Some aspects to be determined in PIRC July

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G.8032 Ethernet Ring Protection Overview March, 2008 ITU-T Q9 – SG 15
Advertisements

MPLS-TP Alarm Suppression tool
Igor Umansky Huub van Helvoort
New Timing Distribution Mechanism TICTOC WG, IETF 71th Philadelphia, USA draft-ji-tictoc-new-timing-distribution-mechanism-00.txt Kuiwen Ji
Satoshi NARIKAWA NTT (G.8032 Acting Co-editor)
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ICND v2.3—2-1 Extending Switched Networks with Virtual LANs Introducing VLAN Operations.
CCNA3 v3 Module 7 v3 CCNA 3 Module 7 JEOPARDY K. Martin.
Part 2: Preventing Loops in the Network
Ethernet Automatic Protection Switching (EAPS)
Multi-homed network in EVPN draft-hao-evpn-mhn-00 July 20131MHN in EVPN Weiguo Hao(Huawei) Yizhou Li(Huawei) Pei Xu(Huawei)
Switching & Operations. Address learning Forward/filter decision Loop avoidance Three Switch Functions.
IEEE 802.1D: Spanning Tree Algorithm and the Filtering Database Ben Schultz Bridge Functions Consortium UNH InterOperability Lab July, 2000.
Bridging. Bridge Functions To extend size of LANs either geographically or in terms number of users. − Protocols that include collisions can be performed.
Sept 21, 2004CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 Reconfigurations Network Protocols and Standards Autumn
draft-kompella-mpls-rmr Kireeti Kompella IETF 91
1 K. Salah Module 4.3: Repeaters, Bridges, & Switches Repeater Hub NIC Bridges Switches VLANs GbE.
Layer 2 Switch  Layer 2 Switching is hardware based.  Uses the host's Media Access Control (MAC) address.  Uses Application Specific Integrated Circuits.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ICND v2.3—1-1 Configuring Catalyst Switch Operations Introducing Basic Layer 2 Switching and Bridging Functions.
Module 13: Network Load Balancing Fundamentals. Server Availability and Scalability Overview Windows Network Load Balancing Configuring Windows Network.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 2: LAN Redundancy Scaling Networks.
Multiple Links Failover Mechanism for RPR Interconnected Rings IEEE WG Orlando, Florida USA March 11~16, 2007.
VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP)
All-Path Bridging Update IEEE Plenary meeting San Francisco July Jun Tanaka (Fujitsu Labs. Ld.) Guillermo Ibanez (UAH) Vinod Kumar (Tejas Networks.
Example STP runs on bridges and switches that are 802.1D-compliant. There are different flavors of STP, but 802.1D is the most popular and widely implemented.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 LAN Switching and Wireless Implement Spanning Tree Protocols (STP) Chapter.
Bridging. Bridge Functions To extend size of LANs either geographically or in terms number of users. − Protocols that include collisions can be performed.
Mike Takefman7/16/2007IEEE RPRWG PIRC Architecture July 2007 Plenary Session San Francisco Mike Takefman Cisco Systems.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 9 Virtual Trunking Protocol.
STP LAN Redundancy Introduction Network redundancy is a key to maintaining network reliability. Multiple physical links between devices provide redundant.
Switching Topic 6 Rapid spanning tree protocol. Agenda RSTP features – Port states – Port roles – BPDU format – Edge ports and link types – Proposals.
1 Version 3.0 Module 7 Spanning Tree Protocol. 2 Version 3.0 Redundancy Redundancy in a network is needed in case there is loss of connectivity in one.
CCNP 3: Chapter 3 Implementing Spanning Tree. Overview Basics of implementing STP Election of Root Bridge and Backup Enhancing STP RSTP MSTP EtherChannels.
SMAC: An Energy-efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Networks
Topic 5 Spanning tree protocol
Virtual MAC Redundancy Protocol (VMRP) IEEE WG Hyatt Regency Dallas, TX USA Nov 12~17, 2006.
Yan Wang Proposed amendments of control frames for c Yan Wang Huawei technologies.
Bridges and Extended LANs
802.17c Protected Inter-Ring Connection Rafi Ram - Corrigent Systems January 2007.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 Implement Spanning Tree Protocols (STP) LAN Switching and Wireless – Chapter.
RPR Interconnection Topologies IEEE WG Orlando, Florida USA March 11~16, 2007.
802.17c Protected Inter-Ring Connection Rafi Ram - Corrigent Systems March 2008.
Coping with Link Failures in Centralized Control Plane Architecture Maulik Desai, Thyagarajan Nandagopal.
Chapter-5 STP. Introduction Examine a redundant design In a hierarchical design, redundancy is achieved at the distribution and core layers through additional.
CCNP Routing and Switching Exam Pass4sure.
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2013
July 12, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Increasing Broadcast Reliability] Date.
Requirements for Ring Protection in MPLS-TP
802.17c Protected Inter-Ring Connection
Transport layer.
: An Introduction to Computer Networks
The Load Balancing Schemes Observations
Configuring EtherChannels and Switch Troubleshooting
Lecture#10: LAN Redundancy
Configuring Catalyst Switch Operations
BSS Management through WUR Wakeup Frame
VLAN Trunking Protocol
NT2640 Unit 9 Activity 1 Handout
Technical Requirements for IEEE ESS Mesh Networks
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
July 12, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Increasing Broadcast Reliability] Date.
Protection of UNIs and E-NNIs
VTS Robust Multicast/Broadcast Protocol
A Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh
Bridges Neil Tang 10/10/2008 CS440 Computer Networks.
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Virtual LAN (VLAN).
Presentation transcript:

Some aspects to be determined in PIRC July 2007 802 Some aspects to be determined in PIRC July 2007 802.17 Plenary Meeting San Francisco, U.S. yanw@huawei.com Huawei Technologies 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG

Status message Status message is respectively transmitted periodically by two inter-ring nodes of a protection group to notify the status the to opposite inter-ring node. Only inter-ring nodes process the status message New controlType Broadcast address or new multicast address Appropriate transmission interval 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG

Status message function Status message notifies the local inter-ring node’s status to the opposite inter-ring node. Active: Notify status change of the local inter-ring node to the opposite inter-ring node When the inter-ring node can’t forward traffic because forwarding function failed or one ring function failed. When the failed inter-ring node recovers. Passive: When no status messages from opposite inter-ring node are received Through two rings: the opposite node is down. Through one ring: one ring function of the opposite node is down. 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG

controlDataUnit of the status message Status message could include the following information, Protection group ID Forwarding status (None, Traffic set 1, Traffic set 2, Both) Traffic can be classified by VLAN ID, MAC address and/or other information. The inter-ring node may forward none, one, or both parts of the traffic. Under normal status, the forwarding status is decided by configuration or negotiation. Under protection status, the forwarding status is decided by the protection mechanism. To TTL balancing method, this field may be not needed. 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG

controlDataUnit of the status message (cont’) Failure indication (No Failure, Partial failure, inter-ring forwarding failure) : Indicate the inter-ring node’s forwarding function failure, one ring function failure and the failure’s recovery. Configuration information (Priority, DevID etc.): May be used to negotiate the forwarding status during initialization or during the running time dynamically. Any others? 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG

Back-to-back interconnected PIRC rings The status of the two back-to-back nodes should be synchronized. The message is needed to notify the status between two back-to-back nodes. This message is not a RPR message. Should new message and new mechanism be defined for this scenario? 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG

Multiple links failure protection Multiple links failure can be detected by Status message One inter-ring node can’t receive the status message from the opposite node through one ring. But no inter-ring node failure notification is received through the other ring. This can be used to differentiate with one ring RPR function failure. TP message In order to protect the inter-ring traffic, both inter-ring nodes should be in forwarding status. 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG

Transient Loop in PIRC The possibility of two inter-ring node forwarding when one inter-ring node recovers from failure. For multiple links failure protection, both inter-ring nodes are in forwarding status. After link defect disappears, there will be transient loop. In relax mode, transient loop could be tolerated. In strict mode, transient loop should be avoided. 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG

Strict mode for loop prevention In a protection group, anytime only one inter-ring node forwards traffic between the rings. Don’t support multiple links failure protection. Guarantee two inter-ring nodes not in forwarding status at the same time. When one inter-ring node switch into forwarding status, it should make sure that the other one is not in the forwarding status. Sometime failed inter-ring node should take action and/or notify the other inter-ring node 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG

Strict mode for loop prevention (cont’) Modify the node’s recovery mechanism When inter-ring node recovers, it shouldn’t switch into forwarding status immediately. When nodes adjacent to the failed link find the link recovers, they shouldn’t switch to normal status immediately. Timer mechanism They keep in protected status until their timers expire. Before the timers expire, the correlative interconnected node shall know the reversion and stop forwarding. Notification mechanism They keep in protected status until the correlative interconnected node stops forwarding and notifies them. 11/07/2007 IEEE 802.17 RPRWG