Kenneth Stein, MD FACC FHRS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delayed Common Post-operative complications occurred after LAAO Dr. Iat-Lon,Leong Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Macau Kiang Wu Hospital.
Advertisements

WATCHMAN™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device
Protecting Against Stroke
WATCHMAN™ Device Implant Overview
PROTECT-AF (LAA Closure with Watchman vs Warfarin in AF and Stroke) A long-term (45-month) follow-up analysis of device therapy with Watchman vs warfarin.
Impact of Anticoagulant and Anti-platelet Therapy on ICD Implant-Related Bleeding and Thromboembolic Events in Patients Enrolled in the NCDR ® ICD Registry.
Protect AF Late Breaking Trial: Randomized Prospective Trial of Percutaneous LAA Closure vs Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in AF ACC & i2 Summit 2009 Orlando,
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
WATCHMANTM Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device
Atrial Fibrillation Warfarin and its newer alternatives
Supervisor: Vs 余垣斌 Presenter: CR 周益聖. INTRODUCTION.
SH AD JUN2015 WATCHMAN™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device
Left atrial appendage occlusion: Ready for prime time? David Hildick-Smith Sussex Cardiac Centre Brighton, UK.
WATCHMANTM Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device
DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 FDA Summary CardioSEAL® STARFlex™ Septal Occlusion System with Qwik Load NMT Medical P000049/S3.
INTRODUCING WATCHMAN How to Setup a Successful Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC) Program SH AB June 2015.
Praxbind® - Idarucizumab
The Case for Rate Control: In the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Charles W. Clogston, M.D. Cardiologist CHI St. Vincent Heart Clinic Arkansas April.
Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Valvular Disease Copyright: American College of Chest Physicians 2012 © Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention.
Why Treat Patent Forman Ovale Clifford J Kavinsky, MD, PHD Professor of Medicine and pediatrics Associate Director, Center for Congenital and Structural.
SCRIPPS CLINIC A Cost Analysis of Bleed Complications from Two Stroke Prevention Strategies in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Left Atrial Appendage.
Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Valvular Disease Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest.
Zephyr® Endobronchial Valve Product Training
Vivek Y. Reddy, MD Helmsley Trust Professor of Medicine
1 GreenLight XPS™ Laser Therapy System The GOLIATH Study.
The Efficacy of Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review Karim Bouferrache Pacific University.
How to Increase Your Patient Volume and Screening Efficiency
Cara Coffelt, PharmD PGY-1 Pharmacy Resident
Global Experience with Peripheral DCBs/Stent Studies: C.R. Bard
Post-FDA Approval, Initial US Clinical Experience with Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Vivek Y. Reddy.
Rachel Neubrander, PhD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
LAAC: What Does the Post Marketing Data Tell Us?
Case 66 year old male with PMH of HTN, DM, ESRD on renal replacement TIW, stroke in 2011 with right side residual weakness, atrial fibrillation, currently.
Post-FDA Approval, Initial US Clinical Experience with Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Vivek Y. Reddy.
WATCHMANTM Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device
David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Device Navigation Leaflet Capture Distal tip Saddle CAUTION: Investigational Device Limited by Federal (United States) Law to Investigational Use.
PFO FDA Considerations for Labeling and Future Trials
These slides highlight a presentation at the Late Breaking Trial Session of the American College of Cardiology 52nd Annual Scientific Sessions in Chicago,
LAA Closure: Lessons from the Pivotal Studies & Three Advisory Panels
Update on the Watchman Device CRT 2010 Washington, DC
LAAO with Watchman Device Post-Procedure Best Practices
Occlusion: Patient Selection Are the Data Supportive?
CRT 2017: Putting LAA closure in the age of DOACs into perspective
How to Screen Patients for LAAC
How Do We Incorporate Patient Perspectives Into Clinical Trial Design?
Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation
David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. Mayo Clinic, Rochester
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
Transcatheter Mitral Repair Complications & Bailout(s)
Ramon Quesada, MD, FACP,FACC, FSCAI,
Sameer Gafoor, MD Swedish Medical Center, Seattle WA
Management of atrial fibrillation. Patterns of Atrial Fibrillation.
UNCERTAINTY OF RISK: THE CASE OF THE TRICUSPID DEVICES
Percutaneous Device Occlusions for Left Atrial Appendage (LAA)
PMA Analysis of the CREST Trial Approvability of the RX Acculink Carotid Stent System for Revascularization of Carotid Artery Stenosis in Standard Surgical.
RE-CIRCUIT Trial design: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation were randomized to uninterrupted dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Cardiovacular Research Technologies
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Fibrillazione atriale
Selecting NOACs for High-Risk Patients
Left atrial appendage closure: A new technique for clinical practice
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines 2010: Prevention of Stroke and Systemic Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter 
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for The Unmet Clinical Needs of Stroke Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation  David R. Holmes, MD, Mohamad Alkhouli,
Assessment of Dual antiplatelet therapy versus Rivaroxaban In atrial Fibrillation patients Treated with left atrial appendage closure ADRIFT investigators.
Assessment of Dual antiplatelet therapy versus Rivaroxaban In atrial Fibrillation patients Treated with left atrial appendage closure ADRIFT investigators.
A Viable Option for Stroke Risk Reduction
Presentation transcript:

Kenneth Stein, MD FACC FHRS Lessons From WATCHMAN Launch: FDA, CMS, and the Launch of a New Therapy Kenneth Stein, MD FACC FHRS Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer, Rhythm Management and Global Health Policy Boston Scientific

Dr. Stein is a Boston Scientific employee and shareholder. Disclosure This presentation may include products and/or uses that have not been approved or cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and are not available for sale in the U.S. All future product approval and launch dates are based on estimates of completion of regulatory submissions, review and/or approval or clearance, as well as other business considerations. Dr. Stein is a Boston Scientific employee and shareholder.

Procedural Success1-2 ~50% new operators ~70% new operators N=449 Implant success defined as deployment and release of the device into the LAA; no leak ≥ 5 mm N=3822 1 WATCHMAN FDA Panel Sponsor Presentation. Oct 2014; 2 Boersma, L.et al. EHJ; published online Jan 2016 in press; 3

Outcomes in the Post-FDA Approval Watchman Experience  Complications  Post-FDA Approval Experience Pericardial Tamponade 39 (1.02%) Treated with Pericardiocentesis 24 (0.63%) Treated Surgically 12 (0.31%) Resulted in Death 3 (0.078%) Pericardial Effusion – No Intervention 11 (0.29%) Procedure-Related Stroke Device Embolization 9 (0.24%) Removed Percutaneously 3 Removed Surgically 6 Death   Procedure-Related Mortality Additional Mortality within 7 days 1 (0.026%)

Comparison of Procedural Complications Across Watchman Studies AGGREGATE CLINICAL DATA PROCEDURAL PARAMETERS No. of Procedures 6720 Implantation Success, % 94.9% COMPLICATION RATES Pericardial Tamponade 1.28% Procedure-Related Stroke 0.18% Device Embolization 0.25% Procedure-Related Death 0.06% Clinical Trial Experience Post Approval Experience

WATCHMAN ‘NESTed’ Post Approval Study 2000 patients from the NCDR LAAO Registry This study is ‘nested’ within the larger LAAO Registry. The data collected within this study will be collected as part of the LAAO registry. Thus, no additional data elements are required as part of the WATCHMAN NESTed study Follow-up occurring at implant, 45 days, 6, 12 and 24 months CMS linkage to NESTed study patients for follow-up data collection during years 2-5 1st Primary Effectiveness Endpoint* The occurrence of stroke (including ischemic and/or hemorrhagic), cardiovascular death (cardiovascular and/or unexplained cause) and systemic embolism at 24 months. 2nd Primary Effectiveness Endpoint* The occurrence (excluding the first 7 days post implant) of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (thrombolic events) at 24 months. Primary Safety Endpoint* The occurrence of major safety events between the time of implant and within 7 days of the procedure or by hospital discharge, whichever is later First data analysis expected Q1 2017 *Results will be compared to Performance Goals based on historical data

ASAP-TOO Assessment of the WATCHMAN Device in Patients Unsuitable for Oral Anticoagulation Indication expansion IDE study testing the safety and effectiveness of WATCHMAN in subjects unsuitable for oral anticoagulation 888 subjects at 100 global sites (65 US, 35 Intl) Randomized 2 Device to 1 Control Control group: Single antiplatelet or no therapy Device group: WATCHMAN plus 3-months DAPT, followed by 9-months low dose ASA Primary effectiveness endpoint: ischemic stroke/systemic embolism 5-year follow up PIs: Vivek Reddy, Maurice Buchbinder, Jacqueline Saw Current status: currently enrolling Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02928497

The WIN-Her™ Initiative Program Summary Patient & physician materials  barriers to female enrollment WIN-Her Initiative Pilot success  35 - 40% female enrollment WIN-Her Initiative Data  future protocol design

LEIO-AF Pre-Clinical Objective: Methods: Results: Evaluate safety and feasibility of LAAC after electrical isolation in canine model Methods: 9 canine underwent PVI and LAA electrical isolation and LAAC with WATCHMAN Results: All PVs and 8/9 LAAs electrically isolated Acute LAA reconnection in 4 of 8 LAAs 45-Days 7of 8 had persistent LAA electrical isolation Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jan;12(1):202-10.

LEIO-AF Human Feasibility 48 Screened 25 Excluded Pre-Enrollment 23 didn’t meet eligibility criteria 2 declined participation 23 Enrolled 1 Excluded Post-Enrollment LAA ostium >33mm on baseline CT 22 catheter ablation + LAAC 20/22 successful LAA isolation 20/20* successful LAAC 2 excluded as unable to achieve pre-specified LAA electrical isolation Follow-up analyzed (n=20) *2 unsuccessful LAA electrical isolation therefore LAAC not attempted

LEIO-AF Human Feasibility: Kaplan Meier

LEIO:AF Study Assumptions 10 Investigational Sites Located in the ~3 countries in EU Have a RhythmiaTM System Sample Size: ~ 214 subjects Utilize WATCHMANTM FLX* Device Randomization: Control Group: Conventional Persistent AF Ablation Treatment Group: Conventional Persistent AF, LAA Electrical Isolation, WATCHMAN Implant Visits at Baseline, 6-wk, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months Primary Endpoint Evaluation at 12-months *Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or US) law to investigational use only. Not available for sale. CE Mark pending – not available for sale in the European Economic Area (EEA).

LEIO-AF: Endpoints Primary Efficacy Primary Safety Secondary Freedom from AF/AT at 12 months Primary Efficacy Major procedure/device events Stroke, Major bleeding, Death Primary Safety Freedom from AF at 12 months Change in AF burden Serious adverse cardiovascular event Change in AF symptom score (AF-EQT and EQ-5D health score) Cost effectiveness Secondary

ABBREVIATED STATEMENT (US) WATCHMANTM Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device with Delivery System and WATCHMAN Access System Indications for use The WATCHMAN Device is indicated to reduce the risk of thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who: Are at increased risk for stroke and systemic embolism based on CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores and are recommended for anticoagulation therapy; Are deemed by their physicians to be suitable for warfarin; and Have an appropriate rationale to seek a non-pharmacologic alternative to warfarin, taking into account the safety and effectiveness of the device compared to warfarin. The WATCHMAN Access System is intended to provide vascular and transseptal access for all WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices with Delivery Systems. Contraindications Do not use the WATCHMAN Device if: Intracardiac thrombus is visualized by echocardiographic imaging. An atrial septal defect repair or closure device or a patent foramen ovale repair or closure device is present. The LAA anatomy will not accommodate a device. See Table 46 in the DFU. Any of the customary contraindications for other percutaneous catheterization procedures (e.g., patient size too small to accommodate TEE probe or required catheters) or conditions (e.g., active infection, bleeding disorder) are present. There are contraindications to the use of warfarin, aspirin, or clopidogrel. The patient has a known hypersensitivity to any portion of the device material or the individual components (see Device Description section) such that the use of the WATCHMAN Device is contraindicated. Warnings Device selection should be based on accurate LAA measurements obtained using fluoro and ultrasound guidance (TEE recommended) in multiple angles (e.g., 0º, 45º, 90º, 135º). Do not release the WATCHMAN Device from the core wire if the device does not meet all release criteria. If thrombus is observed on the device, warfarin therapy is recommended until resolution of thrombus is demonstrated by TEE. The potential for device embolization exists with cardioversion <30 days following device implantation. Verify device position post-cardioversion during this period. Administer appropriate endocarditis prophylaxis for 6 months following device implantation. The decision to continue endocarditis prophylaxis beyond 6 months is at physician discretion. For single use only. Do not reuse, reprocess, or resterilize. Precautions The safety and effectiveness (and benefit-risk profile) of the WATCHMAN Device has not been established in patients for whom long-term anticoagulation is determined to be contraindicated. The LAA is a thin-walled structure. Use caution when accessing the LAA and deploying the device. Use caution when introducing the WATCHMAN Access System to prevent damage to cardiac structures. Use caution when introducing the Delivery System to prevent damage to cardiac structures. To prevent damage to the Delivery Catheter or device, do not allow the WATCHMAN Device to protrude beyond the distal tip of the Delivery Catheter when inserting the Delivery System into the Access Sheath. If using a power injector, the maximum pressure should not exceed 100 psi. In view of the concerns that were raised by the RE-ALIGN1 study of dabigatran in the presence of prosthetic mechanical heart valves, caution should be used when prescribing oral anticoagulants other than warfarin in patients treated with the WATCHMAN Device. The WATCHMAN Device has only been evaluated with the use of warfarin post-device implantation. ADVERSE EVENTS Potential adverse events (in alphabetical order) which may be associated with the use of a left atrial appendage closure device or implantation procedure include but are not limited to: Air embolism, Airway trauma, Allergic reaction to contrast media/medications or device materials, Altered mental status, Anemia requiring transfusion, Anesthesia risks, Angina, Anoxic encephalopathy, Arrhythmias, Atrial septal defect , AV fistula , Bruising, hematoma or seroma, Cardiac perforation , Chest pain/discomfort, Confusion post procedure, Congestive heart failure, Contrast related nephropathy, Cranial bleed, Decreased hemoglobin, Deep vein thrombosis, Death, Device embolism, Device fracture, Device thrombosis, Edema, Excessive bleeding, Fever, Groin pain, Groin puncture bleed, Hematuria, Hemoptysis, Hypotension, Hypoxia, Improper wound healing, Inability to reposition, recapture, or retrieve the device, Infection / pneumonia, Interatrial septum thrombus, Intratracheal bleeding, Major bleeding requiring transfusion, Misplacement of the device / improper seal of the appendage / movement of device from appendage wall, Myocardia erosion, Nausea, Oral bleeding, Pericardial effusion / tamponade, Pleural effusion, Prolonged bleeding from a laceration, Pseudoaneurysm, Pulmonary edema, Renal failure, Respiratory insufficiency / failure, Surgical removal of the device, Stroke – Ischemic , Stroke – Hemorrhagic, Systemic embolism, TEE complications (throat pain, bleeding, esophageal trauma), Thrombocytopenia, Thrombosis, Transient ischemic attack (TIA), Valvular damage, Vasovagal reactions There may be other potential adverse events that are unforeseen at this time.    CAUTION: Federal law (USA) restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician. Rx only. Prior to use, please see the complete “Directions for Use” for more information on Indications, Contraindications, Warnings, Precautions, Adverse Events, and Operator’s Instructions.   © 2015 Boston Scientific Corporation or its affiliates. All rights reserved.  1Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Brueckmann M, et al. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1206-14.