Extreme Precipitation Frequencies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Burkina Faso Ghana Uganda.
Advertisements

COMPARISON OF MEAN AREAL PRECIPITATION ESTIMATES FROM WSR-88D AND HISTORICAL GAGE NETWORKS OVER CHEAT RIVER BASIN, WV David Wang, Michael Smith, D.J. Seo.
1 McGill University Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Quantification of Spatially Distributed Errors of Precipitation Rates and Types from the TRMM Precipitation Radar 2A25 (the latest successive V6 and V7)
Calibration of GOES-R ABI cloud products and TRMM/GPM observations to ground-based radar rainfall estimates for the MRMS system – Status and future plans.
Comparative Precipitation Analysis and Validation of NEXRAD (Stage III) Data, Stream Flow Data, and Rain Gauge Data located in the San Antonio Basin Jayar.
Real-time forecasting of urban pluvial flooding Angélica Anglés London, 28 th May 2010.
Barry D. Keim Louisiana State Climatologist Louisiana State University Hurricane History of the Gulf and East Coast of the U.S.
The Influence of Basin Size on Effective Flash Flood Guidance
Overview of Urban Drainage Flood Prediction Methods and Approaches J.Y. Chen1 and B.J. Adams2 1. Water Survey Division, Environment Canada 2. Department.
Suzanne M. Fortin National Weather Service Pleasant Hill/Kansas City
Estimation of Rainfall Areal Reduction Factors Using NEXRAD Data Francisco Olivera, Janghwoan Choi and Dongkyun Kim Texas A&M University – Department of.
A short term rainfall prediction algorithm Nazario D. Ramirez and Joan Manuel Castro University of Puerto Rico NOAA Collaborator: Robert J. Kuligowski.
Distributed Hydrologic Model-Threshold Frequency (DHM-TF) Reggina Cabrera NOAA/National Weather Service Eastern Region
Precipitation in the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State Robert Houze and Socorro Medina Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
Precipitation Extremes in Western U.S. Urban Areas: How Reliable are Regional Climate Model Projections Vimal Mishra 1, Francina Dominguez 2, and Dennis.
Extreme Value Analysis, August 15-19, Bayesian analysis of extremes in hydrology A powerful tool for knowledge integration and uncertainties assessment.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744
Automated Real-Time Operational Rain Gauge Quality-Control Tools in NWS Hydrologic Operations Chandra R. Kondragunta 1 and Kiran Shrestha 2 1 Hydrology.
6/3/2010 ER FFG Conference An Overview of Gridded Flash Flood Guidance; A Spatially Distributed Runoff and Threshold-Runoff Based Approach Erick Boehmler.
March 14, 2006Intl FFF Workshop, Costa Rica Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. Hydro-Meteorological Decision Support System Bill Conway, Vice President.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
A Statistical-Distributed Hydrologic Model for Flash Flood Forecasting International Workshop on Flash Flood Forecasting March 13, 2006 Seann Reed 1, John.
Integration of Multiple Precipitation Estimates for Flash Flood Forecasting Reggina Cabrera NOAA/National Weather Service.
Rainfall Interpolation Methods Evaluation Alejandra Rojas, Ph.D. Student Dept. of Civil Engineering, UPRM Eric Harmsen, Associate Prof. Dept. of Ag. and.
Wayne Faas Chief, NOAA National Climatic Data Center Data Operations Division December 3, 2003.
NOAA’s National Weather Service Flood and Flash Flood Warning Program Michelle Schmidt Western Region Hydrology and Climate Services Division.
Rationale The occurrence of multiple catastrophic events within a given time span affecting the same portfolio of insured properties may induce enhanced.
Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Basin Scale Precipitation Data Merging Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
COMET HYDROMET Enhancements to PPS Build 10 (Nov. 1998) –Terrain Following Hybrid Scan –Graphical Hybrid Scan –Adaptable parameters appended to.
Multi-Sensor Precipitation Estimation Presented by D.-J. Seo 1 Hydrologic Science and Modeling Branch Hydrology Laboratory National Weather Service Presented.
Robert Hartman Acting Director NWS Office of Hydrologic Development GPM in the NOAA Integrated Water Forecasting Program.
Operational Issues from NCDC Perspective Steve Del Greco, Brian Nelson, Dongsoo Kim NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC Dongjun Seo – NOAA/NWS/OHD 1 st Q2 Workshop Archive,
The NOAA Hydrology Program and its requirements for GOES-R Pedro J. Restrepo Senior Scientist Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA’s National Weather.
UC 2006 Tech Session 1 Louis Wasson GeoResources Institute Mississippi State University Arc Hydro: A User’s Experience.
National Weather Service Water Science and Services John J. Kelly, Jr. Director, National Weather Service NOAA Science Advisory Board November 6, 2001.
1 Understanding Sources of Error and Uncertainty NOAA’S COLORADO BASIN RIVER FORECAST CENTER.
Flash Flood Prediction Working Group Q2 Workshop June 28-30, 2005.
An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented.
Research To Operations For Improved Precipitation Estimates and Forecasts David Kitzmiller Group Leader - Hydrometeorology Hydrology Laboratory, Office.
Pearl River Coordination Meeting October 7, 2009 Dave Reed Hydrologist in Charge Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center.
Probabilistic Forecasts - Baseline Products for the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Services (AHPS) Dave Reed HIC – LMRFC 2006 NWA Annual Meeting October.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
11 Short-Range QPF for Flash Flood Prediction and Small Basin Forecasts Prediction Forecasts David Kitzmiller, Yu Zhang, Wanru Wu, Shaorong Wu, Feng Ding.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology October 09, 2015.
CARPE DIEM Meeting Barcelona June 2002 RAINCLOUDS Satellite rain and cloud probing for monitoring and forecasting water resources at a range of time.
Trends in floods in small catchments – instantaneous vs. daily peaks
Evaluation of Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curves Developed from Dynamically Downscaled Regional WRF Simulations Chuen Meei Gan1 & Tanya Spero2 1)
EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly Nice, France, 10th April 2003
Multi-Site and Multi-Objective Evaluation of CMORPH and TRMM-3B42 High-Resolution Satellite-Rainfall Products October 11-15, 2010 Hamburg, Germany Emad.
The Convective Rainfall Rate in the NWCSAF
EF5: A hydrologic model for prediction, reanalysis and capacity building Zachary Flamig Postdoctoral Scholar.
Derek Ortt1 and Shuyi S. Chen, RSMAS/University of Miami
Hydrologic Considerations in Global Precipitation Mission Planning
A dual-polarization QPE method based on the NCAR Particle ID algorithm Description and preliminary results Michael J. Dixon1, J. W. Wilson1, T. M. Weckwerth1,
Multi-Sensor Precipitation Estimation
Rainfall Averaging Methods
COMMISSION FOR HYDROLOGY (CHy)
Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering
Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
Anna M. Jalowska and Tanya Spero
Theme III: Water Predictions and Ecosystem Services
Sub-daily temporal reconstruction of historical extreme precipitation events using NWP model simulations Vojtěch Bližňák1 Miloslav.
What Rainfall Return Frequency?
Numerical Weather Prediction Center (NWPC), Beijing, China
Evaluation of the TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and its utility in hydrologic prediction in La Plata Basin Dennis P. Lettenmaier and.
Dennis P. Lettenmaier Andrew W. Wood, and Kostas Andreadis
WRE-1 BY MOHD ABDUL AQUIL CIVIL ENGINEERING.
A FRAMEWORK TO ASSESS EFFECTIVENESS AND RISKS OF INTEGRATED RESERVOIR OPERATION FOR FLOOD MANAGEMENT CONSIDERING ENSEMBLE HYDROLOGICAL PREDICTION XVI World.
Presentation transcript:

Extreme Precipitation Frequencies The Use of Multi-Sensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimates for Deriving Extreme Precipitation Frequencies Hisham El-Dardiry (hae5018@louisiana.edu) & Emad Habib (habib@louisiana.edu) Department of Civil Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, LA, USA Study Objectives and Motivation Radar Data Outlier Detection Test Radar quantitative precipitation estimates (QPE) have been used for a long time in different applications including weather prediction models, flash floods prediction and monitoring systems. The statistics of the extreme precipitation events have played an important role in various engineering disciplines including the hydrologic applications, for instance, the design of flood protection structures and the development of the roadway drainage systems. The objective of this study is to examine the utility of radar-based precipitation frequency estimates (PFE) information with their associated uncertainties and comparing them with the NOAA ATLAS 14 gauge-based PFE. Two sources of radar data are used in this study: National Stage IV QPE mosaicked from individual RFC's multi-sensor precipitation analyses. The Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center (LMRFC) selected product for hydrologic operations (XMRG). The two products are available on a 4-km resolution polar-stereographic HRAP grid and are studied for the period from 2002 to 2012. Grubbs-Beck Statistical test was used to identify the overestimated extreme events and consider them as outliers. This test successfully removes most of the ring patterns, but it also deletes some of true extreme events which don’t seem to be artifacts. The PDS in the Southeastern Coast after removing the outliers using Grubbs-Beck test Stage IV QPE Product Vs. LMRFC Products Some of the pixels, which show the ring pattern, are compared with the different LMRFC products and it was noticed that most of the overestimated values in the extreme series are due to gauges malfunctioning. Stage IV Extreme Precipitation Series For Stage IV QPE product, two extreme series are extracted; the annual maximum series (AMS) and the partial duration series (PDS). Studying one of the rings in the Southeastern Coast The precipitation estimates in the ring under study with the corresponding date of occurrence Comparing the precipitation estimates from Stage IV and LMRFC products on October 5th in 2006 at 03 UTC Preliminary Results for PFE Using LMRFC XMRG Product The maximum estimates in the PDS over the CONUS domain for the period from 2002 to 2012 The maximum estimates over the CONUS domain in 2002 Artifacts Detected in Stage IV QPE Product The two extreme series (AMS & PDS) show many rainfall estimates with very high values and most of these suspicious estimates are surrounded with lower estimates that form a ring pattern around some pixels. 10-year quantiles based on fitting GEV distribution for each pixel in a domain covering Louisiana State 25-year quantiles based on fitting GEV distribution for each pixel in a domain covering Louisiana State PFE resulted from Pixel-based approach for a pixel corresponding to Lafayette (30.2050°,-91.9875°) Conclusions The Stage IV real time data comprises some artifacts that should undergo some quality control operations to make it available for direct operational use. It is recommended to use Multisensor Precipitation Reanalysis (MPR) to take full advantage of the additional rain gauge data that may not have been available in real time. Ongoing work focuses on improving the estimation of PFE from radar QPE using different estimation techniques (e.g., index flood method and other regional-based approaches). Acknowledgment Stage IV QPE data were provided by NCAR/EOL under sponsorship of the National Science Foundation. (http://data.eol.ucar.edu/) LMRFC QPE products used in this study were provided by the Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center. Artifacts detected in the PDS in the Southeastern Coast Artifacts detected in the PDS in the Western Coast