A MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT SYSTEM FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Treatment Alternatives to Prison A Health Impact Assessment Scope of research February 2012 Health Impact Assessment – a structured yet flexible research.
Advertisements

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institutes of Health Department of Health and Human Services.
Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Partnerships Review of projects recognizing the needs of and providing treatment supports to DUI offenders Nisha.
Treatment of Substance Involved Offenders in Criminal Justice Settings – Challenges & Outcomes Igor Koutsenok, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Psychiatry,
Effectiveness of a Cognitive Therapy for Repeat Drinking and Driving Offenders Kathleen A. Moore, PhD Melissa L. Harrison, MS M. Scott Young, PhD Department.
Trauma Informed Care: Assessment Susan Sturges, MA, MPA Mental Health Coordinator Brooklyn Treatment Court.
Kayla Pope, MD, JD Boys Town National Research Hospital December 6, 2012.
DWI COURT Determining the Model Target Population.
Sex Offender Treatment US Probation Central California Presented by Helene Creager, LCSW Supervisor & Mental Health Coordinator US Probation Central District.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
Division of Behavioral Health Department of Health & Social Services Clinical Application of the Alaska Screening Tool & Client Status Review of Life Domains.
1 Hillsborough County Alcohol and Drug Indicator Profile M. Scott Young, Ph.D. Kathleen Moore, Ph.D. Department of Mental Health Law and Policy Louis de.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
SCREENING DIAGNOSING TREATING
THE 24/7 SOBRIETY PROJECT. Origins Created by South Dakota Created by South Dakota Has existed since 2005 Has existed since 2005 Now in use in 57 of 66.
Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence, ACE! Department of Criminology, Law & Society George Mason University Amy Murphy, MPP Faye Taxman, Ph.D.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
May 17, 2012 Electronic Information Exchange for Children in Foster Care Beth Morrow Director, Health IT Initiatives The Children’s Partnership Congressional.
Addiction Treatment Works! Through Collaboration and Problem Solving amongst all disciplines.
Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
The Promise of DWI Courts Kent Lawrence, Judge State Court of Clarke County.
Drunk Driving: A Strategy for Reducing Recidivism 12 th Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit Tuesday March 13, 2006 Bradley Finegood, MA, LLPC.
The Iowa Delinquency Assessment Tool
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
A Follow-up of An Analysis of the New Mexico Screening and Tracking Data for DWI Offenders Judith S. Harmon, MA New Mexico Department of Health Office.
Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence, ACE! Department of Criminology, Law & Society George Mason University Faye Taxman, Ph.D. University Professor.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Managing Participant Behavior in Treatment Courts: Maximizing the available tools Cary Heck, Ph.D. University of Wyoming and Denver District Adult Drug.
Evidence-Based Screening Instruments for Co-Occurring Disorders in the Justice System Criminal Justice, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Technical Assistance.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
A Study of DUI Offenders: Preliminary Results of an Alcohol Problem Computerized Screening Carrie Petrucci, Ph.D., Senior Research Associate, EMT,
Better health for individuals What does health mean to individuals.
Introduction Results and Conclusions On counselor background variables, no differences were found between the MH and SA COSPD specialists on race/ethnicity,
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
DUI and other Drug Treatment Dockets Facts and Figures.
Presented by: Michael Kennedy, MFT Director. Psychiatric Emergency Services 24/7 availability Access to  Crisis Stabilization  Crisis Residential Services.
Introduction Results and Conclusions Comparisons of psychiatric hospitalization rates in the 12 months prior to and after baseline assessment revealed.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.
Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations Janelle Prueter Illinois TASC Presented to RSAT West VA Conference July 21, 2011.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
The Role of Psychology Within Addiction Services Dr Mette Kreis, Clinical Psychologist Prison Addiction Clinical Psychology Service, NHS Forth Valley Dr.
DWI Courts Best Practices & Latest Research
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
Accountability Court Programs: Targeting the Right Participants as Part of a Community Continuum of Responses Georgia School of Addiction Studies Conference.
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Biomarker Project – OWI Enhancement Grant
Using the National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices (NCJTP) Survey
Summit County Probation Services
Sentencing Reform in CA
Intercept 5 Community Supervision
Criminal Justice Association of Georgia Annual Conference
What works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned from Evaluating Correctional Programs By: Edward Latessa School of Criminal Justice.
Eighth Judicial District Court Mental Health Court Program
Adolescent Substance Use Screening and Brief Intervention
Why You Need a DUI Court and How to Get Started
Treatment of Clients Experiencing Anxiety
Treatment Court Dockets
Substance Use Prevention for Young Adults and Higher Education
Coconino County Recovery Court
Presentation transcript:

A MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT SYSTEM FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS Judge Richard A. Vlavianos Lifesavers, 2017

TARGETING THE HIGH RISK GROUP REPEAT OFFENDERS

Repeat Offenders Constitute: 1.43% of California Drivers 26% of California DUI Offenders 59% of California drivers in alcohol/drug fatal or injury crashes DMV MIS Report 2015

DUI OFFENDERS ARE DIFFERENT! KNOWING THE CLIENT DUI OFFENDERS ARE DIFFERENT!

What do we know about DUI offenders? High risk for a new DUI does not mean high risk for other types of criminal recidivism More likely to be high functioning in other areas (Many alcoholics still get up every morning and go to work and take care of their children) DUI offenders don’t often show up as high risk on risk assessments standardized on the typical criminal justice population

Are DUI offenders really different? More likely to be: Male White Older Highly educated Employed Of a higher income level Scored as low risk on assessment Need DUI specific tool – DUI RANT, IDA

Are DUI offenders really different? Psychiatric Comorbidity - more likely to have: Substance Use Disorders Conduct Disorder PTSD Anxiety Disorder High prevalence of Major Depression Need DUI specific mental health tool – CARS

Are DUI offenders really that different from drug offenders? Engage in behavior that is dangerous and frequently causes serious injury or fatalities Denial - drinking alcohol is not illegal, highly prevalent, and even encouraged in many activities

TRADITIONAL DUI COURTS WORK! GOOD NEWS TRADITIONAL DUI COURTS WORK!

TRADITIONAL DUI COURT Treatment Designed for addicted/dependent offenders Intensive treatment Intensive court supervision 75 – 100 participants, no >125 Great success rates Evidence based model for addicted offenders

Traditional DUI Court Data Georgia study – 3 courts (NHTSA) 20% reduction in recidivism Up to 65% for graduates Wisconsin study – 1 court (Temple) Michigan study – 3 courts (NPC) Minnesota study – 9 courts (NPC)

Traditional dui courts are Not For Everyone! SOME BAD NEWS Traditional dui courts are Not For Everyone!

Who They Work For Individuals who show both high risk and high need on evidence based screening/assessment! Increases recidivism/no effect for the rest

% Appropriate for DUI Court Risk/Needs Data on Repeat Offenders - San Joaquin Co. using DUI RANT 680 over 23 months in S.J. County 32% High Risk/High Need 68% not – Traditional DUI Court is NOT APPROPRIATE

LIMITATIONS OF TRADITIONAL DUI COURTS Numbers - should be no >125 S.J. County - >500 repeat offenders per year Need to work with many more high risk offenders than traditional DUI Court handles Traditional DUI Court can exclude: Many high risk substance abusers who need lesser interventions; and Those who do not volunteer

THE MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT MORE GOOD NEWS THE MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT Moving the traffic safety needle through a more comprehensive and systemic approach

TRADITIONAL DUI COURT PRINCIPLES THAT CAN BE USED IN OTHER TRACKS Monitoring & accountability to court Same judge Compliance monitored Consequences-certain & immediate Positive reinforcement ACCOUNTABILITY WORKS!!!

MULTI-TRACK MODEL DESIGN All Repeat Offenders!!! Track One – Everyone except High Risk/High Needs Substance Abusers Court Monitoring, no treatment Track Two – High Risk, High Needs Addicts DUI Court – Monitoring and Treatment DUI RANT Screening determines track CARS Screening/referral for mental health disorders

COURT MONITORING TRACK Report to Case Manager - verifies compliance Added probation conditions Alcohol/drug monitoring; Abstain clause; VIP Court reviews scheduled for - 1 mo.; 6 mo.; 1 yr. Court appearance added with non-compliance Immediate response to non-compliance Recognition for compliance 81% of clients - 29% of costs

OUTCOMES Safety

NUMBERS 440% greater impact Active clients 518 (vs. 100?) Since inception (8 and ½ years) 3,769 (vs. 850?) 440% greater impact

Thank You!