Report to CETIS EC SIG Meeting

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

18 March 2004 Colin Milligan funded by. © RELOAD 2003, funded by Workshop Structure Session I Introduction: Interoperability and Reload Session II Content.

Advertisements

Learning Technology Standards A Layperson's Guide to Who s Who and What s What Updated November 25, 2002 by Jonathan Dean Oracle iLearning Product Management.

NATO/PfP ADL Capabilities Name of unitA part of what branch or root unit Number of employees Has the unit A test environment (y/n) Describe any.

The Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative and the Handle System William H Blackmon, PhD Chief Technical Officer Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative.

Design and Implementation of WBT System Components and Test Tools for WBT content standard K. Nakabayashi, Y. Kubota(NTT-X,Inc./ Advanced Learning Infrastructure.

RELOAD Reusable E-Learning Object Authoring and Delivery Phil Beauvoir Colin Milligan funded by.

Copyright © 2001 Bolton Institute Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards CETIS an introduction and overview Lisa Corley CETIS Pedagogy.

© Copyright 2008 KERIS and IMS Global Learning Consortium All Rights Reserved. Issues in Common Cartridge and SCORM Yong-Sang Cho Principal researcher.

Overview of IMS Content Packaging Sheila MacNeill.

Standardisation Issues in eLearning by Diptendu Dutta AUNWESHA Presented at IEEE Computer Chapter 19 th October, 2001.

© 2001 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 Interoperability: future- proofing CAA Niall Sclater CETIS Manager,

IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Report to Plugfest 9 Prepared by Robby Robson Chair, LTSC February 23, 2005 LTSC This work.

University of Piraeus Department of Technology Education and Digital Systems Centre for Research and Technology - Hellas(C.E.R.T.H.) Informatics and Telematics.

Trends & Issues: Breakout Session Robby Robson Standards Evangelist.

Reusable Learning Objects V i r t u a l C o l l e g e Kristi Lozano Director of Distance Education.

E-Learning: No Standards; No Coalitions - No Boom Ed Walker 7 December 2000.

ALFANET September 23th, 2005UNFOLD-PROLEARN workshopValkenburg Authoring a full life cycle model in standards-based adaptive elearning Peter van Rosmalen.

IM Lab NCCU 1 Introduction of SCORM: Sharable Content Object Reference Model Hao-Chuan Wang Computer Science Department National Chengchi University 2003.

Educational Modelling Language (EML): Adding instructional design to existing learning technology specifications Rob Koper

FREMA: e-Learning Framework Reference Model for Assessment David Millard Yvonne Howard IAM, DSSE, LTG University of Southampton, UK.

Asst.Prof.Dr.Surasak Mungsing. By: Akshay Kumar Sharable Content Object Reference Model.

Wednesday, October 22, E-Learning Objects: The Value of SCORM and MPEG-7 Packaging for Digital Media Assets TRACK 3: TEACHING AND LEARNING Thursday,

MSc Education Supporting Infrastructure Emil Doychev Vladimir Valkanov University of Plovdiv Bulgaria.

Warwick Bailey, Director Icodeon Ltd Cambridge, UK.

Why E-Learning Standards?

Update: © Copyright 2002, Carnegie Mellon University All Right Reserved 1/59 ADL/SCORM - What Does it Mean for Developers of ICT Projects? Daniel.

IT Standards for Learning

SCORM By: Akshay Kumar. SCORM 2 What we want? What is SCORM? What is SCORM? Connection with e-learning Connection with e-learning Application of XML Technology.

Implementing IMS Common Cartridge Warwick Bailey, Director Icodeon Ltd Cambridge, UK.

Eduworks EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS Robby Robson Eduworks Corporation CELL:

Accelerating e-Learning Interoperability Introducing the CLEO Lab Tyde Richards IBM Mindspan Solutions Daniel R. Rehak Carnegie Mellon University.

Equal Opportunity Representative Training Tools. EOR Training Tools New and innovative training tools are being developed and are readily available via.

Dr David Massart, EUN AgLRs – Budapest, Hungary Nov. 2, 2009 Reusable Learning Content Discovery and Exchange.

Standards and interoperability - a Norwegian perpective Project Coordinator Tore Hoel, the Norwegian eStandard project

THE ADVANCED DISTRIBUTED LEARNING (ADL) INITIATIVE

Collaborative Learning Environments A Conceptual Framework by Claude Martin.

Best Practices for ADL Registry Metadata Thursday, August 29, 2007 Nina Pasini Deibler Joint ADL Co-Lab.

Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Niall Sclater, and Lorna M. Campbell,

Thursday, November 6, E-Learning Objects: The Value of SCORM and MPEG-7 Packaging for Digital Media Assets Interactivity Cesar Bandera, Director.

IEEE Learning Technology Standards AICC MEETING – FEB 2004.

EXact Suite Where are we going? Rome, 09/03/2015 The eXact Roadmap.

May 10, 2002 Les Smith, SCT Standards in Distance Education S.

An Overview of Learning Technology Specifications and Standards Bill Olivier Director, CETIS.

Origins of IMS Learning Design & its conceptual framework, Oleg Liber, CETIS May 2008.

The Perfect SCORM Sharable Content Objects. Agenda  Welcome – Who Are We  History Of SCORM (RLOs)  SCORM Solution  The Need For SCORM  Do We Need.

SCORM Course Meta-data 3 major components: Content Aggregation Meta-data –context specific data describing the packaged course SCO Meta-data –context independent.

Content and Tools Standards Will Ellis, Head of Digital Learning Resources “We need better digital resources more widely available and more flexible learning.

TransformAble and Sakai Anastasia Cheetham, Jutta Treviranus ATRC, University of Toronto.

Patricia Ploetz, ABD Academic ADL Co-Lab University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Canadian Association for Distance Education Wise And Witty Weekday Presentation.

Overview Collected learning resources Competencies Registry/ Authority Course Delivery system Student Pedagogy Tests/ assessment Activities Communication.

CETIS Assessment SIG Rowin Cross CETIS Assessment SIG, University of Strathclyde.

SCORM-kooskõlaliste õpihaldussüsteemide arendamisest Andres Mellik Tallinna Ülikool Veebruar 2006.

CETIS Further Education Focus Group Steve Jeyes Newark and Sherwood College Edexcel International Edinburgh 21st June 2002 Valkenburg Report.

United States Army Combined Arms Center A next generation simulation architecture supporting both Computer Generated Forces (CGF) and SAF operations Provides.

Introduction to Learning Technology Interoperability Standards & CETIS Lorna M. Campbell CETIS Assistant Director Glenrothes College, August 2003.

Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Lorna M. Campbell and Boon Low CETIS and the University of Strathclyde LMC, SURF Presentation, April 2002.

Third meeting of the Valkenburg Group  Informal network of EML implementers and developers.  Established following the “Developing an EML Authoring and.

CETIS Educational Content Special Interest Group 6 th Meeting, University of London Library 25 February 2003 Sarah Currier Coordinator CETIS EC SIG Centre.

RELOAD Overview Bill Olivier Bolton Institute. RELOAD Aims Standards-based Editor and Runtime toolset –Metadata –Content Packaging –SCORM (& ideally Simple.

Specs & Standards Update: December 2003

IMS Update Content Packaging; InterActive Content SIG

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Innovative Distributive Training and Information Platform

EQ101 review - 1.

Accessing HEE e-LfH’s e-learning content from a local LMS

Minneapolis, MN -- Feburary 3, 2003

Il processo di standardizzazione della formazione in rete

SCORM Runtime Integration

Interoperability in Action

End-to-End Reconfigurability (E2R)

Presentation transcript:

Report to CETIS EC SIG Meeting SCORM By Scott Wilson, CETIS Report to CETIS EC SIG Meeting 25 Feb. 2003, London

The ADL Organisation US Department of Defence Research and development labs: Washington Florida Wisconsin (Ottawa) (Telford)

SCORM requirements Replace CBT material with web material Support tracking of learner activity in an LMS Support a conformance programme Usable by DoD, US Armed Forces, and associated government entities

SCORM Components IMS Content Packaging IMS Metadata AICC Computer Managed Instruction ECMAScript Runtime model IMS Simple Sequencing (1.3) IMS QTI (1.3? Or 1.4?)

SCORM users National Guard Bureau NUSWC US Army USMC US Navy Canadian DND

When to use SCORM 1.2 Materials are delivered by web browser Materials use must be tracked by the LMS Learners operate independently Learners work self-paced

SCORM 1.3 Adds Sequencing Usable in programmed instruction and adaptive programmed instruction scenarios

Strengths Vendor support Large user community Based on IMS specs

Weaknesses Not intended for non-military use Some metadata vocabs unsuitable Single, self-paced learner only Can only be used with browser-delivered learning Relies upon controlled browser configuration

Where SCORM is headed V1.4 V2.0+ QTI integration Digital repository management V2.0+ Semantic web and other new technologies AI/Intelligent Tutoring Simulation integration (HLA)

Finding out more CETIS ADL http://www.cetis.ac.uk http://www.adlnet.org