Financial Transparency Working Group: Office Hours March 13, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EDUCATION SERVICE UPDATE
Advertisements

Why Reform Government? Federal Spending National Debt: $13.23 Trillion Federal Spending National Debt: $13.23 Trillion Your personal share? Over $42,000.
A Forecast for the Changing Environment for Medicaid and Managed Care Michigan Association Health Plans Summer Conference July 18, 2015 © 2015
Planning Together to Improve Outcomes for All Students U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary & Secondary Education (OESE) Office of Special.
Financial Transparency Working Group “FiTWiG” Uniform Procedure Work Session Feb. 9, 2017 Hosted by: Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
Make Data Work for Students:
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
Rental Preservation: Emerging Issues and Success Stories
Financial Transparency Working Need. Data. Now. How good is good enough? March 28, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
Financial Transparency February 9, 2017
Financial Transparency Working Group: State Activity thus Far September 19, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
ESSA Accounting/Reporting Requirement
IRS Large Business & International Division (LB&I)
Title I, Part A Supplement not Supplant (SNS) Under ESSA
Office Hours August 6, 2018 ©2018 Edunomics Lab, Georgetown University.
Financial Transparency Working Group: Office Hours August 8, 2017
Financial Transparency Working Group: Common Reporting Standards Part 2 August 25, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
Financial transparency displays:
Agenda Why school level financial data?
A: Always check your funds netting totals.
Financial Transparency Working Group: Equity Analyses September 7, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Tracking State Progress
PRACTICA & ONLINE ED AUTHORIZATION STATUS
1) SEA rules: site vs. central 2) Shared service centers
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
2019 National ESEA Conference February 2, 2019| Kansas City, MO
Resource Allocation Reviews: Part 2!
Every Student Succeeds Act School Level Expenditure Reporting Requirement September 19, 2018.
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Every Student Succeeds Act Financial Transparency Requirement
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) School Level Per Pupil Expenditure Reporting Requirement January 8, 2019.
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Average annual growth rate
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
ACNM Affiliates Open-Agenda Webinar/ Teleconference
Notes Page Title Here NCI Data on Outcomes:
Presentation transcript:

Financial Transparency Working Group: Office Hours March 13, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University

Communicating During the Call To request to be unmuted, please use the hand raise tool Use the comment box to ask questions or message the group bscpcenter.org

Agenda Working Group update & future meetings What is the status of the financial transparency requirement? Office Hours: Answering your questions

Working Group Update No longer funded by the US Department of Education – solely supported by CCSSO and Edunomics Lab Opinions and guidance provided by Edunomics Lab are based on our interpretation of the law, and are not endorsed by the US Department of Education March 28, 1-2PM EST Can you add the other dates

Status of the financial transparency requirement ESSA LAW Statue requires SEAs to report expenditures by school Accountability REGULATIONS: Written by DoEd but mandatory Creates a requirement for a uniform procedure for attributing spending in LEAs. Clarifies exclusions. Extends deadline, defines student count, etc. GUIDANCE Written by DoEd. Offers examples and clarifications. Guidance is not mandatory Signed into law 12/ 2015 Released 11/2016 Published 1/2017 All SEAs must comply in order to receive Title I funds Process of withdrawing regulations initiated 1/2016, passed both houses and likely to be signed by president this week. 3/2016 DoEd withdraws guidance immediately when regs are pulled. DoED announces that new simple guidance will be released this week. This guidance may or may not make any mention of the financial transparency requirement. Guidance is not mandatory.

ESSA requires that SEAs report: What is in the law? ESSA requires that SEAs report: “The per-pupil expenditures of Federal, State, and local funds, including actual personnel expenditures and actual nonpersonnel expenditures of Federal, State, and local funds, disaggregated by source of funds, for each local educational agency and each school in the State for the preceding fiscal year.” Deadline = Dec. 2018 for 2017-18 school year.

What’s changed by pulling regs and guidance? Date is Dec 2018, no extension at present Vastly increased choice by states on how/what to report: Regulations about a “uniform” procedure are gone. Definitions of numerator and denominator are gone (including what can be excluded and how to “count” students. Note:  requirement for REAL salaries remains in the law

The Productivity Opportunity Remains: To go beyond compliance and build a financial transparency system that works to drive system improvement School as an important unit in the ed system. We already report outcomes by school, and this step will add expenditures. Activate school-level engagement in order to leverage dollars to do the most for students. Research indicates that school-level behaviors/actions/factors play a big role in determining the relationship between expenditures and outcomes. School level financial data can help activate these factors Explore equity and help ensure that allocations are deliberate. Data visibility can enable local communities to wrestle with tradeoffs.

Office Hours Everyone is unmuted Use this time to ask questions, or share updates about your state or district

Example data: Meeting the basic requirement: Central District Valley District Charterama LEA Maple Elem Ceder Elem LEA average Green School River Acad. LEA Average Charterama school #1 A School level Federal $1,101 $432 $554 $301 $614 $401 B S/L $8,722 $7,759 $7,861 $5,493 $7,112 $6,626 $11,619 C Sch total $9,823 $8,191 $8,415 $5,794 $7,726 $7,027 $12,720 D LEA level $421 $589 $- E $4,597 $5,573   F Grand Total $14,841 $13,209 $13,433 $11,956 $13,888 $13,189 Two options: Define a uniform procedure for what gets reported at school level and require that reporting across all districts Require that all LEA expenditures get divvied up across schools.

Moving from Data Inventory to Action 1. SEA has a common chart of accounts (COA) with a field for location 2. SEA has SLFS (or similar) data by school 3. SEA has real salaries/benefits of personnel with location 4. SEA does not yet have access to financial information by school: CO DE, FL, HI, MA, ME, MS, OH, RI, DC, MD, WY, OR, NE Compare SLFS&F-33 Explore early data runs Connect with representative LEAs Identify where SLFS data is incomplete Develop plan to complete SLFS data Share early reports with LEAs Identify equity issues Explore visualization options Develop communication plan CT. IL Examine personnel expend by school. Are these salaries accurate? Compare personnel totals to F-33. What’s missing? Can the difference be parsed per pupil? Identify LEAs for partnership & analysis Consider SLFS or COA w/ location code Settle on data plan for 2017-18 school year. Communicate data plan with LEAs. Pilot collection plan. ND, VA, AZ, SD, MO, TN Explore available data for patterns across districts (% SL vs % Central) Decide if any work needs to be done to dictate how districts divvy up central expenditures. Who will do it? Have LEAs weigh in. Share early reports with LEAs Identify any equity issues Explore visualization options Develop communication plan Identify LEAs for partnership during exploration Consider SLFS or COA w/ location code Settle on data plan for 2017-18 school year. Communicate data plan with LEAs. Train where needed. Pilot collection plan.

Bucket 1 States 1. SEA has a common chart of accounts (COA) with a field for location DE, FL, HI, MA, ME, MS, OH, RI, DC, MD, WY, OR, NE Explore available data for patterns across districts (% SL vs % Central) Decide if any work needs to be done to dictate how districts divvy up central expenditures. Who will do it? Have LEAs weigh in. Share early reports with LEAs Identify any equity issues Explore visualization options Develop communication plan

Bucket 2 States 2. SEA has SLFS (or similar) data by school CO Compare/merge SLFS to F-33 Explore early data runs Connect with representative LEAs Identify where SLFS data is incomplete Develop plan to complete SLFS data Share early reports with LEAs Identify any equity issues Explore visualization options Develop communication plan

Bucket 3 States 3. SEA has real salaries/benefits of personnel with location CT. IL Examine personnel expend by school. Are these salaries accurate? Compare personnel totals to F-33. What’s missing? Can the difference be parsed per pupil? Identify LEAs for partnership & analysis Consider SLFS or COA w/ location code Settle on data plan for 2017-18 school year. Communicate data plan with LEAs. Pilot collection plan.

Bucket 4 States 4. SEA does not yet have access to financial information by school: ND, VA, AZ, SD, MO, TN Identify LEAs for partnership during exploration Consider SLFS or COA w/ location code Settle on data plan for 2017-18 school year. Communicate data plan with LEAs. Train where needed. Pilot collection plan.

In-person meeting materials Link was shared in today’s calendar invite Afton Partners summary coming soon! If you need additional info, reach out to Katie Please send data files or early analysis when you have it http://edunomicslab.org/meeting-essa-financial-transparency-reporting-requirement/