Writing Grants and Responding to Peer Reviews

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the Basics of Peer Review: Part 1 – Receiving a Manuscript IMPULSE Journal for Undergraduate Neuroscience This is a the first of a two part.
Advertisements

Exam and revision techniques. 1. To describe the main EU institutions. 2. To identify the differing sources of EU law and their impacts. 3. To explain.
Essays A Guide. Essays  Extended piece of writing on a single theme  Is in the form of continuous text  In the form of introduction, main section,
HOW TO WRITE AN ARTICLE FOR PUBLICATION Leana Uys FUNDISA.
Essays and Reports A guide. Types of Scientific Writing b Factual account of accepted knowledge  Textbooks, many student essays b Reporting what has.
Approaches to Publish rather than Perish: Some Lessons from the School of Hard Knocks Dr. John Loomis, Professor Dept. of Ag & Resource Economics Colorado.
Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Send.
Reviewing Papers: What Reviewers Look For Session 19 C507 Scientific Writing.
RGC Grant Applications in Biology & Medicine Formulating and Writing winning proposals Kathy Cheah, 2003.
Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Sends.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
1 CM 220: College Composition II Unit 9 Seminar P RESENTING YOUR BIG IDEA TO THE W ORLD.
Being an Effective Peer Reviewer Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
THE REVIEW PROCESS –HOW TO EFFECTIVELY REVISE A PAPER David Smallbone Professor of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, SBRC, Kingston University Associate.
What Does it Take to Publish in the AJAE? Get a good idea. Turn the idea into a well-posed, answerable question. Do the research right. Write Effectively.
Preparing a Scientific Poster LuAnn Wilkerson, Ed.D. Sr. Assoc. Dean for Medical Education Alan LeFor, M.D. Former Chair, Applied Anatomy College & Professor.
CM 220 COLLEGE COMPOSITION II UNIT 9 SEMINAR Professor Thompson General Education, Composition Kaplan University 1.
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Conference Paper. 2 Disclaimer This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies.
Manuscript Review Prepared by Noni MacDonald MD FRCPc Editor-in-Chief Paediatrics and Child Health Former Editor-in -Chief CMAJ
Securing External Federal Funding Janice F. Almasi, Ph.D. Carol Lee Robertson Endowed Professor of Literacy University of Kentucky
Preparing a Written Report Prepared by: R Bortolussi MD FRCPC and Noni MacDonald MD FRCPC.
Guide for AWS Reviewers Lois A. Killewich, MD PhD AWS AJS Editorial Board.
1 CM 220 College Composition II Unit 9: Presenting Your “Big Idea” to the World Instructor Ciccarone General Education, Composition Kaplan University.
Type One: Capture Ideas Type Two: Respond Correctly Type Three: Edit for Focus Correction Areas Type Four: Peer Edit for Focus Correction Areas Type Five:
The Writing Process THE P.O.W.E.R.S. OF WRITING. “P “ is for Pre-Write The success of a piece of writing often depends on the time you take “before” you.
Grant Writing: Specific Considerations in Clinical Studies Ravi Retnakaran MD MSc FRCPC Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital University.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING How a manuscript becomes an article.
RAT Restate Answer the question Tell why WHY RAT? Systematic way for answering questions Provides consistency across grade-level Gives students a structure.
COMM 102 Week 1 Individual Written Communication Exercises Write a 250- to 500-word response to each of the following three exercises, 750 to 1500 words.
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
Features of science revision
Increasing challenge in revision tasks
Examples of Responses.
Journeys into journals: publishing for the new professional
Team Project   1. Use at least 4 independent variables and at least 40 data points In the beginning!) If you start with 5 independent variables you should.
The Writing Process THE P.O.W.E.R.S. OF WRITING.
Intensive Course in Research Writing
Scientific Publishing
The peer review process
Objective and hypothesis
Writing the research protocol
Functional English.
Peer Editing Research.
The NSF Grant Review Process: Some Practical Tips
Writing and Feedback.
Unit 3 Analyzing Informational Text
Youngwummin: Ethics and Data Collection Methods
HOW TO GET GRANTS Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
On the back of the last page of the rough draft of the paper that you are reviewing write your name, then please respond to these questions: State the.
Peer Review ENGL 106: FYC Beth Towle.
Responding to Grant Reviews using a Matrix
Introduction Briefly Outline the Project. Introduction Briefly Outline the Project.
Assessment - KS4 Create detailed revision materials for the work we have done so far Ask your teacher for help if you are not sure what works for you The.
Writing to a Persuasive Prompt
Writing On Demand.
د راپور لیکلو روزنیز پروګرام ته ښه راغلاست
Critique Jon Kolko Professor, Austin Center for Design.
Writing Prompts 5/08/17 – 5/12/17.
Writing Prompts 5/07/18 – 5/11/18.
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
Logical Arguments and Creating Proposals
HELPFUL TIPS FOR EXTERNAL SCHOLARSHIPS
How to study for Technology
Writing and Funding a Research Proposal
Getting to Know You Notes to Trainer:
Scholarly Writing: Term Papers to Publication
Before you appeal, ask yourself:
Presentation transcript:

Writing Grants and Responding to Peer Reviews Laurence Y. Katz, MD, FRCPC Professor of Psychiatry University of Manitoba

Basics of Grant Writing Ask a clear, important and well articulated question Review the literature (you may have been scooped)

Factors to Consider Who is the PI Who do you want on your team Plan team meetings The design of the study (admin or secondary data) Intervention –pilot? Sample size? Granting Agency (local or national, i.e., how much money do you need)?

Writing Sort out who is going to do what (in our lab the PI does the bulk of the writing) Build a case for why they should give you money!!! Be concise and clear Follow the guidelines Expect many drafts/revisions Make sure you have the expertise on your team to critique what you have designed and written Know your audience

Peer Review Remember that it will make your paper better It never just gets accepted (or you have shot too low) Read the reviews carefully and decide which points you will go with Make the revisions to your paper Write a letter to the editor in excruciating point by point detail describing your response to each point the reviewers have made If you did not revise a point explain rationale