Informing the Intrinsic Value of Evaluation Work: Using Social Learning Theory to Promote Self-Efficacy Christa A. Smith Sheryl A. Hodge Office of Educational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

How Learning Theories Account for Group Development and Readiness Assurance: Piaget, Vygotsky and Bandura Michael Sweet Division of Instructional Innovation.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
Focus on Instructional Support
3 High expectations for every child
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon Motivation: In Learning and Teaching Professor Dr. Bill Bauer Chapter 10 EDUC 202.
TRAINING AND COUNTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT
Elizabeth C. Rodriguez Jessica Pettyjohn Chapter 11 Week 10.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Chapter 5: MOTIVATION THROUGH FEELINGS OF COMPETENCE AND CONFIDENCE I think I can, I know I can …
PATHWAYS MENTORING WORKSHOP Dr. Jane Zenger Dr. Quantina Haggwood September 9, 2009.
Primary Languages Education.  to recognise and value the contributions that members of MLTAQ make to the teaching and learning of languages.
CLC reading program Nguyen Thi Thu Trang. In-class activities Assignment Assessment Add your text in here Reading program Objectives Contents.
Cultural Intelligence. Contemporary Organizations Multi-Cultural Workforce Domestic Diversity Domestic Diversity Globalization of Work International Diversity.
Measuring Complex Achievement
Athlete Burnout: An Individual and Organizational Phenomenon
EngageNY.org Session 5: Criteria for Speaking and Listening November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
LCI, Ltd. (2009) From Present to Future: Teaching and Learning in the 21 st Century Facilitated by: Giselle Martin-Kniep.
Cultural Competency and the Inclusive Classroom Professional Development Session Kalyn Estep.
Human Learning & Memory Siena Heights University Chapter 6 Dr. S.Talbot.
Chapter One Applying Psychology to Teaching. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1-2 Overview What is educational psychology? How.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Copyright Motivation: In Learning and Teaching.
Great Expectations Efficacy and Motivation Developing high expectations of what students, schools and school communities can achieve. Ideas developed in.
Planning for Professional Development. How do you currently plan for Professional Development?
Goal Attainment Scales as a way to Measure Progress Amy Gaumer Erickson & Monica Ballay December 3, 2012.
Chapter 5 5 Motivation C H A P T E R. Motivational Theories Social learning theory (Bandura) –Based on perceived self-efficacy –Motivated by expectations:
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
LECTURE 4 WORKING WITH OTHERS. Definition Working with others : is the ability to effectively interact, cooperate, collaborate and manage conflicts with.
Brunning Chapter 6 Beliefs About Self.
Gretchen McAllister Hoda Harati Claudia R. Rodas Northern Arizona University Presentation at the Annual AACTE conference Las Vegas, 2016 Examining long.
Improving Instruction for Students with Severe Disabilities William Sharpton Richard Hall University of New Orleans.
+ Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory By Katie & Matt.
Stephen Miller M.A. Division of Behavioral & Organizational Sciences, Claremont Graduate University Factors Associated With Higher Levels of Health Self.
Portfolio Assessment 2 Presentation Format
11 LB160 – Book 3 Producing Influential Documents 1 Copyright Material © Arab Open University, Lebanon Branch LB160_Book 3_Spring 2010_A joint effort between.
Tri-State Consortium Social Studies Visit Report April 19, 2016.
EDU 675 Week 3 Assignment Using Assessment and Feedback Check this A+ tutorial guideline at 675-Week-3-Assignment-Using-Assessment-and-Feedback.
Motivation: In Learning and Teaching
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Good teaching for diverse learners
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Reflection and Revision
Principle Of Learning and Education Course NUR 315
Integrated E-portfolio for Integrative Learning
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
Social-Cognitive Career Theory
The Role of Expectancy & Self-Efficacy Beliefs
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Differentiate between intrinsic and extrinsic rewards and describe how they influence motivation
Reflections on Educational Beliefs, Teaching and Supervision Chapter 5
The importance of emotional learning within communication between the staff Project Number: RO01-KA
Welcome to the CSBM workshop: Managing office services
EDU 602 Innovative Education- -snaptutorial.com
MTE 518 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
UWE L&T Conference Self-Efficacy: Chris Baker
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Understanding a Skills-Based Approach
Committee # 4: Educational Program For The MD
Enhancing Learning in Practice
Experienced Headteacher Development Programme
Presentation transcript:

Informing the Intrinsic Value of Evaluation Work: Using Social Learning Theory to Promote Self-Efficacy Christa A. Smith Sheryl A. Hodge Office of Educational Innovation & Evaluation Kansas State University AEA 2011 Anaheim, California Copyright 2011

Self-efficacy model (Bandura, 1977) Copyright 2011

Why enhance self-efficacy of evaluators? Bandura (1995, 1997) suggests that efficacy beliefs apply across a variety of domains and cultures and are predictive of: effort persistence choice of tasks Why enhance self-efficacy of evaluators? Copyright 2011

Copyright 2011

Goal and Anticipated Outcomes for Activity improve the efficacies of evaluation professionals through use of prior knowledge and modeling better understand personal strengths as well as strengths necessary within a team setting develop multiple perspectives of colleagues’ strengths enhance collegiality in work environment Goal and Anticipated Outcomes for Activity Copyright 2011

Team-building Activity approximately 20 professionals in our evaluation office self-assessment of strengths in performing evaluation-related tasks feedback from colleagues regarding perceived strengths Team-building Activity Copyright 2011

Team-building Activity self-assessment: write your top five strengths on an index card feedback from colleagues: write top strength for all colleagues on 3x3” Post-it® Note Team-building Activity Copyright 2011

Team-building Activity place Post-it® Note on back of colleague read strengths others have posted take Post-it® Notes off your back reflect on those strengths colleagues noted about you Team-building Activity Copyright 2011

Reflection note others’ strengths reflect on those strengths colleagues assigned to you partner with a colleague and discuss similarities and differences Reflection Copyright 2011

disparate strengths from self- assessment and feedback from colleagues revealed need to clarify and expand roles and responsibilities highlighted gaps in strengths Results Copyright 2011

colleagues must be somewhat familiar with each others’ range of abilities recency effect strengths go beyond recent evaluator roles Lessons Learned Copyright 2011

Next Steps need to better promote abilities need to grow from negative perceptions need to consider vast differences in perceptions of self vs. others’ Next Steps Copyright 2011

Christa Smith Evaluator christas@ksu. edu Sheryl Hodge shodge@ksu Christa Smith Evaluator christas@ksu.edu Sheryl Hodge shodge@ksu.edu Office of Educational Innovation and Evaluation Kansas State University www.oeie.ksu.edu Copyright 2011

Questions? Copyright 2011