Renal Denervation Next Steps

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: Magnitude of the Problem Power Over Pressure
Advertisements

Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. Today’s discussion may regard information or indications not evaluated by.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Treatment of Hypertension Chapter 25 Richard E. Gilbert, Doreen Rabi, Pierre LaRochelle, Lawrence.
HOME AND AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING
Blood Pressure Control By Randomized Drug Group In ALLHAT William C. Cushman, Charles E. Ford, Paula T. Einhorn, Jackson T. Wright, Jr., Richard A. Preston,
Definitions and classification of office blood pressure levels (mmHg) Modified by ESC Guidelines 2013 CARDIOcheckAPP.
10/5/2015. Hypertension GuidelinesDate JNC JNC JNC NICE Guidelines 2011 ESC / ESH Hypertension Guidelines ESC Guideline2007.
Blood pressure control in primary health care WORKSHOP
Template Title Speaker Name Subtitle. Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Grant/Research Support Consulting Fees/Honoraria Major Stock Shareholder/Equity.
A Global Perspective on Blood Pressure Treatment and Control in a Referred Cohort of Hypertensive Patients Bramlage P, et al. J Clin Hyper. doi: /j x.
A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension
Renal denervation for resistant hypertension: it’s time to reconsider!
Title of Presentation Presenter Name, Designation Presenter 2 Name, Designation Presenter 3 Name, Designation.
2007 Hypertension as a Public Health Risk January, 2007.
Strategies to Improve Inadequate Guide Catheter Support John S Douglas Jr MD S Tanveer Rab MD Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia Sunday.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Renal Denervation on 24-Hour Ambulatory.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Renal Denervation in Moderate Treatment-Resistant.
Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. A reminder that this is a discussion of SYMPLICITY trial results and their.
Device Therapy Paul A. Sobotka, MD Professor of Medicine/Cardiology
Dr John Cox Diabetes in Primary Care Conference Cork
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
Prairie Cardiovascular, Springfield, IL US
Update on therapy-resistant hypertension:
US ROX HTN Clinical Trial Design: Reason and Rational
Clinical Trials and Outcomes with DES in CTO Revascularization
David Antecol, M.D., FACC, FASH, FRCP(C) Specialist in Clinical Hypertension (American Society of Hypertension) Disclosures: None.
Opportunities for Intervention
Paul A. Sobotka, MD Professor of Medicine/Cardiology
The Vessix Global Clinical Program REDUCE-HTN: REINFORCE
Critical Appraisal of Devices for the Management of Hypertension
Hypertension November 2016
JNC VIII Hypertension.
Thomas F. Lüscher, FESC, FAHA, FRCP
Catheter-based Renal Denervation with the Symplicity System Provides Safe and Durable Blood Pressure Reduction out to Three Years Horst Sievert1, Henry.
OneShot™ Renal Denervation System
FDA Pathway to Approval: Clinical Requirements for Renal Denervation
Critical Appraisal of the Current Ongoing Study Designs
Claret Cerebral Protection Device: Implications of the Sentinel Study
From ESH 2016 | POS 7D: Jan Rosa, MD
Jan B. Pietzsch1, Benjamin P. Geisler1, Murray D. Esler 2
Optimizing Valve Sizing: Role of CT vs. Echo
Laura Mauri, M.D., M.Sc. Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Medtronic Cardiovascular,
A randomized controlled trial of distal renal denervation vs conventional mode of the intervention for treatment of resistant hypertension Stanislav Pekarskiy.
Surgical Mitral Valve Repair: What is the Gold Standard?
Mapping Sympathetic Nerve Distribution for
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Chemical Renal Denervation Update and Future Directions
Renal Denervation for Non-Hypertensive Indications
SYMPLICITY HTN-3: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Refractory Hypertension: Post Hoc.
What’s New in the 2013 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guideline
Hypertension Hanna K. Al-Makhamreh, MD FACC Interventional Cardiology.
Neuro-Hormonal vs Structural Hypertension why they require different approaches Paul A. Sobotka Chief Medical Officer Rox Medical, Inc.
The Ardian Catheter Based Approach to Renal Denervation to Treat Refractory HTN: Results of the EU Randomized Clinical Trial Krishna Rocha-Singh, M.D.,
Renal Sympathetic Denervation: The Academic View
TRANSCATHETER MITRAL VALVE IMPLANTATION FOR SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION: THE TENDYNE GLOBAL FEASIBILITY TRIAL 1 YEAR OUTCOMES David WM Muller, MBBS,
Renal Denervation Rises From the Ashes
Resistant Hypertension: Initial Combinations of Medications
A Randomized, Prospective, Intercontinental Evaluation of a Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent: the CENTURY II Trial: an Update with 2 Years.
Controlling High Blood Pressure
Table of Contents Why Do We Treat Hypertension? Recommendation 5
Controlling Elevated Blood Pressure
Primary Hypertension Max C. Reif, M.D.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Hypertension November 2016
Clinician Referral Training
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Transcatheter versus medical treatment of symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity score matched analysis Maurizio Taramasso MD, PhD from.
Presentation transcript:

Renal Denervation Next Steps Considerations for Trial Design in Moderate Hypertension David E. Kandzari, MD, FACC, FSCAI Chief Scientific Officer Director, Interventional Cardiology Piedmont Heart Institute Atlanta, Georgia david.kandzari@piedmont.org

Disclosure Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company Grant/Research Support Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic CardioVascular, Biotronik, Thoratec Consulting Fees/Honoraria Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic CardioVascular, Micell Technologies Major Stock Shareholder/Equity None Royalty Income None Ownership/Founder None Intellectual Property Rights None Other Financial Benefit None

Actions following SYMPLICITY HTN 3 Conducted hundreds of analyses on HTN-3 and prior clinical data Identified The Key Areas for Next Trial Design Discussions with Physician Advisors, Payers, & Regulators Initiated Multiple new Pre-Clinical Studies to Test Hypotheses

SYMPLICITY HTN 3: Confounding Factors Drug Changes and Variable Patient Adherence Study Population Procedural experience and variability

Procedure Issue: Incomplete renal denervation and procedural variability significantly impact blood pressure reductions Alternative: Symplicity Spyral™ Expand procedure to include renal artery branches

NE Concentration (pg/mg) Combined Branch & Main Artery Treatment: Effective in Reducing Renal NE in Normotensive Pigs I V Y Y2 N 12 12 12 12 500 400 200 300 100 71% * † ‡ § 83% 92% 91% NE Concentration (pg/mg) Control Main Branch Branch + Main One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s *P=0.0003. †P<0.0001. ‡P<0.0001. §P<0.0001. Melder et al. TCT 2014. Branch + Main x2 Treatment

Medications Issue: Medication changes and variable adherence were potential confounders in SYMPLICITY HTN-3. Many patients changed medications during HTN-3. Drug adherence not measured, but likely a key uncontrolled variable. The mechanisms of action of antihypertensive drugs and RDN overlap, with unknown effect on impact of RDN on BP. Alternative: Consider Pharma model: Obtain off-meds data Standardize drug regimen Measure drug adherence

Study Population Issue: The population studied in HTN-3 differed from other SYMPLICITY studies. Severe resistant HTN on 5 medications including a diuretic with ≥3 at maximal tolerated dose US Study Large African American cohort Obese (average BMI ~35) Large variability in control group BP response in HTN-3 by geographic area and by ethnic group Alternative: Change enrollment BP criteria Not focused on maximum-tolerated meds & severe trHTN Avoid changing patient behavior and medication patterns

2013 ESH/ESC Hypertension Guidelines: Co-Morbidity Risk Matrix Other Risk Factors, Asymptomatic Organ Damage or Disease Blood Pressure (mmHg) High Normal SBP 130–139 or DBP 85–89 Grade 1 HT SBP 140–159 or DBP 90–99 Grade 2 HT SBP 160–179 or DBP 100–109 Grade 3 HT SBP ≥180 or DBP ≥110 No other RF Low risk Moderate risk High risk 1–2 RF Moderate to high risk ≥3 RF Low to Moderate risk OD, CKD stage 3 or diabetes High to Very high risk Symptomatic CVD, CKD stage ≥4 or diabetes with OD/RFs Very high risk BP=blood pressure; CKD=chronic kidney disease; CV=cardiovascular; CVD=cardiovascular disease; DBP=diastolic blood pressure; HT=hypertension; OD=organ damage; RF=risk factor; SBP=systolic blood pressure. Mancia G, et al. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2159-219.

Spyral HTN Global Clinical Program HTN-3 Factor Identified Alternative Spyral™ Catheter Combined Main + Branch VesselTreatment Med Standardization Off-Meds No Max Dose Titration Focus on ABPM Less Severe Hypertension Fewer Prescribed Meds Procedural Medications Study Population

SPYRAL HTN Global Clinical Program* Off Meds On Meds RDN Sham 3M 6M Titrate Meds Phase A Phase B *Pending appropriate regulatory body review

Summary The Spyral HTN Global Clinical Trial program is intended to address the confounding factors identified in SYMPLICITY HTN-3. The on- and off-antihypertensive studies will allow better understanding of the impact of medication on renal denervation. The Spyral HTN clinical program is being actively discussed with global regulatory bodies.