Wendy Wiegmann ~ CCWIP ~ March 23, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Advertisements

California’s Child Welfare Outcomes & Accountability System: Using Performance Measures to Encourage Improvement Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
June Release 3.2 June 23 rd, Person Management Workers will no longer receive an unnecessary pop-up when editing an address on the Person.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Tehama Linkages Commitment Presented by LaDeena Coates, Employment & Training Worker, II Richard Phillips, Social Worker, II.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
AB 636 presented at the joint hearing between the ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES and the ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE ON FOSTER CARE Sacramento, CA.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
CONTINUUM OF CARE REFORM (AB403) Alexis Barries Project Associate Youth Engagement Project Alyssum Maguire Project Coordinator Youth Engagement Project.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
Core for social workers
Post-Secondary Transition
The data Train: Bringing Child Welfare Staff on Board
Continuum of CARE reform (AB403 & ab1997)
The Role of the Education Rights Holder (ERH)
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
2015 Annual Report February 9, 2016 Presenters:
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
A Blueprint for Service Delivery
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Understand County Performance on Federal & State C-CFSR Measures Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP September.
Webinar: The Kinship Diversion Debate
PIP effective January 1, 2017 & runs through December 31, 2018
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Answer Questions about Key Child Welfare Outcomes Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP August 19, 2016.
Quality Case Practice Improvement
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant
Kinship Foster Care in California Testimony to Assembly Select Committee on Foster Care Sacramento, CA 2/15/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social.
Society for Social Work & Research New Orleans 1/14/2017
Bringing Continuous Quality Improvement to Operations
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Daniel Webster & Jay Bell
Wendy Wiegmann ~ CCWIP ~ October 25, 2016
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Understand County Performance on CFSR 3 Measures Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 1, 2017.
209: Visitation: The Heart of Permanency Planning
Claudia Zundel, MSW, Director of Child, Adolescent and Family Services
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Answer Questions about Key Child Welfare Outcomes Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP January 19, 2016.
Wendy Wiegmann ~ CCWIP ~ November 7, 2016
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
2016 Child & Family Annual Report
Wendy Wiegmann ~ CCWIP ~ March 27-28, 2017
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Open Adoption Agreements
Policy and Procedure Impacts
Broward Quality Performance Review
BARBARA NEEDELL, MSW, PhD
Background checks are required by state and federal law prior to CA/DCYF staff authorizing an individual (other than a parent) to have unsupervised access.
Using the CCWIP Data Portal
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Overview of Public Facing ODJFS Child Welfare Dashboards
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Family Engagement in Case Planning & Case Management Version 2.3, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Wendy Wiegmann ~ CCWIP ~ March 23, 2017 The Data Train Series 2 Understanding the Control Panel: How to Make the Most of the CCWIP and SafeMeasures Websites Wendy Wiegmann ~ CCWIP ~ March 23, 2017

The Importance of Data Allows child welfare agencies to: Compare outcomes to agency mission & practice model Strategize on what work needs to be done Focus on what is being achieved Identify what needs attention Connect current practice to best practice and desired outcomes In our program statements, strategic plans, SIPs, and self-assessments, county child welfare agencies are often able to accomplish 1-4. The hardest part always seems to be #5. This training attempts to get at this essential piece of using data to improve child welfare practice by training child welfare staff to find and understand how their work is related to outcome measures. This second training focusses specifically on how workers can use SafeMeasures to stay on top of the processes that directly impact those measures.

Connect current practice to best practice and desired outcomes Mission Connect current practice to best practice and desired outcomes This training attempts to get at this final, most difficult, but essential process by training child welfare staff to find and understand how their work is related to outcome measures. The first data training focused on understanding the measures most often under focus, the ways that they are measured, and utilization of the CCWIP website. This second training focusses specifically on how workers can use the CCWIP and SafeMeasures websites to stay on top of the processes that directly impact those measures.

Agenda REVIEW two important Ventura County goals EXPLORE the CCWIP website to better understand the children affected by the goals IDENTIFY the features of SafeMeasures that can aid in achieving the goals MODIFY SafeMeasures to keep on top of these features MAKE A PLAN for regular use of CCWIP and SafeMeasures

Ventura County’s High Priorities

WIG: “Wildly Important Goal”

P3: Permanency in 12 months for children in care for 24+ months 4/1/12 4/1/13 4/1/14 4/1/15 4/1/16 Children in care on the first day of the censor year who had been in care for more than 24 months: 5 Children achieving permanency within 12 months of censor date: 3 Performance (P3): 60% National Standard: >=30.3% P3: “Of all children in care on the first day of the 12-month period who had been in care for 24 months or more, what percent discharged to permanency within 12 months?” Child 1: No time prior to first day, exit to reunification (7 months total) Child 2: 23 months prior to first day, no exit (more than 48 months total) Child 3: 1 month prior to first day, exit to reunification (2 months total) Child 4: 36 months prior to first day, exit to adoption (46 months total) Child 5: 24 months prior to first day, exit to reunification (30 months total) Child 6: 12 months prior to first day, exit to guardianship (14 months total) Child 7: 10 months prior to first day, no exit (37 months total) Child 8: 14 months prior to the first day, exit to reunification (22 months total) Child 9: 22 months prior to the first day, exit to guardianship (46 months total) Child 10: 18 months prior to the first day, exit to adoption (20 months total) Child 11: 25 months prior to the first day, exit to adoption (38 months total) Child 12: No time prior to first day, exit to reunification (6 months total) Child 13: 27 months prior to the first day, exit to adoption (34 months total) Child 14: 14 months prior to the first day, exit to reunification (18 months total) Child 15: No time prior to the first day, exit to reunification (2 months total) Child 16: 30 months prior to the first day, exit to guardianship (48 months total) Child 17: 1 month prior to first day, exit to reunification (13 months total) Child 18: 6 months prior to the first day, exit to adoption (11 months total)

Website: Worksheet: http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare/ Using the website, please complete exercises 1 through 4 for the WIG

CCWIP Website Demo using actual page navigation on website

Measures Demo using actual page navigation on website

Measure P3 Demo using actual page navigation on website

Selecting the Parameters Demo using actual page navigation on website

Selecting the Parameters Demo using actual page navigation on website

Filtering to Only Include Children in Congregate Care Demo using actual page navigation on website

Using the Multi-Report Option Demo using actual page navigation on website

Measure P3 by Group Home, Age & Race/Ethnicity Demo using actual page navigation on website

Resources To Achieve WIG (from Series 1) Intensive Treatment Foster Care Wraparound Therapeutic Behavioral Services Step-Down Placement Training In-Home Therapy Child and Family Team Meetings Family Finding Parent Child Visits

Reduce Reentries to Foster Care

P4: Re-Entry to Foster Care 04/1/14 4/1/15 4/1/16 Children entering care during the year: 6 Children achieving permanency within 12 months: 4 Children reentering foster care within 12 months of date of discharge: 2 Performance (P4): 50% National Standard: <=8.3% 8 months P4: “Of all children who enter foster care in a 12- month period and are discharged within 12 months to reunification or guardianship, what percent re-entered foster care within 12 months of their date of discharge?” Child 1: 7 months, entered care prior to 12-month period, exit to reunification Child 2: 2 months, entered care during 12-month period, exit to reunification Child 3: 17 months, entered care prior to 12-month period, exit to reunification, but not within 12 months Child 4: 9 months, entered care during 12-month period, exit to guardianship Child 5: 4 months, entered care prior to 12-month period, exit to reunification Child 6: 20 months, entered care during 12-month period, no exit Child 7: 5 months, entered care during 12-month period, exit to reunification Child 8: 17 months, entered care during 12-month period, exit to reunification, but not within 12 months Child 9: 2 months, entered care prior to 12-month period, exit to reunification Child 10: 7 months, entered care during 12-month period, exit to reunification 4 months

Website: Worksheet: http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare/ Using the website, please complete exercises 1 through 4 for Reentries

CCWIP Website Demo using actual page navigation on website

Measures Demo using actual page navigation on website

Measure P4 Demo using actual page navigation on website

Selecting the Parameters Demo using actual page navigation on website

Review the Data Demo using actual page navigation on website

Selecting the Parameters Demo using actual page navigation on website

Using the Multi-Report Option Demo using actual page navigation on website

Measure P4 by Age & Race/Ethnicity Demo using actual page navigation on website

Resources To Reduce Reentries (from Series 1) Parent Child Visits Prototypes Women’s Center In-Home Parenting Education Triple P Parenting Intensive Treatment Foster Care Wraparound Child and Family Team Meetings Safety Organized Practice Structured Decision Making

… Break …

Safe Measures Navigation & Help Source: https://app.safemeasures.org/Content/tutorials/common/SM51%20icons.png

Filters Demo using actual page navigation on website Includes Office, Unit, Caseload

Subsets Demo using actual page navigation on website Depending on the report, may include Service Component, Age, Ethnicity, Gender, Placement Type, Years in Placement, etc.

Crosstab & Full List Demo using actual page navigation on website

Creating a Favorite Make sure you set your filters & subsets first! Demo using actual page navigation on website Note: Make sure that you set your filters & subsets first!

Key SafeMeasures Features Demo using actual page navigation on website

My Dashboard My Favorites: Reports selected by you for revisiting – These reports can be filtered, or subsets selected to help you focus specifically on the children you are interested in. My Alerts: Specifically tailored reports for your county created by NCCD Recommended Pages: Pages recommended to you based on previous activity and County Measures Recently Visited Pages

Worksheet: Using the SM website, please complete exercise 5

My Upcoming Work - Referral First Contact: Yes/No. Have you made (green) or attempted (purple) the first contact with the client? Safety: Yes/No. Did you complete the SDM Safety Assessment on time? By policy, all safety assessments must be completed within two working days of the first contact. Please note that the completion date for safety compliance is the date the assessment is entered, not the assessment date indicated on the form. Risk: Yes/No. Did you complete the SDM Risk Assessment on time? By policy, all risk assessments must be completed within 30 days of the first contact. Time Open: If there is a green check, the referral has been open for less than 30 days from the referral start date. Yellow hazard sign indicates 30-60 days and the red icon indicates that the referral has been open for more than 60 days. Note: This display comes from a training system. No actual client names or IDs are displayed

My Upcoming Work - Case Next Birthday: Birthday cake indicates a birthday coming up in the next 30 days. Contact: This summary shows if a face-to-face client contact was made within the required timeframe. Only actual face-to-face contacts completed with the child/victim during the required timeframe are counted. A qualified contact is required monthly for all open cases. If a contact frequency waiver is in place, the time between contacts can be extended to two, three, or six months. This report currently allows for Contact Frequency Waivers which are no longer allowed under 2F. Non-dependent legal guardianship cases default to a six-month contact schedule.  Case Plan: Yes/No. Has the parent signature status been documented ("signed" or "refused to sign") for the active case plan? Medical Exam: This display shows whether the client has been kept up to date with Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP) medical exams. When a child is removed from a home, he/she should receive an initial CHDP medical exam within 30 days of the removal date. After the initial examination date, workers are expected to ensure the child is seen for a qualifying medical exam in accordance with the published exam periodicity schedule. Dental Exam: This display shows whether the child has been kept up-to-date with Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP) dental exams. When a child (3 years or older) is removed from a home, he/she should receive an initial CHDP dental exam within 30 days of his/her removal date. After the initial examination date, workers are expected to ensure that the child is seen for a qualifying dental exam in accordance with the published exam periodicity schedule. If the child being removed is under 3 years old, he/she will not be required (by AB636 standards) to have a CHDP dental exam until 30 days after his/her third birthday. If the client has had an exam after age 20, he/she does not need future CHDP exams and will be considered in compliance until he/she is out of the system. Relative Home: Has a relative home assessment been completed for a child placed in a relative/NREFM home placement? FSNA: Was a family strengths and needs assessment (FSNA) completed within 30 days prior to effective case plan (65 for court-dependent cases)? Excludes initial case plans and initial FSNAs. CSNA: Was a child strengths and needs assessment (CSNA) completed within 30 days prior to effective case plan (65 for court-dependent cases)? Excludes initial case plans and initial CSNAs. Risk: Was a risk reassessment or reunification assessment completed within 30 days prior to effective case plan (65 for court-dependent cases)? Excludes initial case plans and initial risk assessments. Psy Med: Does the child have a current psychotropic medication authorization? Note: This display comes from a training system. No actual client names or IDs are displayed

My Unit’s Upcoming Work Can filter by worker and sort by Case Name, ClientID, Worker (if you haven’t already preselected a worker), or any of the categories (these will list by most concerning). Next Birthday: Birthday cake indicates a birthday coming up in the next 30 days. Contact: This summary shows if a face-to-face client contact was made within the required timeframe. Only actual face-to-face contacts completed with the child/victim during the required timeframe are counted. A qualified contact is required monthly for all open cases. If a contact frequency waiver is in place, the time between contacts can be extended to two, three, or six months. This report currently allows for Contact Frequency Waivers which are no longer allowed under 2F. Non-dependent legal guardianship cases default to a six-month contact schedule.  Case Plan: Yes/No. Has the parent signature status been documented ("signed" or "refused to sign") for the active case plan? Medical Exam: This display shows whether the client has been kept up to date with Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP) medical exams. When a child is removed from a home, he/she should receive an initial CHDP medical exam within 30 days of the removal date. After the initial examination date, workers are expected to ensure the child is seen for a qualifying medical exam in accordance with the published exam periodicity schedule. Dental Exam: This display shows whether the child has been kept up-to-date with Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP) dental exams. When a child (3 years or older) is removed from a home, he/she should receive an initial CHDP dental exam within 30 days of his/her removal date. After the initial examination date, workers are expected to ensure that the child is seen for a qualifying dental exam in accordance with the published exam periodicity schedule. If the child being removed is under 3 years old, he/she will not be required (by AB636 standards) to have a CHDP dental exam until 30 days after his/her third birthday. If the client has had an exam after age 20, he/she does not need future CHDP exams and will be considered in compliance until he/she is out of the system. Relative Home: Has a relative home assessment been completed for a child placed in a relative/NREFM home placement? FSNA: Was a family strengths and needs assessment (FSNA) completed within 30 days prior to effective case plan (65 for court-dependent cases)? Excludes initial case plans and initial FSNAs. CSNA: Was a child strengths and needs assessment (CSNA) completed within 30 days prior to effective case plan (65 for court-dependent cases)? Excludes initial case plans and initial CSNAs. Risk: Was a risk reassessment or reunification assessment completed within 30 days prior to effective case plan (65 for court-dependent cases)? Excludes initial case plans and initial risk assessments. Psy Med: Does the child have a current psychotropic medication authorization?

Worksheet: Using the SM website, please complete exercise 6

County Measures: Outcomes Measures chosen specifically by Managers, PAs, and Data Champions at the SafeMeasures On-Site meeting Discuss the Performance (Percentage and Color Coding) and Performance Standard (whether you should be low (before line) or high (after line) displays) Things to demo: SIP measures of focus are Stability (P5), Reunification (P1) and Reentry (P4), and based on your work or those of your CQI team, they are already stratified by 0-5 years and Latino(a) children. Why might these populations be of focus?

Referral Monthly Measures County Measures: Referral Monthly Measures Measures chosen specifically by Managers, PAs, and Data Champions at the SafeMeasures On-Site meeting Things to demo: Go through each of the measures separately Limit type: None, Unit, Caseload Limit: Depending on whether you choose unit or caseload, choose the specific unit supervisor or child welfare worker to examine. In most cases, you will choose “Caseload” and choose yourself from the Limit options. When you choose “Caseload,” you will see your stats, next to your unit stats, and Ventura Co. stats. When you choose “Unit,” you will see your unit stats next to Ventura Co. stats.

County Measures: Case Monthly Measures Measures chosen specifically by Managers, PAs, and Data Champions at the SafeMeasures On-Site meeting Things to demo: Limit type: None, Unit, Caseload Limit: Depending on whether you choose unit or caseload, choose the specific unit supervisor or child welfare worker to examine. In most cases, you will choose “Caseload” and choose yourself from the Limit options. When you choose “Caseload,” you will see your stats, next to your unit stats, and Ventura Co. stats. When you choose “Unit,” you will see your unit stats next to Ventura Co. stats. **Make a Note: Contacts with parents on case plan

Well-Being Project: Dashboard

Well-Being Project: Trend Graphs

Worksheet: Using the SM website, please complete exercise 7

Additional SafeMeasures Lists My Dashboard: Favorites, Alerts, Recommendations My Upcoming Work: Stay On Top of Your Caseload My Unit’s Upcoming Work: Be Aware of Problems Calendars County Measures: Outcomes & Process Measures Pre-Selected with NCCD Well-Being Project: Dashboard and Trend Graphs Features! Major reports that have been used for 10 years and still receive a lot of use Reports from CFSR 2 & CFSR 3 & Statewide Measures Safety, Risk, and Strengths/Needs (Case Plan) Assessments Lists!! Outdated and rarely used - these features can be accessed via the reports Ancillary reports that may be useful Many of the reports included in these lists are already covered in your My Upcoming Work and County Measures reports. However, you may explore these lists for additional reports that you want to pay attention to. Includes measures relevant to probation-supervised caseloads only New measures that address new state initiatives (e.g., CCR and RFA) Reports that are reported quarterly in addition to monthly All measures, alphabetically

Notable Reports for Workers, Supervisors, or Both Main Menu Notable Reports for Workers, Supervisors, or Both Workers Supervisors Both My Caseload My Unit Compliance Summaries Investigation Time Open Time to Referral Assignment Time to First Contact Face-to-Face Contacts Data Issues Case Plan Status Face-to-Face Contacts in Preferred Location Parent Signature Education Enrollment TILP Services Current Physical & Dental Examinations Relative/NREFM Home Assessments Children Authorized for Psychotropic Mediation Health & Education Documentation Many of these reports are included in the My Upcoming Work and County Reports. Full Main Menu list was too long to include. Instead, I included a list of reports most relevant to workers, supervisors, or both. **Make a note of: -- Children Authorized for Psychotropic Medication -- Data Issues section

Children and Family Services Review No need to look at anything on this list except for the CFSR 3 and state measures

SDM Measures **Make a note of: -- SDM at Investigation Closure -- SDM at Case Closure -- Referral and Case FSNA and CSNA reports. -- SDM Data issues (for supervisors).

Extras Menu **Make a note of: -- Referral Contact Alert Lists – too long to make contact -- Referral, Promotion, and Perpetrator Alert Lists – cases that may need another look (for supervisors) -- Case Alert Lists – Relevant to placements in group homes

Proposed Measures This is a treasure trove, especially for the WIG and P4 **Make a note of: -- Family Engagement Effort (Under Open Cases) -- Mental Health Screenings (Under Pathways to Well-Being) -- Psychotropic Diagnoses (Under Children in Placement)

Quarterly Views **Make a note of:

Worksheet: Using the SM website, please complete exercise 8 Before allowing them to work on their own, demo modifying a report and setting a favorite for: -- MHST -- Psychological Medications -- FEE If people are stuck, point them to: Extras Menu Visits with Parents/Guardians Visits with Substitute Providers AB74 Children Ages 6-12 Placed in a Group Home 170 to 180 Days AB74 Children Ages 5 and Younger Placed in a Group Home 110 to 120 Days AB 74 Children 12 and Younger in Group Home Approaching 60 Day Extension(s) Proposed Measures Face-to-Face Contacts (All Policy) Face-to-Face Contacts (2F Management Report) Contacts with Collateral Individuals on Behalf of a Referral Time Elapsed from Investigation Completion to Investigation Closure Timeliness of First Completed Contact – By Referral (State Standard) Timeliness of First Completed Contact – By Referral Child (Best Practice) All AWOL/Abducted Children Distance from Client to Assigned Office Family Engagement Effort (Quarterly) Family Engagement Effort (Monthly) Wraparound (Case Plan and/or Service) Three or More Qualified Placement Changes Within the Last 24 Months or Episode Mental Health Screenings Mental Health Screenings (Best Practice) Relative/NREFM Assessment Completed but Not in Relative/NREFM Placement Open Placements: Removal and Placement Home Zip Codes Time in Placement Setting Cumulative Group Home Days in Episode Congregate Care Placements: 1 Year or More Siblings Placed Together (Monthly) Psychotropic Diagnoses TILP Services Main Menu: Case Plan Status Parent Signature (Active Case Plan) Face-to-Face Contacts Face-to-Face Contacts in Preferred Location Removal Episode Time Open Episode Placement Count Placement Change reason TILP services Relative/NREFM Home Assessments Distance from Removal Home to Placement

Thank You! The California Child Welfare Indicators Project (CCWIP) is a collaboration of the California Department of Social Services and the School of Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley, and is supported by the California Department of Social Services, the Stuart Foundation, and the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation. CCWIP is a collaboration of the California Department of Social Services and the School of Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley, and is supported by the California Department of Social Services and the Stuart Foundation.

Questions? Wendy Wiegmann wendy.wiegmann@berkeley.edu 510-643-0839 SafeMeasures support@safemeasures.org “Contact Us” at top of SafeMeasures website