Science or Pseudoscience?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The results of repeated observations and/or experiments concerning a naturally occurring event (phenomenon) are reasonably the same when performed and.
Advertisements

WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Chapter 1 What is Science
Classroom Inquiry on the Fringes of Science Dr. Dougal MacDonald Department of Elementary Education, University of Alberta.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Explaining Behavior.
Scientific Thinking - 1 A. It is not what the man of science believes that distinguishes him, but how and why he believes it. B. A hypothesis is scientific.
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 11, 2003 Chapter 2 (Stanovich) – Cont. from Wed. Chapter 3 (Ray) – Developing the Hypothesis.
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
Introduction to Social Science Research
Chapter 13 Science and Hypothesis.  Modern science has had a profound impact on our lives— mostly for the better.  The laws and principles of science.
Big Idea 1: The Practice of Science Description A: Scientific inquiry is a multifaceted activity; the processes of science include the formulation of scientifically.
1. “FALSE” SCIENCE. 2. FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE USUAL SCIENTIFIC TESTS. 3. INCONSISTENT WITH EXISTING, WELL- ESTABLISHED SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE. What is.
Scientific Processes & Terms Unit 1: Scientific Processes Physical Science Steinbrink.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
Biological Science.
Today’s lecture Scientific method Hypotheses, models, theories...
SCIENCE The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify and evaluate scientific methods and assumptions.
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 9, 2003 Chapter 2 (Stanovich) – Falsifiability: How to Foil Little Green Men in the Head.
This mini lesson will cover: 1. What are the roles of inferences and arguments in science. 2. How can we make stronger scientific arguments and inferences.
Introduction to Life Science. Science is a way of learning about the natural world Scientific inquiry – all the diverse ways in which scientist study.
Science vs. Pseudoscience
ANOMALISTIC PSYCHOLOGY LESSON 1. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 1 & 2 Question 1: Directional (one-tailed is acceptable) Question 2: 1 mark for correctly stating.
Anomalistic Psychology
Nature of Science. Purpose of Science ► Science is the pursuit of explanations of the natural world.
What is Science? If some was ask to you: What is science? How would you respond? Body of Knowledge Method/Process A Way of Thinking or Constructing Reality.
Chapter 1: The Science of Biology Section 1: What is Science?
Hypothesis-Based Science The Scientific Method. Science as Inquiry The process of investigation to answer questions about the natural world.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
The Nature of Scientific Evidence
Introduction to Research Methodology
Distinguish between an experiment and other types of scientific investigations where variables are not controlled,
Nature of science Ms. Fernandez.
PSYC 3450 Experimental Psychology
Nature of Science.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
What is Science?.
Hypothesis-Based Science
Introduction to Research Methodology
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Scientific Method.
Come in and get your notebooks out. We have notes today!
PSYC 3450 Experimental Psychology
Make as many observations as you can.
Introduction to Research Methodology
Section 2: The Nature of Science
What is Science?.
Introduction to Scientific Inquiry
Science of Biology
Science in the News.
The Nature of Science How can you differentiate between science and non-science using the scientific method?
PSEUDOSCIENCE Stuff that looks like science but isn’t.
The Nature of Science Identify what is science, what clearly is not science, and what superficially resembles science (but fails to meet the criteria for.
Scientific Inquiry Vocabulary Grid in Interactive Notebook
NOTTUS Is it science?.
Introduction.
Section 2: The Nature of Science
Nature of Science Dr. Charles Ophardt EDU 370.
The Scientific Method.
What is science? Science is both a body of knowledge and a process for gaining that knowledge that explains how the natural world works and how it got.
What determines Sex Ratio in Mammals?
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Research Methods.
What is Science?.
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
Science Review Game.
Scientific Inquiry Take out some note cards, a pencil, and your note card holder Write the following terms on one note card each: Take a textbook from.
FCAT Science Standard Arianna Medina.
Experiment vs Investigation
The Practice of Science
Presentation transcript:

Science or Pseudoscience?

What is Pseudoscience? “False” science. Claims to be scientific or at an even higher level than science. Fails to comply with the usual scientific tests. Inconsistent with existing, well- established scientific knowledge.

Claims Require Independent Testing Pseudoscientific claims are based on a non- evidential style of belief. Many pseudoscientific claims are never tested scientifically. When pseudoscientific claims are tested, methods, conclusions are questionable. Others cannot replicate test “successes.” Excuse given of “fragility” of phenomena.

What’s Your Sign? Tally how many participants choose their own sign and how many do not. Consider if the findings are significant.

Criticisms of Astrology Do NOT need to copy Constellation names & limits are arbitrary Ophiucus, Cetus omitted from Zodiac Original signs, constellations out of step Planets are not “in” constellations There is no single moment of birth Doctor exerts greater G force than planets If many vague predictions are made, it is impossible to always be wrong

Why Investigate Pseudoscience? Do NOT need to copy Teach relevant science concepts. Clarify what science is (and is not). Engage students in scientific inquiry. Engage students in scientific thinking. Improve creative and critical thinking. Help develop an evidential style of belief. Equip students to evaluate future pseudoscientific claims, e.g., media.

A Thought Do NOT need to copy “The dogmatism of science--the tendency to interpret facts in light of theories--is not absolute but relative. What distinguishes science from pseudoscience is … that scientists stand ready to give up one dogma for another should the evidence warrant it. Pseudoscientists refuse to give up their dogmas regardless of the evidence against them” (R. Carroll).

Nature of a Scientific Theory/Explanation Do NOT need to copy Consistent with itself and with other accepted theories. Sparing in entities and assumptions. Testable and falsifiable. Based on repeated, controlled experiments. Altered in accord with new discoveries. Admits possible error rather than certainty. Remember….C.O.N.P.T.T.

Scientific Evidence Do NOT need to copy Scientific claims must be based on scientific evidence. Scientific evidence results from experience, reasoning, use of instruments, others. Empirical evidence of the senses, unassisted or assisted, is fundamental. Warrant for a claim refers to the quality of evidence with respect to the claim, e.g., “likely that” vs “possible that”.

Evaluating the Quality of Scientific Evidence To what degree does the evidence support the claim (e.g., “a lot”, “a little”)? How secure is the evidence itself, independent of the claim? How much relevant evidence is there (e.g., one test vs many tests)?

“I Saw Bigfoot” Do NOT need to copy Many pseudoscientific claims are based on personal, anecdotal evidence. Are essentially second hand stories: “I saw Bigfoot.” “I was abducted by aliens.” Problems: Very hard to verify or test Essentially unfalsifiable Collected in a haphazard way/filtered Argument from authority

Occam’s Razor Do NOT need to copy When we are faced with more than one hypothesis that explains the data equally well, we choose the simpler explanation. A hairy creature in the woods is more likely a bear than Bigfoot. An unknown object in the sky is more likely a balloon than a flying saucer. “When you hear hoof beats, think of horses not zebras.”

Alternative Explanations of the Evidence Do NOT need to copy Non-occurrence of the event: It didn’t happen. Human error, e.g., mistaken observations and/or inferences. Fraud/trickery, e.g., fake Bigfoot photos, stage magic masquerading as ESP. Chance, e.g., coincidental events, a long run of heads in coin flipping. Science.

Could This Be Pseudoscience? Claim is first publicized thru mass media. Claim is sensational and exaggerated. Evidence for the claim is anecdotal. Claim contradicts known scientific principles. Claim uses scientific-sounding terminology in non- scientific ways.

Is a Pseudoscientist Making This Claim? Claimant has worked alone. Claimant says methods of discovery and testing the claim are secret. Claimant says the ruling elite is trying to suppress the claim. Claimant appeals to false authority. Claimant says a belief is reliable because it is ancient. Claimant seeks publicity and profits.

Examples of Pseudoscience Mental Powers: ESP, mind reading, precognition, psychic surgery, auras Spirit World: contacting the dead, ouija board, channeling, astral travel, astrology Natural Mysteries: dowsing, Atlantis, crop circles, Bigfoot, Loch Ness monster Aliens & UFOs: flying saucers, Roswell, alien abductions, Men in Black http://research.omicsgroup.org/index.php/List_of _topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience