outcome of TFCS-12 - summary slides - (detailed meeting minutes will be provided separately) April The Shilla Seoul, ROK.
BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 14
Environmental Objectives and Exemptions under the Water Framework Directive SCG meeting May 2008 Marieke van Nood, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Change Assurance Update
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
CVTS 2015 – Draft Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 Agenda item 2.2 DSS Meeting 3-4 April 2014.
Eurostat regional yearbook 2012 – new routines and time planning
IAESB Meeting IFAC Headquarters, New York July , 2018
MCO Status Report to JSTC
ISO 9001:2008 – Key Changes NOTE: use of this webinar depends on the instructor/speaker using the text in the notes of the slides!! Examples and speaking.
Action points Who When WG GES 31 March March 2017
WG A ECOSTAT Intercalibration guidance : Annexes III, V, VI
Radiation Safety Information Management System (RASIMS)
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Scene setter European Commission DG Environment
Critical Risk Assessment and Management Practices in Pharmaceutical Industry Abida Zameer Harrisburg University GRAD 699 PGMT.
Critical Risk Assessment and Management Practices in Pharmaceutical Industry Abida Zameer Harrisburg University GRAD 699 PGMT.
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Summary on initial findings
Chorus Portal and B2B Changes Design Document
Presentation transcript:

DRM SIAC Paper Destruction Working Group 13 September 2011 v0.2 of Framework for the Destruction of Paper - Feedback and Next Steps DRM SIAC Paper Destruction Working Group 13 September 2011

The Past… The Framework for the Destruction of Paper was sent for broader review within the Working Group companies on August 17th. All feedback that was sent, even after the deadline, was accepted and considered. 9 persons forwarded varying degrees and scope of feedback from their review or their company representative review Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

Feedback was considered both within and across topic teams. The Present… Feedback was collated into a single excel document and distributed to the TTL Feedback Who provided Discussion Action Feedback was considered both within and across topic teams. TTL have completed or are completing the response to each feedback item Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

Feedback Summary – General Receive both comment that the framework is “Comprehensive” and “Not ready for broad review” Bibliographies need to be more precise, following a standard Not only for TMF in an eTMF as it applicable to all clinical trial records in ECMS? Latter. Scary – how can it be organized in a more friendly way Summary Statement that sums the conclusion In preparation by the TTLs Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

Feedback Summary – Technology Received several very good suggestions on Technology parameters and  interpretations Made several modifications to the parameters and added new parameter Not all changes could be accommodated as in several instances it is up to the readers interpretation as to what should/should not be within scope. Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

Feedback Summary – Records Management Evaluated all feedback to assess for RM position/impact Still 4 items to have further discussion Glossary updated and more coming Parameters -several reworded to make more clear or isolate to our current topic Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

Feedback Summary - Regulatory Validation of Systems Origin - Information Technology SVP Felt that parameters surrounding system validation needed more development Action - It was decided in the TTL this needed to handled through technology team Varied Feedback Minor grammatical edits but no substantial changes to proposed content of parameters Action - Updated as described Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

Feedback Summary - Legal Agreement that the framework can be distributed for broader review Update of scope Discussion about “industry opinion” Of the industry representatives polled, only one response indicated that their organization has a documented position on such a process.  That position is that it is permissible to destroy paper copies once an agreed framework is in place.  The details provided are in alignment with our proposed framework.  The collective team was aware of at least one other company that implemented such a framework but that company would not agree to be on record – thus not formally cited. Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

Feedback Summary - Quality 12 minor updates made to quality parameters Rewording Clarification about certification 2 no actions 1 deletion (of text only from a reference only) Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

TBD is when Regulators will be invited to review. The Future… Version 0.2 is to be soon ready (end of September or earlier) for broader release to DRM SIAC members and beyond such as professional groups, for feedback. TBD is when Regulators will be invited to review. Feedback will taken for 30 days and then considered for another 30 days. It is the intent to release v1.0 of the framework in December 2011 . Feedback mechanism will be included to allow continual feedback. Version 1.1 or 2.0 (depending on severity of changes) in 2012. Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

To Become Involved in this Initiative… To become involved with the continued enhancement and maintenance of this framework: Contact the DIA DRM SIAC, located on the DIA website www.diahome.org Contact Lisa Mulcahy directly at mulcahy67@comcast.net Join the LinkedIn Group called “TMF Reference Model” and request assistance to connect with this working group, or Drug Information Association www.diahome.org