Tom Lastoskie Chair Jack Galuardi Vice Chair ESH Committee Tom Lastoskie Chair Jack Galuardi Vice Chair

Overview Workshop Presentation/Discussion Results of 2016 “Green’ Team Workshop Activity ESH Committee Membership Items of Discussion/Contention Do We Need to Add New Criteria? New ‘Thread’ or Incorporate in ‘Existing Thread’? How to Codify These Changes? Do We Use the Term ESH or EHS? ‘Special Handling’ Needs Better Definition/Explanation in the MRL Deskbook and User Guide Proposed Actions

Results of 2016 “Green’ Team ESH Workshop Activity

Feedback on Proposed Matrix Change (From 2016 MRL Workshop) Environmental, Safety, and Health ‘Green’ Team Assessment of proposed additional criteria Value added: potentially Recommendations: Investigate as an additional thread, not incorporated in existing threads General Comments/ Observations Criteria need to be at a high level (addressing mfg issues and concerns) Criteria should be able to observe this on the floor Needed (early and often) (industry) May be out of scope (govt) and scope creep (industry) Recommended Actions Needs a lot more work

‘Green’ Team Members (2016) -Tom Lastoskie – AFIT (OPR) -Jack Galuardi – APT -Harry Diaz – DCMA -Michael Ganowsky – Boeing -Jason Schmidt – Boeing -Greg Krieger – BAE Rob Arthur – DAU Scott Pearl – AFRL Josh Rosen – Northrop -Eric Whitman – Draper Jordan Masters – ARDEC Gary Stanley – OSD Ctr -Steve Anderson – NAVAIR

All members verified their membership ESH Committee Members Tom Lastoskie – Chair Jack Galuardi – Vice Chair Michael Ganowsky – Member, Boeing Jason Schmidt – Member, Boeing Greg Krieger – Member, BAE Eric Whitman – Member, Draper Harry Diaz-Agosto – Member, DCMA Steve Anderson – Member, Navy (NAVAIR) David Karr – Member, USAF (LCMC) All members verified their membership All members verified their membership

Items of Discussion/Contention

Do We Need to Add New Criteria? Overwhelmingly, the answer is YES!!!

2. New ‘Thread’ or Incorporate in ‘Existing Thread’? This item is the ‘Contentious’ area! A few points: Predominately, DoD personnel want to keep the current Matrix setup of 9 Threads Predominately, Industry personnel would like to have a 10th Thread for ESH A Majority of personnel stated that ESH is NOT a primary functional responsibility of Manufacturing/Quality Compromise is necessary to move forward

3. How to Codify These Changes? Add/Update Criteria Update ‘MRL Users Guide’ to Reflect Changes to Criteria

4. Do We Use the Term ESH or EHS? No strong feedback on either term

5. ‘Special Handling’ Needs Better Definition/Explanation in the MRL Deskbook and User Guide Overwhelmingly, the answer is YES!!!

Proposed Actions for ESH (5 Items)

Update Criteria as Identified on the File ‘MRL_Matrix_with_ESH_Updates_for_worksho p.xlsx’ for Threads ‘D’ and ‘H’; Sub-Threads ‘D.4 – Special Handling’ and ‘H.2 – Facilities’ This Action to be Agreed/Completed at this Workshop Update ‘MRL Users Guide’ to Reflect Changes to Criteria and Incorporate the ‘Industry Comments/Recommendations’ included in the above File

Select the Term ESH or EHS Incorporate New Wording in the MRL Deskbook to Address Situations Where Industry May Look at Some Areas of Manufacturing/Quality Differently Than DoD This Action to be Started (Hopefully, Agreed/Completed) at this Workshop Select the Term ESH or EHS This Action to be Agreed/Completed at this Workshop Define/Explain ‘Special Handling’ With Better Wording in the MRL Deskbook and User Guide