Libraries as Data-Centers for the Arts and Humanities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GMD German National Research Center for Information Technology Darmstadt University of Technology Perspectives and Priorities for Digital Libraries Research.
Advertisements

UKOLN is supported by: JISC Information Environment update Repositories and Preservation Programme meeting, October 24-25, 2006 Rachel Heery UKOLN
ICT 2010: "Global Information Structures for Science & Cultural heritage: The Interoperability Challenge" Networking Session Coordination Action on Digital.
Formation of ETD‘s and releated issues 6th ETD Conference May 20 – , Berlin Dr. Nikola Korb, Co-ordination Agency DissOnline Deutsche Bibliothek.
Online training for professionals: how this is being addressed by AccessIT Adam Dudczak Poznań Supercomputing and Networking Center
OLC Spring Chapter Conferences Metadata, Schmetadata … Tell Me Why I Should Care? OLC Spring Chapter Conferences, 2004 Margaret.
Future of MDR - ISO/IEC Metadata Registries (MDR) Larry Fitzwater, SC 32 WG 2 Convener Computer Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May.
Metadata Standards and Applications 5. Applying Metadata Standards: Application Profiles.
Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.
E pluribus unum. Digitising the Cultural Heritage within a federal structure. Manfred Thaller University at Cologne Knowledge by Networking Berlin, June.
9 th Open Forum on Metadata Registries Harmonization of Terminology, Ontology and Metadata 20th – 22nd March, 2006, Kobe Japan. Presentation Title: Day:
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects November 1, 2004 Descriptive Metadata: “Modeling the World”
A Data Category Registry- and Component- based Metadata Framework Daan Broeder et al. Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics LREC 2010.
Alternative Architecture for Information in Digital Libraries Onno W. Purbo
NOAA Data Citation Procedural Directive 8 November 2012 DAARWG.
Managing Learning Objects in Large Scale Courseware Authoring Studio Ivo Marinchev, Ivo Hristov Institute of Information Technologies Bulgarian Academy.
Why RDA? A domain repository perspective George Alter ICPSR University of Michigan.
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
SciDataCon 2014, WDS Forum, Dehli WDS Certification Objective: building trust in the usage of data & data services Michael Diepenbroek Rorie Edmunds Mustapha.
21st October 2008 eSciDoc – A Service Infrastructure for Cultural Heritage Content VSMM 2008 – Digital Archives Online Natasa Bulatovic, Ulla Tschida,
WP4 Models and Contents Quality Assessment
Data Publication (in H2020)
Stuart J. Chalk, Department of Chemistry University of North Florida
WP3: Common policies and implementation strategies
FAIR Data in Trustworthy Data Repositories:
2nd DPHEP Collaboration Workshop
DSA and FAIR: a perfect couple
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
ELIXIR Core Data Resources and Deposition Databases
FAIR Metadata RDA 10 Luiz Olavo Bonino – - September 21, 2017.
FAIR Sample and Data Access
Donatella Castelli CNR-ISTI
Ways to upgrade the FAIRness of your data repository.
World landscape of repositories and repository networks: achievements, challenges, opportunities Dominique Babini OAI 10 - CERN - UNIGE Workshop on Innovations.
FAIR Metrics RDA 10 Luiz Bonino – - September 21, 2017.
Attribution, Licensing and Metadata
Fitness for use: Users of the U. S
FAIR Data Management, Trustworthy Digital Repositories and Business Continuity / Disaster Preparedness
VI-SEEM Data Repository
Identifiers Answer Questions
Making Annotations FAIR
Persistent identifiers in VI-SEEM
FAIR Sample and Data Access
OPEN DATA – F.A.I.R. PRINCIPLES
Experiences of the Digital Repository of Ireland
Nikhef RDM Policy – first experiences
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
Metadata for research outputs management Part 2
Metadata for research outputs management
EUDAT B2FIND A Cross-Discipline Metadata Service and Discovery Portal
Darja Fišer CLARIN ERIC Director of User Involvement
Creating a Culture of Open Data in Academia
Advances in Digital Rights Management
Metadata in Digital Preservation: Setting the Scene
An Open Archival Repository System for UT Austin
Malte Dreyer – Matthias Razum
Open Archival Information System
Introduction to the MIABIS SOP Working Group
Interoperability – GO FAIR - RDA
A Case Study for Synergistically Implementing the Management of Open Data Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications.
How to Implement the FAIR Data Principles? Elly Dijk
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
Bird of Feather Session
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
Automatic evaluation of fairness
eScience - FAIR Science
Lars Björnshauge, Lund University Libraries
A Research Data Catalogue supporting Blue Growth: the BlueBRIDGE case
IDRP: The first distributed data management infrastructure for nanoscience Rossella Aversa Karlsruhe Institute for Technology (KIT) – Steinbuch Center.
Supporting Open Research
Presentation transcript:

Libraries as Data-Centers for the Arts and Humanities SciDataCon, Denver, September 2016

Testing Libraries as Data Centers No worries, no ISO 9000 or ISO/IEC 30134-2:2016 But: FAIR Principles https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples Findable Accessible Interoperable Re-usable (Reproducible?) There is more Sustainable Resilient / Distributed Semantic „Aware“ [Anlass der Präsentation]

A simple example: DFG Digitization Programme A structured funding programme for print heritage, distributed in Germany Organized by centuries, mandatory guidleines, since several years   Titles Pages VD16 110.000 c. 14 Mio. VD17 295.000 c. 45 Mio. VD18 565.000 c. 90 Mio. May not sound overwhelming, but it represents huge assetts [Anlass der Präsentation]

[Anlass der Präsentation]

A simple example: DFG Digitization Programme >> Findable F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and eternally persistent identifier. F2. data are described with rich metadata. F3. (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable resource. F4. metadata specify the data identifier. [Anlass der Präsentation]

A simple example: DFG Digitization Programme >> Findable F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and eternally persistent identifier. F2. data are described with rich metadata. F3. (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable resource. F4. metadata specify the data identifier. [Anlass der Präsentation]

A simple example: DFG Digitization Programme >> Findable F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and eternally persistent identifier. F2. data are described with rich metadata. F3. (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable resource. F4. metadata specify the data identifier. [Anlass der Präsentation]

A simple example: DFG Digitization Programme >> Accesible A1 (meta)data are retrievable by their identifier using a standardized communications protocol. A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally implementable. A1.2 the protocol allows for an authentication and authorization procedure, where necessary. A2 metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer available. [Anlass der Präsentation]

A simple example: DFG Digitization Programme >> Interoperable I1. (meta)data use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly applicable language for knowledge representation. I2. (meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles. I3. (meta)data include qualified references to other (meta)data. [Anlass der Präsentation]

A simple example: DFG Digitization Programme >> Reusable R1. meta(data) have a plurality of accurate and relevant attributes. R1.1. (meta)data are released with a clear and accessible data usage license. R1.2. (meta)data are associated with their provenance. R1.3. (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards. [Anlass der Präsentation]

[Anlass der Präsentation] ... and now the actual data... [Anlass der Präsentation]

Transcribed digitized images yield text corpora [Anlass der Präsentation]

e.g. highly structured text as TEI [Anlass der Präsentation]

Algorithmic Analysis allows use-cases

Dozens of use cases in Germany (and beyond) [Anlass der Präsentation]

[Anlass der Präsentation] Summary Libraries are ‚natural‘ data centers for research data management Libraries implement FAIR-Principles (even before their existence) Additionally libraries implement advanced data management principles Sustainability: institutions and funding already in place Resilience/Distribution: a culture of division of labour – nationally & internationally Semantic ‚aware‘: culture of content & people beyond the bits & bytes Research Infrastructures, e.g. DARIAH/TextGrid boost actual data re-use How to build Research Infrastructures for the Sciences in libraries? [Anlass der Präsentation]

Thank you for your attention