Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017 Complete.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

Performance Appraisal Systems
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
Teacher Evaluation Model
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Peninsula School District
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Requirements PCBOE 8/5/2015.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 20, 2015 Complete Plan posted on District Website
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Certified Evaluation Orientation Professional Growth & Effectiveness System for Teachers & Other Professionals LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Principal Evaluation Process
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Teacher Evaluation System
Edgewood T-TESS Updates for
Certified Evaluation Orientation
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Teacher Evaluation Training
CLASS KeysSM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Certified Evaluation Orientation Teachers & Other Professionals
CLASS KeysTM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Certified Evaluation Orientation for Administrators
Evaluation Information
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Evaluation by the Numbers
END-OF-YEAR EVALUATIONS
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017 Complete Plan posted on District Website http://www.larue.kyschools.us/Content2/plans

Evaluation Notes To whom does this orientation apply? School Psychologist All other positions are covered by TPGES, OPGES, or they are district level administrators SB1 eliminated current evaluation regulations which included “PGES”. In 2017-2018, KDE will develop new regulations for certified evaluation, for implementation in 2018-2019. Until then, our prior evaluation system is the evaluation plan for this group. The prior system is included as Appendix P in the 2017-2018 LCS Certified Evaluation Plan. The materials and expectations remain unchanged; page numbers have changed

Orientation Tenure Non-Tenured Certified Staff Tenured Certified Staff Orientation by the end of the first month of employment See pg. 89 for Orientation Agenda Staff must sign and date certifying completion of Orientation. Tenure Non-Tenured Certified Staff One through Four Years in LaRue Co. OR First year in LaRue Co., but Tenured in another KY District Tenured Certified Staff More than Four Years in LaRue Co. OR More than One Year in LaRue Co., but Tenured in another KY District

Formative Evaluation Sequence DEADLINE: APRIL 1 Observation Walkthrough Letters & Memos Third Party Observer ONGOING Professional Growth Plan Corrective Action Plan

Formative Evaluation Sequence—Observation, pg. 91 Tenured: At least once every three years Non-Tenured: At least once annually 1. Observation scheduled between Evaluator and Evaluatee 2. Evaluatee completes Pre-Observation form, pg. 102 3. Pre-Observation Conference using Pre-Observation form 4. Evaluator observes class (45 min.)

Formative Evaluation Sequence— Observation, pg. 91 (Cont.) 5. Evaluatee completes Lesson Analysis & Reflection form, pg. 103 after observation and submits to Evaluator prior to post-observation conference 6. Post-Observation scheduled within one work week of observation 7. Post-Conference includes discussion of… Lesson Analysis & Reflection, pg. 103 Formative Evaluation Report Teacher pg. 104-109 Professional Growth Plan, pg. 99 Uses Summary Form Teacher pg. 110

Formative Evaluation Sequence— Observation, pg. 91 (Cont.) 8. Formative Evaluation Report is like a mid-year check-in. It includes all formative evidence to date, not just observation notes observations, data notebook, assessments, student products, units of study, professional development activities, etc. 9. Copies of all forms given to Evaluatee

Formative Evaluation Sequence— Walkthrough—pg. 91 Tenured & Non-Tenured: At least once annually 1. Evaluator conducts at least one unscheduled Walkthrough (10-15 minutes) using the Walkthrough Form (pg. 101) 2. Post-Conference within 1 work week. Tenured: Post-Conference only necessary if concerns surface during Walkthrough. Non-Tenured: Post-Conference required for at least 1 Walkthrough. 3. Copy of the completed Walkthrough Form given to Evaluatee. Signed by Evaluator & Evaluatee.

Formative Evaluation Sequence—Letters & Memos (pg. 90) In addition to district-adopted evaluation forms, letters and memos may be used to document both outstanding performance and performance which needs improvement. Correspondence dated and signed by both parties with a copy provided to Evaluatee Conference highly recommended, but not required

Formative Evaluation Sequence—Third Party Observer (pg. 91) Upon teacher request, observations by another teacher trained in the teacher’s content area or by curriculum content specialists shall be provided. This Third Party Observer may observe and provide information to the primary evaluator, but does not replace the primary evaluator. Evaluatee requests Third Party Observer in writing by Feb. 15. Evaluatee and Evaluator agree on Third Party Observer within 5 working days of the request; if not, Third Party Observer selected by Evaluator.

Formative Evaluation Sequence— Professional Growth Plan--pg. 95, 97-99 Purpose: to develop a plan agreed upon by both the evaluator and the evaluatee that will guide the professional growth of the teacher. The professional growth plan will be aligned with specific goals and objectives of the school/district improvement and professional development plans. Developed collaboratively by Evaluatee & Evaluator by Aug 30 Reviewed Annually PGP Intent on pg. 95 Instructions on pg. 97-98 Form on pg. 99

Formative Evaluation Sequence—Corrective Action Plan pg. 96, 100 A Corrective Action Plan shall be developed when a certified staff member fails to meet district standards OR when an immediate change is required in practice or behavior. Steps in Corrective Action, pg. 96 Administrator initiates the Corrective Action Plan process Administrator and teacher collaborate to develop the CAP Administrator and teacher develop timeline Administrator and teacher develop appraisal method for CAP Administrator evaluates improvement of performance at target date Form, pg. 100

Summative Evaluation Sequence DEADLINE: APRIL 1 Steps for Summative Eval.—pg. 92 1. Summative Conference using Formative data collected (up to three years if tenured) and progress on Professional Growth Plan (Corrective Action Plan, if necessary) 2. Summative Evaluation Report completed at conference (Teacher p.122)

Summative Evaluation Sequence Steps for Summative Eval.—pg. 92 (Cont.) 3. Copy of Summative Evaluation Report given to Evaluatee and filed in Evaluatee’s folder 4. Original Summative Evaluation Report sent to District Certified Evaluation Plan Coordinator

Appeal Procedure for Summative Evaluation—See pg. 139-142 1. Evaluatee must submit Appeal Form (pg. 142) to the chairperson of the Appeal Panel within 5 working days of receipt of the evaluation. 2. The Appeal Panel will meet to consider evidence and make a recommendation decision. Upholding all parts of the original evaluation. Voiding the original evaluation or parts of it. Ordering a new evaluation by a second certified employee who shall be a trained evaluator.

Appeal Procedure for Summative Evaluation—pg. 139-142 (Cont.) 3. The Appeal Panel will make a recommendation to the Superintendent within 15 working days from the date of the filing of the Appeal. 4. All parties will be notified of the recommendation with a letter citing evidence to support the decision.

Other Evaluation Notes School Psychologists will be evaluated as “teachers”.