Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of a Hybrid Carbon Nanotube/Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;138(4):041001-041001-6. doi:10.1115/1.4033576 Figure Legend: Schematic diagram of the electromagnetic SE measurements setup

Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of a Hybrid Carbon Nanotube/Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;138(4):041001-041001-6. doi:10.1115/1.4033576 Figure Legend: SEM micrographs of MWCNTs grown via GSD method over glass fibers at different magnifications

Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of a Hybrid Carbon Nanotube/Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;138(4):041001-041001-6. doi:10.1115/1.4033576 Figure Legend: Raman spectra of the different processed glass fibers specimens based on: glass fiber as is (raw), SiO2 and nickel sputter-coated fabric (Sp), SiO2 and nickel sputter-coated and heat-treated fabric not exposed to the hydrocarbon gas (Sp + HT), and sample with MWCNTs grown on the surface via graphitic structures by design (GSD)

Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of a Hybrid Carbon Nanotube/Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;138(4):041001-041001-6. doi:10.1115/1.4033576 Figure Legend: Electromagnetic SE in two frequency ranges for the glass fibers specimens based on: glass fiber as is (raw), SiO2 and nickel sputter-coated and heat-treated fabric not exposed to the hydrocarbon gas (Sp + HT), and sample with MWCNTs grown on the surface via GSD

Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of a Hybrid Carbon Nanotube/Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;138(4):041001-041001-6. doi:10.1115/1.4033576 Figure Legend: In-plane electrical resistance versus the specimen length for the hybrid GFRP–CNT composites

Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of a Hybrid Carbon Nanotube/Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;138(4):041001-041001-6. doi:10.1115/1.4033576 Figure Legend: Through thickness electrical resistance versus the specimen length for the hybrid GFRP–CNT composites

Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of a Hybrid Carbon Nanotube/Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;138(4):041001-041001-6. doi:10.1115/1.4033576 Figure Legend: Representative stress versus strain curves for the GFRPs based on: glass fiber as is (raw), SiO2 and nickel sputter-coated fabric (Sp), SiO2 and nickel sputter-coated and heat-treated fabric not exposed to the hydrocarbon gas (Sp + HT), and sample with MWCNTs grown on the surface via GSD

Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of a Hybrid Carbon Nanotube/Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;138(4):041001-041001-6. doi:10.1115/1.4033576 Figure Legend: Tensile mechanical properties of the GFRPs based on: glass fiber as is (raw), SiO2 and nickel sputter-coated fabric (Sp), SiO2 and nickel sputter-coated and heat-treated fabric not exposed to the hydrocarbon gas (Sp + HT), and sample with MWCNTs grown on the surface via GSD