Author : Jaihyung Cho jaihyung@etri.re.kr Draft Titles draft-jaihyung-ccamp-arpsignal-00.txt “Use of ARP and Flood Routing Technique for LSP setup in ECPN” Other Submitted Drafts : - draft-jaihyung-ccamp-lserequirement-00.txt “Requirement for (G)MPLS implantation over Ethernet” - draft-jaihyung-ccamp-lseframework-00.txt “Framework for (G)MPLS implementation in Ethernet based Customer Premise Network” Author : Jaihyung Cho jaihyung@etri.re.kr 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005

Proposal : Use GMPLS Control for Bridge Ethernet QoS need Reservation L2 LSP may be a Cost-effective Solution for Ethernet QoS 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005

Issue : RSVP may not be appropriate for Ethernet Ethernet Switches ARP Signal Premium Core 20M/4M 100M 1G 1G VDSL VDSL modem DSLAM L3SW N-SW BRAS KORNET(BE) L2 LSP See draft-jaihyung-ccamp-arpsignal-00.txt for discussion RFC2814, RFC2815, RFC2816 : RSVP for 802 Networks Heaviness, weak security, operational difficulty, low industry support, etc.. USE ARP !!! for L2 LSP setup 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005

62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005 Why use ARP ? Ubiquitous deployment in all terminals Receiver capability is not mandatory LSP can be established in partial deployment Designed to carry MAC address Appropriate if MAC address is used for Label New Session  auto triggering of ARP Connection to unknown terminal  ARP 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005

Incorporation of Routing Use Flood Routing !! technique Establish LSP via optimum path for QoS 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005

62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005 Next Actions Call for participation on L2SC issues Request for review/feedback Call for contribution to the 3 drafts Send your proposal, that we can add More drafts to come Ethernet based Access Network Core network implementation using High-performance Ethernet Bridges 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005