SIRE Inspector Training Course 19th September 2007 INTERTANKO

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Murdoch e-Mentoring Network via Linked-in Introductory Guide Careers & Employment Centre Ph:

Advertisements

INTERTANKO Update on Terminal Issues Introduction to the Terminal Vetting Database – access all areas OCIMF APTF 16 Singapore February 2010.

University Safety Office 10 Parks Road Oxford OX1 3PD Health and Safety Self Assurance Toolkit Directly.

KNOWLEDGE BASED DECISION MAKING FOR AN INFORMED GROUP CONSCIENCE.

Oil Companies International Marine Forum

Intertanko Vetting Seminar Geoffrey Snow SIRE Programme Manager.

Presentation by Gunnar A. Knudsen Manager, Ports and Terminals Section for Andromeda Shipping (India) Mumbai, 28 November 2003.

 To provide for the health and safety of persons at work and for the health and safety of persons in connection with the use of plant and machinery;

BP Inspector Vetting Seminar 25th October 2007 INTERTANKO

Printed by DEVELOPING A NON-PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA Scott A. Uhlich, MCP Georgia Department of Human.

Bahrain- 2nd March 2010 The Vetting Committee

Theme 7: Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993

Registration and Assessment There are 3 periodic assessments throughout the PhD: Assessment 1: the Research Plan (by 8 weeks) All students must complete.

A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.

APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING

WHO WE ARE 2007 BP SHIPPING clean seas safe ships commercial success.

Topic 4 How organisations promote quality care Codes of Practice

Intertanko Vetting Seminar

Mediterranean MoU 7th Committee Meeting on PSC Alexandria, EGYPT 31st January - 2nd February A Presentation by INTERTANKO Port State Control Capt.

Atlantic Technical Management SUNOCO LOGISTICS & ATLANTIC TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT, A PARTNERSHIP FOR MANAGING MARINE RISKS.

Partnerships and Relations between Charterers and Owners in the current economic landscape Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental Manager.

May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager

1 Hosting an FDA Inspection: A Field Investigator ’ s Perspective Presented by Mihaly S. Ligmond Consumer Safety Officer US Food and Drug Administration,

PORT STATE CONTROL Conference 2005, London Increased Information Sharing The Issue of Transparency Peter M Swift.

Safety Stand Down – Together We Will Make the Difference.

INTERTANKO/HEIDMAR Terminal Vetting Database UPDATE FOR PREVENTION FIRST 2004 SYMPOSIUM by Capt John N. Hill Heidmar, Inc September 14, 2004.

Terminal Vetting Database II Latin-American Journey of SPM Operators Cartagena – Sep 29, 2006.

Vetting Inspection Closing Meetings INTERTANKO Vetting Seminar Manila November, 2007.

African Regional Director

CDI Chemical Distribution Institute INTERTANKO Vetting Seminar London, 2 nd October 2006.

 Definition of a quality Audit  Types of audit  Qualifications of quality auditors  The audit process.

218B Area and Division Governor Training Maintaining Strong Clubs.

One Inspection, Two Inspections, Three Inspections, More Peter M Swift.

Stakeholders Terms of Reference - BOD Goals GCOOS Stakeholder Council Once potential users and stakeholders for GCOOS have been identified, a Stakeholder.

Members SEMINAR April 8, 2011 INTERTANKO Overview Report Joseph Angelo Managing Director.

Leading the way; making a difference Hellenic Mediterranean Panel April 10, 2014 INTERTANKO OVERVIEW JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.

Latin American Panel November 1, 2011 INTERTANKO OVERVIEW REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO MANAGING DIRECTOR.

Introduction to BP Ship Terminal Feedback integration with Intertanko Terminal Vetting Database. March 2006 Jim Fortnum Offshore Assurance Superintendent,

Tripartite meeting Korea, Seoul, 14 – 15 September 2006 Agenda B.10 Sharing information for ships in service (incident information sharing) Konstantin.

Leading the way; making a difference NOx Tier III requirements 1. 1.The NOx Tier III enforcement date of 1 January 2016 is kept for already designated.

HELLENIC MEDITERRANEAN PANEL HELLENIC MEDITERRANEAN PANEL March 10, 2011 INTERTANKO OVERVIEW REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO MANAGING DIRECTOR.

INTERTANKO MEETING Houston Presented by Eric Osen 24 September 2002 ChevronTexaco Shipping Company LLC Clearance & Vetting System.

The Purpose Of A Foodservice Inspection Program  Evaluation  Protection  Education  Compliance

HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.

INFORMATION FOR CASE MANAGERS SHARED LIVING SERVICES.

INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Mumbai 19th September 2005 Port State Control Related Issues Capt Howard N. Snaith. Master Mariner. M.N.I. Director, Marine,

Tanker industry from the shipowners and safety perspective

Nuts and Bolts: Functional Variations of Assessment and Evaluation Barbara Hornum, PhD Director, Drexel Center for Academic Excellence Associate Professor,

Specific Behaviors to Manage Relationships By Uswatun Khasanah

Introduction to BP Ship Terminal Feedback integration with Intertanko Terminal Vetting Database. Dec 2005 Scott Woodward Marine Assurance Superintendent,

Agriculture Business Organizations

Employee vs. Independent Contractor

Health and Safety Self Assurance Toolkit 2017

Vetting Committee Report

Terminal Vetting Database FOR INTERTANKO VETTING SEMINAR

Mr. Fredrik Larsson Marine Manager

SEATRADE Tanker Industry Conference

Luc Cassan BASF Vetting Department

2017 RSSAC Organizational Review – Overview

An Overview of Main areas of work by the The Vetting Committee

OVID Refresher Inspector Course

SIRE Inspector Training Course 25th April 2007

INTERTANKO Standard Inspection Feedback Forms

The Departmental Performance Review (PR)

Port State Control Questionnaire

Preparing Tables and Figures: Some Basics

VIND – Officer Training

Hey You ! Yes You ! Electrical Contractor A.E.C.I. Motto ‘To Foster & Protect The Electrical Contractor & Our Industry’. Become A.

Preparation for Third Party Audit

Candidate Registration & Induction

Presentation transcript:

SIRE Inspector Training Course 19th September 2007 INTERTANKO Ship Owners’ Perspective Commercial Vetting Inspections

Commercial Vetting Inspection Vetting Inspection Feedback Forms Based on comments and cooperation with our membership, The INTERTANKO Vetting Committee developed a Standard Inspection Feedback form several years ago. The purpose of this form is to supply confidential information that can be used in a constructive & statistical manner to assist in our ongoing discussions with Port State Control, Oil Major Vetting Departments, and establishments such as CDI and SIRE. Part 1 of the questionnaire relates to Commercial Vetting Inspections, (Part 2 relates to Port State Control inspections & forms a separate presentation). We encourage INTERTANKO members to supply their vessels with a copy of this form with the request that the forms be completed for each inspection as appropriate. We also request that these forms be completed on each occasion that a commercial or PSC inspection takes place whether the results are positive or negative.

INTERTANKO Vetting Inspection Form

Commercial Vetting Inspection

Commercial Vetting Inspection

Commercial Vetting Inspection

Commercial Vetting Inspection

Commercial Vetting Inspection

Commercial Vetting Inspection

Commercial Vetting Inspection

Commercial Vetting Inspection

Commercial Vetting Inspection

Commercial Vetting Inspection

A Pertinent Comment to bear in Mind “It is accepted that interested parties wish to assure their corporate reputations and they have a right to expect their contractor to use their best endeavors to attain that level of service”…but …the standard of observations needs to be maintained”.

Additional Feedback to Consider Ask the Question not what you think the Question is. Utilise your experience, keep observations factual explanatory and not interpretations.

Additional Feedback to Consider “Yes” or “No” Answers by Inspectors: As stand alone answers these can cause difficulties for the owner/operator if these are without suitable qualification.

Additional Feedback to Consider The Benefits of the Close out Meeting: - The inclusion of additional comments after the inspection; the number of observations/comments do tend to increase once the final report comes out, this; Lowers morale onboard Defeats the object of the close out meeting; Increases the possibilities of misunderstandings; Diminishes respect from those onboard