A Cautionary Tale about Hazard Ratios

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An examination of the Named Person Role in Practice.
Advertisements

Making a Difference: Measuring Your Outcomes Montgomery County Volunteer Center February 4, 2014 Pam Saussy and Barry Seltser, Consultants.
CPS Recidivism Associated with a Home Visiting Program: A Quasi Experimental Analysis Ed Byrnes, Ph.D. Eastern Washington University Michael Lawson, M.S.
Determining Your Program’s Health and Financial Impact Using EPA’s Value Proposition Brenda Doroski, Director Center for Asthma and Schools U.S. Environmental.
“It’s All About the Data” The Interface of Evaluation, Program Development, and Partnership to Address Substance Abuse and Reduce Child Abuse and Neglect.
Getting Started With Intake & CPS Process. Developmental Competencies SW Understands the roles and tasks of the intake process SW Understands.
ARIZONA PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR TITLE I - D, Part 2 SUBGRANTEES Barbara J. Presler, Arizona Department of Education Title I, Part D Coordinator Orlenda.
“If you don’t know where you are going, how are you gonna’ know when you get there?” Yogi Berra Common Elements of Strong Program Evaluation THEORY OF.
Steve Aos Assistant Director Washington State Institute for Public Policy Phone: (360) Institute Publications:
Challenges and Successes Treating Adolescent Substance Use Disorders Janet L. Brody, Ph.D. Center for Family and Adolescent Research (CFAR), Oregon Research.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
ENHANCING FAMILY GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH FAMILIES EXPERIENCING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE April 8, 2010.
Performance and Progress 2005/2006. Introduction  Data collected during 2005/2006 fiscal year.  Who did our programs serve?  Did programs reach the.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
The Children’s Data Network: An Update… September 2, 2015.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Participation for All: Curriculum Corporation Conference Tony Keenan Chief Executive Officer Hanover Welfare Services.
Performance and Progress 2006/2007. Introduction Data collected during 2006/2007 fiscal year. Who did our programs serve? Did programs reach the intended.
Great Start Collaborative-Wayne Collaborative Meeting November 16, 2015.
NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.
Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services Family Resource Centers Differential Response The Center for Human Services Fiscal Academy Fiscal.
Learning & Leisure Services Early Years and Childcare Promoting Attachment through the Solihull Approach.
CAPTA and Beyond: Referrals for developmental screenings for children involved with child welfare Introduction to Frequently Asked Questions Online Resource.
FAQ Maternal, Infant & Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs.
Overview of the NYS Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs NYS Care Management Coalition May 20, 2016.
Making the most of your 24 hours. Advance Planning  What’s your 24-hour coverage strategy?  Message strategy  Secure your allies/partners/sponsors.
Peer to Peer Session on Parent Leadership Jim Redmon, Kansas Children’s Cabinet and Trust Fund Jackie Counts, Institute of Educational Research & Public.
CHIP EDUCATION PROJECT EVALUATION. A pre-post study to determine the impact of the Navigators Program on service patterns and estimated costs (1 year.
Can You Enhance Knowledge and Stimulate Excellence One STEM Unit at a Time? AEA – October 16, 2014 Panel: Evaluating STEM Professional Development Interventions.
Make a Move: An Intervention to Reduce Childhood Obesity Kimberly Nerud, PhD, RN International Rural Nursing Conference Rapid City, South Dakota July 19,
Welcome! These slides are designed to help you think through presenting your benchmark planning and progress. Feel free to pick and choose the slides that.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
A Long and Winding Road: Long-Term Implementation of a Rural College Access Program AEA Annual Conference, Denver, CO October 15-18, 2014.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
Jefferson County: ESY Information and Procedures
Upcoming Changes in Dane County system
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
An introduction to Survival analysis and Applications to Predicting Recidivism Rebecca S. Frazier, PhD JBS International.
Upcoming Changes in Dane County System
Dana Keener, PhD Tina Gaudiano, MA, LPC Carolyn Turner, BA
First 5 in 2017: Policy Outlook & System Approach
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
TITLE IV-E WAIVER SITE VISIT
Darrington Family Support and Resource Center
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes 2016
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
2.6: Data System Business Process Maps
Unlocking Student Potential
Child Find: Project SEEK
Emily McDonald – General Manager, Practice Quality & Evaluation
Child Care Research Roundtable
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Conducting Propensity Score Matching and Survival Analysis to Predict Recidivism for a Home Visitation Program Case Study, and Applying Results Propensity.
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Early Start Bereavement Pathway
Evaluating Your Home Visiting Program
Denver Office of Children’s Affairs
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
2.6: Data System Business Process Maps
First 5 Sonoma County Triple P Implementation & Evaluation
HV CoIIN Measures Maternal Depression
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
Work Group #2 Emerging Solutions and Technologies
Proposal Development Support & Planning
Established in Minneapolis in 1982
Department of Social Services Home Visiting Program
Supporting Families Together Association
Region IV CCDF Conference – Atlanta, Georgia
Presentation transcript:

A Cautionary Tale about Hazard Ratios Communicating Technical Findings to Lay Audiences Shannon Williams, PhD AEA Conference | Atlanta, GA October 26, 2016 - Story about this study and my role leading an evaluation that I ultimately don’t understand

History of Past Program Evaluations CPS look-up study conducted annually since 2001 Consistently “positive” results for CPS outcomes comparing pre and post program referrals Half of B&B parents had a prior history of CPS referral (including as the victim) Look-up showed only a small proportion of the B&B parent cohort had any CPS contact one year after their case closure

Comparing CPS Referrals Pre/Post Past Evaluations| Comparing CPS Referrals Pre/Post n = 2,512 Pre Program Post Program Substantiated Inconclusive Unfounded/UK Receiving 8+ Hours of HV Programming (2010-2014) No history

New Evaluation Design | Requirement from Major Funder Corporation for National and Community Service has funded organization nearly $1million/year for 90 B&B members, since 2000 New evaluation requirements for grantees receiving $500k or more to demonstrate higher level of evidence Programmatically not feasible to conduct RCT, quasi-experimental the highest level of evidence Uses national service to staff home visitors Corporation for National and Community Service has funded nearly $1million/year for 90 B&B members, since 2000. AmeriCorps members commit 1-4 years of service as Home Visitors and Family Resource Center Aides

Screen Shot 2016-10-26 at 7.54.16 AM.png The findings of this study provide strong evidence that Birth & Beyond home visitation supports Sacramento County parents and their families by reducing the risk of child welfare referrals after participating in the program.

Challenges | Communicating Results from New Evaluation Educate evaluation audiences about predictive studies Describe findings to lay-audiences in non- technical language Balance significance of findings, with study caveats Facilitate process with only a superficial understanding of statistical analysis

Summarizing Significant Findings All percentage differences in this table refer to hazards ratios, which give the probability difference of recidivism at t time X, provided that the individual has not already recidivated.

Client Eager to Communicate Results to Secondary Audiences Program Staff & Board of Directors Additional Funders Nurturing Parenting Program (NPP) Developers/Users County Child Welfare Agency In addition: Parents with 25-36 hours of HV were 57% less likely to have a ANY TYPE OF REFERRAL over a four-year period than non-HV parents.

Likelihood to recidivate generally increases over time. Shows likelihood to have a substantiated case at each period in time (if not previously recidivated). Remember that this is a predictive model, rather than what actually happened (see previous study)

Developed Language for Client to Communicate Evaluation

Great News Gone Awry… Study generated excitement and enthusiasm in client organization and in social service community Used evaluation findings as basis to secure additional funding Language intended to make study transparent to general public… … begun to raise questions with technical reviewers from the secondary audiences Tendency for audience to make straightforward, arithmetic calculations Language matters

Example of ‘Explanation Drift’ Parents who had previously come to the attention of child welfare services…. ORIGINAL | …and had 25-34 hours of B&B home visitation lessons, were 173% less likely to have a future substantiated allegation of child abuse than those who had not received B&B services. CORRECTED | …but did not receive B&B home visitation services, had 173% greater odds of having a future substantiated allegation of child abuse than those who received 25-34 hours of B&B services.

Lessons Learned | Transitioning from observational to predictive evaluations Make connections for client early-on regarding study limitations Simplify communication by reporting only most significant findings and numbers Budget time and resources for communicating findings beyond standard report for primary audience Use analyst to present findings