Douglas S. Bell, MD, PhD Leader, UCLA CTSI Informatics Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPIRIT IV A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Advertisements

August 30, 2009 at CET. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes – the PLATO trial.
Clinical Trials What Are They and When Are They Right For You? Maura N. Dickler Assistant Attending Physician Breast Cancer Medicine Service Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
Comparison of the New Mayo Clinic Risk Scores and Clinical SYNTAX Score in Predicting Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT): Design Cannon CP.
CPORT- E Trial Randomized trial comparing medical, economic and quality of life outcomes of non-primary PCI at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac.
Randomized Comparison of High-Dose Oral Vitamins versus Placebo in the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) Gervasio A. Lamas, MD, FACC Professor of.
Women's Health Study: Low-Dose Aspirin in Primary Prevention Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. Dr.
Lookback Module: What you should know 2012 National Conference on Health Statistics Monitoring Health Care Reform through Provider-based Surveys: New Initiatives.
Leadership. Knowledge. Community. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Antiplatelet Guidelines Antiplatelet Therapy for Vascular Prevention in Patients with.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
Background  Obesity is an extremely common problem ~ 1/3 of adult Americans are obese  Patients commonly ask physicians for advice on weight loss, yet.
CPORT- E Trial Randomized trial comparing outcomes of non-primary PCI at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery.
The Influence of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Clinical Outcomes After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Kishore J. Harjai, MD, FACC Chetan Shenoy,
The 2015 PCORI Annual Meeting: Progress in Building a Patient-Centered Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research Community Innovative Features of the.
Naotsugu Oyama, MD, PhD, MBA A Trial of PLATelet inhibition and Patient Outcomes.
ADAPTABLE Update 14 December Agenda for Today CDRN Presentations Mytrus Update Other Items.
Hypothesis: baseline risk status of the patients and proximity to a recent cardiovascular event influence the response to dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients.
WarfarinApixaban Primary outcome: major/clinically relevant bleeding (through 6 months) Secondary objective: Death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis Randomize.
DIABETES INSTITUTE JOURNAL CLUB CARINA SIGNORI, D.O., M.P.H. DECEMBER 15, 2011 Atherothrombosis intervention in metabolic syndrome with low HDL/High Triglycerides:
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Involving Patients with Low Risk Chest Pain in Discharge Decisions: A Multicenter Trial Erik P. Hess MD MSc.
1 Do Tirofiban And ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial N Engl J Med 2001;344:
Rivaroxaban in stable peripheral or carotid artery disease
Rachel Neubrander, PhD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
_________________ Caitlin M. Gibson, PharmD, BCPS
Heparin Should be the First-line Therapy for Patients with ACS/AMI
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Clinical Trial Commentary
Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark
The POSITIVE study A large international research effort coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) worldwide ALLIANCE for Clinical.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
ADAPTABLE Inclusion/Exclusion
Vladimir Ganyukov, MD, PhD
ADAPTABLE The Aspirin Study
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
Study Design AMI <12 hours, any age, cardiogenic shock excluded
Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives Variable Response to Clopidogrel.
Medical Therapy for Peripheral Artery Disease
Jeff Macemon Waikato Cardiothoracic Unit
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session of the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November.
PAD Patients vs Post-ACS Patients:
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Antithrombotics and PAD: A New Paradigm in Practice
What Has Been Tried and What Is True?
Antiplatelet Therapy and Secondary Prevention
Statins Evaluation in Coronary procedUres and REvascularization
Diabetes and CV Risk Reduction: Cardiologists’ Perspectives on the Latest Outcomes Data.
NOACS: Emerging data in ACS/IHD
The Time Dependence of Anti-thrombin Initiation in Patients with Non-ST-segment –elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Subgroup Analysis form the ACUITY.
Frank W. Rockhold, PhD Professor of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, MD
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
American Heart Association Presented by Dr. Julinda Mehilli
Factor Xa Inhibitors in PAD
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Cindy Murray NP Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Implications of Preoperative Thienopyridine Use
Elevated Admission Plasma Glucose Following ACS
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
Jason Springer MD MS Mei Liu PhD
ADAPTABLE The Aspirin Study CDRN Call
REACHnet: Research Action for Health Network
Presentation transcript:

Douglas S. Bell, MD, PhD Leader, UCLA CTSI Informatics Program Aspirin 81mg vs. 325mg UCLA Recruitment Plan Douglas S. Bell, MD, PhD Leader, UCLA CTSI Informatics Program 1

2014 AHA/ACC NSTE-ACS Guidelines IIa IIb III [For patients who experience NSTE-ACS], a maintenance dose of aspirin (81 mg/d to 325 mg/d) should be continued indefinitely.

Main objectives To perform a large, pragmatic clinical trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of two doses of aspirin (81 mg and 325 mg) in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease Primary effectiveness endpoint: Composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for MI, or hospitalization for stroke Primary safety endpoint: Hospitalization for major bleeding

Pragmatic research: e-data collection Web portal follow-up Randomized to 3 vs 6 mos contact Patient-reported hospitalizations Medication use Health outcomes DCRI call center Patients who miss 2 contacts N=20,000 ADAPTABLE enrollee 6 18 24 30 12 PCORnet Coordinating Center follow-up Via Common Data Model Validated coding algorithms for endpoints CMS and private health plans follow-up Longitudinal health outcomes Death ascertainment National Death Index (NDI) & Social Security Database Baseline data

Computable Phenotype INCLUSION EXCLUSION Known CAD ≥18 years of age History of MI Prior coronary revascularization ≥18 years of age Estimated 3-year MACE risk >8% Age >65 years Creatinine >1.5 mg/dL Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2) Known 3-vessel CAD Known Cerebrovascular disease or PAD Current smoker EXCLUSION Allergy or intolerance to ≤325 mg aspirin per day Current use of warfarin, NOAC, or Ticagrelor Pregnant or nursing an infant Significant GI bleed within past 12 months Significant bleeding disorder

“Pragmatic” Study Design Patients matching the computable phenotype identified through EHR search Patients contacted (via mail, email, phone, face-to-face) with link to study website Study web portal conducts informed consent and random assignment of aspirin dose ASA 81 mg QD ASA 325 mg QD Follow-up through study website: Every 3–6 months Supplemented with CDM/claims data Duration: Enrollment over 24 months; maximum follow-up of 30 months

pSCANNER Recruitment Approach Enrollment goals UCLA: 1,340 patients UCI: 660 patients Eligible participants will be contacted via: Mail and patient portal message (if portal user) Phone calls Face-to-face contact in clinic by study RA Each contact will provide a golden ticket number that the patient can use to enter the study web portal PCP, cardiologist will be pre-notified of eligible patients Opportunity opt patients out who should not participate Study fliers provided for clinicians to hand out during visits FAQ for physicians to help them answer patient questions

ADAPTABLE timeline UCLA 12,059 patients match computable phenotype 6,079 had an ambulatory visit with their PCP or cardiologist in the last 3 years Plan to launch recruitment this month, continue waves through Summer, 2017 UC Irvine Finalizing subcontract and IRB Asked by Duke to hold until UCLA well underway

pSCANNER Study Team UCLA PI: Douglas S. Bell, MD, PhD Co-I: Gregg Fonarow, MD (Cardiology) Project Manager: Marianne Zachariah UC Irvine PI: Shaista Malik, MD (Cardiology) Project Manager: Roni Bracha

Reference slides