Rachel Davis Valdosta State University

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

DELAWARE EARLY LITERACY INITIATIVE Dr. Jim J

Advertisements

Chapter 5 Phonemic Awareness Matt Hancock. What? It is the ability to detect, identify, and manipulate phonemes (smallest unit of spoken language that.

Phonological Awareness

Reading Fluency According to The American Heritage Dictionary of English Language (2006) fluent reading is reading in which words are recognized automatically.

H860 Reading Difficulties Week 5 Fluency Difficulties.

Wise et al. 2010—Fluency and Comprehension Fluency and Comprehension Wise et al. (2010). The relationship between different measures of oral reading fluency.

Assessment Considerations for Young Children with Cleft Palate Introduction CLEFT LIP AND/OR PALATE Cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) is the fourth most common.

Dyslexia A Brief Overview of the Law, Accommodations & Modifications for Students with Dyslexia Stephanie Lancaster, MA, LDT-C & Angie Sharbaugh-Hunt,

 Specific learning disability is defined as a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language,

Phonological Awareness Intervention with Preschool Children: Changes in Receptive Language Abilities Jodi Dyke, B.S. Tina K. Veale, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Eastern.

Early Reading First Year 3 ( ) Testing Battery Karen Erickson, PhD & Hillary Harper, M.S. CCC-SLP.

The Effects of Increased Cognitive Demands on the Written Discourse Ability of Young Adolescents Ashleigh Elaine Zumwalt Eastern Illinois University.

The assessment of language in children with learning disabilities, hearing disabilities and in children with a mental retardation A. Desoete, M. Dhondt,

Reading Disabilities Ann Morrison, Ph.D.. Predominant Reading Disabilities DyslexiaHyperlexia Defined as a language- based learning disability resulting.

Dyslexia and the Brain Dys= poor Lexis = words/language

The Idaho State Department of Education Presents: “ELLA” Early Learning Literacy Activities This program is designed to support the most important early.

Classroom Support of Literacy Development for Students Demonstrating Underlying Language and Phonological Deficits.

1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.

Regional Reading Academy: The Reading Process and Implications for Speech-Language Pathologists Tricia M. Curran, Ph.D., CCC-SLP October 2005 Introduction.

RDG 567 & RDG 568 (East Lyme Cohort) Session 3.

Examining Word Reading Efficiency Among Struggling Readers: Does Slow and Steady Win the Race? M. Pierce 1, T. Katzir 1, M. Wolf 2, G. Noam 3 1 Harvard.

Reading Success Lab Software: An Integrated Approach to Assessing and Strengthening Reading and Math Skills James M. Royer, PhD Department of Psychology.

+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.

HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver Kindergarten Readiness Screener June, 2014 HISD Summer Leadership Institute HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Introduction The Coding subtests from the Wechsler scales are a commonly used portion of the Processing Speed Index. They are widely understood to measure.

1 Assessment and Monitoring in the Primary Years

MethodMethod References Introduction Kindergarten predictors of reading skills Papadimitriou Artemis, Vlachos Filippos, University of Thessaly

: 1. cognitive evaluation non verbal 2 verbal An assessment must contain.

Dyslexia Defined: ‘All you need to know in 15 minutes!’ Mark Sherin School Radio 4 Learning Comenius Regio

| pag. 1 Dyslexia in Late Adolescence : How to Diagnose Diagnosis at the Level of Classification, Causes and Treatment Pieter Depessemier Caroline Andries.

PreK CIRCLE Progress Monitoring Training September 2015 Midland ISD.

Day 1. Literacy development Why are we here? Historical trends in beginning reading. Language and reading development.

ELLA Module 3 Assessments and Interventions. Goals for Today: Participants will be able to: Identify the four purposes for assessment. Align DIBELS assessments.

RDG 568 Practicum in Reading Class 2 Foundations of Literacy.

CHAPTER 8 DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN READING COMPREHENSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION AUTHORS: SUZANNE M. ADLOF, CHARLES A. PERFETTI, AND.

Professional Development Session

Dyslexia: To Screen or Not to Screen Wendy Stovall, Ed.S., Keri Horn, Ed.S., Amber Broadway, Ed.S., & Mary Bryant, Ed.S. Crowley’s Ridge Education Service.

WCSD-Ganley 2009 Speech-Language PLC Our Journey as a PLC Defining our next steps October 30, 2009.

Speech-Language PLC Our Journey as a PLC Defining our next steps October 30, 2009.

Rapid Automatic Naming/ Phonemic Awareness Moore Public Schools PreK, Kindergarten, and 1 st grade Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early.

Development of Rhyming Tasks in Preschool Aged Children with Hearing Loss Mary Katherine Connelly, Kaylie McNally Joan A. Luckhurst, Ph.D., CCC/SLP, faculty.

Background Purposes of the Study Methods Elayne Hansen and Dr. Marie Stadler, Ph.D. CCC-SLP  Communication Sciences and Disorders  University of Wisconsin-Eau.

Victor J Ramirez Patricial Lomeli Kimberly Kimura Dyslexia.

Phonemic Awareness Knowledge Steven Rosenberg, Ed.D. EDU 573 School of Education University of Bridgeport.

Building a Scientific Base for Practice Early literacy reports Pearson and Hiebert (2011) National reports in literacy: Building a scientific base for.

Reading Skills Assessment Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers

Working with Young readers. What to Expect…  Participant updates and Q&A since last meeting, meet the presenter  Ages and stages of reading and writing.

DEBRIEF Clinical Experience. Best Practices in Teaching Phonological Awareness and Phonics.

Introducing preLAS 2000 Gina Davis Assessment Consultant preLAS.

Ali Fay, B.S. Ed. Valdosta State University

The Effects of Exercise on Attention During Articulation Therapy

Development in the Content Domains

Early Literacy Screening: Comparing PALS-K with AIMSweb and STAR

Meredith Saletta, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, and Jenny Winberg, B.A.

Data-Driven Decision Making

Rachel Davis Valdosta State University

Does training in number knowledge improve arithmetic scores?

Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia

Speech and Language Diagnostic Report Samples

Rebekah Foster, B.S. Ed. Melissa Carter, M.S., CCC-SLP

Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia

DIBELS: An Overview Kelli Anderson Early Intervention Specialist - ECC

How are our youngest students impacted?

Preschool Focus Area 5: 5.2 – Clothing Date: Health and Safety

understanding The Reading Process Stacy Erwin, M. Ed

Chapter 3: How Standardized Test….

Presentation transcript:

Rachel Davis Valdosta State University The Relationship Between Phonological Awareness and Naming Speed in Preschool Children Rachel Davis Valdosta State University

Disclosure Statement No authors had any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest associated with the content of this presentation.

Introduction One of the main processes of single word reading is word recognition. Deficits in word reading lead to deficits in comprehension. As single word reading becomes more autonomic and fluent, more attention can be given to comprehension of what is being read

Introduction One of the strongest predictors of later reading success is phonological awareness (PA), skills associated with perceiving, manipulating, and evaluating the sounds in spoken language” (Skibbe, Gerde, Wright, & Samples-Steele, 2016). Naming speed is a more complex speed of processing ability. NS Screeners help identify those with dyslexia.

Purpose and Hypothesis

Methods Participants: 2 typically developing 4 yr/old male and female who had not yet begun kindergarten Phonological awareness: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals – Fourth Edition (CELF-4) Naming speed: Arkansas Rapid Automatized Naming Screener (AR-RAN) Both tests were administered to each participant

Results (CELF-4) subtest for phonological awareness: Participant A: raw score = (15/30) Participant B: raw score = (22/40) Criterion score for age 5:0- 5:5 = (>8). Rapid-automatized naming test, AR-RAN Participant A: time- 3:36 total errors- 11 Participant B: time- 1:46, total errors- 3

Conclusion Experimental question: Can a RAN screener be tested with children younger than kindergarten and does it have a relationship with phonological awareness at such a young age? Results indicate that a RAN screener using colors can be used and that it does it have a relationship with PA at the age of 4.

Relation of Data to Hypothesis This research has indicated to not support the hypothesis that a rapid-automatized naming screener used on children younger than kindergarten will not have a relationship with phonological awareness at such a young age.