R. D. Shelton and Hassan B. Ali WTEC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why is Europe so efficient at producing scientific papers, and does this explain the European Paradox? Patricia Foland and R. D. Shelton WTEC 11th International.
Advertisements

Productivity or Employment: Is it a choice? Andrea De Michelis Federal Reserve Board Marcello Estevão International Monetary Fund Beth Anne Wilson Federal.
1 HEALTH EXPENDITURE TRENDS: WHAT ARE THE KEY ISSUES FOR POLICY- MAKERS? Eva Orosz and David Morgan Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Business PublishingMacroeconomics, 3/eOlivier Blanchard Prepared by: Fernando Quijano and Yvonn Quijano 12 C H A P T E R Technological.
Duane Shelton and Sam Monbo WTEC STI 2012 Montreal September 6-8, 2012 Input-Output Modelling and Simulation of Scientometric Indicators: A Focus on Patents.
1 Productivity and Growth Chapter 21 © 2006 Thomson/South-Western.
 Gross Domestic Product was the total output of goods and services of United States.  The monetary value of all goods and services were calculated on.
Scientometrics and the Diplomacy of Science R. D. Shelton and Lance Miller WTEC PICoSEP 2011 Pyongyang.
The Race for World Leadership of Science and Technology: Status and Forecasts R. D. Shelton and P. Foland WTEC Baltimore, Maryland, USA Word version in.
1 “European R&D Benchmarking (2002) “European R&D Benchmarking (2002)” Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Student Presentations Students: Miguel.
Performance-based funding of public research in tertiary education institutions: Country experiences Presentation to the Norwegian Fagerberg Committee:
Status of the implementation of the Regional R&D Strategy for Innovation for the Western Balkan Ministry of science education and sports - Croatia.
1 “European Innovation Scoreboard (2002) “European Innovation Scoreboard (2002)” Master in Eng. and Technology Management Science, Technology and Innovation.
The measurement of Innovation An historical perspective The “Frascati Manual” and the “Oslo Manual” S&T indicators Innovation indicators Some evidence.
Chapter 9 Economic Growth and Rising Living Standards
Working Group on Innovation Indicators and Inclusive Innovation Víctor G. Carreón Rodríguez National Council of Science and Technology Mexico.
9 Economic Growth CHAPTER CHECKLIST
Some aspects of National STI system in Albania & The Research at Polytechnic University of Tirana T.Korini, UPT, Tirana Tbilisi, 11 April 2012.
Relations Between National Research Investment Input and Publication Output: Application to an American Paradox R. D. Shelton Sponsored by a sabbatical.
The Emerging High Tech Competitors from Asia, Contrasts between the national systems of innovation and its performance of China and India Professor Sunil.
DIGEST OF KEY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2008 Presentation Slides National Science Board.
Changing Engines of Growth in China: From FDI and Privatization to Innovation and Knowledge Furong Jin, Keun Lee, and Yee-Kyoung Kim Dep’t of Economics,
Trends of Science & Techn ology Potential and R esource in Japan Yuko NAGANO National Institute of Science and Technology Policy JAPAN Feb. 21 th 2010.
Major Current Trends in Innovation: The OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014 Dominique Guellec Head, Country Studies and Outlook Division.
INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS IN R&D AND INNOVATION Ádám Török Secretary General, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Why the US lost leadership in scientific papers, and will soon lose in other indicators R. D. Shelton and Lance Miller WTEC Sponsored by NSF coop agreement.
Public Project Funding of Research Activities: National Differences and Implications for the Creation of a European Research Council Michael Dinges Benedetto.
Causal Connections Between Scientometric Indicators R. D. Shelton, Tarek Fadel, Patricia Foland Which Ones Best Explain High-Technology Manufacturing Outputs?
Measuring Innovation Professor Sunil Mani Centre for Development Studies Trivandrum Kerala, India.
Which Scientometric Indicators Best Explain National Performance of High-Tech Outputs? R. D. SheltonTarek Fadel WTEC ITRI Presented at the Collnet Conference,
1 Innovation & knowledge indicators  R&D EXPENDITURES  INTERNATIONAL PATENTS  OTHER INDICATORS OF INNOVATION, KNOWLEDGE AND HUMAN CAPITAL.
© 2013, published by Flat World Knowledge. Published by: Flat World Knowledge, Inc. One Bridge Street Irvington, NY © 2013 by Flat World Knowledge,
Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies Duane Shelton and Loet Leydesdorff ISSI 2011 Durban.
MERIT1 Does collaboration improve innovation outputs? Anthony Arundel & Catalina Bordoy MERIT, University of Maastricht Forthcoming in Caloghirou, Y.,
Understanding China’s Growth: Past, Present and Future Xiaodong Zhu Department of Economics East Asia Seminar at Asian Institute, University of Toronto.
Gross Domestic Product Chapter 12 Section 3 Economic Growth.
Section 7 - Module Economic Growth.
European Commission Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs The harmonised EU investment survey: What can it tell us about investment growth.
How do we measure economic performance?
American Leadership of Science and Technology: Reality or Myth?
Rising Living Standards
Current Account Imbalances in the Euro Area
The Impact of African Science: A Bibliometric Analysis Scientometrics 102(2): (2015) Hugo Confraria and Manuel Mira Godinho (MERIT-UNU and.
How much is enough: what should we be spending on the NHS?
Investigacion e Innovacion
public employment (consequences on public – private wage differences)
South Carolina Economic Summit
Sustainable development in times of crisis. Growth prospects in Greece
Scientometrics and the Diplomacy of Science
Introduction to the UK Economy
R. D. (Duane) Shelton ITRI & WTEC Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Why is Europe so efficient at producing scientific papers, and does this explain the European Paradox? Patricia Foland and R. D. Shelton WTEC 11th International.
The decline of research in corporate research and development (R&D)
The United States is Failing to Keep Pace With Competitors’ Investments in R&D As China’s intensity (black) rapidly grows by an average of 8 percent per.
Energy research and R&D indicators: An LMDI decomposition analysis for the IEA Big 5 in energy research Roula Inglesi-Lotz.
Overview of the development of Life Sciences in ASEAN and relevance of biosecurity awareness.
National Efficiencies in Publishing Scientific Papers
R. D. Shelton and P. Foland WTEC Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Chapter 8 Economic Growth.
R. D. Shelton Tarek Fadel WTEC ITRI
The Role of Road Infrastructure in Agricultural Production
Duane Shelton and Geoff Holdridge WTEC, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Econometric Tests of Copyright Openness
Chapter 12: Gross Domestic Product and Growth Section 3
South Asia Challenges and benefits of research collaboration in a diverse region March 2019 Maria de Kleijn-Lloyd.
The United States is Failing to Keep Pace With Competitors’ Investments in R&D As China’s intensity (black) rapidly grows by an average of 8 percent per.
Chapter 12: Gross Domestic Product and Growth Section 3
South Asia Challenges and benefits of research collaboration in a diverse region March 2019 Maria de Kleijn-Lloyd.
Forecasting Plays an important role in many industries
Presentation transcript:

R. D. Shelton and Hassan B. Ali WTEC Scientometric Secrets of Efficient Countries: Turkey, Greece, Poland, and Slovakia R. D. Shelton and Hassan B. Ali WTEC Sponsored by NSF cooperative agreement ENG-0844639.

Outline of Presentation Why are Turkey and some other countries gaining in science publication so rapidly? Turkish insight from S&T policy analysis Our insight from allocations of R&D investment Interpretations of ki as an efficiency indicator Comparison of several nations using efficiency indicators Role of government funding and higher education spending in increasing efficiencies

Turkey is one of the fastest growing countries in scientific publication. Why? Both China and Turkey doubled their share from 2000 to 2005. Shelton & Foland (2008) raised this question, but reasons were not known at that time.

Others notingTurkish growth (EURAXESS Turkey, 2010) Turkish world ranking growth rate between the years 2002-2008: 3rd rank in terms of growth rate in GERD, with a position improved from 26 to 21, 7th rank in terms of growth in GERD as a percentage of GDP, with a position from 50 to 42, 1st rank in terms of growth in FTE researchers, with a position from 25 to 16, 3rd rank in terms of the growth in scientific publications, with a position from 22 to 18, 2nd rank in terms of the growth in PCT patent application, with a position from 33 to 27.

Also noting Turkish growth (Erkan 2009) “GERD intensity in Turkey exhibits a significant upward trend after 2002 GERD reached a historical peak in 2005: more than 40% of Turkish was financed by industry and 50% by government. One of the most promising indicators for Turkey is scientific publications per million inhabitants. Although Turkey’s share is around 1.5% in the OECD area, in the last five years, with a growth rate of 141% Turkey reached the highest rate in the world. We couldn’t find similar analysis for the other fast-growing countries.

Some explanations from Turkish researchers on increased scientific publications Akpinar and Karçaaltıncaba (2010) radiology and medical imaging “Driving force…appears to be the rapid adaptation to imaging technology and improved education and extensive investment in human resources and technology in university, government and private hospitals and clinics…” Gokceoglu et. al (2008) Earth science In the last decade the annual growth rate was 16%, with a concomitant increase in the number of citations. Increase attributed to: changes in the rules of academic promotion and appointment, changes in academic attitudes towards publishing, increasing support for research, financial incentives for publishing, and expansion of higher education.

Our insights: some components of GERD are more efficient at producing papers Gross numbers are not necessarily a good measure of the efficiency of a nation in producing scientific papers One can divide publications by population, GDP, or GERD (Gross Expenditure for R&D) One useful indicator is to divide publication share by GERD share For the larger economies this “relative efficiency” ki, has been fairly constant, which permits forecasts However, some smaller countries have high and increasing relative efficiencies, because some components of GERD are more effective than others.

A Simple Model for Country i mi = k iwi mi is share of papers published (fractional basis) wi is the share of GERD for the OECD Group k i is a "constant" of proportionality; it differs by country k i is also the efficiency of country i in producing papers per $1 million in GERD, normalized by the OECD overall efficiency. ki = mi/wi = (pi/P)/(gi/G) = (pi/gi)/(P/G) For data in a single year the equation is an identity, but it is most useful over a range of years when k i is approximately constant

Review of Shelton Model National Publication Systems (The Black Box) Resources In Papers Out Multiple Linear Regression Is Used to Identify Which Inputs are Most Important

More Detailed Model of Publication System (Inside the Black Box) $ Inputs Papers Published p1 g1 US EU Journal Editors AT ROW G (total) P (total) National Research Systems -- Fairly Independent Highly Interdependent Paper Selection mi = pi/P Paper share wi = gi/G GERD share

Since 1998, ki Has Been Fairly Constant for BIG Countries

For some countries ki is not constant: countries with rapidly growing relative efficiency Greece and Poland are both efficient and becoming more so.

Comparison of high ki countries with some larger ones Values above 1.5 shown, plus some large countries. Greece, New Zealand, Poland, Slovakia, Portugal, and Turkey are the most efficient.

Government funding instead of industry A: Turkey and the others increased paper share by sharpening focus on sectors that maximize papers Government funding instead of industry University instead of business R&D spending Multiple regression shows these input components are more effective in producing paper outputs.

Regression analysis of which GERD components best account for paper outputs Year = 1999, Constant $ PPP series used Dependent Variable (DV) = papers in SEI, fractional counts Independent Variables = two components of R&D funding (IV1, IV2)—several types N = 39 countries in OECD Group, sometimes fewer P is significance probability of IV; if p < 0.05, variable is important R2 > 96% always – IVs are very good predictors

Government vs. Industrial funding of R&D IV1 = government funded part of GERD IV2 = industry likewise Much smaller components omitted IV1: P = 0.000 (very significant) IV2: P = 0.838 (not significant) plus coefficient is smaller (and negative) Regression equation: Papers = 2.73 IV1 – 0.031 IV2 + 1957

Scattergram of paper share vs. government funding share

Scatterplot of relative efficiency ki vs Gov% The regression line is:ki = 0.201 + 0.0349Gov%, the p < 0.001 for Gov%, and the R2 is 35.9%.

Scatterplot of relative efficiency ki vs HERD% The regression line is: ki = 0.400 + 0.0487HERD%, the p < 0.001 for HERD%, and the R2 is 46.5%.

Part of GERD Funding from Government Turkey and Greece focus on government R&D rather than industry, so they are more efficient than the US.

Part of GERD Spending at Universities Likewise this focus on university R&D spending helps make Turkey and Greece more efficient than the US.

Conclusions A useful indicator of the efficiency of a nation in producing scientific papers is the ratio of publication share to GERD share, ki For the larger economies this “relative efficiency” ki, has been fairly constant, which permits forecasts However, some smaller countries have high and increasing relative efficiencies Government investments and higher education spending are much more important than those from industry, accounting for much of the superior efficiencies and fast-growing paper publication share in some smaller countries Not surprising to bibliometricians, regression analysis quantifies these statements. Causality can’t be proven, but strong associations can be found

References-1 Shelton, RD, (2006), Relations between national research investment and publication output: Application to an American paradox. Scientometrics 74, 191-205. Shelton RD and Foland, P. (2008) National Efficiencies in Publishing Scientific Papers.  10th International Conference on S&T Indicators, Vienna, Sept. 2008.  Foland, P & Shelton RD (2010) Why is Europe so efficient at producing scientific papers, and does this explain the European Paradox? 11th International Conference on S&T Indicators, Leiden, Sept. 2010.

References-2 Posted at itri2.org/s/ Shelton, RD. & Foland, P. (2010) The race for world leadership of science and technology: Status and forecasts.  Science Focus 5, pp. 1-9 (Feb. 2010) in Chinese.  Also, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 369-380, Rio de Janeiro, July, 2009.   Shelton, RD and Leydesdorff, L (2011a) Bibliometric evidence for an empirical trade-off in national funding strategies. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 763-774. Durban, July, 2011. Shelton, RD and Leydesdorff, L (2011b) Publish or Patent: Bibliometric evidence for an empirical trade-off in national funding strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, in press. Posted at itri2.org/s/