Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Disproportionality in Special Education
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
VESID UPDATES Patricia J. Geary 9/15/06.  Behavioral Interventions  IDEA Federal Regulations  State Assessments  State Performance Plan  Levels of.
IDEIA Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Office of the Independent Monitor Update on Progress of MCD Outcomes
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
Legal and Ethical Issues
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
A Three-Tiered Model: early intervention for students “at- risk” for learning difficulties CASP Convention 2004 Allan Lloyd-Jones Special Education Consultant.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
The New IDEA: Major Changes Presentation to the Charter Schools Summit November 7, 2006 Nancy Reder, Esq. Deputy Executive Director NASDSE.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
The New IDEA in Special Education
Board of Education Meeting September 10, Special Education Quality Review - Monitor compliance related to programs and services provided to students.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Special Education School District Profile Slinger School District Lynda McTrusty.
Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services
What is “Annual Determination?”
Appleton Area School District
Special Education Reviews: A new paradigm for LEAs
New Significant Disproportionality Regulations
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Hartford Jt. 1 School District
For Starters: It’s IDEIA !
CHAPTER 2: Steps in the Assessment Process
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Special Education Process
Leadership Academy Special Education.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Early Intervening Services
Response to Intervention
ESSA Schoolwide 2017.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Significant Disproportionality Stakeholder Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 New York State Education Department James P. DeLorenzo Statewide Coordinator for Special Education

Conforming to IDEA 2004 Initial changes to State law Chapter 352 of the Laws of 2005 Initial changes to State regulations effective September 2005 – emergency effective December 2005 - permanent Federal regulations – ? Further changes to State law and regulations

Intent – IDEA 2004 Timely and high quality evaluations and services for all students High-quality, research-based instruction Procedural relief Less adversarial dispute resolution Streamlined discipline procedures Accountability for results

General Education NCLB/IDEA Research-based instruction Response-to-intervention Early intervening services Highly qualified teachers Universal design for learning Universal design of assessments Accessible instructional materials

Early Intervening Services Services to nondisabled students who need additional academic and behavioral support to succeed in a general education environment – includes: Scientifically-based academic instruction and behavioral interventions Staff development Educational and behavioral evaluations Services and supports, including scientifically based literacy instruction

Use of IDEA funds for early intervening services Up to 15% option for all districts Required districts to reserve maximum 15% of IDEA Part B funds for early intervening services for any finding of disproportionality based on race/ethnicity

Individual Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations

To ensure: Early intervening services are available to students. All children receive timely and appropriate evaluations. Children will not have to wait to fail before receiving interventions. Determinations of eligibility for students with learning disabilities are based on research-based approaches.

Evaluation Timelines Initial evaluation and eligibility must be completed within 60 calendar days*** Exceptions: New student to district after the 60 days has begun and before eligibility determined Or parent repeatedly fails or refuses to produce student for the evaluation *** Monitoring Priority

Eligibility for Special Education Student shall not be determined eligible for special education if the determinant factor is lack of appropriate instruction in reading, including explicit and systematic instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary development, reading fluency (including oral reading skills) and reading comprehension strategies lack of instruction in math; or limited English proficiency.

Learning Disabilities Process that determines if the student responds to scientific, research-based intervention as part of the evaluation procedures.

Components of RtI Research-based instruction Reading Early grades Increasing levels of intervention Ongoing assessments of how student responds

Learning Disabilities Definition of learning disability amended to repeal 50% discrepancy rule. School district: may use a process that determines if the student responds to scientific, research-based intervention as part of the evaluation procedures. is not required to consider whether a student has a severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability.

Reevaluations Limit to once a year, unless the parent and LEA agree that a reevaluation more frequently is needed In NYS, a student must be reevaluated at least once every three years. In NYS, the parent and LEA cannot agree that the three-year reevaluation is not necessary* * pending final federal regulations

Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) http://www.vesid.nysed.gov/specialed/publications/policy/iep/sampform.htm

To ensure…. More time is spent providing instruction to students with disabilities (procedural relief)

Annual Goals Must be measurable Must include a description of how they will be measured Each annual goal must include: Evaluative criteria Evaluation procedures Schedules for measuring progress

Short-term Objectives and Benchmarks Required for: all students who meet the eligibility criteria to take NYSAA all preschool students

CSE Meetings Any changes to an IEP must be made in a CSE meeting At this time, in NYS All CSE members must participation No agreement between parent and LEA that attendance of certain members is not necessary or that certain members can be excused Parent member can decline participation of additional parent member Can be a parent of a declassified student or a student who has graduated within 5 years.

State Performance Plans improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities… Opening page.

To ensure…. Accountability for Results Data collection Public reporting of results Measurable and rigorous targets Focused monitoring Technical assistance Enforcement

Monitoring Priorities and Indicators Graduation Drop out Achievement (AYP) Suspension Least restrictive environment Preschool student outcomes Post school outcomes Disproportionality Evaluations within 60 days Parent Involvement Effective transitions Due Process

Data from every district Graduation Drop-out Performance on State Assessments Rates of Suspension Preschool LRE School-age LRE Race/ethnicity

New Measures of Performance NYS’ SPP Design Six-year timetable for continuous improvement Added rigor to definitions of significant discrepancy New processes for self-reviews and compliance correction

Six-year Timetable for Continuous Improvement New York State will collect data for federal Indicators 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14 from a different group of one sixth (1/6) of the school districts on each indicator each year, except that New York City will submit data on all indicators annually.

School Year In Which Data for the Federal Indicator Must Be Submitted   School Year In Which Data for the Federal Indicator Must Be Submitted COUNTY / SED CODE DISTRICT NAME GRADE LEVELS 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 ALBANY COUNTY 010100010000 Albany C S D K 12 14 7 8 11 12 13 010201040000 Berne-Knox-Westerlo C S D 010306060000 Bethlehem C S D 010500010000 Cohoes City S D 010701030000 Green Island U F S D 010802060000 Guilderland C S D 010622080000 Maplewood C S D No HS none 010615020000 Menands U F S D 010605060000 North Colonie C S D 010402060000 Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk C S D 010601060000 South Colonie C S D 011003060000 Voorheesville Central School 011200010000 Watervliet City S D

Added rigor to definitions of significant discrepancy For suspensions of more than 10 days 2005-07- 4X statewide baseline average 2007-09 - 3X statewide baseline average 2009-11 - 2X statewide baseline average For Disproportionality Indicators (identification, classification and placement) 2004-05 - Risk ratio of 3.0 or higher Subsequent years - Lower risk ratios

New processes for self-reviews and compliance correction State-developed self-review monitoring protocols Resources for technical assistance Provided in advance of reporting year for school districts – Be proactive Monitor more school districts

Monitoring Correction of compliance within one year Two consecutive years – district in need of assistance Three consecutive years – district in need of intervention

Planning is bringing the future into the present so that you can do something about it.