Survey of Potential Overnight Service Passengers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Results from the 2008 Oklahoma Health Care Insurance and Access Survey Presentation to the Oklahoma Health Care Authority Board November 13,
Advertisements

Interim Review of the MBTA Late-night Service Pilot Program February 5, 2015.
On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
2013 Survey of California Home Buyers. Survey Methodology 1,400 telephone interviews conducted in March 2013 Respondents are home buyers who purchased.
2012 Survey of California Home Sellers. Methodology Telephone surveys conducted in August/September of 600 randomly selected home sellers who sold in.
PROJECTED RIDERSHIP OF THE HOUSATONIC RAILROAD STUDY Presented by Julie Pokela, Ph.D. August, 2010.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP
2008 Regional Bus Survey Preliminary Results Presentation to the Access for All Advisory Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director April.
Asleep at the Wheel: The Prevalence and Impact of Drowsy Driving.
NEW FOCUS nf nf 1 Research Strategy and Implementation Telephone: Facsimile: ACN: 066.
2001 US Demographic Study MPA Worldwide Market Research -1- With about 70% of US residents counting themselves as movie- goers - average admissions per.
MBTA Late-Night Service Proposed Service Changes Fiscal & Management Control Board February 29,
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee September 9,
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
An Up-to-Date Analysis of Future Workforce Needs in Transit
Vice President/Communications
Towards a better future for women and work: Voices of women and men
Findings of the Petaluma Transit 2014 Onboard Survey
Rush Line Corridor: Connecting Manufactured Home Parks to Opportunity
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
National Consumer Agency Economiser – Transport Section
HIGH SCHOOL ADMISSIONS AND STRATIFICATION
Society of Women Engineers
2007 Household Travel Survey
Thomas White, Stephen F. Duncan, and Jeremy B. Yorgason
Access Free Fare Program Assessment Survey
Ololade Olakanmi American Medical Association November 2007
Districtwide Passenger Origin & Destination (O & D) Surveys 2015 Planning & Development Committee November 01, 2016.
Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city
Table 1: NHBS HET3 Participant Characteristics
Indiana Community Health Needs Assessment
Pensions and Investments
Chesapeake Bay Program Office and Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
An Overview Title VI Applicability Public Outreach Fare Policy
Measuring and capturing mind share
NM OSAP Recipients Meeting August 29, 017
TD Bank | HELOC 2017 March 2017.
2016 Communications Survey
Assisting YouthBuild Programs to Promote Financial Saving:
NM OSAP Recipients Meeting August 21, 2018
Innovation and the online payment realm A market study
different Approaches different generations
28a. Percentage of employees having a high school diploma or higher education, by industry, 2005 (All types of employment)
Travel Behavior Inventory: Household Travel Survey
Report available at: Figures adapted from the TIEDI Analytical Report #23: Which languages do immigrants use.
The Midlife Crisis?.
BMC/ BUMC 2018 MA DEP Commuter Survey
2017 Charlottesville Parks and Recreation Survey: Findings
Mass Transit Usage According to IBISWorld, the public transportation industry increased 14.3%, from $63 billion during 2013 to $72 billion for 2017,
Old Saybrook Public Schools
Weekly C-Store Shopping Patterns
Automated Fare Collection 2.0 Next Generation MBTA Fare System
C-Stores and Their Customers Are at the Mercy of the Oil Market
TTC POSTSECONDARY DISCOUNT PROGRAM INTERCEPT SURVEY RESULTS
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
Did not have a usual source of care Went without care because of cost
Make Mother’s Day a Retail Sales Spike
Unit 3 Economic Challenges
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
Mobility Management: Do you save money by allowing paratransit customers to ride free on fixed-route? CalACT Conference April 2019.
Shenandoah County Public Transit Feasibility Study
Florida International University
Context and Methodology
NM OSAP Recipients Meeting August 20, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Survey of Potential Overnight Service Passengers 1/30/17 OPMI

Survey Background & overview In March 2016, the FMCB ended Late Night service In Fall 2016, the FMCB directed staff to conduct a survey and return to the Board with additional information on the needs of potential users of transit during time when the MBTA is not currently in revenue operations Staff designed and conducted this survey in collaboration with municipal and advocacy partners; data was collected in November-December 2016 No action is requested from the Board at this time

Survey Goal Supplement current behavior data (actual travel patterns between 1am and 5am) with stated preference information Acceptable service levels for actual use Likelihood of use Frequency of use Optimal boarding time Trip purposes Because survey respondents were not randomly selected, we can’t generalize or estimate ridership demand

Stated Preference Questions Possible Use of Overnight Service Frequency/Distance Preferences Q11 If a safe and affordable night bus service were available between 1AM and 5AM, how likely would you be to use it? Q12 If a safe and affordable night bus service were available between 1AM and 5AM, how frequently would you use it? Q13 Please indicate the level of convenience you would experience with the following frequency intervals (times between service) on night bus services. Q14 If a safe and affordable night bus service were available between 1AM and 5AM, how many minutes would you be willing to walk to a bus stop to use it? MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Demographics of respondents

Survey Outreach and Results Conducted online 11-12/2016 In 8 languages Outreach strategies Online outreach/Twitter/social media City of Cambridge & City of Boston outreach Current travel patterns 1am-5am and potential use of overnight service Usable responses: 7,278 High response rates for most demographic categories except age: 62% are 22-34 years old MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Demographics of Survey Respondents Current overnight travel N Percentage Cumulative 5 or more nights per week 901 12% 3 to 5 nights per week 1,433 20% 32% 1 to 2 nights per week 2,847 39% 71% Less than once per month 1,126 15% 87% Less than once every three months 422 6% 92% Never 549 8% 100% Age N Percent Under 18 98 1% 18 to 21 1018 14% 22 to 34 4476 62% 35 to 44 814 11% 45 to 64 614 9% 65 or over 77 Prefer not to say 67 Gender N Percent Woman 3741 52% Man 3052 43% Other 70 1% Prefer not to say 279 4% MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Demographics of Survey Respondents Race N Percent White Non-Hispanic 4400 63% Black or African American 692 10% Asian 526 7% Other 400 6% Prefer not to say 833 12% Household Income N Percent Less than $14,500 746 10% $14,500 to $28,999 748 11% $29,000 to $43,499 1,067 15% $43,500 to $57,999 863 12% $58,000 to $75,999 815 $76,000 to $108,499 802 $108,500 to $151,999 525 7% $152,000 or more 390 5% Prefer not to say 1,161 16% Hispanic/ Latinx Status N Percent Yes 696 10% No 5,811 82% Prefer not to say 612 9% Currently Use Smartphone N Percent Yes 6,924 97% No 209 3% Language of Survey N EN (English) 7,198 ES (Spanish) 65 PT (Portuguese) 10 ZH-S (Simplified Chinese) 5 ZH-T (Traditional Chinese) 3 HC (Haitian Creole) 1 Total Non-English 84 MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Respondents’ home zipcodes MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Respondents’ Overnight Travel 71% report current travel between 1am and 5am at least once a week Only 8% “never travel” at that time 1,966 respondents travel for work; 4,624 travel for non work-related reasons MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Preliminary results

Current Transportation Modes (between 1am and 5am) Few substantive differences between work and non-work travel One chart of passenger survey not broken down by work-non-work Differences with employer-reported – employers over-report drive themselves and underreport rideshares; don’t have walk as an option – need to check if it was given. MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Self-Reported Likelihood of Using Overnight Bus Service People who currently travel for work – over 90% very or extremely likely People who currently travel for non-work – over 80 very or extremely likely People who don’t currently travel – only 20% very or extremely likely Income – decreasing likelihood with higher salaries (among people who currently travel for work), though no category goes under 80% for very/extremely likely MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Self-Reported Projected Usage of Overnight Bus Service But what does very likely and extremely likely mean for actual demand? 80 to 90% of the extremely and very likely respondents report that they will use the service at least once per week Even at Somewhat Likely, over 50% of the respondents would use the service less than once per month or rarer. People who currently travel for work between 1 and 5 report higher frequency demand than those who travel for non-work reasons. MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Optimal Boarding Time MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Level of Service Preferences Frequency Levels Tolerance Distance Tolerance Workers and non-workers are not substantially different, though there are differences by race and gender (minorities are more tolerant, women less willing to walk farther). MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Appendix

Current Overnight Travel Patterns – Demographic Differences Race Income MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Self-Reported Likelihood of Using Overnight Bus Service – Workers Only People who currently travel for work – over 90% very or extremely likely People who currently travel for non-work – over 80 very or extremely likely People who don’t currently travel – only 20% very or extremely likely Income – decreasing likelihood with higher salaries (among people who currently travel for work), though no category goes under 80% for very/extremely likely MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Optimal Boarding Time by Industry MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016

Method of MBTA Fare Payment In addition, a small proportion pay through other means or do not currently ride the MBTA. MBTA Overnight Survey of Potential Passengers – Nov/Dec 2016