TileCal issues and Combined Performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Advertisements

1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
IAP-PAI 25/05/20051 CMS Si Rad. Hardness Introduction Damage in Si Neutron tests => Beam => Irrad. Setup.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration SUSY 2005, July 18-23, 2005 Durham, UK.
My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.
Active Dividers Tilecal upgrade meeting at Stockholm (3-5 June 2013) François Vazeille on behalf of Roméo Bonnefoy, Michel Crouau (Now retired) Dominique.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Pavel Šťavina, Bratislava 2004 Slovak contribution to experiment ATLAS  Even though Slovakia is small country with limited finances we have fulfilled.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
SLHC SG: ATLAS Pixel G. Darbo - INFN / Genova SLHC SG, July 2004 ATLAS Pixel at SLHC G. Darbo - INFN / Genova Talk overview: A table with different High.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
Algorithms for the ROD DSP of the ATLAS Hadronic Tile Calorimeter
Precision Cross section measurements at LHC (CMS) Some remarks from the Binn workshop André Holzner IPP ETH Zürich DIS 2004 Štrbské Pleso Štrbské Pleso.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   Elizabeth Locci SPP/DAPNIA, Saclay, France Prague.
The LHCb Electromagnetic Calorimeter Ivan Belyaev, ITEP/Moscow.
FPGAs in ATLAS Front-End Electronics Henrik Åkerstedt, Steffen Muschter and Christian Bohm Stockholm University.
The ATLAS Tiles Hadronic Calorimeter
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
Ideas for Super LHC tracking upgrades 3/11/04 Marc Weber We have been thinking and meeting to discuss SLHC tracking R&D for a while… Agenda  Introduction:
Fabiola Gianotti, 14/10/20031  s = 28 TeV upgrade L = upgrade “SLHC = Super-LHC” vs Question : do we want to consider also the energy upgrade option.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
1 RHIC II – Ion Operation Wolfram Fischer RHIC II Workshop, BNL – Working Group: Equation of State 27 April 2005.
25 juin 2010DPallin sLHC_Tile meeting1 Tilecal VFE developments at Clermont-Ferrand June 2010 Status G Bohner, J Lecoq, X Soumpholphakdy F Vazeille, D.
Backgrounds in the Muon Collider Experiments Adam Para, Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting, SLAC, March 8, 2012.
Trigger & Tracking detector for CMS
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
On detector electronics: High voltage part Tilecal session in ATLAS upgrade week (Tuesday 10 November 2009) François Vazeille  What are the constraints.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Discussion on the integrator specifications with comparison of the 3 options Debriefing meeting at LPC, 28 April 2016 François Vazeille  Summary of the.
1 E T miss measurement E T miss is an important signal for - new physics (e.g. SUSY, H  ZZ  ll ) - reconstruction of a narrow invariant mass distribution.
2005-Apr-04MPI Calorimeter Plans for SLHC1 ATLAS at SLHC Calorimeter R&D at MPI Three possible routes being investigated: Verify feasibility for high intensities.
TileCal EM scale status Irene Vichou University of Illinois at Urbana on behalf of TileCal Collaboration MPI Hadronic Calibration Workshop May 3 rd, 2006.
PreShower Characterisations
Jet Energy Scale and Calibration Framework
Tile Upgrade Workshop (CERN- February 2008, 8 and 9)
Upgrade activities at Clermont-Ferrand
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
of the High Voltage part of the on-detector electronics
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Tile Upgrade Workshop (CERN- February and 9)
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Little module (HeatLoadCalculator) available at:
From Hadronic Energy Scale to Jet Energy Scale
Status of upgrade works at Clermont-Ferrand
Jet reconstruction in ALICE using the EMCal
Issues with Simulating High Luminosities in ATLAS
Tilecal session in ATLAS upgrade week (Tuesday 10 November 2009)
Introduction The aim of this talk is to try to get a feeling on the expected degradation of performance of a calibration once we move from MonteCarlo.
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Status of the TOF Detector
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
Measurement of Muon Energy Loss in ATLAS
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Time resolution in TileCal
SLHC Non-Inner Detector Upgrades
Search for supersymmetric neutral Higgs bosons in the decay channel A/H->m+m- in the ATLAS detector George Dedes , Sandra Horvat Max-Planck-Institut.
Reconstruction of the SC with rime
Inclusive Measurements as an mSUGRA Signal with ATLAS
ATLAS full run-2 luminosity combination
Presentation transcript:

TileCal issues and Combined Performance Workshop on ATLAS Upgrades for High Luminosity Feb. 14th 2005 D. PALLIN LPC Clermont-FD TileCal issues and Combined Performance

TileCal issues / main limitations Main identified Tilecal limitations to operate at SLHC increase of radiation levels increase of pile-up possible LHC operation with bunch spacing less than 25ns Start investigations on radiation & ageing effects on the sensor (detector) radiation effects on the electronics pile-up effects on jet energy resolution ATL-TILECAL-2005-002 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005

TileCal issues/ radiations in the Tilecal Radiations levels on fibres & tiles (1034): Re-estimation of 96TDR radiations levels using last radiation maps total dose for all scenarios ~ scaling from 1034 At 1034 : <50 Gy/year sampling1 <11 Gy/year sampling2 <2.5 Gy/year sampling3 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005

TileCal issues/ radiation effects tiles+fibres Impact on light loss (tiles+fibres) R=0,834exp(-D/43)+0.166exp(-D/1,35) with D in kGy The maximum anticipated light loss (in sampling 1) is ~3% for 5 years of running at 1034 (Nominal scenario) ~7% for 5 years of running at 2.3 1034 (Ultimate scenario) ~12% for 5 years of running at 4.6 1034 (IR-Upgrade scenario) ~18% for 5 years of running at 1035. ATLAS Upgrade Workshop D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005

TileCal issues/ ageing on tiles+fibres Ageing (tiles+fibres) Tilecal TDR Analyses going on to measure or to give more refined limits on Ageing Test bench at LIP (radiations & ageing) Analysis of regularly tested Tilecal modules <1% per year ATLAS Upgrade Workshop D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005

TileCal issues/ light budget Impact on Tilecal performances-energy measurement 20 pe/GeV enough to achieve the required Tilecal energy resolution 40 pe/GeV needed to detect the muon signal in each samples Mean light yield on produced modules ~ 65pe/GeV ‘Light loss budget’ 65-40=25 pe/GeV. => 40% decrease still acceptable Uniformisation of the light loss in each samples tiles are calibrated using Cs system PMT’s HV can handle calibration variation of a factor 2 Calculations leads to a E decrease by ~3-5% for a light yield deterioration of 50%  Decrease of (Tilecal) energy measurement due to . . light yield degradation could be fully recovered  Marginal effect on (Tilecal) Energy resolution  2y @1033+ 5y @1034+ 5y @1035 ~ 30% light loss max ATLAS Upgrade Workshop D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005

TileCal issues/ radiation effects on electronics From Niel, TID and SEE radiation tests: All active components tested above required doses (safety factors included) for 10y @1034 OK for 5 y @2.3 1034 All components survived to doses expected for 5y @1035 BUT without enough safety margin left conservative safety factors: better knowledge at LHC start Additional radiation tests needed to reach required factors especially on Mother board ,digitizer, interface, ELMB, LVPS Hopefully same electronics could be kept. If not (radiation levels underestimated) partial upgrade? Redesign ? ATLAS Upgrade Workshop D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005

Combined performances Pile-up The spread of the deposited energy by MB evts scales as  (MB per BX) Difficult to anticipate the size after shaping/filtering (see options in Larg talks) but LARG pile up effet larger than in Tilecal Effect on the jet energy resolution could be reduce also at reconstruction level (jet defined in a smaller R cone, ET cuts on cells). BUT MAJOR impact on energy resolution when MB  fast evaluation of the deterioration of the jet energy resolution in function of pile up and jet energy Use standard jet energy parametrisation : From 96TDR, 99TDR : (R=0.4, no dig. filt., had. scale) PU(larg)~9 GeV, PU(Tilecal)~2 GeV => c2 ; c1 = elec noise ~ 3 GeV ; a=62,4%, b=1.7% ATLAS Upgrade Workshop D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005 SF=  (MB scenario /MB nominal )

Combined performances nominal IR upgd., B ATLAS Upgrade Workshop D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005

D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005 Summary Tilecal detector: Radiations will not affect to much the tile+fiber system, NO impact on the Tilecal Performances on Energy measurement and resolution Tilecal Electronics: Hopefully same electronics could be kept. A possible strategy: Wait for first measurements of radiation levels at LHC start. Perform Radiation tests up to safety required levels. If radiation levels underestimated or electronics fail at higher doses investigate for new electronics: partial upgrade? Redesign ? Combined Performances needs more detailled simulation to evaluate pile up contribution to jet energy ATLAS Upgrade Workshop D. Pallin, Clermont-Fd 14-02-2005