Publicly funded nuclear lifetime extensions: story of Ukraine

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Screening.
Advertisements

Transboundary EIA Prunéřov II World’s first transboundary environmental impact assessment of CO2 emissions and climate impacts of a coal-fired power plant.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Monitoring.
Nuclear program of Lithuania Dr. Vidas Paulikas, Radiation Protection Department VATESI Visaginas, 29 June 2009.
Environmental and Social Due Diligence Dr. Dariusz Prasek Head of Operational Support EBRD Environment & Sustainability Department Moscow 4 th June 2008.
IAEA Perspective and Lessons Learned in Shipping HEU Spent Fuel to Russia Institute of Nuclear Materials Management 48 th Annual Meeting July , 2007.
European Ombudsman Access to environmental information Task Force on Access to Information Geneva, 4 December 2014.
The importance of crossborder EIAs: an EU’s standpoint Workshop on The Espoo Convention and the Russian Federation: opportunities and challenges Friday,
NOTIFICATION AUTHORITY IN ROMANIA MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION MRDPA.
FIDIC MDB Conference Brussels June 2012 © European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 2010 | EBRD Procurement considerations when financing.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Access to Public Information in Slovenia Nataša Pirc Musar, LL.B. Commissioner for Access to Public Information The Hague – 24 th -25 th November, 2004.
0 Tadas Matulionis Lietuvos Energija AB Strategic planning manager Minsk, December 07, 2007 Environmental Impact Assessment of a New Nuclear Power Plant.
Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context Workshop on “Making Aarhus work in international forums” Geneva, 23 February.
Jerzy Jendrośka Energy security and legal requirements for environmental protection, public involvement and transboundary co-operation Scientific support.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
Recent developments in EU legislation relevant to the future development of article 6 of the Aarhus Convention European Commission, DG Environment, A2.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context Peter Croal CIDA February 27, 2012.
Trans-boundary EIA in the Slovak Republic History 18 November 1999 Ratification of ESPOO Convention by the Slovak Republic 17 February 2000 ESPOO Convention.
Environmental Dialogue between of Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia and the European Commission, DG Environment Workshop on The Espoo Convention.
Directive on the Authorisation of electronic communications networks & Services Directive (2002/20/EC) Authorisation Directive Presented by: Nelisa Gwele.
Finland’s experience in implementing and applying the Espoo Convention Seija Rantakallio Councellor Moscow, 21 September.
23 January 2016 Gustavo C ARUSO Head, Regulatory Activities Section Division of Nuclear Installations Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
A view from the field Ir. Jan Haverkamp Greenpeace EU policy advisor dirty energy nuclear transparency.
INTERNATIONAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW OCTOBER 29, 2012.
Decision–making on construction of new nuclear facilities O.Melen-Zabramna Head of legal unit, EPL, Ukraine
Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo, 1991) Task Force on Public Participation in Decision-making Aarhus Convention,
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE The role of EIA and decision-making.
Peter Lukáč Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic Department of Environmental Assessment.
2-6 November 2015 Lisbon, Portugal Regional Meeting on Applications of the Code of Conduct on Safety of RR's 1 Some aspects of the Code of Conduct on the.
ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION presentation JOHN HONTELEZ, SECRETARY GENERAL EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL BUREAU Seminar Dublin 26 February 2010.
European Radiation Protection K. SCHNUER 4th ISOE European Workshop on Occupational Exposure Management at Nuclear Power Plants Lyon 24 to 26 March 2004.
Directive 2011/70/Euratom – reality check of implementation
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
The European Ombudsman and the Aarhus Convention
EU information review of the year 2011
Paks II and public participation
Prof. Dr. Eike Albrecht Centre for Law and Administrative Sciences
The Role of EU Law and EU Actors Help or Hindrance?
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
STRESS TESTS and TAIWAN PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency
Jerzy Jendrośka Maastricht Recommendations on Public Participation
The Final Decision in the Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure in Ukraine as a Multilateral Agreement Tretiak Taras Associate Professor of National.
Environmental assessment system in Finland
Instance of Article 6(1)(b) in England and Wales: small electric lines
14-16 September 2016, Wrocław, Poland
A Race to the Bottom A Context for the Madness
EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE
Problematic aspects of Directive 2011/70/Euratom
Towards Modern Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Uzbekistan
Towards Modern Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Uzbekistan
Towards Modern Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Uzbekistan
Jerzy Jendrośka Transboundary procedures
EESC – Brussels – 7 September 2015
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
Vogtle.
NUTS Agenda: 5.1; Document 9
Anni Podimata, Vice President ITRE
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation
Magdalena Bar Annual EELF Conference 2016
The Aarhus Convention and Biosafety
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
What are you liable for? – Diversity of civil liability of mediators across EU Mag. iur. Dana Rone Turība University.
Presentation transcript:

Publicly funded nuclear lifetime extensions: story of Ukraine Dana Mareková St. Pölten, September 22, 2017 www.bankwatch.org

Story begins: LTEs in Ukraine 12 out of 15 nuclear units reaching the end of design lifetime by 2020 6 units got licenses extended for 10-20 years with no consulted EIAs Euratom and EBRD approved loans over EUR 300 million each for 'safety upgrade’

Making powerful listen GOOD GUYS? BAD GUYS? Ukrainian government EBRD, Euroatom/European Commission Neighboring governments: Austria + Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania IMPORTANT ARGUMENTS – PLOT OF THE STORY Conditions for European loans to Ukraine require Adherance to Espoo and Aarhus conventions Decommissioning system www.bankwatch.org

Ukrainian government …operation of nuclear units does not have negative impacts…and there are no parties according to the Espoo Convention… …the analysis allows to conclude that practically no harmful transboundary impact is expected from normal operation of SouthUkraine nuclear power plant…  …notified the neighboring governments that the decision of the 6th Meeting of the Parties relates only to the extension of operation of units 1 and 2 of Rivne NPP and does not cover other operating NNPs of Ukraine…

European Commission …compliance with Espoo and Aarhus conventions is a precondition for disbursing the loan… …Concerning the international environmental agreements (including Espoo and Aarhus conventions), Energoatom and the Government of Ukraine shall undertake to comply with all environmental and social laws, including those relating to public consultation and/or participation… …. Commission is of the opinion that any decision by Ukraine to extend the life-span of any of its nuclear power plants will require assessments under the conventions mentioned above (Espoo and Aarhus Conventions) whether or not it involves any physical work…. www.bankwatch.org

Neighbors – surprising twists Repeated requests to UA government to apply Espoo Letter to ECIC (sept 2016): calling for recommendations to UA to apply Espoo In 2017 consultations started Some governments are part of Espoo WG www.bankwatch.org

Back to public funders – also surprising … How is Ukraine meeting loan conditions? Denial of request for access to documents Court case EU Ombudsman www.bankwatch.org

Ukraine story today EIA reports for Zaporizhia and SouthUkraine NPPs – poor quality Start of voluntary transboundary consultations on ZNPP and SUNPP in May? 2017 – Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania consulting public Consultations not related to decision-making process for lifetime extensions Promise to start negotiations with countries on Rivne 1, 2 – January 2018 www.bankwatch.org

Story is not only about Ukraine 92 reactors heading for LTE across Europe Espoo and Aarhus undermined, but functional We all have a legal and moral right and an “obligation” to have a say about our nuclear (free) future www.bankwatch.org

Thanks for your attention! www.bankwatch.org