Paul Collier & Giulia Papotti

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
Advertisements

LHCC 3rd June 2015 Mike Lamont for the LHC team
Lot’s of time lost due to cryo problem in IR8. Major impact, therefore review of MD program… Start discussion here, please let us know your input. Will.
Summary and outcome of the 1st LIU-HL-LHC brainstorming meeting (24 th June 2011) Mike Lamont This event is jointly organized by the HL-LHC and LIU projects.
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and parameters Filling schemes Operational settings OP procedure and COLL setting Planning Shift breakdown To define the.
HL-LHC/LIU Joint workshop Goal: Progressing towards an agreed set of 450 GeV beam parameters for High Luminosity operation in LHC after LS2 & LS3. Slides.
LHC progress Report LHCC Wednesday 23 rd March 2011.
Evian 2014 historical perspective run 1: 2010: L peak >10 32 cm -2 s -1  2x10 32 cm -2 s : produce >1 fb -1  delivered.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and MP concerns BI configuration Operational settings Collimators Planning Shift breakdown Thanks to: P.Baudrenghien, G.Bellodi,
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
LHC Machine Operational Status and Plans LHCC, 22nd September 2010 Steve Myers (On behalf of the LHC team and international collaborators)
Request and expectations from the experiments J. Boyd, C. Schwick (LPC) Chamonix LHC workshop 27/1/2016 1Experiment requests - Chamonix 2016 Many thanks.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Tue 23/8 – Wed 24/8 09:00 Start 90 m optics run – Preparation and verification of the collimation functions – Re-generation of functions for Transverse.
Proposal for the 2016 pA run of LHC
Mike Lamont An attempt at synthesis Acknowledgements all round
Fabio Follin Delphine Jacquet For the LHC operation team
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Scenarios for 2017 and 2018 Thanks to Gianni, Fanouria, Gianluigi, Dario, Stephane, Elias, Michi, Jamie, Christoph, Rogelio, Mirko, Riccardo, Hannes,
Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011
M.Fitterer, A.Patapenka, A.Valishev (FNAL)
Transverse Damping Requirements
Impact of running with LHCf and early Totem 90 m optics
LHC Commissioning with Beam
Task 2. 5: Beam-beam studies D. Banfi, J. Barranco, T. Pieloni, A
Wednesday :06 Dump fill 3533: interlock BPMS in IP6
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Plans for ions in the injector complex D
LHC Machine Status report
Machine Coordinators: G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
Wire, flat beams and beam-beam MDs in 2017
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Friday 07:00 Power glitch on the EDF network. Point 8 affected.
LHC status Benoit Salvant (Beams department, Accelerator and Beam Physics group) for the LHC complex teams With many thanks for their inputs to J. Boyd,
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Tue :25 Beams dumped due to RF vacuum interlock
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Thursday 17th May 01:11 Fill #2633 dump in squeeze arc circulator load channel Ad1B 03:16 Fill #2644 Stable beams, lumi 5.2e33 cm-2s-1 04:38 Dumped by.
Beam requirements and operational scenarios in 2010
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
Summary of Week 26 Main aims: G. Arduini, B. Holzer, M. Lamont
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Collimation margins and *
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Aims for the week Recover from technical stop and precycle at 10A/s
90m "proper" VdM scans in the 90m/10m optics
Monday morning 09:40 Dump fill 2838, integrated ~130 pb-1.
From commissioning to full performance…
Friday 14th September 03:15 Beta* at 1 km. Optics measurements, see yesterday. 07:00 Dump. 08:00 Refill with 3 nominal bunches for high beta. 11:15 Beams.
Monday :15 fill 3523 dumped by BPMs IP6
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Thu 04:00 Fill #2729 Stable Beams. Initial lumi 6.5e33 cm-2 s-1.
Summary Tuesday h23: Machine closed. Precycle started.
Wednesday h18: 228b fill lost just before start of ramp.
Another Immortal Fill….
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
Tuesday
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
HI2011 Commissioning Status
Monday 152 bunch operation summary
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Saturday 29th October Friday during IP2 1 m squeeze test
Presentation transcript:

Paul Collier & Giulia Papotti X LHC Performance Workshop Summary Session 5 2016 & Run 2 Paul Collier & Giulia Papotti March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5 1

There is a lot of detail in these talks!! Session Contents LHC YETS Recovery Mirko Pojer Experiments: Expectations and Requirements Jamie Boyd LHC Machine Configuration in the 2016 Proton Run Roderik Bruce Beams from the Injectors in 2016 Rende Steerenberg Plans for the Ion Run in 2016 Reyes Alemany Fernandez Key Machine Developments for 2016 & Run 2 Rogelio Tomas Garcia Plans for 2016 and Run 2 Mike Lamont There is a lot of detail in these talks!! March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

YETS Recovery It is going to be tight! Feb. 26/27 – DSO Tests March, 4 – LHC tunnel closed and start of powering tests March, 16 – end of powering tests, experiments closed and (official) start of machine check-out March, 21 – start of beam commissioning It is going to be tight! 12 Days for Hardware Commissioning 5 Days Machine Checkout Plans are in place for most systems and services (LBDS, Kickers, Collimators RF, BI, Controls etc.) Challenging series of tests – but should be ok. The big worry is the re-qualification of the cold circuits March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Powering Tests Powering tests: Very Challenging! UPS Tests systematically in each sector Overhaul of the 32 Main circuit EE systems HV tests needed afterwards Temperature drifts in DFB’s and MS Need for ELQA on many circuits Powering tests: 7000 tests in 12 days!! 1/3 are 60A … should be ok Massive parallel testing – rely on automated sign-offs Very Challenging! Will rely on availability of the sectors for powering No access (apart from that needed to power) March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Experiment Requests and Requirements As usual a rich diversity of requests! High Luminosity Proton-proton running at 13 TeV Special Runs Heavy ion Running Lots of 13 TeV p-p data for ATLAS/CMS (~30/fb @ 25 ns): ~40cm β* (approximately twice the luminosity/pileup of 2015) LHCb Leveled with b* = 3m to a m of 1.1 ALICE Leveled with b* = 10m to a m of 0.01 Both require regular flipping of magnet polarity (new for ALICE) TOTEM aligned from the start and taking data during high intensity runs. In addition to high intensity p-p must foresee the following: One early VdM scan (with possibility of another depending on analysis) A high β* (~2.5km) running period for TOTEM/ALFA (no 90m β* run in 2016) 4 week Heavy Ion period, details still under discussion LHCf do not foresee taking data in 2016 except in a possible 8 TeV p-Pb run A few Special Requests March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

All of these will have some kind of overhead! Miscellaneous p-p VdM scans early in the year (~2 days) hopefully the only one … setup as in 2015: β* ~ 19 m (IP1 & 5), 24m IP8, ε ~ 3 µm, zero crossing angle (large at IP8) and (βx =βy) Request also a length scale calibration (same optics as VdM) LHCb may take SMOG data Other Things (Special Requests): CMS interested in a high pile up run (few intense bunches) ATLAS/CMS want some periods of low/medium pile-up using separation levelling ‘After-glow calibration’ run – 4 widely spaced high intensity bunches During normal runs: Experiments support having non-colliding bunches (similar to 2015) as long as these do not cause instabilities Also request isolated bunches in the filling scheme during ramp-up for ‘out of time’ pile-up studies. Only during occasional fills. All of these will have some kind of overhead! March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Important to minimize the impact on the High-Luminosity running High Beta* Running Goal: Measure elastic proton-proton scattering in the Coulomb-nuclear interference region and potentially measure the luminosity independent of VdM scan. Beam Settings: β* as high as possible (β*> 2 km) Zero crossing-angle 3 bunches (2 colliding in 1&5) As low emittance as possible Vertical Roman Pots positioned at 3 σnominal or closer Scheduling: Optics commissioned before – extra time added to MD periods for this 1 day final set-up and 3 days Physics probably in September. Important to minimize the impact on the High-Luminosity running March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Requests for Heavy Ion Running Significantly different requests from the experiments Still under discussion, Hopefully converge on strategy before the March LHCC The current options under discussion are: 2016 2018 A p-Pb @ 5 TeV Pb-Pb @ 5 TeV B p-Pb @ 8 TeV C It would be useful to know so we can prepare! Experiments would also like a 5 TeV p-p reference run. But Differences in opinion as to whether this should be included in the Heavy Ion periods Long term plan for HI running desirable March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Ion Run (from the Machine Side) The experiments have not made their mind up yet … have to plan for all options A Pb-Pb run in 2016 would be very similar to 2015 Possibly lower b* but in any case dominated by burn-off P-Pb is actually slightly easier at higher energy Smaller frequency difference – orbits less offset. Can run with the p-p b* for ATLAS and CMS But ALICE will be limited to higher b* by the 2mm vertical offset and anyway levelled IP1&5 Ebeam (TeV) Peak Lumi (cm-2s-1) Integrated Fill Lumi (ub-1) Integrated Run Lumi (nb-1) PbPb 6.37Z 2.7e27 35 1 pPb 4Z 2e29 2600 77 6.5Z 3e29 3900 116 Within the usual 10-15% uncertainty In all cases Luminosity sharing is going to be a difficult subject March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Beams from the Injectors Injectors running close to the limit(s) – Hence LIU!! Increasing longitudinal emittance and bunch length will put the PS space charge limit in the shadow of the PSB space charge limit Same intensity limit (SPS) with slightly smaller transverse emittance might be possible, hence brighter beams   PSB extraction PS extraction SPS extraction Ip / ring ɛh and ɛv nb Ip / bunch [x1011] [mm ∙ mrad] batches bunches 1σ, norm. LHC25 (STD) initial spec. 13.8  ≤ 2.5 2 4 + 2  1.15  ≤ 3 72 1.15 ≤ 3.5 1 – 4 x 72  288 LHC25 (STD) 2015 16 1.9 1.2 2.3 2.5 1 – 2 x 72  144 LHC25 (STD) 2016 16.5 1.3 2.6 LHC25 (STD) Stretched 17 2.4 1.35 LHC25 (BCMS) Operational 7.5 0.8 4 + 4 1 48 1.4 1 – 4 x 48  192 LHC25 (BCMS) Stretched 8.5 0.9 1.1 LHC25 8b4e (STD) 14 ~ 1.9 1.7 ~2.2 1.6 ~ 2.4 LHC50 (STD) 11 1.5 1.8 36 1 - 4 x 36  144 LHC50 (BCMS) 6 1 – 4 x 24  96 March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Beam Status Still new ideas coming! (80 bunch scheme) PSB PS SPS LHC 25ns/50ns STD 25ns/50ns BCMS Doublet 100 ns 25ns 8b4e 25ns 80b4e = Available = Ongoing / Considered Still new ideas coming! (80 bunch scheme) A well scrubbed SPS will be vital to reach top performance Little room for other improvements until LIU Availability is the only way to significantly improve overall performance March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

The time spent doing MD’s invariably pays off Machine Development Short Term – of immediate benefit to the performance As much as possible try to move these into commissioning/operation periods Medium – development for the future running for run2 & run3 Development of future running scenarios Long – Necessary MD’s for HL-LHC ‘Long’ is a misnomer. Some of these need answers in the relatively short term, eg to make decisions on the baseline Very Long – Future machines, basic understanding For example, studies for FCC This is not a prioritisation Data from MD’s of all types is needed to make progress Balance between long term performance and shorter term gains MD’s also allow us to develop our basic understanding of accelerator physics The time spent doing MD’s invariably pays off March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

MD scheduling A Few Priorities (for the LHC) in 2016: 2016: 22 days Scheduled >30 days requested already! 2017: Shorter year, 15 days scheduled 2018: Hopefully 22 days again A Few Priorities (for the LHC) in 2016: ATS Optics for pushed b* and flat beam studies, Online coupling correction and IR non-linear corrections, Collective effects: E-Cloud, beam-beam etc. , Collimation: Impedance, Quench limits, Halo control, Crystals, Emittance Growth, System Development: RF, LBDS, Injection, Beam Instrumentation, Machine Protection, March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Machine Configuration for 2016 2015 was a commissioning year ... relaxed b* emphasis on getting LHC running with 25ns beams at 6.5 TeV 2016 is a production year – push performance … lower b* Complete intensity ramp up with standard 25ns beams But we should not jeopardize availability! For 2016 Choice of b* and associated crossing angle and collimator settings 10 s BB sep 11 s BB sep Need: Tighter Hierarchy in IR7/6 10 s beam-beam separation Optics with re-matched phase Recover the aperture margin established last year All depends on the measured aperture being as good as before March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Performance Reach At lower b* the Geometric reduction factor becomes increasingly important Can reduce the bunch length to limit the effect … to be tested! Initially start with standard 1.3 ns – look to reduce later The choice seems to be between b* = 40 and 50 cm ``` Relative Integrated Luminosity 8h fill length 40cm gives slightly more Ldt, but: Everything is tighter … will it affect availability? Shorter fills? On the other hand it did work in tests last year! Best Plan: Assume we go for 40cm Measure aperture for final choice to start with, Start intensity ramp up, Be ready to step back if we run into problems (some overhead here) β* 4σt 1.3 ns 1.0 ns 50 cm 1 1.1 40 cm 1.08 1.19 20h fill length β* 4σt 1.3 ns 1.0 ns 50 cm 1 1.04 40 cm 1.07 1.12 With both 50 and 40 cm it should be possible to reach >1x10+34 March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

P-P Plans for 2016 Keep an eye on UFO’s – adjust BLM’s? What do we Want: Stable Safe Operations Don’t compromise on machine safety! Don’t do anything to compromise machine reproducibility Electron Cloud under control Short dedicated scrubbing Continue during intensity ramp-up 6.5 TeV, 40-50 cm b* Keep an eye on availability Nominal 25ns beam, 2748 bunches, 288 bpi May push later to shorter bunches & BCMS Reasonable Good! Availability Sustained effort to trace faults Keep avoidable interruptions to production running to a minimum Excellent Operational Efficiency Combined ramp/squeeze Work on injection process Keep an eye on UFO’s – adjust BLM’s? Commission additional interlocks Special run set-up (VdM & Hi-b*) Check out ULO Don’t Forget: Beware of Earth Faults! March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Seems unlikely – Availability is the key to more! 2016 Schedule v1.1 Phase Days Initial Commissioning 28 Scrubbing: 4 days initially and then as required 7 Proton physics 25 ns 152 Special physics runs (high b*; VdM) 8 Machine development 22 Technical stops 15 Technical stop recovery 6 Ion setup/proton-lead run 4 + 24 Total 266 days (38 weeks) With the present schedule and machine availability we actually spend ~50 days/year in High Intensity p-p stable beams Can we run Longer? Seems unlikely – Availability is the key to more! March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

2016 Performance Reach 40 cm 50 cm Beam size at IP (um) 14.2 15.9 Somewhat optimistic assumptions based on availability at the end of 2015 and no new issues from lower b* So, Usual caveats apply: Availability? Aperture? Interlocks? Phase advance? ULO, E-Cloud, UFO’s etc. etc. Assume Nbunch = 2736, 3.5 mm emittance, 1.2z10+11 ppb, 1.25 ns 40 cm 50 cm Beam size at IP (um) 14.2 15.9 Crossing angle (urad) 185*2 165*2 F (bunch length: 1.25 ns) 0.63 0.72 Peak luminosity (cm-2s-1) 1.1e34 1.0e34 Burn-off lifetime (hour) 25.8 28.5 Integrated per 150 days (fb-1) 33.2 30.7 Reasonable to assume ~25 fb-1 delivered March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5

Run 2 (and Conclusions) 2017 & 2018 slightly longer for p-p operation (+10 days) Deliver 100+ fb-1 to ATLAS/CMS … keep ALICE, LHCb, TOTEM & ALFA happy Keep pushing performance and availability Peak Luminosity limited to ~1.7x10+34 by Inner Triplet cooling Look forward to HL-LHC without compromising present performance ATS, b* levelling, LRBB compensation tests, full RF detuning Prepare for 7 TeV operation Training campaign in (some) sectors during EYETS? Enthusiasm and commitment remains high – we could do some serious stuff in 2017 & 2018 M. Lamont EYETS – Extended Year End Technical Stop – 19 weeks – CMS pixel upgrade Assume machine stays cold during EYETS Assume for the moment: p-Pb end 2016, Pb-Pb end 2018 – tbc. March 3rd 2016 Chamonix Session 5