Document Delivery Update for May 2011 – Andrew Jackson

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® IBM Research © 2006 IBM Corporation Faceted Logic, Ontologies, and Wikis: Possible Approaches for ONTOLOG Content John Boz Handy-Bosma, Ph.D., Senior.
Advertisements

The Unbundled Option A Public Library Perspective.
OCLC Update Session Ron Glass Senior Library Services Consultant TexShare 9 th Interlibrary Loan Workshop Austin, TX October 9, 2009.
DEBE CONFERENCE 2005 WORKSHOP SESSION PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING Essential features of PBL
Federated Searching Feedback From Usability Testing & Focus Groups Sarah C. Williams Angela Bonnell Milner Library, Illinois State University.
TRAINING – A RETURN ON INVESTMENT?. Links to individual programs here Training webpage.
User Interface Design for Federated Searching Mike Visser, Product Manager Endeavor March 16, 2005.
Monitoring Police Performance: International Perspectives Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
Queen’s Libraries User Surveys Selected information from the Faculty and Student surveys June 2002.
HINARI website interface, journals, and other full text resources (module 2)
Usability Process for eBP at Intel Eric Townsend, Intel.
Chapter 7 Usability and Evaluation Dov Te’eni Jane M. Carey.
Two Decades of User Surveys The Experience of Two Research Libraries from 1992 to 2011 Jim Self, University of Virginia Steve Hiller, University of Washington.
1 CS 430 / INFO 430 Information Retrieval Lecture 24 Usability 2.
Usability and Evaluation Dov Te’eni. Figure ‎ 7-2: Attitudes, use, performance and satisfaction AttitudesUsePerformance Satisfaction Perceived usability.
Ch 3 Usability page 1CS 368 Usability Models the authors compare three usability models and introduce their own “the extent to which a product can be used.
Review an existing website Usability in Design. to begin with.. Meeting Organization’s objectives and your Usability goals Meeting User’s Needs Complying.
Evaluation of digital Libraries: Criteria and problems from users’ perspectives Article by Hong (Iris) Xie Discussion by Pam Pagels.
Usability Methods: Cognitive Walkthrough & Heuristic Evaluation Dr. Dania Bilal IS 588 Spring 2008 Dr. D. Bilal.
What is a Usable Library Website? Results from a Nationwide Study Anthony Chow, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Michelle Bridges, Patricia Commander, Amy Figley,
Providing Access to Digitized Content Via the Finding Aid: A Usability Study Jody L. DeRidder University of Alabama Libraries
Social Media Strategy Heathlewett Public Library Lewis Sievers.
World Wide Web Resources What Do the Experts Say About Web Pages? February, 2001.
Embedding information literacy in an undergraduate Management module: reflecting on students’ performance and attitudes over two academic years Clive Cochrane.
Library Web Training & Standards Presentation for Content Developers Library WebOps November 1 st & November 5 th, 2012 Guest speaker: Jonathan Woodcock,
GETTING STAFF INVOLVED: CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR STAFF DEVELOPMENT, NEW SERVICES AND INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY Mary Ann Venner, Head of Access Services.
After the Academy Selena Lock LibQUAL+ Results Meeting 22nd August 2005.
Chapter 8 Usability Specification Techniques Hix & Hartson.
User Survey Fran Wilson Director Resource Sharing.
User Needs Assessment to Support Collection Management Decisions Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries For ALCTS-CMDS.
OCR GCSE Humanities Get Started - getting to grips with delivery and assessment Unit B033 Humanities Independent Enquiry Structure and Assessment.
OSU Libraries presented by the u-team.
Gatekeeper Plan features that support person-centered planning.
1 Pioneer Investments Legal and Compliance System Assessment Weekly Status Update June 23, 2005.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 587 Fall 2007.
Workflow Toolkit Tim Bowersox IDS Librarian SUNY Geneseo.
System Interface Evaluation: Goodreads Group 3 April 17, 2012.
Cognitive Walkthrough Leader Responsibilities Planning the evaluation method Developing two tasks to be performed by each group member (Evaluator) Meeting.
USABILITY Student Anna Sysova Group Minsk 2016 BELARUSIAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF INFORMATICS AND RADIOELECTRONICS.
Using the Research by Subject Pages 1. The research by subject link is a shortcut for library users interested in finding key resources associated with.
Building the Next Successful Library Discovery Tool Jeremy Hall & Michael Kucsak.
User Interface Design G52UID Milena Radenkovic Introduction.
PresQT Workshop, Tuesday, May 2, 2017
Jisc Open Access Dashboard
that you love one another, that your joy may be full
Technical Session Jonathan Wood.
Usability engineering
ServiceNow Implementation Knowledge Management
Librarians’ Use of Online Social Networks in Nigeria Uloma Doris Onuoha & Rosaline Oluremi Opeke Presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the American.
Key Performance Indicators in Ship Supply Management
SCG Meeting Brussels, 9 February 2017
Saad Ahmad Jola Bolaji Melvin Chien Maxwell Taylor
GALILEO Support Services
How to Evaluate a Library Service: Methods and Examples
Introduction to the HEART Framework
Supervisor role and responsibilities
WorldCat Local.
Usability Testing CS 4501 / 6501 Software Testing
#1 #2 #3 Solve: 21 ÷ Solve: Solve: 3 (7 + 4) 12 ÷ 3 – 2 + 1
Getting Full Text Articles Using PubMed and CINAHL
The User Interface Design Process
An inspirational talk about task management and team motivation
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
IMPROVING PUBLIC INFORMATION
Human Computer Interaction Lecture 14 HCI in Software Process
Environmental objective document –
Session 1: The report on CIS-members´ views on the experience in the implementation of the economic aspects of the WFD.
Contributing factors Lack of communication Lack of coordination
Functional skills Week 10.
TBLT: Quick Outline for ELTchat
Presentation transcript:

Document Delivery Update for May 2011 – Andrew Jackson Placement student Jonathan Hansmann from MSc Information and Library Studies, University of Strathclyde

Student placement Jonathan is looking at TKN usability in relation to Effectiveness – which can be measured by such factors as the percentage of tasks completed, ratio of success to failures, number of features or commands used and overall workload. Efficiency – which can be measured by such factors as the time taken to complete a task, time taken to learn to use the product or service, time spent on errors, number or percentages of errors, frequency of use of help, and number of repeated or failed commands Satisfaction – which can be measured by using rating scales for measuring the usefulness of a product or service, rating scales for measuring the satisfaction with specific features or functions, by counting the number of times the user gets upset or frustrated, and users’ overall perception of the information service or product in relation to performing a specific task or solving problems. Information Users and Usability, Chowdhury and Chowdhury, 2011

Methodology Full-text article search (20 references from BMJ) undertaken by Jonathan Jonathan spent an hour with Lorraine McLeod of GGC to gain librarian-user perspective & also supplied with local users’ feedback Article searches also undertaken by members of the Working Group (just Grampian so far) Full-text article search (14 references from The Lancet) undertaken by Susan Lindner of KSG, ‘non-expert’ user. Report to follow by 31 May

Next steps Jonathan’s report to be circulated to Working Group Report also to be discussed with Working Group members from KSG to identify key issues, assess options for change within current objective year, etc. Report to inform first Working Group discussion (June) … swiftly followed by first DDS workflow workshop / discussion (June) with last year’s Lean session in mind