Disproportionality: Tier Two Monitoring Activities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disproportionality in Special Education
Advertisements

Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Addressing the Disproportionate Representation of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Students in Special Education SPR&I Regional Training.
Navigating the SPR&I Database Oregon Department of Education Fall
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
Discipline Under the IDEA Tulsa Public Schools Special Education and Student Services Presenter: Cheryl Henry August, 2011.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
DE-PBS Cadre Meeting Tuesday, February 15, Upcoming Events Inclusion Conference – March 15, 2011 Jill Kuzma Social Skills Workshops: ◦ March 22,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Verification Review (VR) 2013−14 TRAINING.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
Timeline Changes and SPR&I Database Updates SPR&I Fall Training Day Two.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Diversity in Special Education. What is Diversity Diversity is about difference – students in special education vary in many ways, and those in regular.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting.
District Annual Determinations IDEA Part B Sections 616(a) and (e) A State must consider the following four factors: 1.Performance on compliance.
March 7, 2012 ESC-20/AACASE Special Education Director Meeting.
Manifestation Determinations Review of Suspension Meetings And Review of Placement Meetings.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
Significant Discrepancy in Suspension and Expulsion Rates in West Virginia: Barriers to Implementation of Discipline Policy and Procedures November 15,
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Special Education Performance Profiles and SPP Compliance Indicator Reviews Office for Exceptional Children.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
Agenda 1:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webinar reminders 1:05 Topics: Statewide Field Test for Fiscal State Application for Title VI-B, RTI Resources, and.
Required Services and Procedures for Students with Disabilities Presented by Scott Hall and Ty Manieri 2010 Oregon Special Education Fall Conference Eugene,
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
1. An FBA is legally required for all students exhibiting behavior problems at school. False. We would ALL be doing FBAs ALL the time!
Agenda Part I Recap of the Final Rule Part II Standard Methodology Part III Remedies Part IV Dates Part V Questions.
Special Education General Supervision, Support and Compliance
WELCOME What is on your table? Agenda for both days
What is “Annual Determination?”
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
Special Education Reviews: A new paradigm for LEAs
DISPROPORTIONALITY REGULATIONS
New Significant Disproportionality Regulations
CClick here to get started
Disproportionality Institute March 29-30, 2018 Little Rock, Arkansas
Recommendations for an Early Childhood Suspension and Expulsion Policy
Agenda 3:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webinar reminders
Guam Department of Education
Assessment, Evaluation and Support
SPR&I Regional Training
U.S. Department of education Office of Special Education Programs
Section 504 Discipline Procedures
Loretta Garcia TAP Coordinator TAP Hotline
Iowa Department of Education Davenport CSD School Board
Disproportionality Prevention Support
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Significant Disproportionality Stakeholder Meeting
Significant Disproportionality
Presentation transcript:

Disproportionality: Tier Two Monitoring Activities

Regulations and Reasons The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2004 requires States to: Require policies and procedures to prevent inappropriate over identification or disproportionate representation by race/ethnicity as children with disabilities [34 CFR 300.173] [20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(24)] Collect and examine data regarding disproportionality based on race/ethnicity, disability category, least restrictive environment, and the incidence, duration, and type of disciplinary actions [34 CFR 300.646(a)] [20 U.S.C. 1418(d)(1)] Establish requirements for review and revision of policies, practices, and procedures [34 CFR 300.646(b)] [20 U.S.C. 1418(d)(2)] Disaggregate suspension/expulsion data by race/ethnicity [34CFR300.170(a)] [20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(22)(A)] Monitor LEA’s to examine disproportionality [34CFR300.600(d)(3)][20U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(C)] Why is it important to analyze Disproportionate Representation data? The disproportionate representation process is intended to determine why some student groups are identified for special education and related services more than others.

Introductions and Purpose To Analyze Policy, Practices and Procedures in Relationship to Disproportionality To Support Targeted Districts and LEAs in Identifying Critical Steps That Would Assist in Improving Disproportionate Outcomes

Tier Two General Procedures: Disproportionality Discipline 4-A (% of Suspension/Expulsion Data: Special Education Students vs. General Education Students) ADE-SEU randomly selects students with 10 or more days Out of School Suspension LEA uploads the following information to MySped ADE-SEU Review of Manifestation Determination (MD) Review of Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) Review of Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP) Individual Education Plan (IEP) District Discipline Policies/Handbooks can be e-mailed to becky.cezar@arkansas.gov if not posted on the District Webpage ADE-SEU will review all information submitted by the district.

Tier Two Indicator Disproportionality 4-B (% of Suspension/Expulsion of Special Education Students vs. General Education Students by Race) ADE-SEU randomly selects students with 10 or more days out of School Suspension and/or Expulsions from the racial group with overrepresentation. Student names given to LEAs LEA uploads the following information to MySped ADE-SEU Review of Manifestation Determination (MD) Review of Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) Review of Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP) Individual Education Plan (IEP) District Discipline Policies/Handbooks can be e-mailed to becky.cezar@arkansas.gov if not posted on the District Webpage ADE-SEU will review all information submitted by the district.

Tier Two Indicator Disproportionality 9 (% of special education students with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification) ADE-SEU randomly selects students from disability groups with overrepresentation. LEA uploads the following information: Referral Information Evaluation Reports EDR/EPC District Practices and Policies for Identification will be e-mailed to becky.cezar@arkansas.gov Student Folder Checklist and review of district information will be completed by ADE-SEU

Tier Two Indicator 10 (the % of special education students of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that could be the result of inappropriate identification) ADE-SEU randomly selects students from disability groups and race with overrepresentation. LEA uploads the following information: Referral Information Evaluation Reports EDR/EPC District Practices and Policies for Identification will be e-mailed to becky.cezar@arkansas.gov Student Folder Checklist and review of district information will be completed by ADE-SEU

Directions to Upload to MySped Directions for Uploading Information to MySped Resource

Next Steps ADE-SEU ADE-SEU will review all uploaded information and ask for additional information if needed. If compliant practices are verified, a letter will be sent to Superintendent and LEA If non-compliance is indicated, LEA will have 90 days to: correct at student level including additional evidence; develop or revise policies, practices, and procedures; and provide training for district staff If district does not clear non-compliance, district with assistance from ADE-SEU will develop a Corrective Action Plan Letter will be sent to Superintendent and LEA If district clears non-compliance

Timelines for Tier-2 Disproportionality April 12, 2016: Letters mailed to Superintendent and LEA stating that district has had disproportionate representation for 2 or more years. October 3, 2016: ADE-SEU ZOOM with 5 Districts October 3, 2016: ADE-SEU Folder Selection sent to LEA. October 17, 2016: LEA uploads requested information to MySped November 21, 2016: Results of folder reviews provided to District Superintendent and LEA (Student Folder Checklist Yes/ No report) and request for additional pulls if necessary February 20, 2016: District has 90 days to correct any findings and submit to ADE-SEU.