Comparative political economics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE WESTMINSTER MODEL OF DEMOCRACY
Advertisements

UK Review Chart. Basics  Multinational state (4 or 5)  Unitary system  No constitution  Parliamentary Democracy  Monarch is head of state.
Lijphart, C1 Introduction: Organizing Democratic Institutions.
Linkage Institutions Political Parties, Civil Society, Interest Groups, Electoral Systems & Elections.
The Scottish Parliament
Public Policy AP Comparative Unit VI.
British Constitutionalism
Institutions: The rules of the game POLI 352A.
Spanish Politics and Society The Institutions of Spanish Democracy: Legislatives in Spanish Politics. Anthony Gilliland Office
Part 2: Governance & Policy-Making
Electoral Systems.
Linkage Institutions Political Parties, Civil Society, Interest Groups, Electoral Systems & Elections.
Weber’s ideal type of bureaucracy has all of the following features except? Hierarchical structure Task specialization Freedom of action Political neutrality.
The Swiss Political System An Introduction Second Part Presentation at the Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2010 Prof. em. Wolf Linder.
January 26,  In representative democracies, their purpose is to allow voters to express their political preferences  Elections provide an opportunity.
Politics in Britain The political system.
REGIME TYPE Presidentialism & Parliamentarism.
Federal and Unitary Systems Territorial Representation in Democratic Systems February 9 th, 2006.
Political attitudes and electoral behaviour: the role of political institutions Jacques Thomassen.
United Kingdom.
Part 2: Governance & Policy- Making Fall Organization of the State  Parliamentary Democracy  Parliamentary Sovereignty  Parliament can make or.
American Politics and Foreign Policy Separation of Power Prof. Jaechun Kim.
Comparisons…Sys tems. Electoral Systems: Single Member District Plurality vs. Proportional Representation.
A Chapter-by-Chapter Synopsis
 Regime = pattern of politics, policies, institutions  Politics = way people compete for political power  Policies = outcome of political conflict 
World Governments.
How democratic is the American Constitution?. Today… Review of the argument Your reactions to Dahl’s argument Prerequisites for democracy?
Presentation Outline II. Political Institutions a)The Executive Branch b)The Legislative Branch c)The Judicial Branch d)Electoral System e)Party System.
POLITICAL SYSTEMS I. UK.
Political Institutions. Presentation Outline 1) Presidential Systems 2) Parliamentary Systems 3) Mixed Systems 4) Authoritarian Systems 5) Party Systems.
PRESIDENTIAL AND PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEMS
Swedish Politics Helena Wockelberg PhD Department of Government, Uppsala University.
Interest Groups Interest Representation (Cont’d) March 13th, 2003.
Democratic Models and Practice: Application to Atlantic Canada Dr. D Brown Pols 322 Fall term 2010.
Political Parties Citizenship: American Government.
European Politics and Government. Characteristics of a democratic government A democracy is a form of government in which the supreme power is vested.
Institutional Design: Electoral Systems and Executive- Legislative Relations Plan for Today 1. Understand the characteristics and democratic consequences.
Special Mid-Term Exam Week TA Office Hours Dan Sadler, Monday 11:00-1:00 Brendan Derry, Monday 1:00-3:00 Kevin Gill, Tuesday 12:30-2:30 Julie Sergi, Tuesday.
Constitutions and Institutions
US AND UK CONSTITUTIONS COMPARED
Elections and Electoral Systems Election Systems First Past the Post Additional Member Supplementary Vote Closed List System Single Transferable Vote.
MacLennan-Buchanan1 Canadian Democracy Canada has both state and political institutions. State institutions are related closely to the Constitution and.
British Government Overview unitary state London Britain is a unitary state with political authority centralized in London. three branches of government.
Comparison Systems. Electoral Systems: Single Member District Plurality vs. Proportional Representation.
Patterns of Democracy.
Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Slide 1 Chapter 1, Section 2 Indirect Democracy In an indirect or representative democracy, the people elect agents.
United Kingdom. Creation of the “Constitution of the Crown” Sources of authority – Tradition – Ration-legal Magna Carta Bill of Rights Common Law (civil.
LG302 Comparative European Politics Germany: still the “Grand Coalition State”?
Comparative political economics
Comparative political economics
WHAT MAKES THE ADVANCED DEMOCRACIES DIFFERENT FROM OTHER COUNTRIES?
Global Comparative Politics (3)
Fundamentals of Law and Government
Comparative political economics
A Federal Parliamentary Democracy
Models of democracy Faculty Of Law- Constitutional Law.
Flaws in the System.
Unit 1: Foundations of Government
Government  The group of people who control and make decisions for a country, state, etc.
Constitutions and Institutions
Chapter 1: Principles of Government Section 2
A Federal Parliamentary Democracy
Retrieve your laptop AFTER class
WHAT MAKES THE ADVANCED DEMOCRACIES DIFFERENT FROM OTHER COUNTRIES?
STABILITY OF ELECTION LAW EFFECTIVE PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES
WHAT MAKES THE ADVANCED DEMOCRACIES DIFFERENT FROM OTHER COUNTRIES?
Comparison Systems.
Comparison Systems.
A Federal Parliamentary Democracy
Presentation transcript:

Comparative political economics Lecture 2 Paolo Graziano

The Westminster model of democracy Majority principle British parliamentary and governmental institutions Need for alternation that prevents ‘elective dictatorship’ Prerequisite: homogeneous societies UK, Canada… … Australia, New Zealand … … Barbados.

The case of UK I concentration of executive power in one- party and bare-majority cabinets (large minority is excluded from power) – exception with minority cabinets in the ’70s cabinet dominance vis-à-vis Parliament (but possible – although rare - vote of no confidence) two-party system: Conservative and Labour party (but recently increase of the Liberal Democrats) majoritarian (single-member districts and ‘first past the post’) and disproportional (votes vs. seats) electoral system. interest group pluralism

The case of the UK II unitary and centralized government concentration of legislative power in asymmetrical bicameral legislature: House of the Commons and House of the Lords flexible (“unwritten”) Constitution absence of judicial review: Parliament is the sovereign authority (except for EU control…) central bank controlled by the executive (1997: power to set interest rates)

The consensus model of democracy more usable for ‘plural’ societies it contributes to conflict reduction… …guaranteeing strong minorities… …limiting the power of majorities. Switzerland, Belgium … … and the European Union.

The cases of Switzerland/Belgium I executive power-sharing in broad coalition cabinets executive-legislative balance of power (possible government instability) multiparty system (religious, socioeconomic and linguistic cleavages) proportional representation interest group corporatism (agreements reached among few strong political and social actors)

The cases of Switzerland/Belgium II federal and decentralized government strong bicameralism (with the partial exception of Belgium) constitutional rigidity: need of ‘supermajorities’ in order to change judicial review (but not in Switzerland) central bank independence

A supranational case of CD: the EU I executive power-sharing in broad coalition cabinets executive-legislative balance of power multiparty system proportional representation interest group corporatism

A supranational case of CD: the EU II federal and decentralized government strong bicameralism constitutional rigidity judicial review central bank independence