Seismic network of landers on Mars: Proposed positioning of landing ellipses and evaluation of the encountered range of slopes Michael G., Hauber E., Oberst,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOLOGY OF PHOBOS-GRUNT LANDING SITES: A VIEW FROM THE MEX HRSC IMAGES. Vernadsky Institute, Moscow C. Lorenz, A. Basilevsky K. Willner Technical University,
Advertisements

Space Engineering I – Part I
AQUEOUS SEDIMENTARY DEPOSITS IN HOLDEN CRATER: LANDING SITE FOR THE MARS SCIENCE LABORATORY Rossman P. Irwin III and John A. Grant Smithsonian Institution,
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 64 th International Astronautical Congress September 2013, Beijing, China Assessment of possible observation.
IMPACT OF INSERTION LOCATION ON THE LONGEVITY OF A MARS BALLOON Spaghetti plot for a balloon launch centered in Hellas (42S, 70E) as shown above. Trajectories.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Hopper Trajectory February 26, 2009 [Alex Whiteman] [Mission Ops] [Lunar Descent] Page 1.
P A C PROTECTED ANTIPODE CIRCLE At the Center of the FARSIDE of the Moon for the Benefit of all Humankind P A C PROTECTED ANTIPODE CIRCLE At the Center.
Errors in Viking Lander Atmospheric Profiles Discovered Using MOLA Topography Withers, Lorenz, and Neumann LPSC 2002 Abstract #1294 Abstract’s Abstract:
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
C.M. Rodrigue, 2007 Geography, CSULB Mars: Second Order Landscapes Geography S/07 Dr. Christine M. Rodrigue.
Stargazing on Mars Stargazing on Mars Cover Page Environment Constellations Polar Axis Observing Moons Observing Mars Moon to Moon Solar Eclipses Earth.
Constellations A constellation is a region of the sky.
ASTRONOMY 340 FALL October 2007 Class #9. Salient Martian Features  R Mars = 3396 km (R Earth = 6378 km)  Higher surface area to mass ratio 
ExoMars LSEC 2018 Landing Site Engineering Constraints LSSWS# December 2014 L. Lorenzoni and ExoMars Project.
Working Group 5 Draft Report On Sub Working Group Conclusions 1.
Pre-decisional: For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Mars 2020 Project EDL Landing Site.
Early Spacecraft Exploration Viking  “The scientific goal of the Viking missions is to ‘increase our knowledge of the planet Mars with an emphasis on.
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology August 4, 2015 Austin Nicholas Landing Site Considerations Related to the Potential Sample.
Landing Site Thermal Minima for Rover Lifetime Concerns Nathan T. Bridges and Terry Z. Martin Jet Propulsion Laboratory Significant acknowledgments to.
Beginning search for deep moonquakes locations on the lunar far side T. Sonnemann 1, 2, M. Knapmeyer 1 and J. Oberst 1 1 Institute of Planetary Research,
Unit 2: Misconception Alert!
Observing Mars By Brad Jarvis. Overview Basic facts Orbits and distance Viewing Mars from Earth The view from space Current exploration Conclusion References.
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
Slide: 1 The first Moscow Solar System Symposium (1M-S3) >> Phobos Digital Terrain Model (DTM)and Coordinate Refinement for Phobos-Grunt Mission Support.
Mars Exploration Rovers Entry, Descent, Landing and Deployment.
Correlating aftershock sequences properties to earthquake physics J. Woessner S.Wiemer, S.Toda.
PROPOSED 2018 Joint Rover Mission Plans for Proposed 2018 NASA & ESA Joint Rover Mission Landing Site Selection Matt Golombek Mars Exploration Program.
GLOBES SHOW THE EARTH AS A SPHERE TITLED ON ITS AXIS THE AXIS GOES THROUGH THE NORTH POLE AND THE SOUTH POLE PHYSICAL MAPS SHOW THE LOCATION OF IMPORTANT.
Phoenix The Phoenix Mars Mission Doug Lombardi Education and Public Outreach Manager Lunar and Planetary Laboratory The University of Arizona
Lava Flows of Arsia Mons, Mars Ruben Rivas College of Engineering University of Arizona (Tucson, Az) Space Grant Mentor: David Crown Planetary Science.
Mars Science Laboratory Landing Site Workshop 1 Xanthe-Hellas-Elysium-Isidis LSC / 01 / 06/06 NMMNHS 1 Four Proposed Mars Science Laboratory Landing Sites.
Software used: ArcMap , MatLab R2015b, Google Earth 7.1.5
C.M. Rodrigue, 2014 Geography, CSULB Mars: Fourth Order Landscapes Geography 441/541 S/14 Dr. Christine M. Rodrigue.
Review of Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems. Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems MinMars Mars entry body design is derived from JPL Austere Mars entry.
NAI Mars Focus Group Videocon Science and Landing Site Priorities for the Mars 2003 Mission Presentations by: n Ronald Greeley (ASU) & Ruslan Kuzmin (Vernadsky.
1 A simple method for supporting future landers by predicting surface pressure on Mars Paul Withers Boston University 725 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston MA.
Determine most suitable area to artificial groundwater recharge in Parsyan basin in IRAN By: Mandana Ashouri GIS Supervisor: Dr. Maidment.
MAPPING MARS CRATER LANDING SITES & MODELLING CRATER DYNAMICS COMPUTERS IN GEOLOGY TERM PROJECT STEPHANIE SHAHRZAD NOVEMBER 7, 2015.
Pre-decisional: For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Mars 2020 Project Engineering Assessment.
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
C.M. Rodrigue, 2007 Geography, CSULB Boldly Going Where No Geographer Has Gone Before: The Martian Classroom The Los Angeles Geographical Society (7 September.
Surface Features of Mars. General Features Mars is a Desert World. Its surface is dominated by desert terrain dotted with Volcanoes and Craters. There.
STA 2 Expansion Project Conceptual Plan for Cell 4 STA 2 Expansion Project Conceptual Plan for Cell 4 Long-term Plan Communications Meeting November 18,
Exploration Mobility Within Driveback Constraints Graham Mann School of Information Technology Murdoch University Western Australia.
Enterprise Network Sourcing & Price: Cost Considerations for WAN Design Brianna Boudreau Senior Analyst.
By: Jacob, Chad, Breana, Kayla, Micah, Nick
Curiosity Curiosity pictures Rover view Old Rover View form older rover.
Mars.
ESCI 214: Mars: What and Where. (Survey of Major Geologic Features)
Chapter 4 Antenna Arrays
Orbital and Physical Properties
The Akon Europa Penetrator
How Can We Come to Understand MARS?
Scale: Kilometers.
Astronomy 340 Fall October 2005 Class #9.
Patricia Craig, Ph.D. Planetary Science Palooza LPSC 2017
Timeline of Martian Volcanism
Lunar Descent Analysis
Olympus Mons Mitchell Kirshner 3/11/14.
All The Planets.
Earth vs. Mars Comparison
by M. P. Golombek, R. A. Cook, T. Economou, W. M. Folkner, A. F. C
Surface Features of Mars
WESt Sammamish park project
Scale: Kilometers.
THE CIRCUM-HELLAS VOLCANIC PROVINCE (CHVP)
Surface Features of Mars
Walter S. Kiefer Lunar and Planetary Institute
Stephen Eikenberry 21 Feb 2019 AST 2037
Presentation transcript:

Seismic network of landers on Mars: Proposed positioning of landing ellipses and evaluation of the encountered range of slopes Michael G., Hauber E., Oberst, J., Jaumann R. Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Berlin

desired configuration The optimal configuration is a triangle of 3 landers separated by 30 degs, with a fourth station at an antipodal location. The triangle ideally should enclose a seismically active region: the favoured options are Tharsis and Elysium

constraints The proposed mission design for the former Netlander mission: allows for a maximum spread of landing times of 2h 40 min, which means that the possible landing sites fall within two bands of around 40degs width in longitude: one for prograde and the other for retrograde entries. The reachable latitude range is expected to be 34S-53N. Constraints imposed by the parachute and airbag systems determine that the sites should be at an altitude of no more than the 0 m MOLA level. For the Netlander design, the 3-sigma landing ellipse is of the order of 540x55 km. Varies somewhat depending on the site.  (cf. Gusev crater, the Spirit rover landing site, at 170 km across) Ellipse semi-major axis orientated along entry trajectory (perpendicular to trace of reachable sites) the local slope should be < 15° on 5m scale, and the area free of obvious hazards

Amazonia network

Ladon basin

slope range MOLA – 500m baseline

3d view MOLA/Viking MDIM

difficult sites – Lycus Sulci

slope range

altitude range MOLA

3d view

alternative sites – Olympus south

slope range

altitude range

3d view swap for hrsc?

Elysium network

Tharsis network – T1 variant

Amazonia variant – Olympus south

Chryse network

table of sites

conclusion 540x55km 3 landing ellipses can be optimally placed such that the 15º local slope constraint is violated with maximum 2.2% probability for the Amazonia network (at Ladon basin) Amazonia network offers the safest sites with the current constraints Elysium network has good possibilities, although the retrograde entries may be constrained to ~11ºN; Ladon basin would be a good antipode, if time constraint relaxed by 50% proposed Tharsis variants require significant relaxation of the landing time constraint (300% for T1) (note that Hellas ellipses are expected to be significantly larger, and the landing systems may need to operate differently) There are several feasible Chryse network configurations in the north; other than Hellas, a site east of Dao Vallis might serve as the antipode An Amazonia network with a site south of Olympus Mons appears to be an interesting variant G. Michael acknowledges the European Community's Human Potential Programme under contract RTN2-2001-00414, MAGE.