Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Detection of Prostate Cancer in 2007
Advertisements

Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 1-8 (January 2009)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Results of Targeted Biopsy in Men with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Classified Equivocal, Likely or Highly Likely to Be Clinically Significant Prostate.
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
European Urology Focus
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
The Origin of the Bone Scan as a Tumour Marker in Prostate Cancer
Perri Carlson, Kathryn Nicholson Perry 
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
The Role of Tobacco Smoke in Bladder and Kidney Carcinogenesis: A Comparison of Exposures and Meta-analysis of Incidence and Mortality Risks  Marcus G.
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Liver Iron Overload: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis  Maria Sarigianni, Aris Liakos, Efthymia.
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal.
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Yuanshan Cui, Yong Zhang  European Urology 
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
The Origin of the Bone Scan as a Tumour Marker in Prostate Cancer
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (July 2010)
Long-term Cancer-specific Survival in Patients with High-risk, Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer and Tumour Progression: A Systematic Review  Sven van.
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer  Valeria.
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
European Urology Oncology
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019)
European Urology Oncology
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Preventing Osteoporosis in Men Taking Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis  Joseph Sargon Joseph, Vincent.
Role of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Biopsy of the Peripheral Zone in the Same Session after Repeated Negative Biopsies in the Diagnosis.
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
The Comparability of Models for Predicting the Risk of a Positive Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-Specific Antigen Alone: A Systematic Review  Fritz Schröder,
Assessing a Patient’s Individual Risk of Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer: Be Aware of Case Mix Heterogeneity and A Priori Likelihood  Jan F.M. Verbeek,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 250-266 (August 2017) What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel  Paul C. Moldovan, Thomas Van den Broeck, Richard Sylvester, Lorenzo Marconi, Joaquim Bellmunt, Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, Michel Bolla, Erik Briers, Marcus G. Cumberbatch, Nicola Fossati, Tobias Gross, Ann M. Henry, Steven Joniau, Theo H. van der Kwast, Vsevolod B. Matveev, Henk G. van der Poel, Maria De Santis, Ivo G. Schoots, Thomas Wiegel, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Philip Cornford, Nicolas Mottet, Thomas B. Lam, Olivier Rouvière  European Urology  Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 250-266 (August 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026 Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis flow chart. Bx=biopsy; CAD=computer-aided diagnosis; mpMRI=multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; RP=radical prostatectomy; T2WI=T2-weighted imaging. European Urology 2017 72, 250-266DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026) Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 (A) Assessment of the risk of bias for included studies. (B) Risk of bias summary graph. RoB=risk of bias. European Urology 2017 72, 250-266DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026) Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Negative predictive value of prebiopsy multiparametric MRI as a function of cancer prevalence (blue crosses: overall prostate cancer; red crosses: clinically significant prostate cancer). The blue line is the correlation line for overall prostate cancer; the red dotted line is the correlation line for clinically significant prostate cancer. mpMRI=multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging. European Urology 2017 72, 250-266DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026) Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Forest plot showing the (A) NPV and (B) PPV of prebiopsy multiparametric MRI for overall prostate cancer in the seven studies selected for meta-analysis that used a cut-off score of ≥3/5 for defining positive MRI. Studies have been ranked according to cancer prevalence (left column). Intervals in the right column are 95% CIs of the (A) NPV or (B) PPV. As NPV and PPV vary with cancer prevalence, combined estimates of NPV and PPV have not been provided. (C) Conditional probability plot showing the estimation of the combined NPV and PPV in the seven studies, as a function of the prevalence of overall prostate cancer. The x axis (prior probability) indicates the overall prostate cancer prevalence. The y axis (posterior probability) indicates either PPV (dashed line, upper quadrant) or 1 – NPV (dotted line, lower quadrant). CI=confidence interval; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; NPV=negative predictive value; PPV=positive predictive value. European Urology 2017 72, 250-266DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026) Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions