From the NDPHS Evaluation Team April 22, 2008 Brussels

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SADC Regional Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) policy review and Statistics meeting Republic of Zambia Ministry of Science, Technology and Vocational.
Advertisements

Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
1 Evaluation of the STRATINC project Presentation to the project meeting Tenerife, 7 April 2005 Alasdair Reid, Technopolis (Belgium)
Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
July 2011: OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris June 2011: Joint Global Assembly of Open Forum and Better Aid Platform to prepare for HLF4.
Standards experts. Accreditation solutions. Andrea Spencer Coordinator, WTO/NAFTA Enquiry Point (Canada) TBT Special Meeting on Procedures for Information.
MAC Committee Update Robert Kondziolka, MAC Chair.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
3rd WG meeting, Brussels Proposed Plan for Governance of the Washington Group Prepared by: Jennifer Madans, Barbara Altman, Beth Rasch (USA); Renée Langlois.
PRESENTATION IV Cycle of the Structured Dialogue.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Progress update on developing Health Sector Strategic Plan (HSSP IV) Joint Annual Health Sector Review Technical Review Meeting Wednesday 5 th.
PARIS21 EVALUATION Progress so far PARIS21 Steering Committee meeting OECD Conference Centre 4 June 2009.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE REMJA WORKING GROUP ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND EXTRADITION.
CENTRAL FINANCE AND CONTRACTS UNIT Civil Society Dialogue - EU-Turkish Chambers Forum-II: EU-TURKEY CHAMBERS PARTNERSHIP GRANT SCHEME “Development of International.
List of Decisions #Decision for the Board 1 Does the Board agree to its composition? The Board requested that its composition be considered “proposed”
BU610 Applied Business Research 2015 Section A (Waterloo Part-time MBA) Faculty Advisors: Shelly Jha Detlev Nitsch Jack Schnabel.
Mbombela Climate Change Workshop 2 5 November 2015 Civic Centre Hall, Mbombela.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
BU610 Applied Business Research 2016 Section A (Waterloo Part-time MBA) Faculty Advisors: Mitali De Shelly Jha Kalyani Menon
EURIPIDES² - PENTA Consortium Building Day Stockholm – 28 April 2016 TEMPLATE TO BE SENT BACK TO or
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Project Lead Partner: Fire and Rescue Department under the Ministry.
> 1 ACP S&T Grant Contract N° FED/2009/ Introducing WP6 Monitoring & Quality control Objectives, actions, procedures Dr Sarah Bracking.
Organization of work and practical arrangements 28 April-10 May 2013 Geneva, Switzerland David Ogden, Acting Chief, Convention Operations Branch, Secretariat.
Update to Members Analysis Team Update on current activities for comment List of proposed new project ideas Opportunity for Members to suggest new projects.
Scottish Students’ Society. Purpose Represent the interests of students and newly qualified members in the CIPFA Scottish Branch; Act as a facilitator.
Title of presentation Copyright IDS and MeTA 2010
BENCH-CAN Internal evaluation 2nd semester
Welcome to Scottish Improvement Skills
process and procedures for assessments
Office 365 Security Assessment Workshop
Introductions and aims of today’s briefing
5.2 Monitoring and Evaluation
19th GRI Coordination Group meeting
REWG activities in LILIIA MALON REWG Chair Prague
Prison Health Expert Group Progress and Future activities
STRESS TESTS and TAIWAN PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
Annual Progress Report 2010 Annual Work Plan 2011
CAEP Orientation: Newcomers
Project Grant: Fall 2016 Competition
EQAVET Annual Network Meeting
THREE-YEAR LOCAL STRATEGIC PLANNING
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
New NDPHS Expert-Level Structures
End of Fieldwork Debriefing
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
IRRS REFRESHER TRAINING Lecture 4
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018
What’s in this presentation
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
Introduction to the Review of the SI MQs NatSIP Associate/Scrutiner
Policy-to-project-to-policy Conference
STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF CO-OPERATION
External evaluation of NDPHS
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
External evaluation of NDPHS
EU Water Framework Directive
From the NDPHS Evaluation Team October 16th, 2013 Reykjavik
Presentation transcript:

From the NDPHS Evaluation Team April 22, 2008 Brussels An Update to the CSR From the NDPHS Evaluation Team April 22, 2008 Brussels

Purpose To provide members of the CSR with an update on the activities to date by the NDPHS Evaluation Team. Following the last CSR Meeting in Kaliningrad, November 2007, the Evaluation Team met for the first time in Vilnius, during the PAC Meeting. I had the opportunity to provide a brief update to the CSR members who were present.

Evaluation Team Members Chair: Robert Shearer, Canada Members: Mogens Jörgensen, Denmark Thomas Ifland, Germany Viktoras Meizis, Lithuania Jørgen Kaurin, Norway Toril Roscher-Nielsen, Norway Evgeny Slastnykh, Russia Marek Maciejowski, Secretariat Bernd Treichel, Secretariat

Consultant Contracted Following a competitive process, we are pleased to announce that Dirk van den Boom of the Centre for Evaluation, from the University of Saarbrucken, Germany, was chosen to assist the Evaluation Team with this important task. Contact information: Email:consulting@v-d-boom.de Phone: +49 681 685 38 87

Brussels Evaluation Team Meeting On March 12th, 2008, the Evaluation Team met at the Mission of Canada to the European Union. Dirk van den Boom had the opportunity to meet the members of the Evaluation Team present, and also participate in the meeting of the NDPHS Working Group Chairs and International Technical Advisors. The minutes of this meeting are available on the NDPHS website.

Brussels Evaluation Team Meeting Meeting Outcomes: The team agreed to endorse the terms of reference as proposed. (available at this meeting). The final report needs to be structured to assist the CSR to determine the future directions for the NDPHS. The report should not exceed 50 pages. Appropriate annexes could be included.

Brussels Evaluation Team Meeting Outcomes Continued The CSR Chair will facilitate discussions with the consultant and the NDPHS Stakeholders and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and respective Ministries of Health (by visiting some partner countries this year and possible phone calls to encourage partner responses for the evaluation process). Questions? Note: It was suggested that Ministries of Social Affairs be consulted.

CSR April 21-22, 2008 Interviews will be conducted during this meeting for most participants. Dirk van den Boom has provided us with an outline of the interview process and a schedule was circulated in advance of this meeting. This is the initial stage of our evaluation process. 17 interviews are planned and will be conducted over a 1 ½ hour period.

Content of Interviews Framework, scope and objectives Questions will be asked around the following areas: Framework, scope and objectives Overall structure and organisation Impact and Progress of the Partnership Commitment of the NDPHS actors Questions for Expert Group Members Other Issues

In Addition to these Interviews The Evaluation Team is recommending that each partner country respond to the following three questions in a written format. How would you characterize the impact of the Partnership so far? How would you describe the commitment of partner countries to the Partnership so far? What is your view on the perspective and the need for the Partnership in the future?

In Addition to these Interviews As Chair of the Evaluation Team, I will be forwarding an email request, immediately following this meeting, requesting that these questions be responded to in writing, no later than June 13, 2008. These responses will be returned to Robert Shearer, at the Mission of Canada to the European Union, and compiled into a full narrative report. This summary report will be provided to the evaluator, and will be taken into account in his final report.

Additional Information The evaluation process conducted by the consultant will continue with: Written questionnaires for EG-members following the interviews done with EG chairs Additional meetings already planned in Berlin and Stockholm to continue face-to-face interviews with available NDPHS-stakeholders Document-analysis of all documents available through the NDPHS-website Additional telephone-interviews where deemed necessary

Questions or Comments Your ongoing participation and involvement is key to making this evaluation a success! Your Evaluation Team is committed to keeping you informed as we progress in this important work.