Neutronics Issues for Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan, Ahmad Ibrahim, Tim Bohm, Paul Wilson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

for Fusion Power Monitoring

Advertisements

Scoping Neutronics Analysis in Support of FDF Design Evolution Mohamed Sawan University of Wisconsin-Madison With input from R. Stambaugh, C. Wong, S.

September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.

09 FNST meeting Preliminary Neutronics Analysis for IB Shielding Design on FNSF (Standard Aspect Ratio) Haibo Liu Robert Reed Fusion Science and Technology.

Status of Fusion Nuclear Data Development Mohamed Sawan Tim Bohm U. Wisconsin-Madison Fusion Neutronics Team.

Views on Neutronics and Activation Issues Facing Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers L. El-Guebaly and the ARIES Team Fusion Technology Institute University.

Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.

First Wall Thermal Hydraulics Analysis El-Sayed Mogahed Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin With input from S. Malang, M. Sawan, I.

Background on GIMM studies in HAPL Challenges for a final optic optical requirements environmental threats system integration Design choices Logic pursued.

ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 U. Wisconsin, Madison Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.

April 27-28, 2006/ARR 1 Support and Possible In-Situ Alignment of ARIES-CS Divertor Target Plates Presented by A. René Raffray University of California,

November 8-9, Blanket Design for Large Chamber A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from M. Sawan (UW), I. Sviatoslavsky (UW) and X. Wang (UCSD)

Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:

Status of 3-D Analysis, Neutron Streaming through Penetrations, and LOCA/LOFA Analysis L. El-Guebaly, M. Sawan, P. Wilson, D. Henderson, A. Ibrahim, G.

Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison Shielding Protection Schemes for Final Optics L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University.

Impact of Magnetic Diversion on Laser IFE Reactor Design and Performance A. R. Raffray 1, J. Blanchard 2, A. E. Robson 5, D. V. Rose 4, M. Sawan 2, J.

Shielding of the Final Focusing System in the HIF Point Design* by Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier ARIES Projct Meeting January 8-9, 2003 *Work performed.

Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment and Activation Analysis L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison ARIES E-Meeting October.

1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL GIMM Conference Call.

Initial Activation Assessment for ARIES Compact Stellarator Power Plant L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, D. Paige and the ARIES Team Fusion Technology Institute.

Minimum Radial Standoff: Problem definition and Needed Info L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison With Input from:

Final Focus Magnet Shielding Update Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier ARIES Meeting October 2-4, 2002 Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department.

ARIES-IFE Study L. M. Waganer, June 7, 2000 Page 1 Considerations of HI Beam and Vacuum System Arrangement L. Waganer The Boeing Company 7 June 2001 ARIES.

The High Average Power Laser Program in DOE/DP Coordinated, focussed, multi-lab effort to develop the science and technology for Laser Fusion Energy Coordinated,

Performance of Dielectric Mirrors for Inertial Fusion Application Lance Snead, Keith Leonard, and Jay Jellison Oak Ridge National Laboratory Mohamed Sawan.

Development of the FW Mobile Tiles Concept Mohamed Sawan, Edward Marriott, Carol Aplin University of Wisconsin-Madison Lance Snead Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Systems Modeling Update including Magnetic Deflection HAPL Program Meeting General Atomics August 8-9, 2006 Wayne Meier LLNL Work performed under the auspices.

Kaschuck Yu.A., Krasilnikov A.V., Prosvirin D.V., Tsutskikh A.Yu. SRC RF TRINITI, Troitsk, Russia Status of the divertor neutron flux monitor design and.

Neutronics Parameters for Preferred Chamber Configuration with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Ed Marriott, Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst.

ARR/April 8, Magnetic Intervention Dump Concepts A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from: A. E. Robson, D. Rose and J. Sethian HAPL Meeting.

Bohm 1 Preliminary Neutronics Analysis of 3x2 Toroidal and Poloidal Legs of ELM Coils Tim Bohm and Mohamed Sawan University of Wisconsin 7/22/2010.

October 30th, 2007High Average Power Laser Program Workshop 1 Long lifetime optical coatings for 248 nm: development and testing Presented by: Tom Lehecka.

SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.

1 Solid Breeder Blanket Design Concepts for HAPL Igor. N. Sviatoslavsky Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

IFE Plant Structural Concepts Including Shielding and Optical Stability Requirements Thomas Kozub, Charles Gentile, Irving Zatz - PPPL.

Three-Dimensional Nuclear Analysis for the US DCLL TBM M. Sawan, B. Smith, E. Marriott, P. Wilson University of Wisconsin-Madison With input from M. Dagher.

Experimental validation of FENDL-3 nuclear data library Paola Batistoni ENEA - Fusion and Nuclear Technology Dept. Frascati - ITALY FENDL-3 1 st Research.

HAPL Concrete Shielding Requirements Mohamed Sawan UW Fusion Technology Inst. HAPL Project Meeting UW-Madison October 22-23, 2008.

The Materials Test Station: An Accelerator Driven Neutron Source for Fusion Materials Testing Eric Pitcher Presented at: Sixth US-PRC Magnetic Fusion Collaboration.

1 Neutronics Assessment of Self-Cooled Li Blanket Concept Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

August 9, 2006 Design, Fabrication and Maintenance Considerations of Blanket Options for Magnetic Intervention G. Sviatoslavsky, I.N. Sviatoslavsky, M.

1 Neutronics Parameters for the Reference HAPL Chamber Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

M. S. Tillack Final Optic Research – Progress and Plans HAPL Project Meeting, PPPL October 2004 Z. Dragojlovic, F. Hegeler, E. Hsieh, J. Mar, F.

February 5-6, 2004 HAPL meeting, G.Tech. 1 Chamber Tasks Coordination Presented by A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from J. Blanchard and the HAPL.

Status of Modeling of Damage Effects on Final Optics Mirror Performance T.K. Mau, M.S. Tillack Center for Energy Research Fusion Energy Division University.

Surface Effects and Retention of Steady State 3 He + Implantation in Single and Polycrystalline Tungsten S.J. Zenobia, G.L. Kulcinski, E. Alderson, G.

1 Nuclear Assessment of HAPL Chamber with Magnetic Intervension Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

Fusion Neutronics Activity at JAERI from October 2000 to September 2001 Peseted by Takeo NISHTANI IEA International Work Shop on Fusion Neutronics The.

Benchmark Calculations in Support for FENDL-3 Generation Mohamed Sawan Tim Bohm Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin-Madison 2 nd RCM.

Plans for Validation and General Observations Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin-Madison 3 rd RCM on FENDL December.

Required Dimensions of HAPL Core System with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst. Rene Raffray UCSD HAPL Project.

December 13, 2006 Blanket and Shield Design Considerations for Magnetic Intervention G. Sviatoslavsky, I.N. Sviatoslavsky, M. Sawan (UW), A.R. Raffray.

The Neutronics of Heavy Ion Fusion Chambers Jeff Latkowski and Susana Reyes 15 th Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion Symposium Princeton, NJ June 9, 2004 Work performed.

Effect of Mirror Defect and Damage On Beam Quality T.K. Mau and Mark Tillack University of California, San Diego ARIES Project Meeting March 8-9, 2001.

Radiological Issues for Thin Liquid Wall Options L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, and D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison.

1 A Self-Cooled Lithium Blanket Concept for HAPL I. N. Sviatoslavsky Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL Meeting ORNL March.

Vacuum System for IFE Chambers

A comparison of optical trains based on a GIMM

IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE

Concepts and Requirements for GIMM Structures

Mark S. Tillack T. K. Mau Mofreh Zaghloul

Can beam ports, magnets, and neutrons live together in harmony?

Anti-Neutrino Simulations

Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier

Updated DCLL TBM Neutronics Analysis

Summary slide for Conceptual Design Study for Heat Exhaust Management in the ARC Fusion Pilot Plant, E.A. Tolman et al., IAEA- FIP-P1-22 Introduction ARC,

Monte Carlo simulations for the ODIN shielding at ESS

MAGiC Shielding Simulations

DCLL Nuclear Analysis WBS Costing Mohamed Sawan University of Wisconsin-Madison Mahmoud Youssef University of California-Los Angeles ITER TBM Meeting.

Presentation transcript:

Neutronics Issues for Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan, Ahmad Ibrahim, Tim Bohm, Paul Wilson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL Project Meeting Santa Fe, NM April 8-9, 2008

HAPL Final Optics Issues Addressed Determine nuclear environment at steel vacuum vessel lining the final optics ducts as well as possible steel support for GIMM Assess impact of shielding configuration options on nuclear environment at final optics

Design Parameters Used in Analysis Target yield 367.1 MJ Rep Rate 5 Hz Fusion power 1836 MW Chamber inner radius 10.75 m Thickness of Li/FS blanket 0.6 m Thickness of SS/B4C/He shield 0.5 m Chamber outer radius 11.85 m GIMM angle of incidence 85° GIMM distance from target 24 m

Nuclear Environment at SS VV Lining Beam Duct and Possible GIMM Support 0.32 W/cc 0.63 dpa/FPY 11.5 He appm/FPY 0.15 W/cc 0.3 dpa/FPY 5 He appm/FPY 0.0006 W/cc 0.0006 dpa/FPY 0.004 He appm/FPY 1 W/cc 2 dpa/FPY 30 He appm/FPY 0.01 W/cc 0.01 dpa/FPY 0.02 He appm/FPY 0.003 W/cc 0.003 dpa/FPY 0.006 He appm/FPY

Observations on Nuclear Environment Results at SS VV All steel lining the laser beam ducts will survive the full 40 FPY plant lifetime with total cumulative damage << 200 dpa For a 1 He appm rewelding limit, rewelding will not be possible for the SS vacuum vessel lining the beam ducts except at Steel lining of the duct around the focusing and turning mirrors

Shielding Configuration Options Assessed Bio-Shield Turning (M3) GIMM (M1) Beam Duct Focusing (M2) Shield Blanket Option I: All optics including GIMM enclosed in concrete shield Good support for GIMM Eliminates streaming contribution from other ports Small volume under vacuum Might be steering streaming neutrons towards dielectric focusing and turning mirrors Might require large amount of concrete

Shielding Configuration Options Assessed Option II: Only focusing and turning mirrors enclosed in concrete shield with GIMM left in open space between chamber and larger containment building Bio-Shield Turning (M3) GIMM (M1) Focusing (M2) Shield Blanket GIMM support is challenging Large volume between chamber and containment building should be maintained under vacuum (could be reduced by using steel beam duct between chamber and bio-shield) Possible large contribution from neutrons streaming through other ports Might reduce amount of required concrete Could reduce flux at dielectric mirrors by eliminating the “steering” effect in long duct

Shielding Configuration Options Assessed Option III: Only focusing and turning mirrors enclosed in concrete shield with neutron trap added at inner surface of containment building behind GIMM Bio-Shield Turning (M3) GIMM (M1) Focusing (M2) Shield Blanket Neutron Trap GIMM support is challenging Large volume between chamber and containment building should be maintained under vacuum (could be reduced by using steel beam duct between chamber and bio-shield) Might reduce amount of required concrete Could eliminate “steering” effect in long duct Neutron traps reduce contribution from neutrons streaming through other ports

Peak Fast Neutron Flux (n/cm2s) Fast Neutron Flux at Final Optics with Different Shielding Configuration Options Option I Option II Option III Peak Fast Neutron Flux (n/cm2s) Option I Option II Option III GIMM 1.39x1013 1.37x1013 Focusing Mirror 2.36x1010 4.27x1010 4.03x1010 Turning Mirror 3.18x108 4.30x108 8.32x108

Fast Neutron Flux Distribution in Final Optics of HAPL GIMM M2 M3 Flux (n/cm2s) Option I Option II Option III

Dominating Effect for Fast Flux Level at Focusing Mirror Option I Option II Option III Which of these is the dominant effect? “Steering” of streaming neutrons in beam duct of option I Contribution from neutrons streaming through all ports in the “open” configuration of options II and III Results clearly show that dominating effect is enhanced contribution from other ports in the “open” configuration This is confirmed by comparing results for options I and II that show increased secondary neutron and gamma fluxes at focusing mirror E<0.1 MeV neutron flux is x4 higher in option II Gamma flux is x3 higher in option II

Preferred Final Optics Shielding Configuration Option I Option II Option III Preferred configuration is the original Option I where all optics including the GIMM are enclosed in concrete shield Results in lowest radiation levels at the dielectric focusing and turning mirrors Allows for better GIMM support Reduces volume inside containment building maintained under vacuum Requires the least amount of concrete Relative amount of concrete: 1, 1.12, and 1.14 for options I, II, and III

Conclusions All steel VV lining laser beam ducts will survive the full 40 FPY plant lifetime Rewelding will not be possible for SS VV lining of beam ducts except around the focusing and turning mirrors Original shielding configuration with all optics including GIMM enclosed in concrete shield is the preferred option since it yields lowest flux at dielectric mirrors, provides better GIMM support, reduces volume under vacuum, and requires least amount of concrete