UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASEP -- Proposal for CVT -- GRB informal meeting # January 2009 JASIC GRBIG-ASEP
Advertisements

R59 : ASEP P. Steenackers / R. Valgaeren56 th GRB 4 SEP 2012 Informal document GRB (56th GRB, 3-5 September 2012, agenda item 4)
59 th GRB (28-30 January 2014) JASIC Japan proposal for Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle 1 Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle: GVM ≤ 2.5 ton PMR (power to mass ratio)
Some observations on the base of the ASEP dBase Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA.
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, sections 3.2 and 3.3 Determination of engine speeds, calculation of available power.
Reproducibility of NL ASEP proposal Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA.
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
Datum (Tag.Monat.Jahr) OICA Method – short overview IG ASEP, Japan – Draft for an OICA presentation FG. GRBIG-ASEP
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
19-21 September 2011 JASIC Kei-truck of N1 Informal document GRB (54th GRB, September 2011, agenda item 3(b))
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Transmitted by the expert from Germany The French/German ASEP proposal Informal.
Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
UN/ECE GRB R41WG DEG conclusions 8 August General - 1 In February 2007, GRB agreed: In February 2007, GRB agreed: That ISO362-2 is practical and.
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
4.6 Model Direct Variation
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.
Anchor points in ASEP the shifting in the various proposals as the chairman has understood it ASEP meeting June 2008 v4.
ASEP Test Results CVT & Hybrid Vehicles GRB informal meeting # September 2007 JASIC.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
GRB – ASEP – 08 Criteria to compare proposals Den Hagg – September 2007.
Additional ASEP data GRB IG ASEP sept 2007 By the Netherlands.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
WLTP-DHC Gear shift analysis Proposed by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 6-7 July 2011 Stockholm, Sweden.
Motorcycle Noise Emission
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview R51 ASEP IWG July 2017.
ASEP, items for clarification
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
ASEP -- Revision of D/F and OICA methods --
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Noise problems and driving conditions in China based on ECE R51.03
Off-cycles principles
ASEP, a way to analyse methods
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Box and Whisker Plots 50% Step 1 – Order the series.
“Reference Sound Assessment”
ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
UN QRTV GTR Informal Working Group 6th session – Baltimore, USA, May 2018 Regulation (EU) No 540/2014: commonalities and differences with UN R
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Replacement exhaust systems
IMMA proposal for a test procedure towards real driving conditions
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP Annex 7 General Process Subroutine Vehicle Testing Subroutine
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
CLEPA Input for 3rd IWG ASEP meeting
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
GRB informal group R51.03 Annex 10
Presentation transcript:

UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview

ASEP overview ◆Overview of the regulation ◆Reference point To assess the amount of change in WOT noise relative to the engine speed. The criterion are below the linear slope of 5 dB/1,000 rpm for higher engine speeds and 0* dB/ 1,000 rpm for lower engine speeds in relation to the reference point +3 dB. The regulation applies to Class III (PMR>50) only. ◆Reference point  -The same as Lwot at the time of measuring Lurban (in case of measurement using the two gears, select the one for the lower gear). 0 Engine revolutions in front of microphone nPP’ Full-throttle noise value dB Reference point Upper limit point Regulatory value 3dB Lower limit point 5dB/1000rpm slope 0dB/1000rpm slope Test result image <Non-conformance area> <Conformance area> (*1dB from 2017) P P' B B' A A' Microphones (Throttle fully closed) (Wide open throttle) Test course overview

ASEP overview ◆Upper limit point  - The vehicle speed nAA’ at point AA’ is adjusted so that the engine speed nBB’ at point BB’ could satisfy the below and WOT noise level is measured.   nBB’=0.85×(s-nidle)+nidle (PMR≤66)   nBB’=3.4×PMR-0.33(s-nidle)+nidle (PMR>66)   The selected gear shall be 2nd. If the 3rd gear satisfies requirements of nBB' and vBB', 3rd shall be used. If the 4th gear satisfies requirements of nBB' and vBB', 4th shall be used. 0 Engine revolutions in front of microphone nPP’ Full-throttle noise value dB Reference point Upper limit point Regulatory value 3dB Lower limit point 5dB/1000rpm slope 0dB/1000rpm slope Test result image <Non-conformance area> <Conformance area> (However, VBB’≤80km/h) s: rated engine speed nidle: Enging speed at idle P P' B B' A A' Microphones (Throttle fully closed) (Wide open throttle) Test course overview ◆Lower limit point  - The vehicle speed VAA’ is adjusted so that the engine speed nAA’ at point AA’ could satisfy the below the WOT noise level is measured.   nAA’=0.1×(s-nidle)+nidle  (However, VAA’≧20km/h)   No specification of gear selection for the measurement.

ASEP overview ◆Evaluation method of the final result 0 Engine revolutions in front of microphone nPP’ Full-throttle noise value dB Reference point Upper limit point Regulatory value 3dB Lower limit point 5dB/1000rpm slope 0dB/1000rpm slope Test result image <Non-conformance area> <Conformance area> ◆Evaluation method of the final result  - Noise value is plotted against engine speed in front of microphone nPP’.  - Measurement is required at least for the reference and upper limit points; Additional test points are allowed.  - Criteria must be met at all points within the range from lower to upper ASEP limit lines.  - If the change of nBB’ is limited to less than 0.05×(s-nidle) against the reference point, the ASEP does not apply (in case of some CVT vehicles). P P' B B' A A' Microphones (Throttle fully closed) (Wide open throttle) Test course overview

ASEP control range ASEP control range Example 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th vBB' < 80 km/h nBB' < 0.85 * (S - nidle) + nidle (PMR < 66)     3.4 * PMR - 0.33 * (S - nidle) + nidle (PMR > 66) 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th ASEP control range nAA' > 0.1 * (S - nidle) + nidle vAA' > 20 km/h #/n

Limit (shown by the graph) Example Line with slope of 5dB/1000min-1 Line with slope of 1dB/1000min-1 * 3dB Lwot,(i) Reference point full throttle acceleration test ・vPP’ = 50km/h ・the same gear(i) as tested in Annex3 Any measurements shall be within this area. nwot,(i) * 0dB/1000min-1 until the end of 2016 #/n

Example of ASEP measurement

Example of ASEP measurement G vehicle: MT model Maximum output=29kW; vehicle weight=168 kg; PMR=119.3; s=14000rpm; nidle=1600rpm Desk study results of test conditions Gear Upper limit point Lower limit point nBB’=10300rpm nAA’=2840rpm VBB’(km/h) VAA’(km/h) 2nd 61.8 17.0 3rd 77.7 21.4 4th 93.8 25.9 ◆Reference point  Third gear VPP’=50km/h (Lurban: Measured with third gear) ◆Upper limit point  nBB’=3.4×PMR-0.33(s-nidle)+nidle =10300  VBB’≦80km/h ◆Lower limit point  nAA’=0.1×(s-nidle)+nidle =2840  VAA’≧20km/h It is expected that 3rd gear will be employed for the upper limit measurement and 4th gear for the lower limit. Reference point test result Gear L R VAA’ VPP’ VBB’ nPP’ 3rd 1 76.1 77.6 41.9 50.1 57.4 6589 2 76.8 42.4 50.7 58.1 6668 3 76.7 77.2 40.5 49.2 57.0 6471 Average 76.5 41.6 50.0 57.5 6576 Final test result Upper limit value test result Gear L R VAA’ VPP’ VBB’ nPP’ nBB’ 3rd 1 82.7 81.9 65.9 71.8 77.9 9443 10246 2 66.4 71.9 9457 3 82.2 67.0 72.8 78.1 9575 10272 Average 82.4 82.3 72.2 78.0 9492 10254 ASEP試験の試験方法の説明となります。 Regulatory value (~2016) Upper limit point (2017~) Reference point Lower limit point Lower limit value test result Gear L R VAA’ VPP’ VBB’ nPP’ nAA’ 4th 1 70.7 71.1 26.3 34.0 39.9 3706 2867 2 70.8 26.2 33.8 39.7 3684 2856 3 25.9 34.2 40.1 3728 2823 Average 71.0 26.1 2848

Example of ASEP measurement - If exemption provisions apply. ASEP exemption: If the variation of the exit engine speed nBB’ relative to the reference point is below 0.05×(s-nidle), then the ASEP does not apply. Vehicle H: CVT model; Max. output = 37.7kW; Vehicle weight =250 kg; PMR=116; s=7500rpm; nidle=1300 rpm Reference point Upper limit point Lower limit point Std. nPP’ (rpm) <Reference> Final test result Lwot (dB) ◆Reference point  VPP’=50km/h ◆Upper limit point  nBB’=3.4×PMR-0.33(s-nidle)+nidle =5691  VBB’≦80km/h ◆Lower limit point  nAA’=0.1×(s-nidle)+nidle =1920  VAA’≧20km/h Test result Vehicle speed (km/h) Engine speed (rpm) Noise(dB) Condition VAA’ VPP’ VBB’ nAA’ nPP’ nBB’ L R Upper limit VBB’≦80 72.5 75.4 80.0 nBB’≦5691 3879 4585 4810 78.3 79.3 Reference point - 41.6 50.0 60.1 3112 4437 4804 77.5 80.2 Lower limit VAA’≧20 20.0 40.6 56.2 nAA’≧1920 2379 5094 5112 80.6 82,3 Differences from the value at reference point nBB’ 4,804 rpm are below “0.05×(s-nidle)=310rpm” for both upper and lower limits, and therefore the exemption applies. As it is unable to adjust the engine speed, measurements are made at VAA’=20km/h and VBB’=80km/h.

Questions or comments can be addressed to Daniela Leveratto, IMMA Technical Director, at the following email: d.leveratto@immamotorcycles.org Thank you!