Rita Hvistendahl og Astrid Roe

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Individual, Home, and Community Factors PISA/PIRLS Task Force International Reading Association January 2005.
Advertisements

What can we learn from the international PISA study about improving reading at age 15? February 2011.
24 July 2014 PISA 2012 Financial Literacy results – New Zealand in an international context.
Hacettepe University Usluel, Y. K., Kelecioğlu, H. & Mazman, S.G. COMPARATIVE EXAMINATION OF COMPUTER AND INTERNET USAGE OF PISA BALKAN COUNTRIES 2010.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
1 Information and Communication Technology Literacy Issues in Higher Education Li-Jen Yu Shannon, Ed.D. Sam Houston State University ISECON November 3,
Computer in Education Jiaying Zhao CSE 610 Western Oregon University.
UNESCO MOBILE LEARNING WEEK RESEARCH SEMINAR Keynote Address by Andreas Schleicher Director for Education and Skills, and Special Advisor on Education.
International Survey of Adult Skills (ISAS) Policy Results 14th October 2013.
Implication of Gender and Perception of Self- Competence on Educational Aspiration among Graduates in Taiwan Wan-Chen Hsu and Chia- Hsun Chiang Presenter.
Education and ICT: Documenting the relationship Victor Thiessen Dalhousie University E. Dianne Looker Acadia University.
The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system Claudio QUINTANO, Rosalia CASTELLANO, Sergio LONGOBARDI University of Naples.
Elementary Assessment Data Update Edmonds School District January 2013.
Granite School District. Reading is a natural process. Reading includes at least three parts of your brain at a time. Good readers do not need to read.
PISA: Behind the headlines and past the rankings Sue Thomson Director, Educational Monitoring and Research, ACER National Project Manager PISA National.
Computer Games Help Struggling Mathematic Students Michelle Brennan Education 7202T Seminar in Applied Theory and Research II Fall 2013 Dr. O’Connor-Petruso.
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,
The only factor in which itself significant differences are not produced is the Factor VI (“Non-use of Internet”). Nevertheless, the average score, which.
The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, Overview for Parents and the difference they.
SIMCE TIC 2011 Initial Results Center for Education and Technology - ENLACES.
1 The Impact of Computer Use on Reading Achievement of 15-year-olds Patrick Bussière and Tomasz Gluszynski Child, Youth and Social Development Studies.
The background of the improvement of PISA results in Hungary Trends in Performance Since 2000 International Launch of PISA 2009 Report February 10 th,
Improving Equity & Quality of Education in Thailand Using the results from International and National Assessments [PISA, TIMSS, & National Test]
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
SRI & Lexile Measures. Using Lexile Levels and SRI Data for Improving Reading Instruction.
Manor School Progress Tracking Contents Introduction3 Summary of Findings Free School Meal Progression5 Gender Progression6 Special.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
Harnessing technology.
What is reading literacy? Curriculum in mother tongue Core skills at the initial stage Cultural identity Strongly integrated Active learner Pragmatic.
Ivana Lukica, University of Zagreb, Croatia Dr. Agnieszka Kaldonek-Crnjakovic, George Mitchell School, London, UK.
Helping ELL Learners Advance To the Next Level: Teaching Through Video Games By: Colleen Hart.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
The Enlaces Network Chile’s ICT for Schools Policy.
1 Perspectives on the Achievements of Irish 15-Year-Olds in the OECD PISA Assessment
1 Main achievement outcomes continued.... Performance on mathematics and reading (minor domains) in PISA 2006, including performance by gender Performance.
1 PISA 2006 Main achievement outcomes and factors associated with performance on science Eemer Eivers, Gerry Shiel & Rachel Cunningham Educational Research.
Rita Hvistendahl and Astrid Roe
Objectives To explore the data analyses that are available in RAISEonline and how they can be used to identify differences in progression rates To consider.
World Beaters or Underachievers
The future of PISA: perspectives for innovation
#DigitalLives cgest.asu.edu/DigitalLives
Literacy and The Standard of Living in Latin America
What do the data and research really tell us?
Mrs McMullen Parent Forum Wednesday 27th January 2016
ERFCON th International Conference of the Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Zagreb 17 – 19 May 2017, Zagreb SOCIAL COMPETENCE.
The Whartons Parent Forum
Workshop 2S (Secondary)
Off to a Good Start? Primary School Experiences and the Transition to Second-Level Education Emer Smyth.
PCAP for Grade 8 Canadians
Research Brief: Mapping A Strategy to Attract the Politically Engaged Student to East Evergreen University Consultants: Elizabeth Goff Scott Gravitt Kim.
The digital divide: the special case of gender
Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
Motivation and learning
Francesc Pedró Katerina Ananiadou Seoul, 9 – 11 November 2009
Standards- based grading for parents- grades k-2
To obtain a copy of this poster, please visit
Between-school Variance in Achievement
Learning Objective: I can explain why development varies by gender.
Data Tables Packet #19.
Sabine Wollscheid, Senior Researcher, Dr. phil.
Learner motivation and individual differences in language learning Dr Louise Courtney Professor Suzanne Graham University of Reading Siena July 2017.
Study Design/Methods Used
What are Learning Targets?
The Yeholot Last Hurdle Program for Matriculation Summary Report
ICILS 2013 International Computer and Information Literacy Study
A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION: THE TEACHERS’ ROLE I. Bobonova, S. Ceretkova.
Motivation and learning
Presentation transcript:

Rita Hvistendahl og Astrid Roe Reading habits and ICT use among language minority students. Based on PISA data from 2000 and 2006 Research questions: For what activities and how frequently do boys and girls from language minorities use computers? How do the students assess their own ICT skills? Is there a connection between ICT use and PISA scores for scholastic achievement? How are the reading habits and attitudes towards reading among language minority boys and girls compared to majority students? Has there been a development over time with regard to ICT use, reading scores and reading habits? Pupils use of ICT in 2000 and 2006 The figures show that the percentage of students who use computers on a daily basis has increased among all groups from 2000 to 2006, in particular for minority girls   Gender differences in use have evened out – but with one exception; boys still play more computer games than girls. Internet use has increased among all students, and computer use at home is higher than at school. IKT-bruk i 2000 IKT-bruk i 2006 ICT use of and self-confidence The figures display the scores of four additive indices comprising items based statements about the students’ use of ICT, and about their confidence in their own skills. The OECD mean score is = 0, the standard deviation = 1. Norwegian students score above the OECD average, but with high variance between genders and student groups. Scholastic achievement The mean scores for the language minority students are lower than those of other pupils in all three areas. In 2000 the gender differences among minority students were low. For majority students however, there were large differences in the reading scores. This changed in 2006. Minority girls have significantly higher reading scores than do boys due to improved performance among the girls and a decline for the boys. The higher percentage of poor readers among minority boys is a serious challenge for Norwegian schools. Reading habits The frequency of reading activities has increased, in particular with digital texts. Gender differences in reading habits have increased among minority students, and are approaching those of majority students. Implications for Norwegian schools The development from 2000 to 2006 shows that language minority students are becoming more “alike” the majority pupils. On the positive side reading frequency has increased. On the negative gender differences in the boys’ disfavour have increased. This can most probably be explained by improved integration.   It is disturbing that the minority boys’ reading scores have declined from 2000 to 2006, and that it is those with the lowest scores who find Internet use difficult. Digital competence requires advanced reading skills – and this is a serious challenge for Norwegian schools. Rita Hvistendahl og Astrid Roe SPRING Språk i utdanning