Exploiting Semantic Activity Labels for

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can I Use It, and If so, How? Christian Lieske SAP AG – MultiLingual Technology Discussion of Consortium Proposal for OLIF2 File Header.
Advertisements

Background information Formal verification methods based on theorem proving techniques and model­checking –to prove the absence of errors (in the formal.
Solutions to Review Questions. 4.1 Define object, class and instance. The UML Glossary gives these definitions: Object: an instance of a class. Class:
An Extensible System for Merging Two Models Rachel Pottinger University of Washington Supervisors: Phil Bernstein and Alon Halevy.
Research topics Semantic Web - Spring 2007 Computer Engineering Department Sharif University of Technology.
A First Attempt towards a Logical Model for the PBMS PANDA Meeting, Milano, 18 April 2002 National Technical University of Athens Patterns for Next-Generation.
A Review of Ontology Mapping, Merging, and Integration Presenter: Yihong Ding.
Design Modeling for Web Applications
The Data Mining Visual Environment Motivation Major problems with existing DM systems They are based on non-extensible frameworks. They provide a non-uniform.
Lecturer: Dr. AJ Bieszczad Chapter 66-1 Object-Oriented analysis and design Special nature of OO development Use cases Design with UML OO system design.
Second Language Acquisition and Real World Applications Alessandro Benati (Director of CAROLE, University of Greenwich, UK) Making.
Web Service Architecture Part I- Overview and Models (based on W3C Working Group Note Frank.
Advanced Data Mining and Integration Research for Europe ADMIRE – Framework 7 ICT ADMIRE Overview European Commission 7 th.
Ontology Learning and Population from Text: Algorithms, Evaluation and Applications Chapters Presented by Sole.
10 December, 2013 Katrin Heinze, Bundesbank CEN/WS XBRL CWA1: DPM Meta model CWA1Page 1.
Architectural Design.
Kansas State University Department of Computing and Information Sciences CIS 830: Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence From Data Mining To Knowledge.
Ontology-derived Activity Components for Composing Travel Web Services Matthias Flügge Diana Tourtchaninova
Katanosh Morovat.   This concept is a formal approach for identifying the rules that encapsulate the structure, constraint, and control of the operation.
Web Services Experience Language Web Services eXperience Language Technical Overview Ravi Konuru e-Business Tools and Frameworks,
“Integrating Standards in Practice” 10th Open Forum on Metadata Registries July 9-11, 2007 New York City, NY USA An international conference to share and.
San Diego Supercomputer CenterUniversity of California, San Diego Preservation Research Roadmap Reagan W. Moore San Diego Supercomputer Center
Author: Lornet LD team Reuse freely – Just quote Desired Properties of a MOT Graphic Representation Formalism Simplicity and User Friendliness (win spec,
Web Services Glossary Summary of Holger Lausen
Defining Text Mining Preprocessing Transforming unstructured data stored in document collections into a more explicitly structured intermediate format.
Data Management David Nathan & Peter Austin & Robert Munro.
Dimitrios Skoutas Alkis Simitsis
VIKEF – Take the VIKEF train towards smart services …
Ocean Observatories Initiative Data Management (DM) Subsystem Overview Michael Meisinger September 29, 2009.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
1 Mapping to Relational Databases Presented by Ramona Su.
Jan 9, 2004 Symposium on Best Practice LSA, Boston, MA 1 Comparability of language data and analysis Using an ontology for linguistics Scott Farrar, U.
7 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition.
WebService. Outline Overview of Web Services SOAP (messaging) WSDL (service description) UDDI (registry)
Modeling System Requirements: Events and Things. Objectives Explain the many reasons for creating information system models Describe three types of models.
ISO-PWI Lexical ontology some loose remarks Thierry Declerck, DFKI GmbH.
Week III  Recap from Last Week Review Classes Review Domain Model for EU-Bid & EU-Lease Aggregation Example (Reservation) Attribute Properties.
Date : 2013/03/18 Author : Jeffrey Pound, Alexander K. Hudek, Ihab F. Ilyas, Grant Weddell Source : CIKM’12 Speaker : Er-Gang Liu Advisor : Prof. Jia-Ling.
Integration of Domain & Application Knowledge in MPEG-7/21 in the DS-MIRF Framework Laboratory of Distributed Multimedia Information Systems & Applications.
A Mediated Approach towards Web Service Choreography Michael Stollberg, Dumitru Roman, Juan Miguel Gomez DERI – Digital Enterprise Research Institute
Pete Johnston, Eduserv Foundation 16 April 2007 An Introduction to the DCMI Abstract Model JISC.
SwA Co-Chair and Task Lead Strategy Session Agenda Technology, Tools and Product Evaluation Working Group Status Briefing Co-Chair(s) Michael Kass (NIST),
Formal Verification. Background Information Formal verification methods based on theorem proving techniques and model­checking –To prove the absence of.
SemAF – Basics: Semantic annotation framework Harry Bunt Tilburg University isa -6 Joint ISO - ACL/SIGSEM workshop Oxford, January 2011 TC 37/SC.
Behind the LO-MATCH interface for end-users Semantic annotation Fabrizio Lamberti Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica Politecnico di Torino Italy.
Refining the Use Cases 1. How Use Cases Evolve  Early efforts typically define most of the major use cases.  The refining stages complete the process.
Naming – Concept – Sense – Reference. In semantics, there are two major ways to find out the meaning of a word which then becomes the two major branches.
© University of Manchester Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 unported 3.0 license Quality Assurance, Ontology Engineering, and Semantic Interoperability.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. SOA-RM Overview and relation with SEE Adrian Mocan
Pattern Recognition. What is Pattern Recognition? Pattern recognition is a sub-topic of machine learning. PR is the science that concerns the description.
Profiling: What is it? Notes and reflections on profiling and how it could be used in process mining.
Use cases, tests classes, …
Use Case Model.
DATA MODELS.
Learning objective To study a range of geographical skills.
Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S)
Software Architecture & Design Pattern
Object-Oriented Analysis
Introduction to Database Systems
Semantic Marks A semantic mark is
Appellations, Authorities, and Access
Logical architecture refinement
Statistical NLP: Lecture 9
Extracting Semantic Concept Relations
Tomás Murillo-Morales and Klaus Miesenberger
Design Model Like a Pyramid Component Level Design i n t e r f a c d s
Database Systems Instructor Name: Lecture-3.
Information Networks: State of the Art
Data Warehousing Data Mining Privacy
SECTION 4: OO METHODOLOGIES
Presentation transcript:

Exploiting Semantic Activity Labels for Specialization of Abstract Process Activities Andreas Bögl, Michael Karlinger, Christoph Schütz, Michael Schrefl, and Gustav Pomberger This work is an outcome of the Vertical Model Integration (VMI) 4.0 project which is supported within the program Regionale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit OÖ 2007-2013 by the European Fund for Regional Development as well as the State of Upper Austria.

Overview Semantic Annotation of Business Process Activities Consistent Specialization of Business Process Activities by Label Specialization Future Work

Semantic Annotation of Activities Business Process Knowledge Base Semantic Activity Label Business Process Activity Repository

Linguistic Encoding of Activity Labels An activity label in a business process model as formulated by the modeler typically consists of: Words describing tasks/actions, e.g., “Verify”, “Define” Words describing process objects, e.g., “Order”, “Requirements”

Linguistic Encoding of Activity Labels An activity label in a business process model as formulated by the modeler typically consists of: Words describing tasks/actions, e.g., “Verify”, “Define” Words describing process objects, e.g., “Order”, “Requirements”

Linguistic Encoding of Activity Labels An activity label in a business process model as formulated by the modeler typically consists of: Words describing tasks/actions, e.g., “Verify”, “Define” Words describing process objects, e.g., “Order”, “Requirements” Interpretation of linguistic meaning of activity labels requires a description of the relationship between the used words

Linguistic Encoding of Activity Labels An activity label in a business process model as formulated by the modeler typically consists of: Words describing tasks/actions, e.g., “Verify”, “Define” Words describing process objects, e.g., “Order”, “Requirements” Interpretation of linguistic meaning of activity labels requires a description of the relationship between the used words The “Define” task is performed on the “Requirements” object.

Linguistic Encoding of Activity Labels An activity label in a business process model as formulated by the modeler typically consists of: Words describing tasks/actions, e.g., “Verify”, “Define” Words describing process objects, e.g., “Order”, “Requirements” Interpretation of linguistic meaning of activity labels requires a description of the relationship between the used words Semantic activity labels abstract from concrete lexical representations and encode in a machine-readable format process items and their relationships

Process Knowledge Base

Semantic Activity Label A semantic activity label over a process knowledge base consists of a set of process items and relationships from that process knowledge base.

Semantic Activity Label

Semantic Activity Label

Process Activity Repository A business process activity repository consists of a process knowledge base a set of process activities a set of semantic activity labels over the process knowledge base and a mapping from process activities to semantic activity labels

Behavior-consistent Specialization Two important definitions of behavior consistency based upon what a user observes (observation consistency), which activities a user may invoke (invocation consistency). Ebert, J. and Engels, G., 1994. Observable or invocable behavior – You have to choose. Technical Report, Universität Koblenz. We consider an activity S as an observation-consistent specialization of A if and only if the linguistic meaning of A is observable in S.

Consistent Activity Specialization The specialization relationships between process items and relationships in the process knowledge base determine a specialization hierarchy of activities

Consistent Activity Specialization The specialization relationships between process items and relationships in the process knowledge base determine a specialization hierarchy of activities

Specialization of Abstract Process Activities

Future Work Development of refinement and extension operators for activity labels in order to support modelers Process mining: Exploit semantic activity labels in order to find frequent process patterns in existing business process models