Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

before and after rehabilitation
Figure 2. Effect of Siberian and Panax ginseng respectively on postprandial glucose level before and after three months of intake in patients with type.
Intermediate-level learner
Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Teachers Response (N= 11)
Instructional materials
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 8. Drawing result before game
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions
Nilai rata-rata total validitas
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
in the last evaluation of the software
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Significant (2- tailed)
Rating of Water Quality
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Contrast equality of group means
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Test of Normality
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Training Programs in Management and Leadership
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning
Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
Geometry and Mensuration
Table 1. Students` responses
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
erythematous disease pre and post intervention (n=60)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Respondents Frequency
Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P
Presentation transcript:

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance Figure 3. Comparison of class performance. Identical questions were asked during the respective clicker sessions in 2013 and 2014 Volker Patzel et al. Implementation of a Technology-supported Three-stage Classroom Feedback System for Promotion of Self-regulation and Assessment of Student and Teacher Performance. American Journal of Educational Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 4, 446-449. doi:10.12691/education-3-4-9 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.