GDF Suez Holland E 16-4 VSP Part 1:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Traditional practice separates seismic data processing and further interpretation. However the most efficient processing methods utilize a-priori information.
Advertisements

3. COMPOSITE VIDEO SIGNAL Prepared by Sam Kollannore U. Lecturer, Department of Electronics M.E.S.College, Marampally, Aluva-7.
Processing and Binning Overview From chapter 14 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Lesson 17 Intro to AC & Sinusoidal Waveforms
Chapter 15 AC Fundamentals.
Part (2) : AC Circuits Lecture 1 د. باسم ممدوح الحلوانى.
Derivation and Use of Reflection Coefficient
Now that we have determined the solutions to the differential equation describing the oscillations of the electric and magnetic fields with respect to.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
IVA. Electromagnetic Waves and Optics
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
SINUSOIDAL ALTERNATING WAVEFORMS
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS Assist.Prof.Dr. Nuray At.
THE ULTRASOUND IMAGE: GENERATION AND DISPLAY
AC Fundamentals Chapter 15. Introduction 2 Alternating Current 3 Voltages of ac sources alternate in polarity and vary in magnitude Voltages produce.
ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT ET 201 Define and explain characteristics of sinusoidal wave, phase relationships and phase shifting.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
1 ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 3 Propagation and Modulation of RF Waves.
Deconvolution Bryce Hutchinson Sumit Verma Objectives: -Understand the difference between exponential and surface consistent gain -Identify power line.
Chapter 15 AC Fundamentals.
Last week’s problems a) Mass excess = 1/2πG × Area under curve 1/2πG = × in kgs 2 m -3 Area under curve = -1.8 ×10-6 x 100 m 2 s -2 So Mass.
Usage of joint rating functions for seismic phase association and event location Asming V.E., Prokudina A.V., Nakhshina L.P. Kola Regional Seismological.
Chapter 13 – Sinusoidal Alternating Waveforms Lecture 12 by Moeen Ghiyas 23/11/
ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY EET 103/4
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Higher Physics – Unit Waves. a a λ λ crest trough Wave Theory All waves transmit energy. The energy of a wave depends on its amplitude. a = amplitude.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey
The HESSI Imaging Process. How HESSI Images HESSI will make observations of the X-rays and gamma-rays emitted by solar flares in such a way that pictures.
AC SINUSOIDS Lecture 6 (I). SCOPE Explain the difference between AC and DC Express angular measure in both degrees and radians. Compute the peak, peak-peak,
P wave amplitudes in 3D Earth Guust Nolet, Caryl Michaelson, Ileana Tibuleac, Ivan Koulakov, Princeton University.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Testing the Match between Vibroseis and Dynamite Data Reflection.
Exercise.04 Receiver functions will be determined Receiver functions will be inverted Receiver functions and surface-wave dispersion will be inverted jointly.
Does It Matter What Kind of Vibroseis Deconvolution is Used? Larry Mewhort* Husky Energy Mike Jones Schlumberger Sandor Bezdan Geo-X Systems.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
1 AC Circuit Theory. 2 Sinusoidal AC Voltage Waveform: The path traced by a quantity, such as voltage, plotted as a function of some variable such as.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 Vertical Seismic Profiling– Nov 2, 2015
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology Field measurements and mapping Terminology on folds and folds Stereographic projections From maps to cross-sections.
Chapter 13 The Basic Elements and Phasors. Objectives Be able to add and subtract sinusoidal voltages or currents Use phasor format to add and subtract.
CSE 554 Lecture 8: Alignment
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021
Shadowing.
Lunar Trajectories.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
ALTERNATING CURRENT AND VOLTAGE
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
Please go to View, then select Slide Show
Motion in Two Dimensions
Fitting Curve Models to Edges
Paul Ogwari University of Memphis Center for Earthquake Research and Information 2nd year MSc Research on: Effects of Type of Faulting on Earthquake.
Modeling of free-surface multiples
From Raw Data to an Image
Andrea Benucci, Robert A. Frazor, Matteo Carandini  Neuron 
Motion in Two Dimensions
Shot Gather For Shot 1 Source Receivers R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 S1
Attentional Modulations Related to Spatial Gating but Not to Allocation of Limited Resources in Primate V1  Yuzhi Chen, Eyal Seidemann  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
4.5 Graphs of Sine and Cosine Functions
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Ken Creager, Wendy McClausland and Steve Malone
Representation of Color Stimuli in Awake Macaque Primary Visual Cortex
Key areas Conditions for constructive and destructive interference.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Presentation transcript:

GDF Suez Holland E 16-4 VSP Part 1: Vertical Stack of raw X, Y, Z traces Removal of casing ringing on Z-axis traces Fabio Ogliani Schlumberger Data and Consulting Services July 2009

E 16- 4 VSP: Z AXIS STACK Time reference: source Display amplitudes: trace normalized

E 16- 4 VSP: X AXIS STACK Time reference: source Display amplitudes: trace normalized

E 16- 4 VSP: Y AXIS STACK Time reference: source Display amplitudes: trace normalized

X AXIS STACK: Close-up in the casing ringing interval Stack traces from raw data. The first arrival time is manually picked on the 3 components: X (no filter), Y (no filter) and Z with FK filtering to remove casing ringing. Time reference: source Display amplitudes: trace normalized

Y AXIS STACK: Close-up in the casing ringing interval Stack traces from raw data. The first arrival time is manually picked on the 3 components: X (no filter), Y (no filter) and Z with FK filtering to remove casing ringing. Time reference: source Display amplitudes: trace normalized

Z AXIS STACK: Close-up in the casing ringing interval Stack traces from raw data. The first arrival time is picked at the first break. Time reference: source Display amplitudes: trace normalized

Z AXIS STACK: Close-up after the casing ringing removal Stack of Z axis traces after FK filtering to remove the down and upgoing casing ringing waves. (Masked velocities: higher than 3600 m/s). The first arrival time is manually picked on the 3 components: X (no filter), Y (no filter) and Z with FK filtering to remove casing ringing. Time reference: source Display amplitudes: trace normalized

Z AXIS STACK: Close-up after the casing ringing removal Stack of Z axis traces after FK filtering to remove the down and upgoing casing ringing waves. (Masked velocities: higher than 3600 m/s). The first arrival time is manually picked on the 3 components: X (no filter), Y (no filter) and Z with FK filtering to remove casing ringing. Time reference: source Display amplitudes: trace normalized

Z AXIS STACK: Close-up after the casing ringing removal Stack of Z axis traces after FK filtering to remove the down and upgoing casing ringing waves. (Masked velocities: higher than 3600 m/s). The first arrival time is manually picked on the 3 components: X (no filter), Y (no filter) and Z with FK filtering to remove casing ringing. Time reference: source Display amplitudes: trace normalized

Part 2: Processing of True-Z traces GDF Suez Holland E 16-4 VSP Part 2: Processing of True-Z traces Fabio Ogliani Schlumberger Data and Consulting Services July 2009

True-Z field Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT)

Velocity Filter: Downgoing Field Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels

Predictive Decon: Downgoing Field Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels Predictive Decon. Prediction time: 2nd zero crossing. Autocorrelation length 1 sec

Zero phase filter: Downgoing field Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels Predictive Decon. Prediction time: 2nd zero crossing. Autocorrelation length 1 sec Waveshape filter: zero phase 8-90 Hz. Filter length 0.15 sec. White noise 10 %.

Velocity Filter: First Residual Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels First Residual: Subtraction of Down field

Velocity Filter: Second Residual Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels First Residual: Subtraction of Down field Second residual: Subtraction of downgoing Shear field

Predictive Decon: Second Residual Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels First Residual: Subtraction of Down field Second residual: Subtraction of downgoing Shear field (2600 to 4235 m) Predictive Decon. Prediction time: 2nd zero crossing. Autocorrelation length 1 sec

Zero phase filter: Second Residual Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels First Residual: Subtraction of Down field Second residual: Subtraction of downgoing Shear field Predictive Decon. Prediction time: 2nd zero crossing. Autocorrelation length 1 sec Waveshape filter: zero phase 8-90 Hz. Filter length 0.15 sec. White noise 10 %.

Zero phase filter: Upgoing enhancement Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels First Residual: Subtraction of Down field Second residual: Subtraction of downgoing Shear field Predictive Decon. Prediction time: 2nd zero crossing. Autocorrelation length 1 sec Waveshape filter: zero phase 8-90 Hz. Filter length 0.15 sec. White noise 10 %. Upgoing wave enhancement: median stack 7 levels Normal polarity: acoustic impedance increase = through

Zero phase filter: Upgoing enhanc. + Amplitude recovery Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels First Residual: Subtraction of Down field Second residual: Subtraction of downgoing Shear field Predictive Decon. Prediction time: 2nd zero crossing. Autocorrelation length 1 sec Waveshape filter: zero phase 8-90 Hz. Filter length 0.15 sec. White noise 10 %. Upgoing wave enhancement: median stack 7 levels Time varying amplitude recovery: exponent gain1.2. Normal polarity: acoustic impedance increase = through

Zero phase Upgoing&corridor stack Normal polarity Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels First Residual: Subtraction of Down field Second residual: Subtraction of downgoing Shear field Predictive Decon. Prediction time: 2nd zero crossing. Autocorrelation length 1 sec Waveshape filter: zero phase 8-90 Hz. Filter length 0.15 sec. White noise 10 %. Upgoing wave enhancement: median stack 7 levels Time varying amplitude recovery: exponent gain1.2. Corridor stack: width: 0.1 s AGC on display 0.4 ms AGC Normal polarity: acoustic impedance increase = through

Zero phase Upgoing&corridor stack Reverse polarity Sequence of processing: Stack (vertical sum) of raw traces ( tool-referenced X,Y and Z axes) Casing ringing removal in Z axis stacks: depths from 1165 m to 1544 m Transit time picking Rotation of to True-Z axis Band pass filter 4-98 Hz Static correction: + 3 ms one way time Normalization of first arrival amplitudes (window 0.120 s from TT) Velocity filter: Downgoing field enhancement: median stack 7 levels First Residual: Subtraction of Down field Second residual: Subtraction of downgoing Shear field Predictive Decon. Prediction time: 2nd zero crossing. Autocorrelation length 1 sec Waveshape filter: zero phase 8-90 Hz. Filter length 0.15 sec. White noise 10 %. Upgoing wave enhancement: median stack 7 levels Time varying amplitude recovery: exponent gain1.2. Corridor stack: width: 0.1 s AGC on display 0.4 sec AGC Reverse polarity: acoustic impedance increase = peak

GDF Suez Holland E 16-4 VSP Part 3: Shear velocities The source of information for shear velocities are the two horizontal wavefields and the velocity filter residual field of the vertical component. The recorded X and Y components (affected by the tool rotation) have been projected along the direction of maximum and minimum energy of the first arrival wave (HMX and HMN respectively). The HMX waves are assumed to occur in the vertical plane of well deviation and are combined with the tool-Z traces to obtain the True horizontal response (True-X). The HMN waves sense the response orthogonal to HMX-TrueX The Shear time and velocities from HMX(TrueX), HMN and Z waves are tabulated separately. They do not show significant variations of S velocities and therefore do not provide indications shear anisotropy. The average Shear velocities and VPVS ratios are computed accordingly. Fabio Ogliani Schlumberger Data and Consulting Services July 2009

Horizontal Maximum Component (True-X) The wavefield is obtained with the projection of tool-X and tool-Y data along the direction of maximum energy (tool-HMX). The tool-HMX and tool-Z data are then rotated with the complementary of the well deviation angle to create the True-X horizontal component. The shear time is picked along the blue line trends and refined with the yellow line trend.

Horizontal Minimum Component The wavefield is obtained with the projection of tool-X and tool-Y data along the direction of minimum energy (tool-HMN). The tool-HMN component is assumed to be orthogonal to the True-X component of the previous picture. The shear time is picked along the blue line trends and refined with the yellow line trend.

Vertical Component (First residual field) The wavefield is obtained with the tool-Z stacked traces and tool-HMX tarces. These wavfields are rotated with the well deviation angle to create the True-Z (vertical) component. The shear time is picked along the blue line trends.

E 16-4 VSP: P & S interval velocities

GDF Suez Holland E 16-4 VSP Part 4: Examples of diffractions The two horizontal components (Horizontal Maximum rotated to TrueX and Horizontal Minimum energy wavefields) and the TrueZ component show diffraction hyperbolae in addition to the usual Down/Up P/S content. The following slides show the wavefields in the original version and after the removal of the removal of Down and Up events (residual fields). The diffractions are visible in the residual fields. All files are displayed with one-way first arrival time (i.e. no shift to two-way times is applied). Therefore the diffraction apex indicates the diffractor depth. The diffractor distance from the well is a function of P and S travel paths. Since the P or S nature of the diffraction is not analyzed in detail, the horizontal distance from the well, is not estimated in this report. Fabio Ogliani Schlumberger Data and Consulting Services July 2009

True-Y Horizontal Minimum Component This horizontal wavefield shows well-developed diffraction hyperbolae, masked mostly by DownS waves See next slide for DownS , DownP, UpP and UpS removal. Time scale: First arrival in one-way times from the SRD

True-Y Horizontal Minimum Component Residual after removal of Down&Up P&S events This horizontal wavefield shows well-developed diffraction hyperbolae. DownS, DownP, UpP and UpS fields have been removed with media stack filtering Time scale: First arrival in one-way times from the SRD

True-X Horizontal Maximum Comp. This horizontal wavefield shows moderately -developed diffraction hyperbolae, masked mostly by DownS waves See next slide for DownS , DownP, UpP and UpS removal. Time scale: First arrival in one-way times from the SRD

True-X Horizontal Maximum Comp True-X Horizontal Maximum Comp. Residual after removal of Down&Up P&S events The HMX horizontal wavefield diffraction hyperbolae somehow different from those of the HMN field. DownS , DownP, UpP and UpS fields have been removed with media stack filtering Time scale: First arrival in one-way times from the SRD

True-Z component after Velocity filter Residual after removal of Down events This field is taken from the main processing and is the velocity filter result. The diffraction hyperbolae are masked by UpP waves See next slide for UpP and removal. Time scale: First arrival in one-way times from the SRD

True-Z component Residual after removal of Down&Up P&S events This field comes from the main processing and is obtained with an additional velocity filter step, removing the UpP waves. Time scale: First arrival in one-way times from the SRD