Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Preliminary resolution study results N. Blaskovic.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 November 2013 week 2 FONT shift summary N. Blaskovic.
FONT Meeting1 Calibrations over IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
October 12, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Good Field Region and Tuning Strategy 1 Undulator Good Field Region and.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) - Review of Feedback Prototype Tests at ATF(KEK) Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
Magnet Motion Produces Luminosity Loss. NLC Feedback Operation Kicker Gain Bunch Charge Measure deflected bunches with BPM and kick other beam to eliminate.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
25th June, 2003CMS Ecal MGPA first results1 MGPA first results testing begun 29 th May on bare die (packaging still underway) two chips looked at so far.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
1Ben Constance7 th January 2010 FONT5 December 2009 feedback results During the final shift we ran K1-to-P2 position feedback 151.2ns bunch spacing, quadrupoles.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
7 May 2009Paul Dauncey1 Tracker alignment issues Paul Dauncey.
CLIC CTF3: Phase Feed Forward Comparing the effect of the phase feed forward system on beam phase stability with various theoretical predictions. CLIC.
FONT Meeting1 Charge normalisation and IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF October 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis**, Colin Perry.
IPBPM issues (Limitation of resolution) Siwon Jang (KNU)
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
Sensitivity of HOM Frequency in the ESS Medium Beta Cavity Aaron Farricker.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
NumberMikey Davis02 November 2012 Roundup of ATF Trip.
FONT GROUP MEETING ATF JUNE SUMMARY Neven & Talitha Talitha Bromwich - Friday, 26 June 2015.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
Overview of progress at FONT Neven Blaskovic TMD technologies CASE student John Adams Institute Oxford University.
LHC Collimation Working Group Monday, 21 March 2016 Analysis of collimator BPMs in the 2015 run A.Valloni, G. Valentino with input from R. Bruce, A. Mereghetti,
1/33Mikey Davis24 January 2013 Review of 23 rd of January Shift.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic.
D. BettATF Operations Meeting - 15 June IP C. Perry G. Christian Y. Kim D. Bett N. Blaskovic Kraljevic.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan
Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.
Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich
Further Tracking Studies and March Trip Plan
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, P. Burrows, G. Christian, C. Perry, R
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
Monitoring glitches in the frequency divider
ATF cable plan N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting.
Firmware Update 29/03/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan.
Analysis of March ATF Run
ATF Shift Plans Rebecca, Talitha 08/09/2017 Friday, 08 September 2017
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
Revised ATF Shift Plans
Progress towards nanometre beam stabilisation at ATF2
Chapter 6 Feedback Circuits
Phase Monitor Electronics: Output vs
Progress towards nanometre level beam stabilisation
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Status of Phase Feedforward Tests
Towards a ground motion orbit feed-forward at ATF2
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
Extraction kicker scan & feedback results
Presentation transcript:

Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Introduction Mikey showed on 8th Feb that most feed-forward runs show jitter reduction: N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Introduction However, the extent of jitter reduction varies greatly between runs. Today’s presentation concentrates on two issues that can limit feedforward correction: Insufficient gain DAC outputs beyond amplifier’s linear range This study makes use of plots of kick to bunch 2 vs. position of bunch 1 at IPB (charge normalised), as shown on slide 4. N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Bunch 1 upstream-downstream position correlation Example Bunch 1 upstream-downstream position correlation Ratio of calculated kick to kick that should have been applied Whether DAC outputs are within the kicker amplifier’s linear range Negative gradient: ‘correcting towards 0’ N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview Overview 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 This presentation will assess one feedforward run per slide as follows: Assessment will be based on DAC output and gain level only, not on the level of correction achieved. ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 OK ffRun8 ffRun9 Saturating kicker amplifier / insufficient gain Wrong gain sign 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Criteria Saturating kicker amplifier criterion: Runs where most triggers have an IPK DAC output outside the range -1200 to 1200 counts Insufficient gain criterion: Runs where gradient of IPK kick to bunch 2 at IPB vs. bunch 1 position at IPB is 0 to -0.5 Wrong gain sign criterion: Runs where gradient of IPK kick to bunch 2 at IPB vs. bunch 1 position at IPB is positive N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun1 Gain P2-IPK: -48 000 Gain P3-IPK: +30 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun3 Gain P2-IPK: -48 000 Gain P3-IPK: -30 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 OK! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun4 Gain P2-IPK: -46 000 Gain P3-IPK: -10 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun5 Gain P2-IPK: -48 000 Gain P3-IPK: -30 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 OK! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun6 Gain P2-IPK: +48 000 Gain P3-IPK: +30 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Wrong gain sign! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun7 Gain P2-IPK: -48 000 Gain P3-IPK: -30 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 OK! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun8 Gain P2-IPK: -70 000 Gain P3-IPK: 0 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 OK! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun9 Gain P2-IPK: -50 000 Gain P3-IPK: 0 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun1 Gain P2-IPK: -45 000? Gain P3-IPK: +20 000? 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain! Overview ffRun2 Gain P2-IPK: -80 000 Gain P3-IPK: +40 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Saturating kicker amplifier! Overview ffRun3 Gain P2-IPK: -120 000 Gain P3-IPK: +60 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Saturating kicker amplifier! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain! Overview ffRun5 Gain P2-IPK: -80 000 Gain P3-IPK: +40 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain! Overview ffRun6 Gain P2-IPK: -100 000 Gain P3-IPK: +50 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun7 Gain P2-IPK: -50 000 Gain P3-IPK: +25 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Overview ffRun8 Gain P2-IPK: +50 000 Gain P3-IPK: -25 000 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Wrong gain sign! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Summary On next slide, summary of how insufficient gain and/or saturating kicker amplifier is related to extent of feedback correction. As done by Mikey, ‘Improvement’ is given by: ‘’ ′Improvement ′ = Jitter FfOn B2 − Jitter FfOff B2 Jitter FfOff B2 where B2 is bunch 2 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

30th Jan -7 % -29 % -12 % -28 % 60 % -15 % -4 % -9 % -13 % -16 % -6 % -5 % 61 % ‘Improvement’ -39 % -24 % -22 % -42 % -20 % -10 % -11 % -2 % -8 % -17 % 59 % 43 % 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun8 ffRun9 ffRun9 Mikey’s results from 8th Feb Today’s results 1st Feb 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun8 Feedforward reduces jitter Gain OK & DAC out OK Feedforward increases jitter Low gain / saturating amplifier Wrong gain sign N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Conclusions Some of the underperforming feedforward runs seem to be limited by: Insufficient kicks due to diluted gains or incorrect sign of one of the gains Operating beyond the kicker amplifier’s linear range Ensure that average DAC out is centred at zero counts on shift. N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Appendix Summary of the four feedforward runs deemed to have OK gain and OK DAC out N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Summary of OK! runs 30th Jan 30th Jan 30th Jan 30th Jan ffRun3 ffRun5 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Appendix Analysis concerns N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Possible analysis improvements Reconsider double 3σ flier removal on position. Calculate the jitter from a Gaussian fit, as opposed to just finding the std of the data. Try Young-Im’s calibration, using reference cavity for charge normalisation. N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Apparent extraneous orbit Trigger 267 from fbRun1 on 010213 has normal charge upstream and at IP and yet has a strange response at IPB: trigger 267 trigger 267 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting